, Phase diagram of water, 2006.

, lef t) mixed cavitation regime Re = 10 6 , ? v = 0.07, angle of incidence= 1.1 ? , (right) saturation Re = 1.1 × 10 6 , ? v = 0.08, angle of incidence= 5 ? (Briançon-Marjollet 1990)

, R 0 = 1mm, ? = 1. The time is non-dimensionalized time with reference time R 0 of symmetry, 1971.

). .. , , 1987.

, Maximum wall pressure obtained for different stand-off distances, 2012.

, Experimental mass loss rate vs exposure time (Franc, p.10, 2006.

, Schematic of erosion model by Fortes-Patella, 2004.

. .. , 10 1.10 (lef t) Nearly axi-symmetric pit height profile from AFM (experiments) and FEM (simulation), (right) numerically predicted pressure distribution on surface and pit height, 2006.

, 12 1.12 (lef t) Time evolution of pressure from bubble collapse showing liquid jet and bubble ring collapse, (right) zoom near ring collapse pressure peaks for two rigid and two compliant materials R max = 2mm, 11 FEM modelling of material fatigue and mass loss after repetitive impacts (Fivel 2015), 2015.

, Vapor bubble collapse due to imposed pressure difference p liquid p bubble , (top) collapse of an isolated bubble -spherical collapse, (bottom) bubble collapse near a solid wall -non-spherical collapse

, Representation of proposed FSI using CFD-CSM solvers, p.14

. .. Step-wise-fsi-methodology, 15 1.16 Weak scaling of YALES2 on an IBM BlueGene/P computer, 2011.

. .. Stand-off-distance,-?-=-h/r-max, , vol.20, p.165

, lef t) maximum depth of surface damage produced, R max = 1.45 mm, (right) volume of deformation, Collapse of single cavitation bubble on an aluminum sample, 1998.

, Evolution of velocity field during bubble collapse near a solid wall and development of free vortex ? = 1.1, R max = 340 µm, p.21, 2017.

, Maximum jet velocity and (right) penetration depth from liquid jet into a P AA sample for bubble collapsing near elastic boundaries, 2001.

, Experimental setup for laser generated bubble collapse near solid wall

, Schematic of the experimental setup for laser generated bubble collapse near solid wall

, Left to right, top to bottom: Isolated bubble undergoing a nearly spherical collapse R max = 535 µm, resolution=200000 f ps

, Evolution of bubble radius with time -isolated bubble collapse and rebound R max = 420 µm, resolution=540000 f ps

, Left to right, top to bottom : Liquid micro-jet impacting the solid aluminum surface R max = 400 µm

, Collapse of bubble and resulting "splash" effect , presence of liquid film between the bubble and aluminum surface can be observed during the growth and first collapse, R max = 390µm, ? = 0, vol.87

, splash" effect after the collapse pushes the bubble cavity away from aluminum surface forming a mushroom shaped cavity R max = 430 µm, ? = 1.1, frame size= 1.2 × 1.4 mm 2, p.27

, Collapse of bubble torus and formation of tiny micro-bubbles on aluminum surface R max = 730 µm, ? = 1.4, frame size= 1.9 × 2.2 mm 2

, Elongated bubble torus and liquid micro-jet dissipating into surface micro-bubbles R max = 535 µm, ? = 1.7, frame size= 1.1 × 2 mm 2

, Bubble torus and liquid micro-jet retarded by liquid layer between the surface and collapsing bubble R max = 430 µm, ? = 2.14, frame size= 1.0 × 1.8 mm 2

, distinct surface pits due to liquid micro-jet impact R max = 400 µm, ? = 0.55, (lef t) surface under a high resolution optical microscope after 10 bubble collapses, frame size = 250 × 250 µm 2 , (right) AFM scan of pits, scan size = 110 × 110 µm 2

, 16 Indentation pit of depth 600 nm and pit radius of about 20 µm, scan size = 70 × 70 µm 2

, Indentation pit of depth more than 1 µm and pit radius of about 20 µm, scan size = 110 × 110 µm 2

, no visible surface deformation due to rebounding bubble cavity from "splash" effect R max = 430 µm, ? = 1.1 frame size = 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2

, (right) recovered aluminum sample under optical microscope, frame size = 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2 , (right) AFM scan of top surface pits, scan size= 150 × 150 µm 2, Circular damage pattern after 100 repetitive bubble collapses due to collapsing bubble torus and micro-bubbles R max = 730 µm, ? = 1.4

, 34 2.22 No surface deformation on Al-7075 from detached bubble collapse, frame size = 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2

, Comparison of ? range for observed surface damage in the present experiments and Philipp, 1998.

