T. R. Silva, J. Hak, M. Winckler, O. Nicolas, and . Silva, A Comparative Study of Milestones for Featuring GUI Prototyping Tools, Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, vol.10, issue.06, pp.564-589, 2017.

T. R. Silva, J. L. Hak, and M. Winckler, A Review of Milestones in the History of GUI Prototyping Tools, INTERACT 2015 Adjunct Proceedings: 15th IFIP TC. 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, vol.22, pp.267-279, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01343040

T. R. Silva, J. L. Hak, and M. Winckler, An Approach for Multi-Artifact Testing Through an Ontological Perspective for Behavior-Driven Development, Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, vol.1, issue.7, pp.81-107, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712536

T. R. Silva and M. Winckler, A Scenario-Based Approach for Checking Consistency in User Interface Design Artifacts, Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2017), pp.21-30, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02138494

T. R. Silva, J. L. Hak, and M. Winckler, A Behavior-Based Ontology for Supporting Automated Assessment of Interactive Systems, 2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2017), pp.250-257, 2017.

T. R. Silva, Definition of a Behavior-Driven Model for Requirements Specification and Testing of Interactive Systems, 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp.444-449, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712535

T. R. Silva, J. L. Hak, and M. Winckler, Testing Prototypes and Final User Interfaces Through an Ontological Perspective for Behavior-Driven Development, 6th International Working Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering, and 8th International Working Conference on Human Error, Safety, and System Development (HCSE 2016 and HESSD 2016), vol.9856, pp.86-107, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01647702

T. R. Silva and M. Winckler, Towards Automated Requirements Checking Throughout Development Processes of Interactive Systems, 2nd Workshop on Continuous Requirements Engineering, 22nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ). CEUR-WS.org. (Silva and Winckler, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712531

G. Adzic, Specification by Example: How Successful Teams Deliver the Right Software, 2011.

, Available at, p.1, 2018.

S. Ambler, Agile Modeling: Effective Practices for eXtreme Programming and the Unified Process, 2002.

S. W. Ambler, The Agile Unified Process (AUP), p.1, 2005.

S. W. Ambler and M. Lines, Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD): A Practitioner's Guide to Agile Software Delivery in the Enterprise, 2012.

D. J. Anderson, Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business, 2010.

J. Annett, Hierarchical Task Analysis, Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, 2003.

D. Astels, Test-Driven Development: A Practical Guide. 1st edn, 2003.

M. Bano and D. Zowghi, User Involvement in Software Development and System Success: A Systematic Literature Review, EASE '13: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp.125-130, 2013.

E. Barboni, Beyond Modelling: An Integrated Environment Supporting Co-Execution of Tasks and Systems Models, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems -EICS '10, pp.165-174, 2010.

J. Barnett, State Chart XML (SCXML): State Machine Notation for Control Abstraction, 2017.

M. Beaudouin-lafon and W. E. Mackay, Prototyping Tools and Techniques, Prototype Development and Tools, pp.1-41, 2000.

K. Beck, Manifesto for Agile Software Development, p.1, 2001.

K. Beck, Test Driven Development: By Example. 1st edn, 2002.

K. Beck and C. Andres, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2004.

A. Bertolino, Product Line Use Cases: Scenario-Based Specification and Testing of Requirements, Software Product Lines, pp.425-445, 2006.

B. W. Boehm, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson, Guidelines for Verifying and Validating Software Requirements and Design Specifications', in Euro IFIP 79, References Booch, pp.711-719, 1979.

A. Professional,

J. Bowen and S. Reeves, UI-Driven Test-First Development of Interactive Systems, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems -EICS '11, pp.165-174, 2011.

R. A. Buchmann and D. Karagiannis, Modelling mobile app requirements for semantic traceability, Requirements Engineering, vol.22, pp.41-75, 2017.

, Object Management Group, Business Process Model And Notation TM (BPMN TM, p.1, 2011.

G. Calvary, The CAMELEON Reference Framework, 2002.

G. Calvary, A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces, Interacting with Computers, issue.3, pp.289-308, 2003.

