P. Aghion, J. Cai, M. Dewatripont, L. Du, A. Harrison et al., October). Industrial Policy and Competition, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.1-32, 2015.

P. Aghion and J. Tirole, Formal and Real Authority in Organizations, Journal of Political Economy, vol.105, issue.1, pp.1-29, 1997.

J. Angrist and J. Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion, 2009.

P. Bajari, S. Houghton, and S. Tadelis, Bidding for Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis of Adaptation Costs, American Economic Review, vol.104, issue.4, pp.1288-1319, 2014.

P. Bajari, R. Mcmillan, and S. Tadelis, Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis, Economics, & Organization, vol.25, issue.2, pp.372-399, 2009.

P. Bajari and S. Tadelis, Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.32, issue.3, pp.387-407, 2001.

P. Bajari and L. Ye, Competition Versus Collusion in Procurement Auctions: Identification and Testing, 2001.

A. Baltrunaite, C. Giorgiantonio, S. Mocetti, and T. Orlando, Discretion and supplier selection in public procurement, 2018.

O. Bandiera, A. Prat, and T. Valletti, Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment, American Economic Review, vol.99, issue.4, pp.1278-1308, 2009.

K. Barbosa and S. Straub, The Value of Revolving Doors in Public Procurement, 2017.

G. S. Becker, Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, Journal of Political Economy, vol.76, issue.2, pp.169-217, 1968.

G. Bel and X. Fageda, Reforming the local public sector: economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol.11, issue.1, pp.45-65, 2008.

G. Bel and X. Fageda, Factors Explaining Local Privatization: A MetaRegression Analysis, Public Choice, vol.139, issue.1/2, pp.105-119, 2009.

G. Bel and A. Miralles, Factors Influencing the Privatisation of Urban Solid Waste Collection in Spain, Urban Studies, vol.40, issue.7, pp.1323-1334, 2003.

M. Bertrand, E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan, How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.119, issue.1, pp.249-275, 2004.

M. Bertrand and S. Mullainathan, Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences, Journal of Political Economy, vol.111, issue.5, pp.1043-1075, 2003.

J. Beuve and Z. Le-squeren, When does ideology matter? An empirical analysis of French municipalities' make-or-buy choices, 2016.

J. Beuve, M. W. Moszoro, and S. Saussier, Political contestability and public 224 contract rigidity: An analysis of procurement contracts, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2018.

R. Blundell and S. Bond, GMM Estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions, Econometric Reviews, vol.19, issue.3, pp.321-340, 2000.

G. J. Bobonis, C. Fuertes, L. R. , and R. Schwabe, Monitoring Corruptible Politicians, American Economic Review, vol.106, issue.8, pp.2371-2405, 2016.

M. Boycko, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, A Theory of Privatization, Economic Journal, vol.106, issue.435, pp.309-319, 1996.

T. F. Bresnahan and J. D. Levin, Vertical Integration and Market Structure, 2012.

T. L. Brown and M. Potoski, Managing Contract Performance: A Transaction Costs Approach, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol.22, issue.2, pp.275-297, 2003.

J. Bulow and P. Klemperer, Auctions Versus Negotiations, The American Economic Review, vol.86, issue.1, pp.180-194, 1996.

R. Burguet and Y. Che, Competitive Procurement with Corruption, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.35, issue.1, pp.50-68, 2004.

L. J. Cameron, Limiting Buyer Discretion: Effects on Performance and Price in Long-Term Contracts, The American Economic Review, vol.90, issue.1, pp.265-281, 2000.

L. Chever, S. Saussier, and A. Yvrande-billon, The law of small numbers: investigating the benefits of restricted auctions for public procurement, Applied Economics, vol.49, issue.42, pp.4241-4260, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01656456

E. Chong, S. Saussier, and B. S. Silverman, Water Under the Bridge: Determinants of Franchise Renewal in Water Provision, Economics, and Organization, p.10, 2015.