, Schematic of CPS algorithm-estimation of sound speed and pressure from equation of state (in green)

. .. , Schematic of CCS algorithm-estimation of intermediate sound speed and corrected pressure from equation of state (in yellow), p.48

, Subtri of a node pair for a triangular element (b) CV of a node in a mesh (c) Subtri of an edge-mesh face in a hexahedron (d) Exterior triangles of all subtetrahedra showing the contribution node CV for hexahedral element, Control volume representation for spatial discretization: (a), 2011.

, Waves entering and leaving the computational domain through an inlet plane at x 1 = 0 and an outlet plane x 1 = L for a subsonic flow (Poinsot 1992)

, Density vs pressure evolution in the cavitation model, p.56

, Speed of sound vs density evolution in the cavitation model, p.57

, Dynamic viscosity vs density evolution in the cavitation model, p.58

, 8 1D representation of bubble radius initialization

, 59 3.10 1D Lagrangian, Eulerian and ALE mesh node motion with associated material particle motion, 1D representation of bubble radius initialization for different mesh spacing of ?x=10, vol.5, p.61, 2004.

. .. , One to one transformation between the material domain, spatial domain and the referential domain for ALE (Donea 2004), p.62

, Finite element mesh with elements, p.67, 2004.

, 2 1D finite element (a) Linear (b) Quadratic (c) Linear approximation (d) Quadratic approximation of field variable, p.68, 2004.

, Elastic and plastic response to an applied load, p.68, 2004.

, Al-7075 showing the elastic and plastic regime separated by the yield strength ? y , (right) elastic regime for Al-7075, Stress-strain curve at strain rate 1.0 s ?1

, Stress-strain curves for Al-7075, St A-2025 and NAB at strain rate 1.0 s ?1, p.70

. .. , Accumulated plastic strain P ?p (Di Paola 2017a), p.70

, Mechanical calculation with PASAPAS procedure (Di Paola 2017b), p.73

, Boundary conditions and mesh used for FEM simulations

.. .. ,

.. .. Step-wise,

, Shock tube test case representation

, 2 Numerical oscillations from centred difference scheme near discontinuities in CPS solver, without the use of any filtering

, Effect of pressure and density filtering in CPS with coarse mesh ?x = 1mm, vol.83

, Effect of pressure and density filtering in CPS with fine mesh ?x = 100µm, vol.84

, Numerical oscillations from centred difference scheme near discontinuities in CPS and CCS solver

, Effect of pressure and density filtering in CCS with coarse mesh ?x = 1mm, p.85

, Effect of pressure and density filtering in CCS with fine mesh ?x = 100µm, p.85

, Effect of isolated filtering of density in CCS coarse mesh ?x = 1 mm, vol.86

, Effect of isolated filtering of density in CCS fine mesh ?x = 100 µm. . . 86 5.10 Full vs 1/4 th domain for 2D Rayleigh collapse, vol.87

, 2D Rayleigh collapse comparison for R b = 17R 0 (t rayleigh = 8.75 µs) & R b = 25R 0 (t rayleigh = 9.3 µs). Initial bubble radius R 0 = 500 µm, p.88

, Full computational domain for 3D Rayleigh-Plesset comparison, 89 5.13 1/8 th symmetric computational domain for 3D Rayleigh-Plesset compar

.. .. Ison,

, Vapor bubble iso-surface of ? = 0.5, R 0 = 500 µm, p.90

, 3D Rayleigh Plesset validation R 0 = 500 µm, p.91

, Temporal evolution of 2D bubble collapse R max = 100µm, p ? = 100M P a, t = 0 & 250ns -stationary vs moving domain

, Temporal evolution of 2D bubble collapse R max = 100µm, p ? = 100M P a, t = 380 & 500ns -stationary vs moving domain

, Radius evolution during 2D bubble collapse R max = 100 µm, p ? = 100 M P a -stationary vs moving domain

, Bubble position for different stand-off ? = 0.5, 0.8, 0.9, 1.4, solid wall at the bottom of the frame