G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, and D. Thevenin, Supporting Context Changes for Plastic User Interfaces: A Process and a Mechanism', in People and Computers XV -Interaction without Frontiers, pp.349-363, 2001.

J. C. Campos, Systematic Automation of Scenario-Based Testing of User Interfaces, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems -EICS '16, pp.138-148, 2016.

J. C. Campos, A More Intelligent Test Case Generation Approach through Task Models Manipulation, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-20, 2017.

S. K. Card, A. Newell, and T. P. Moran, , 1983.

R. A. Carvalho, . De, F. L. Carvalho-e-silva, . De, and R. S. Manhaes, Mapping Business Process Modeling constructs to Behavior Driven Development Ubiquitous Language, 2010.

R. A. Carvalho, . De, R. S. Manhães, F. L. Carvalho-e-silva, and . De, Filling the Gap between Business Process Modeling and Behavior Driven Development, 2010.

D. Chelimsky, The RSpec Book: Behaviour Driven Development with RSpec, Cucumber, and Friends, 2010.

E. J. Chikofsky, I. I. Cross, and J. H. , Reverse Engineering and Design Recovery: A Taxonomy, IEEE Software, pp.13-17, 1990.

M. Cohn, User Stories Applied for Agile Software Development, 2004.

A. Coyette, S. Kieffer, and J. Vanderdonckt, Multi-fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces, Proc. of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.150-164, 2007.

B. Crandall, G. Klein, and R. R. Hoffman, Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis, 2006.

K. Dalkir, Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, 2011.

E. W. Dijkstra, On The Reliability of Mechanisms, 1970.

M. Dumontier, Ontology Design Principles, GitHub. Available, p.6, 2018.

A. Dwarakanath and S. Sengupta, Litmus: Generation of Test Cases from Functional Requirements in Natural Language, Int. Conference on Application of Natural Language to Information Systems, pp.58-69, 2012.

C. Ebert, Global Software and IT: A Guide to Distributed Development, Projects, and Outsourcing, 2011.

A. Egbreghts, A Literature Review of Behavior Driven Development using Grounded Theory, 27th Twente Student Conference on IT, 2017.

M. Elkoutbi, I. Khriss, and R. K. Keller, Automated Prototyping of User Interfaces Based on UML Scenarios, Automated Software Engineering, vol.13, pp.5-40, 2006.

A. Engel, Verification, Validation, and Testing of Engineered Systems, 2010.

R. Fahssi, C. Martinie, and P. Palanque, Enhanced Task Modelling for Systematic Identification and Explicit Representation of Human Errors, Proc. of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.192-212, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01387758

F. Ali, M. Pérez-quiñones, M. A. Abrams, and M. , Multiple User Interfaces: Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces, pp.93-118, 2005.

J. Fierstone, A. Dery-pinna, and M. Riveill, Architecture Logicielle pour l'adaptation et la composition d'IHM -Mise en oeuvre avec le langage SUNML, 2003.

K. Forsberg and H. Mooz, The Relationship of System Engineering to the Project Cycle, Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium of National Council on System Engineering, pp.57-65, 1991.

D. Graham, Foundations of Software Testing: ISTQB Certification, 2008.

M. Green, Report on Dialogue Specification Tools', in User Interface Management Systems, 1985.

. Springer, , pp.9-20

N. Guarino, D. Oberle, and S. Staab, What Is an Ontology?', in Handbook on Ontologies, 2009.

. Springer, , pp.1-17

J. T. Hackos and J. C. Redish, User and Task Analysis for Interface Design, 1998.

J. Hak, M. Winckler, and D. Navarre, PANDA : Prototyping using ANnotation and Decision References Analysis, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp.171-176, 2016.

T. D. Hellmann, Automated GUI Testing for Agile Development Environments, 2015.

J. R. Highsmith, Adaptive Software Development: A Collaborative Approach to Managing Complex Systems, 1999.

S. Hotomski, E. Charrada, . Ben, and M. Glinz, Aligning Requirements and Acceptance Tests via Automatically Generated Guidance, 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, pp.339-342, 2017.

, Standard for System and Software Verification and Validation IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, 2017.