E. Chong, C. Staropoli, and A. Yvrande-billon, Auction versus Negotiation in Public Procurement: Looking for Empirical Evidence, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00512813

. Glachant, The Manufacturing Markets, Legal, Political and Economic Dynamics, pp.120-142
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01492359

H. Christoffersen and M. Paldam, Markets and Municipalities: A Study of the Behavior of the Danish Municipalities, Public Choice, vol.114, issue.1/2, pp.79-102, 2003.

R. H. Coase, The Nature of the Firm, Economica, vol.4, issue.16, pp.386-405, 1937.

E. Costas-pérez, A. Solé-ollé, and P. Sorribas-navarro, Corruption scandals, voter information, and accountability, European Journal of Political Economy, vol.28, issue.4, pp.469-484, 2012.

D. Coviello, A. Guglielmo, and G. Spagnolo, The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance, Management Science, vol.64, issue.2, pp.715-738, 2017.

,. De-bettignies and T. Ross, Public-private partnerships and the privatization of financing: An incomplete contracts approach, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.27, issue.3, pp.358-368, 2009.

F. Decarolis, Awarding Price, Contract Performance, and Bids Screening: Evidence from Procurement Auctions, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.108-132, 2014.

C. Desrieux, E. Chong, and S. Saussier, Putting all one's eggs in one basket: Relational contracts and the management of local public services, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.89, pp.167-186, 2013.

D. Tella, R. , and I. Franceschelli, Government Advertising and Media Coverage of Corruption Scandals, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol.3, issue.4, pp.119-151, 2011.

D. Tella, R. , and E. Schargrodsky, The Role of Wages and Auditing during a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires, Journal of Law and Economics, vol.46, issue.1, pp.269-92, 2003.

S. Djankov, T. Ghossein, A. M. Islam, and F. Saliola, Public procurement regulation and road quality, 2017.

, Communication from the Commission to the Institutions: Making Public Procurement work in and for Europe, European Commission, 2017.

, Flash Eurobarometer 457 "Businesses' attitudes towards corruption in the EU, European Commission, 2017.

, Public procurement guidance for practitioners, European Commission, 2018.

C. Ferraz and F. Finan, Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.123, issue.2, pp.703-745, 2008.

L. Foster, J. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson, Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?, American Economic Review, vol.98, issue.1, pp.394-425, 2008.

R. Gibbons, Transaction-Cost Economics: Past, Present, and Future?, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol.112, issue.2, pp.263-288, 2010.

V. P. Goldberg, Competitive Bidding and the Production of Precontract Information, Bell Journal of Economics, vol.8, issue.1, pp.250-261, 1977.

R. Gradus, E. Dijkgraaf, and M. Wassenaar, Understanding Mixed Forms of Refuse Collection, Privatization, and Its Reverse in the Netherlands, International Public Management Journal, vol.17, issue.3, pp.328-343, 2014.

J. L. Guasch, J. Laffont, and S. Straub, Concessions of infrastructure in Latin America: Government-led renegotiation, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol.22, issue.7, pp.1267-1294, 2007.

O. Hart, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.112, issue.4, pp.1127-1161, 1997.

R. Hebdon and P. Jalette, The restructuring of municipal services: a Canada-United States comparison, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol.26, issue.1, pp.144-158, 2008.

A. Hefetz and M. Warner, Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol.14, issue.2, pp.171-190, 2004.

F. Herweg and K. M. Schmidt, Auctions versus negotiations: the effects of inefficient renegotiation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.48, issue.3, pp.647-672

. Imf, Corruption : Costs and Mitigating Strategies, 2016.

S. Kelman, Procurement and Public Management: The Fear of Discretion and the Quality of Goverment Performance, 1990.

S. Kelman, Unleashing Change: A Study of Organizational, 2005.

I. Kim, A model of selective tendering: Does bidding competition deter opportunism by contractors?, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol.38, pp.907-925, 1998.

S. Kishimoto, E. Lobina, and O. Petitjean, Our Public Water Future: The Global Experience with Remunicipalisation, 2015.

B. Klein, R. G. Crawford, and A. A. Alchian, Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process, The Journal of Law & Economics, vol.21, issue.2, pp.297-326, 1978.