, Time step ?t evolution for 2D bubble collapse computation,? = 0.9

, Temporal evolution of density field during liquid pressure-induced attached bubble collapse near solid wall, ? = 0, vol.9

, frame size = 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2

, Location of probe points on the solid wall-points F 00(x, y) = (0, 0) and F 10(x, y) = (0.001, 0)

, Temporal evolution of pressure at point F 00 and maximum pressure p max?wall , ? = 0, vol.9

, Maximum pressure at the solid wall p max?wall and its location on the wall as a function of distance from the axis of symmetry i.e point F 00, ? = 0, vol.9

, Contour showing -(lef t) numerical Schlieren, (center) pressure and (right) velocity field during liquid jet impact, ? = 0, vol.9

, frame size = 500 × 500 µm 2

, R max = 495 µm, p = 100 M P a, case P 0.9, frame size = 500 × 500 µm 2, Contour showing -(lef t) numerical Schlieren, (center) pressure and (right) velocity field on remaining bubble collapse and shock wave superimposition ? = 0, vol.9

, Pressure plots on the solid wall between points F 00 and F 10 at different time instants ? = 0.9

, and (bottom)? = 0.8, (lef t) entire simulation time, (right) zoomed on the dynamical pressure peaks, and p max?wall for (top)? = 0.5, p.0

, Collapsing bubble shape (top) 2D numerical simulation ? = 0.5, R max = 449 µm, p = 100 M P a, (bottom) experimental bubble collapse in atmospheric condition ? = 0, vol.55

, Contour showing -(lef t) numerical Schlieren, (center) pressure and (right) velocity field on remaining bubble collapse and shock wave superimposition ? = 0.8, R max = 487 µm, p ? = 100 M P a, frame size = 500 × 500 µm, p.105

, Contour showing -(lef t) numerical Schlieren, (center) pressure and (right) velocity field on remaining bubble collapse and shock wave superimposition ? = 0.5, R max = 449 µm, p ? = 100 M P a

, Plot showing (lef t) spatial and (right) temporal convergence of the numerical solution at p F 00 , ? = 0.8

, Reduced computational domain for 2D bubble collapse -domain boundary 10R 0 × 5R 0 , domain size = 5 × 2.5 mm 2

, Plot showing agreement of results for domain size 40R 0 and reduced computational domain size 10R 0 ×5R 0 , ? = 0.9

, Temporal evolution of density field during liquid pressure-induced detached bubble collapse near solid wall -appearance of expansion wave driven secondary cavitation near the solid wall, ? = 1.4, R max = 500µm

, pressure contour on each frame showing temporal evolution of a shock-induced 2D bubble collapse, ? = 0, R max = 495 µm, p = 0.1 M P a, p shock = 50 M P a, case SH0.9, vol.9

, 20 2D attached bubble: pressure peaks at p F 00 and p max?wall on the solid wall for shock-induced collapse, ? = 0.9, case SH0.9, p.110

, 21 2D attached bubble: pressure plots on the solid wall between points F 00 and F 10 at different time instants, ? = 0.9, case SH0.9, p.111

, Velocity vectors showing the flow field during the final stages of collapse near the solid wall, ? = 0, vol.9

, frame size = 500 × 500 µm 2, vol.9

, 112 6.24 2D detached bubble: comparison of bubble shapes in (top) numerical simulation ? = 1.4, R max = 500 µm, Numerical Schlieren showing the sequence of events during the remaining bubble collapse-emission of primary and secondary shock, ? = 0, vol.9

, 25 2D detached bubble: final stages of collapse showing shock propagation near the solid wall ? = 1.4, R max = 500 µm, p = 0.1 M P a

, 4, frame size = 1 × 2.5 mm 2

, 26 2D detached bubble: pressure peaks at p F 00 and p max?wall on the solid wall for shock

. .. , 116 6.28 3D attached bubble: evolution of velocity on the iso-volume of attached bubble and pressure contour on solid wall, ? = 0, th cut section of bubble iso-volume attached on the solid wall, ? = 0.9, vol.9

, 50M P a, frame size = 2 × 2 mm 2

, 118 6.30 3D detached bubble: evolution of velocity on the iso-volume of attached bubble and pressure contour on solid wall, 29 3D attached bubble: pressure peaks at p F 00 and p max?wall on the solid wall for shock-induced collapse ? = 0.9