. Iso, Human-centred design processes for interactive systems, vol.13407, 1999.

I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh, The Unified Software Development Process, 1999.

A. Professional,

M. Käpyaho and M. Kauppinen, Agile Requirements Engineering With Prototyping: A Case Study, 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp.334-343, 2015.

I. Khaddam, N. Mezhoudi, and J. Vanderdonckt, Towards Task-Based Linguistic Modeling for Designing GUIs, 27th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01218707

C. Ladas, Scrumban -Essays on Kanban Systems for Lean Software Development, 2009.

S. Lai, F. Leu, W. C. Chu, and .. , Combining IID with BDD to Enhance the Critical Quality of Security Functional Requirements, 2014 Ninth International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA), 2014.

J. A. Landay, SILK: Sketching Interfaces Like Krazy, CHI 96, pp.398-399, 1996.

J. C. Leite, P. Do, and A. D. Oliveira, A Client Oriented Requirements Baseline, International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp.108-115, 1995.

C. Lewis and J. Rieman, Task-Centered User Interface Design: A Practical Introduction, 1993.

Q. Limbourg, USIXML: A Language Supporting Multi-path Development of User Interfaces, pp.200-220, 2004.

Q. Limbourg and J. Vanderdonckt, Comparing Task Models for User Interface Design, 2003.

, The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction

&. Taylor and . Francis, , pp.135-154

D. R. Lindstrom, Five Ways to Destroy a Development Project, IEEE Software, vol.10, issue.5, pp.55-58, 1993.

P. Lombriser, Gamified Requirements Engineering: Model and Experimentation, References Proceedings of the 22nd International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ, pp.171-187, 2016.

J. H. Lopes, Evaluation of Behavior-Driven Development, 2012.

D. Lübke and T. Van-lessen, Modeling Test Cases in BPMN for Behavior-Driven Development, IEEE Software, pp.15-21, 2016.

G. Lucassen, Behavior-Driven Requirements Traceability via Automated Acceptance Tests, Proceedings -2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, pp.431-434, 2017.

E. R. Luna, Capture and Evolution of Web Requirements Using WebSpec, Proc. of the Int. Conference on Web Engineering, pp.173-188, 2010.

M. Maguire and N. Bevan, User Requirements Analysis: A Review of Supporting Methods', in IFIP World Computer Congress, pp.133-148, 2002.

E. Marcotte, Responsive Web Design, 2014.

J. Martin, Rapid Application Development, 1991.

C. Martinie, Extending Procedural Task Models by Systematic Explicit Integration of Objects, Knowledge and Information, Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, p. European Association for Cognitive Ergonomics (EAC, 2013.

C. Martinie, A Generic Tool-Supported Framework for Coupling Task Models and Interactive Applications, Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems -EICS '15, pp.244-253, 2015.

C. Martinie, P. Palanque, and M. Winckler, Structuring and Composition Mechanisms to Address Scalability Issues in Task Models, Proc. of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.589-609, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591816

J. E. Mcdonald, P. D. Vandenberg, and M. J. Smartt, The mirage rapid interface prototyping system, UIST '88 Proceedings of the 1st annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User Interface Software, pp.77-84, 1988.

R. Van-megen and D. B. Meyerhoff, Costs and benefits of early defect detection: experiences from developing client server and host applications, Software Quality Journal, vol.4, issue.4, pp.247-256, 1995.

G. I. Melnik, Empirical Analyses of Executable Acceptance Test Driven Development, 2007.

B. Meyer, On Formalism in Specifications, IEEE Software, vol.2, issue.1, pp.6-26, 1985.

G. J. Myers, The Art of Software Testing, 2004.

S. Nair, J. L. De-la-vara, and S. Sen, A Review of Traceability Research at the Requirements Engineering Conference RE@21, 2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp.222-229, 2013.

D. Navarre, A Tool Suite for Integrating Task and System Models Through Scenarios, pp.88-113, 2001.

D. Navarre, P. Palanque, and R. Bastide, Model-Based Interactive Prototyping of Highly Interactive Applications', in Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces III, pp.205-216, 2002.