S. Knack, N. Biletska, and K. Kacker, Deterring Kickbacks and Encour228, 2017.

, aging Entry in Public Procurement Markets: Evidence from Firm Surveys in 88

, Developing Countries. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2985503, Social Science Research Network

F. Lafontaine and M. Slade, Vertical Integration and Firm Boundaries: The Evidence, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.45, issue.3, pp.629-685, 2007.

Z. Le-squeren and J. Moore, The Permeability of Public Contracts: Evidence from Renegotiations in the French Car Park Sector-Chaire EPPP, 2016.

J. Levin and S. Tadelis, Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from, Cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.58, issue.3, pp.507-541, 2010.

J. Levinsohn and A. Petrin, Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.70, issue.2, pp.317-341, 2003.

J. D. Loecker, Product Differentiation, Multiproduct Firms, and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity, Econometrica, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1407-1451, 2011.

M. Lokshin and Z. Sajaia, Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models, Stata Journal, vol.4, issue.3, pp.282-289, 2004.

F. López-de-silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, Privatization in the United States, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.447-471, 1997.

A. M. Manelli and D. R. Vincent, Optimal Procurement Mechanisms. Econometrica, vol.63, issue.3, pp.591-620, 1995.

S. Masten and S. Saussier, Econometrics of Contracts: an Assessment of Developments in the Empirical Literature on Contracting, Économie Industrielle, vol.92, issue.1, pp.215-236, 2000.

S. E. Masten, Modern Evidence on the Firm, The American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.2, pp.428-432, 2002.

A. Miralles, A duration model analysis of privatization of municipal water services, Revista de Economia Aplicada, vol.17, issue.2, pp.47-75, 2009.

M. W. Moszoro and P. T. Spiller, Third-Party Opportunism and the Nature of Public Contracts, 2012.

A. Muço, Learn from thy neighbor: Do voters associate corruption with political parties? Job market paper, 2017.

. Oecd, Competition and procurement, 2011.

. Oecd, Government at a Glance, 2011.

. Oecd, OECD Foreign Bribery Report-An Analysis of the Crime of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, 2014.

. Oecd, Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement, 2016.

. Oecd, Compendium of good practices on the use of open data for Anticorruption, 2017.

. Oecd, Government at a Glance, 2017.

G. S. Olley and A. Pakes, The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry, Econometrica, vol.64, issue.6, pp.1263-1297, 1996.

J. Palguta and F. Pertold, Manipulation of Procurement Contracts: Evidence from the Introduction of Discretionary Thresholds, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol.9, issue.2, pp.293-315, 2017.

A. J. Picazo-tadeo, F. González-gómez, J. G. Wanden-berghe, and A. Ruizvillaverde, Do ideological and political motives really matter in the public choice of local services management? Evidence from urban water services in Spain, Public Choice, vol.151, issue.1/2, pp.215-228, 2012.

S. Saussier and J. Tirole, Strengthening the efficiency of public procurement, 2015.

. Scpc, La prévention de la corruption en France: état des lieux, chiffres clés, perspectives, jurisprudence. Technical report, Documentation française, p.919598575, 2014.

A. Shleifer, A Theory of Yardstick Competition, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.16, issue.3, pp.319-327, 1985.

G. Spagnolo, Reputation, Competition, and Entry in Procurement. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1988818, Social Science Research Network, 2012.

P. T. Spiller, An institutional theory of public contracts : regulatory implications, 2008.

J. Stock, M. Yogo, and J. Wright, A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol.20, pp.518-529, 2002.

A. Sundell and V. Lapuente, Adam Smith or Machiavelli? Political incentives for contracting out local public services, Public Choice, vol.153, issue.3/4, pp.469-485, 2012.

S. Tadelis, Public procurement design: Lessons from the private sector, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.30, issue.3, pp.297-302, 2012.

A. Tran, Which regulations reduce corruption? Evidence from the internal records of a bribe-paying firm, Mimeo. School of Public & environmental Affairs. Indiana University, 2011.

I. Van-beveren, Total factor productivity estimation: a practical review, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.26, issue.1, pp.98-128, 2012.

O. E. Williamson, Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization, 1975.

O. E. Williamson, Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations, The Journal of Law & Economics, vol.22, issue.2, pp.233-261, 1979.