, 50M P a, frame size = 2 × 2 mm 2

, 31 3D detached bubble: pressure peaks at p F 00 and p max?wall on the solid wall for shock-induced collapse, ? = 1.4

, Top view and front view showing the initial setup of planar 3D bubble cloud, frame size = 4 × 4 mm 2

, Temporal evolution of bubble shapes and pressure on the solid wall from 3D collapsing cloud, p = 0.1 M P a, p shock = 50M P a

, bubble radius R max = 500µm, (bottom) solid domain, size = 1×2.5mm 2 , (top) fluid domain, size = 5 × 2.5 mm 2, FSI coupling domain and interface between the fluid and solid, max

, Stress-strain curves for Al-7075, St A-2025 and NAB at strain rate 1.0 s ?1, p.124

, S10(x, y) = (0.001, 0), Location of probe points in the solid domain, S00(x, y) = (0, 0)

, Solid wall interface profile at (a) after liquid jet impact, (b) after entire simulation time t = 6 µs, case P 0.9

, Temporal evolution of surface displacement at (a) S00, (b) S10, (c) relative displacement, case P 0.9

, Solid wall interface profile at (a) after liquid jet impact, (b) after entire simulation time t = 6 µs, case SH0.9

, Temporal evolution of surface displacement at (a) S00, (b) S10,(c) relative displacement, case SH0.9

, Temporal convergence of relative displacement (a) interface profile at 6µs and 11 µs, (b) total displacement at S00, (c) relative displacement at S00 for total time t = 11 µs, case SH0

, remaining bubble collapse (2D equivalent of 3D bubble torus at t = 4.420 µs) and subsequent shock wave superimposition at bubble symmetry axis (t = 4.470 µs) for St A-2205, R max = 495 µm, case SH0.9, frame size = 1 × 1 mm 2, von Mises stress ? V M at different time instants during liquid jet impact (t = 4.295 µs)

, von Mises stress ? V M contour showing propagation of stress waves in the solid for St A-2205

, Accumulated plastic strain P ?p for the three considered material at the end of simulation time t = 6 µs, R max = 495 µm, case SH0.9, frame size= 1 × 1 mm 2

, Solid wall interface position (a) after water-hammer shock impact at symmetry axis, (b) after entire simulation time t = 6 µs, p.130

, Interface position at different time instant showing propagation of waterhammer shock on St A-2205

, von Mises stress ? V M contour showing propagation of stress waves in the solid for St A-2205

, Temporal evolution pressure, sound speed on the wall and fluid velocity u x at ?y = 5 µm (wall parallel i.e. along x-direction from viscous fluid calculations) near solid wall for detached bubble collapse

, Accumulated plastic strain P ?p for the considered material at t = 6 µs, R max = 500 µm, case SH1.4, frame size= 1 × 1 mm 2, p.132

, Temporal evolution of displacement at (a) S00, (b) S10,(c) relative displacement

, Pressure dampening in step-wise coupled FSI showing convergence of pressure on St A-2205 in four steps, case SH0.9

, Maximum pressure p max?wall evolution on rigid wall and on the deformable materials with two-way FSI, case SH0.9, p.136

, on maximum pressure p max?wall evolution on rigid wall and on the deformable materials with two-way FSI, case SH0.9, p.136

, Numerical Schlieren and accumulated plastic strain P ?p in two-way FSI for St A-2205 at different time instants showing the dynamical features of bubble collapse and corresponding generation of plasticity, R max = 495 µm, case SH0.9, frame size=1 × 1 mm 2

, Comparison of accumulated plasticity P ?p contour for one-way and twoway coupled FSI at t = 6 µs, R max = 495 µm, case SH0.9, frame size=250 × 250 µm 2

, Comparison of solid interface profile for one-way and two-way coupled FSI, case SH0

, Surface damage as a function of distance from the wall, p.141, 2019.