M. Newman, DENIM: An Informal Web Site Design Tool Inspired by Observations of Practice, vol.18, pp.259-324, 2003.

C. A. Nicolle, USERfit -Design for all methods and tools', in COST 219bis Seminar 'Human Aspects of Telecommunications for Disabled and Older People, 1999.

J. Nielsen, A Virtual Protocol Model for Computer-Human Interaction, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol.24, issue.3, pp.80028-80029, 1986.

D. North, Introducing BDD', Better Software, 2006.

D. North, Agile Specifications, BDD and Testing eXchange: How to sell BDD to the business'. London: Skills Matter, 2009.

D. North, What's in a Story?, p.1, 2017.

A. C. Oran, Analysing Requirements Communication Using Use Case Specification and User Stories, Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, 2017.

, , pp.214-223

L. J. Osterweil, Unifying Microprocess and Macroprocess Research, Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, pp.68-74, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11608035_7

S. R. Palmer and J. M. Felsing, A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development, 2002.

P. Hall,

F. Paternò, ConcurTaskTrees : An Engineered Approach to Model-based Design of Interactive Systems', in The Handbook of Analysis for Human Computer Interaction, pp.1-18, 1999.

F. Paternò, Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications, 2000.

F. Paternò, ConcurTaskTrees: An Engineered Notation for Task Model', in The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp.483-503, 2003.

F. Paternò, , vol.3, 2017.

F. Paternò and C. Mancini, Developing task models from informal scenarios, CHI EA '99, 1999.

, CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp.228-229

F. Pontico, C. Farenc, and M. Winckler, Model-Based Support for Specifying eService eGovernment Applications', in Task Models and Diagrams for Users Interface Design: 5th International Workshop, TAMODIA, pp.54-67, 2006.

M. Poppendieck, T. D. Poppendieck, and T. Poppendieck, Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit, 2003.

A. Puerta and J. Eisenstein, XIML: A Universal Language for User Interfaces, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2002.

K. Pugh, Lean-Agile Acceptance Test-Driven-Development, 2010.

J. Pullmann, , p.1, 2017.

M. Rahman and J. Gao, A Reusable Automated Acceptance Testing Architecture for Microservices in Behavior-Driven Development, Proceedings -9th IEEE International Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, pp.321-325, 2015.

B. Ramesh, Implementing Requirements Traceability: A Case Study, Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. York, pp.89-95, 1995.

A. Reddy, Scrumban [R]Evolution, The: Getting the Most Out of Agile, Scrum, and Lean Kanban, 2015.

M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll, Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of HumanComputer Interaction, 2001.

M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll, Scenario-Based Design, The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp.1032-1050, 2002.

D. W. Royce, Managing the Development of Large Software Systems, IEEE Wescon, pp.328-338, 1970.

D. Saffer, Designing for Interaction: Creating Smart Applications and Clever Devices, 2006.

C. Santoro, A Task Model-Based Approach for the Design and Evaluation of Innovative User Interfaces, 2005.

K. Schwaber, Agile Project Management with Scrum, 2004.

T. R. Silva, Definition of a Behavior-Driven Model for Requirements Specification and Testing of Interactive Systems, Proceedings -2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp.444-449, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712535

T. R. Silva, A Comparative Study of Milestones for Featuring GUI Prototyping Tools, Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, vol.10, issue.06, pp.564-589, 2017.

T. R. Silva, J. Hak, and M. Winckler, An Approach for Multi-Artifact Testing Through an Ontological Perspective for Behavior-Driven Development, Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, pp.81-107, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712536

T. R. Silva, J. Hak, and M. Winckler, Testing Prototypes and Final User Interfaces Through an Ontological Perspective for Behavior-Driven Development, 6th International Working Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering, and 8th International Working Conference on Human Error, References Safety, and System Development (HCSE 2016 and HESSD 2016), pp.86-107, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01709193

T. R. Silva, J. Hak, and M. Winckler, A Behavior-Based Ontology for Supporting Automated Assessment of Interactive Systems, Proceedings -IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp.250-257, 2017.