O. E. Williamson, The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach, American Journal of Sociology, vol.87, issue.3, pp.548-577, 1981.

O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, 1985.

J. M. Wooldridge, On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables, Economics Letters, vol.104, issue.3, pp.112-114, 2009.

J. M. Wooldridge, List of Figures 1 General government procurement as percentage of general government expenditure, Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cengage Learning, 2013.

. , Country-level distribution of businesses perceiving corruption as a problem for doing business

P. Remunicipalizations and . France, , p.95, 1998.

. , The cost of corruption

. , Share of adapted procedures for contract below the EU threshold in French municipalities, 2006.

. .. France, , p.139

. , Distribution of cases of investigation in French municipalities, 20062015.

, Distribution of the size of investigated municipalities, p.141, 2006.

. , Coefficients distribution placebo tests-Impact of being an investigated municipality over the probability to use a formal procedure (open auctions)

, Coefficients distribution placebo tests-Impact of being a guilty municipality over the probability to use a formal procedure, p.151

. , Share of adapted procedures for contract below the EU threshold in French municipalities, 2006.

, Density of participation to the tender between procedures, p.190

. , Distribution of mit in the Amadeus sample (construction industry in 2014)

B. , Coefficients on ln(labour)

. , Level of corruption and press freedom

, Level of disclosure and public availability of private interests, p.218, 2014.

). .. , 219 1 Decision matrix to support the choice of the procurement procedure. 54 2 Public procurement thresholds for local contracting authorities (20062015), 2010.

. , 65 5 Summary of chapters: Research Questions, Methodology and Main Results (Part 2), Main characteristics of the adapted and the open auction procedures 58 4 Summary of chapters: Research Questions, Methodology and Main Results (Part 1)

, Average value for price and leak across management, p.95

.. .. Summary,

. , Samples for in-house and private provisions

, Endogenous switching regression for private provision, p.98

. .. Determinants-of-remunicipalization, , p.99

, Determinants of remunicipalization-Continuation of previous Table, vol.100

, Determinants of privatization-Continuation of previous Table, p.102

. , Public procurement thresholds for local contracting authorities, 20062015.

, Main characteristics of the adapted and the open auctions procedures 136

, Distribution of the award mechanisms-All contracting authorities, p.137

. , Yearly distribution of call for tenders and award notices at the municipality level (2006-2015)

, Sample distribution by award mechanism, p.138, 2006.

, Sample distribution by type of products over the period, p.139, 2006.

, Summary statistics for the award mechanism dataset, p.141

, 142 2.10 Summary statistics for the number of bidders dataset, p.143

. .. , 143 2.12 Choice of formal award mechanism-Neighbors of investigated municipalities, Summary statistics for

. , Effects of investigation over the number of bidders in investigated and neighboring municipalities-OLS regression

, Effects of investigation over the number of bidders in investigated and neighboring municipalities-Negative binomial regression, p.146

. , Effects of investigation over the location of the contractors in investigated and neighboring municipalities

, Robustness-Regression over the use of formal procedure, p.148

, Robustness-Regression over the number of participants, p.149

. .. Robustness-regression-over-localism, , p.150

. , Public procurement thresholds for sub-central contracting authorities, 2006.

. .. , Sector distribution-Main estimation sample, p.191

. .. , Sector distribution-Main estimation sample, p.191

, Main characteristics of the adapted and the open auction procedures 192

, Comparison of tenders with adapted procedure and open auction

. , Test of differences in relative TFP means

.. .. Second-stage-regressions,

, Second-stage regressions-Heterogeneous effect by sector of the contract197

.. .. Robustness-labor-productivity,

-. Robustness and . .. Estimated-with-wooldridge's-approach,

. .. , Robustness-Fractional probit (main equation)

. , Regression over the number of participants

, Effect of the selection procedure on firm's characteristics, p.202

A. , 1 Sector distribution of firms in Amadeus-Main estimation sample, p.204

, A.2 Statistics on the Amadeus dataset-Main estimation sample, p.204

B. , Broad structure of NACE Rev