B. , Computational domain for full 2D Rayleigh collapse case, R max = 8.5mm, N cells = 205648

, Cell size transition between the uniform quad-elements and surrounding tri-elements, growth ratio= 1.05

, Full domain for 3D Rayleigh-Plesset validation, domain size 10 × 10 × 10 mm 3 , N cells = 14771173

, th symmetrical domain for 3D Rayleigh-Plesset validation, domain size 20 × 20 × 20 mm 3 , N cells = 6117566

B. , Computational domain for 2D bubble collapse near a solid wall -domain 40R 0 , size 20 × 20 mm 2 , N cells = 176058, max. skewness=0.64, p.159

B. , Cell size transition between the two meshed domains -domain

, 2D bubble collapse near a solid wall with cartesian mesh -boundary 40R 0 , domain size 5 × 2.5 mm 2 , computational cells 500 × 500, N cells = 250000, max. skewness=0 -domain 10R 0

, Computational domain for 3D bubble collapse near solid wall with cartesian mesh -domain size 2 × 2.5 × 2 mm 3 , computational cells 200 × 250 × 200, N cells = 10000000

D. R. Beattie and -. P. Whalley, A simple two-phase frictional pressure drop calculation method, International journal of multiphase flow, vol.8, issue.1, pp.83-87, 1982.

T. B. Benjamin and . T. Ellis-a, The collapse of cavitation bubbles and the pressures thereby produced against solid boundaries, Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London. Series A, pp.221-240, 1966.

J. P. Best and -. A. Kucera, A numerical investigation of non-spherical rebounding bubbles, Journal of fluid mechanics, vol.245, pp.137-154, 1992.

J. R. Blake and -. D. Gibson, Cavitation bubbles near boundaries, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol.19, pp.99-123, 1987.

J. R. Blake, Y. Tomita, and R. P. Tong, The art, craft and science of modelling jet impact in a collapsing cavitation bubble". In: In Fascination of Fluid Dynamics, pp.77-90, 1998.

N. Bremond, M. Arora, S. M. Dammer, and D. Lohse, Interaction of cavitation bubbles on a wall, Physics of fluids 18, vol.12, p.121505, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00264702

C. E. Brennen, Transient bubbles interacting with an attached cavity and the boundary layer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.218, pp.355-376, 1990.

E. Brujan, Cavitation in Non-Newtonian Fluids: With Biomedical and Bioengineering Applications, 2011.

E. Brujan, K. Nahen, P. Schmidt, and -. Vogel, Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near an elastic boundary, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.433, pp.251-281, 2001.

G. L. Chahine and C. Hsiao, Modelling cavitation erosion using fluid-material interaction simulations, Interface Focus 5, pp.2042-8898, 2015.

G. L. Chahine, A. Kapahi, and -. Hsiao, Modeling of surface cleaning by cavitation bubble dynamics and collapse, Ultrasonics sonochemistry, vol.29, pp.528-549, 2016.

C. Chnafa and S. Mendez, Image-based large-eddy simulation in a realistic left heart, Computers & Fluids, vol.94, pp.173-187, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00943609

J. Choi and -. G. Chahine, Relationship between material pitting and cavitation field impulsive pressures, 2016.

A. J. Chorin, Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, Mathematics of computation 22, vol.104, pp.745-762, 1968.

A. W. Cook and W. H. Cabot, A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.195, pp.594-601, 2004.

D. Paola, F. Guerin, and -. Paredes-r, Starting with Cast3M thermo-mechanical calculations -Training manual, 2017.

J. Donea, A. Huerta, and -. Rodríguez-ferran, Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Methods", In: Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. American Cancer Society. Chap, vol.14, 2004.

M. Dular, Experimental and numerical modeling of cavitation erosion, Sixth International Symposium on Cavitation, CAV2006, 2006.

M. Dular, T. Pozar, and R. , High speed observation of damage created by a collapse of a single cavitation bubble, pp.43-1648, 2019.

C. Egerer, S. Hickel, and N. A. , LES of Turbulent Cavitating Shear Layers, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering '13, pp.349-359, 2013.

M. Fivel and J. C. Franc, Towards numerical prediction of cavitation erosion, Interface focus 5, vol.5, p.20150013, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01188508

R. Fortes-patella, -. J. Reboud, and L. -briancon-marjollet, A phenomenological and numerical model for scaling the flow aggressiveness in cavitation erosion, EROCAV Workshop, vol.11, pp.283-290, 2004.

J. Franc, Incubation time and cavitation erosion rate of work-hardening materials, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol.131, p.21303, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00216170

J. Franc and J. Michel, Fundamentals of cavitation, vol.76, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00216178

J. Franc and M. L. Riondet, Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting, pp.248-259, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00905642

S. Fujikawa and T. Akamatsu, Effects of the non-equilibrium condensation of vapour on the pressure wave produced by the collapse of a bubble in a liquid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.97, pp.481-512, 1980.