T. R. Silva, J. Hak, and M. Winckler, A Formal Ontology for Describing Interactive Behaviors and Supporting Automated Testing on User Interfaces, International Journal of Semantic Computing, vol.11, issue.04, pp.513-539, 2017.
DOI : 10.1142/s1793351x17400219

T. R. Silva, J. Hak, and M. A. Winckler, A Review of Milestones in the History of GUI Prototyping Tools, IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction -INTERACT 2015 Adjunct Proceedings, pp.1-13, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01343040

T. R. Silva and M. Winckler, A Scenario-Based Approach for Checking Consistency in User Interface Design Artifacts, IHC'17, Proceedings of the 16th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.21-30, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02138494

T. R. Silva and M. A. Winckler, Towards Automated Requirements Checking Throughout Development Processes of Interactive Systems, 22nd International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering -Foundation for Software Quality, REFSQ 2016, pp.1-2, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712531

H. M. Sneed, Testing against Natural Language Requirements, Proc. of the Seventh International Conference on Quality Software, pp.380-387, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/qsic.2007.4385524

M. Soeken, R. Wille, and R. Drechsler, Assisted Behavior Driven Development Using Natural Language Processing, TOOLS Europe, pp.269-287, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-30561-0_19

C. Solís and X. Wang, A Study of the Characteristics of Behaviour Driven Development, Proceedings -37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp.383-387, 2011.

K. S. Sousa, H. Mendonça, and J. Vanderdonckt, A Model-Driven Approach to Align Business Processes with User Interfaces, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol.14, issue.19, pp.3236-3249, 2008.

D. Souza and C. S. , Semiotic engineering: Bringing designers and users together at interaction time, Interacting with Computers, vol.17, issue.3, pp.317-341, 2005.

J. Stapleton and P. Constable, DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method: The Method in Practice, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/tools.1999.779095

J. Tian, Software Inspection, Software Quality Engineering: Testing, Quality Assurance, and Quantifiable Improvement, pp.237-250, 2005.

U. Body-of-knowledge, User Experience Professionals' Association, p.1, 2018.

E. J. Uusitalo, Linking Requirements and Testing in Practice, Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE'08, pp.265-270, 2008.

P. Valente, Bridging Enterprise and Software Engineering Through an User-Centered Design Perspective, Web Information Systems Engineering -WISE 2016, pp.349-357, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01712528

P. Valente, The Goals Approach: Agile Enterprise Driven Software Development', in Complexity in Information Systems Development, pp.201-219, 2017.

J. Vanderdonckt, A MDA-Compliant Environment for Developing User Interfaces of Information Systems, pp.16-31, 2005.

Y. Wang and S. Wagner, Combining STPA and BDD for Safety Analysis and Verification in Agile Development: A Controlled Experiment, International Conference on Agile Software Development (XP 2018, pp.37-53, 2018.

Y. Wautelet, Unifying and Extending User Story Models, International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp.211-225, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01085628

M. Winckler, Cascading dialog modeling with UsiXML, International Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems, pp.121-135, 2008.

M. Winckler and P. Palanque, StateWebCharts: A Formal Description Technique Dedicated to Navigation Modelling of Web Applications', in Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification, pp.61-76, 2003.

M. Winckler and P. Palanque, Models as Representations for Supporting the Development of eProcedures', in Usability in Government Systems, pp.301-315, 2012.

A. Wolff, Linking GUI Elements to Tasks -Supporting an Evolutionary Design Process, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams, pp.27-34, 2005.

D. P. Wood and K. C. Kang, A Classification and Bibliography of Software Prototyping, Requirements Engineering Project, 1992.