D. C. Gibson and J. R. Blake, Growth and collapse of cavitation bubbles near flexible boundaries, 7th Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics. Institution of Engineers, pp.215-224, 1980.

D. C. Gibson, Cavitation adjacent to plane boundaries, Proc. 3rd Australasian Conf. on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics. Sydney, pp.210-214, 1968.

E. Goncalves and R. F. Patella, Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models, Computers & Fluids, vol.38, pp.1682-1696, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00530245

, Numerical study of cavitating flows with thermodynamic effect, Computers & Fluids, vol.39, pp.99-113, 2010.

N. A. Hawker and Y. Ventikos, Interaction of a strong shockwave with a gas bubble in a liquid medium: a numerical study, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.701, pp.59-97, 2012.

R. Hickling and M. S. Plesset, Collapse and rebound of a spherical bubble in water, The Physics of Fluids 7.1, pp.7-14, 1964.

C. W. Hirt, A. A. Amsden, and . L. Cook-j, An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds, Journal of computational physics, vol.14, pp.227-253, 1974.

C. Hsiao, A. Jayaprakash, -. Choi, and G. L. Chahine, Modelling of material pitting from cavitation bubble collapse, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 755, 2014.

E. Johnsen and T. Colonius, Shock-induced collapse of a gas bubble in shockwave lithotripsy, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.124, pp.231-262, 2008.

S. Joshi, Modelling cavitation erosion using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, 2018.

J. Kim and P. Moin, Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Journal of computational physics 59, vol.2, pp.308-323, 1985.

M. Kraushaar, Application of the compressible and low-Mach number approaches to Large-Eddy Simulation of turbulent flows in aero-engines, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00711480

E. Lauer, X. Y. Hu, -. Hickel, and N. A. , Numerical modelling and investigation of symmetric and asymmetric cavitation bubble dynamics, Computers and Fluids, 2012.

W. Lauterborn and C. Ohl, Cavitation bubble dynamics, pp.65-75, 1997.

W. Lauterborn and A. Vogel, Shock wave emission by laser generated bubbles, Bubble dynamics and shock waves, pp.67-103, 2013.

R. W. Lewis and P. N. Nithiarasu, Fundamentals of the finite element method for heat and fluid flow, 2004.

O. Lindau and W. Lauterborn, Cinematographic observation of the collapse and rebound of a laser-produced cavitation bubble near a wall, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.479, pp.327-348, 2003.

M. Malandain, Simulation massivement parallèle desécoulements turbulentsà faible nombre de Mach, 2013.

V. Moureau and C. Bérat, An efficient semi-implicit compressible solver for large-eddy simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.226, pp.1256-1270, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01655344

V. Moureau and P. Domingo, Design of a massively parallel CFD code for complex geometries, Comptes Rendus Mécanique, vol.339, issue.2-3, pp.141-148, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01672172

S. Müller and P. Helluy, Numerical simulation of a single bubble by compressible two-phase fluids, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol.62, pp.591-631, 2010.

C. F. Naude and A. T. Ellis, On the mechanism of cavitation damage by nonhemispherical cavities collapsing in contact with a solid boundary, Journal of Basic Engineering, vol.83, pp.648-656, 1961.

D. Obreschkow, M. Tinguely, -. Dorsaz, A. Bosset, and M. Farhat, Universal scaling law for jets of collapsing bubbles, Physical review letters 107, vol.20, p.204501, 2011.

C. Ohl, T. Kurz, and W. Lindau-o.-lauterborn, Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol.357, pp.269-294, 1751.

Y. Paquette, Interaction Fluide-Structure etÉrosion de Cavitation, 2017.

A. Philipp and W. Lauterborn, Cavitation erosion by single laser-produced bubbles, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.361, pp.75-116, 1998.

M. S. Plesset and R. B. Chapman, Collapse of an initially spherical vapour cavity in the neighbourhood of a solid boundary, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.47, pp.283-290, 1971.

M. Plesset, On the stability of fluid flows with spherical symmetry, Journal of Applied Physics, vol.25, p.9, 1954.

F. Pöhl, S. Mottyll, and S. Skoda-r.-huth, Evaluation of cavitation-induced pressure loads applied to material surfaces by finite-element-assisted pit analysis and numerical investigation of the elasto-plastic deformation of metallic materials, pp.618-628, 2015.

T. J. Poinsot and S. K. Lele, Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows, Journal of computational physics, vol.101, issue.1, pp.104-129, 1992.

S. Popinet and S. Zaleski, Bubble collapse near a solid boundary: a numerical study of the influence of viscosity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.464, pp.137-163, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01445438

A. Prosperetti, The equation of bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid, Physics of Fluids, vol.30, pp.3626-3628, 1987.

L. Quartapelle and V. Selmin, High-order Taylor-Galerkin methods for nonlinear multidimensional problems, Finite Elements in Fluids 76, vol.90, p.46, 1993.

L. Rayleigh, On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity, Philosophical Magazine Series, vol.6, pp.94-98, 1917.

F. Reuter, S. R. Gonzalez-avila, -. R. -mettin, and -. Ohl, Flow fields and vortex dynamics of bubbles collapsing near a solid boundary, Physical Review Fluids 2.6. issn: 2469-990X, 2017.

O. Reynolds, Experiments showing the boiling of water in an open tube at ordinary temperatures, Scientific Papers on Mechanical and Physical Subject, vol.2, pp.1900-1903, 1894.

T. Roger and -. Lartigue, An asymptotic-preserving and semiimplicit pressure-based compressible solver for flows at all Mach numbers, ERCOFTAC ETMM11 international conference, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01658696

S. C. Roy and -. Franc, Cavitation erosion: Using the target material as a pressure sensor, Journal of Applied Physics, vol.118, p.164905, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01223687

S. C. Roy and -. Franc, Determination of cavitation load spectra-Part 1: Static finite element approach, pp.110-119, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01242998

S. C. Roy and -. Franc, Determination of cavitation load spectra-Part 2: Dynamic finite element approach, pp.120-129, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243001

S. J. Shaw and -. C. Schiffers, Experimental observations of the stress experienced by a solid surface when a laser-created bubble oscillates in its vicinity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.110, pp.1822-1827, 2001.

S. J. Shaw, -. W. Schiffers, and D. C. Gentry-t.p.-emmony, The interaction of a laser-generated cavity with a solid boundary, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.107, pp.3065-3072, 2000.

D. Silverrad, Propeller Erosion, p.33, 1912.

G. A. Sod, A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of computational physics, vol.27, pp.1-31, 1978.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01635155

W. D. Song, -. Hong-m.h-lukyanchuk, and T. C. , Laser-induced cavitation bubbles for cleaning of solid surfaces, Journal of applied physics 95, vol.6, pp.2952-2956, 2004.

M. Tinguely, The effect of pressure gradient on the collapse of cavitation bubbles in normal and reduced gravity, 2013.

Y. Tomita, P. B. Robinson, . P. Tong-r, and J. R. Blake, Growth and collapse of cavitation bubbles near a curved rigid boundary, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.466, pp.259-283, 2002.

R. P. Tong, W. P. Schiffers, . J. Shaw-s, J. R. Blake, and -. C. , The role of 'splashing' in the collapse of a laser-generated cavity near a rigid boundary, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.380, pp.339-361, 1999.

T. J. Van-terwisga, -. A. Ziru, and . J. Foeth-e, Cavitation erosiona review of physical mechanisms and erosion risk models, 7th International Symposium on Cavitation CAV2009, 2009.

S. Vantieghem, Numerical simulations of quasi-static magnetohydrodynamics using an unstructured finite-volume solver: development and applications, 2011.

A. Vogel and W. Lauterborn, Optical and acoustic investigations of the dynamics of laser-produced cavitation bubbles near a solid boundary, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.206, pp.299-338, 1989.

Q. X. Wang and J. R. Blake, Non-spherical bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid. Part 1. Travelling acoustic wave, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.659, pp.191-224, 2010.

Q. Zeng, M. Gonzalez-avila-s.r.-dijkink-r.-koukouvinis-p.-gavaises, and C. Ohl, Wall shear stress from jetting cavitation bubbles, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol.846, pp.341-355, 2018.

Z. Zhang and -. Zhang, Surface tension effects on the behavior of a cavity growing, collapsing, and rebounding near a rigid wall, Physical Review E, vol.70, p.56310, 2004.