!. >> and . Scenario, << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> And I inform "Toulouse" and choose "Toulouse, Blagnac (TLS)" in the field "Departure" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> When I inform "Paris" and choose, Running story stories/Confirm Flight Selection.storyConverted User Story: Confirm Flight Selection (stories/Confirm Flight Selection.storyConverted) Narrative: the information, the fare rules and then finalize my booking. Scenario: Confirm a Flight Selection Proceed to Login Reach the Travel Planet Search Page << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Go to Flight Search -Task not found

;. <<-scenario, ;. >>-<<-scenario, ;. >>-<<-scenario, . >>, and . Scenario, >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 15 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 16 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: Sam, Déc 1, 2018 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> And I set "Sam, Déc 1, 2018" in the field "Departure Date" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Departure -Task not found! >> When I inform "Paris" and choose "Paris, Charles-de-Gaulle (CDG)" in the field "Departure" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Inform Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose Destination -Task not found! >> And I inform "Nice" and choose "Nice, Côte D'Azur (NCE)" in the field "Destination" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: Sam, Déc 1, 2018 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 15 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 16 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: Sam, Déc 1, 2018 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Departure Date -Found in Position: 8 -Associated Value: No Value >> When I set "Sam, Déc 10, 2018" in the field "Departure Date" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 23 >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 16 >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 16 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> And I submit "Search" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> Then will be displayed "2. Sélectionner un voyage" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> Given, No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Arrival Date -Found in Position: 9 -Associated Value: No Value >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Arrival Date -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Set Arrival Date -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Set Arrival Date -Task not found! >> When I set "Lun, Déc 10, 2018" in the field "Arrival Date" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 23 >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 17 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 16 >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 16 >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Submit Search -Found in Position: 11 >> And I submit "Search" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display 2. Sélectionner un voyage -Task not found! >> Then will be displayed "2. Sélectionner un voyage" Using timeout for story Confirm Flight Selection.storyConverted of 21600 secs. << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display Availability Page -Task not found! >> Given "Availability Page" is displayed << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> When I click on "No Bag" referring to "Air France 7519" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on No Bag -Task not found! >> And I click on "No Bag" referring to "Air France 7522" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Book -Task not found! >> When I click on "Book" << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Display J'accepte les Conditions d'achat concernant le(s) tarif(s) aérien(s). -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display J'accepte les Conditions d'achat concernant le(s) tarif(s) aérien(s). -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Display J'accepte les Conditions d'achat concernant le(s), vol.1, 2018.

. <<-scenario, << Scenario: No Optional Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful Multidestination Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Return Trip With Data.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: One-Way Trip Declined.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> << Scenario: No Optional Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Click on Decline the trip -Task not found! >> And I click on, No Optional Successful Return Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose J'accepte les Conditions d'achat concernant le(s) tarif(s) aérien(s). -Task not found! >> << Scenario: Successful One-Way Trip -Regular Case.scen -Searched Task: Choose J'accepte les Conditions d'achat concernant le(s)

, Si vous avez des questions ou des doutes sur l'entretien ou sur les questions qui seront posées, n'hésitez pas à nous interrompre et à demander plus d'informations

, Faire signer consentement éclairé

, Initier l'enregistrement

, Annex A: Case Study Interview Protocol Partie I : Questionnaire démographique et de contexte Question 1. Pourriez-vous répondre à l'ensemble des informations de base ci-dessous ?

A. , Votre sexe : B. Votre âge : C. Votre niveau d'étude

D. , Depuis combien de temps vous êtes au service de mission de l'IRIT ?

E. Avez, Nous sommes également intéressés par votre opinion sur les demandes reçues. Label : * faits, ? interprétation Section A : Réception de demandes de réservation Question 1. Comment les demandes de réservation des voyageurs arrivent-elles à vous et avec quelle fréquence ? Avez-vous des suggestions pour faire mieux ? * Question 2. Combien de demandes de réservation de voyage avez-vous reçues la semaine dernière ? Avez-vous des suggestions pour faire mieux ? * Question 3. Pensez-vous qu'il manque quelque chose dans la description des demandes de réservation que vous recevez ? Comment cela pourrait-il être mieux ? ? Question 4. Est-ce que vous devez prendre des notes (ex. post-it, email, etc.) sur les demandes de réservations ? Si oui, combien de notes en moyenne ? Comment cela pourrait-il être mieux ? Combien de notes avez-vous pris la semaine dernière ? * Question 5. Si vous prenez des notes, comment vous les conservée et sur quel format ? Comment améliorer l, -vous déjà eu des expériences dans de services similaires auparavant ? Question 2. Pourriez-vous nous donner un aperçu de ce travail, en fournissant une brève description de vos tâches ? Partie II : Processus de traitement de demandes Nous sommes intéressés par les préférences et les difficultés que les voyageurs de l'IRIT ont rencontrées et vous ont signalées lorsqu'ils essaient de réserver leurs voyages d'affaires

, Pour les multiples-destinations, il ne marche pas toujours. Et le changement qu'on peut voir c'est quand il y a plusieurs voyageurs qui partent au même temps, Interviewer : D'accord ! Pourriez-vous lister trois fonctionnalités que vous aimeriez changer pour ce type de système ? · P1 : Changer ou complètement changer ? Interviewer : Oui ! Interviewer : Après le système est bien présenté

, Comme j'ai dit à tout à l'heure, c'est un modèle pour décrire une fonctionnalité, décrire une demande, D'accord ? Donc, il est toujours comme ça. Il a un titre pour décrire le type d'histoire, on appelle ce modèle, de récit utilisateur, Section C : Rédaction des Récits Utilisateurs. Interviewer : Bon ! Dans cette dernière partie, c'est le modèle qu'on va essayer de tester avec vous

. Et,

. Quand,

A. , Et

, Et je tape "Paris" et choisis "Paris, Charles de Gaulle (CDG)" dans le champ, En tant donné que je vais à la page

. Donc, Interviewer : D'accord ! Quelque chose en plus ? P4 : Non, non. Après je ne vois pas. Interviewer : Pourriez-vous lister 3 fonctionnalités que vous aimeriez garder pour ce type de système de réservation de voyage ? · P4 : Que je voudrais garder ? Interviewer : Oui. Quels sont les plus utiles ? Que vous pensez être indispensable à votre avis. P4 : Je ne sais pas de tout. Interviewer : La partie de chercher de vol. La partie d'ordonner par data

, Pouvoir ordonner par prix, par exemple. Pouvoir renseigne les infos directement par un autre système, parce que les données sont déjà dans la base. Bon, voilà ! Quelque chose que vous considérez? P4 : Voilà ! C'est? moi. Je préfère, parce que nous, on renseigne toutes les infos à la fin, P4 : Après, c'est vrai que le site c'est fluide, donc, il va vachement vite. Après il est assez complet aussi, parce qu'on a tous les vols, avec tout

. Après, Une fois qu'on a réservé le vol pour pouvoir valider, on a juste copié le numéro de bon de commande et puis comme ça, c'est validé. Interviewer : D'accord ! Pourriez-vous lister trois fonctionnalités que vous aimeriez changer pour ce type de système ? · P4 : Changer ? Après c'est totalement? je ne sais pas, Non ! Changer je ne vois pas, je ne vois pas en fait. Parce que ce n'est pas totalement sur le logiciel. Le logiciel est vraiment bien. Interviewer : Vous ne changiez rien ? P4 : Non ! Je ne pense pas. Je ne pense pas ! Section C : Rédaction des Récits Utilisateurs. Interviewer : Bon ! Dans cette partie on va évaluer le modèle, qu'on a prescrit pour décrire les actions d'utilisateur et les réponses que le système donne sur ses actions. Donc

. En, Donc, chaque scénario, on a une description de scénario, un contexte qu'on donne par la clause « En tant donné » ; ou plusieurs contextes. On peut ajouter plusieurs contextes, ou une action, un évènement, et le résultat que le système va nous donner. Après cet évènement, on registre ça dans la clause « Alors ». P4 : D'accord ! Interviewer : Donc, comme exemple : En tant que voyageur fréquent, Je veux rechercher des billets, en fournissant des emplacements et des dates, P4 : D'accord ! Interviewer : Bon, et pout c'est préambule-là on a plus de scénarios possibles

. D'accord-?-p4-:-d'accord-!-interviewer, scénario possible ; une recherche de ticket aller simple, par exemple. Donc, En tant donné que je vais à la page, Donc, dans cette histoire

, C'est la réponse que le système va me donner suite à cette action-là. D'accord ? P4 : D'accord ! Interviewer : Donc, c'est un modèle qu'on utilise pour décrire l'interaction entre l'utilisateur