Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

La révolution du capital humain : d'une approche macroéconomique à une théorie microéconomique

Abstract : The hypothesis underlying this work is that the recent criticism faced by human capital concept are inextricably linked to the emerging conditions of the theory. Getting to the roots of the human capital revolution gives a new perspective on both theoretical and measurement issues. Using the history of economic thought perspective, we analyse the conceptual foundations of the human capital theory developed by Gary Becker, Jacob Mincer and Theodore Schultz in the late fifties. In 1950, Schultz used the concept of human capital in order to explain growth residual. His research program is embodied in the corpus ofgrowth theory. Schultz promptly succeeds to show the importance of this forgotten factor. Simultaneously, Mincer works on the same concept considering it as the main determinant of the personal income distribution. Few years later, Becker tried to understand the individual choice of training using the rational choice theory, and study the private rate of return of investment in education. His model, immediately adopted by Mincer, will establish itself as the standard model, vanishing the macroeconomic approach of Schultz.
Document type :
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : ABES STAR :  Contact
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - 1:14:21 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, March 23, 2021 - 1:52:03 PM


Version validated by the jury (STAR)


  • HAL Id : tel-01983340, version 1


Sylvère Matéos. La révolution du capital humain : d'une approche macroéconomique à une théorie microéconomique. Economies et finances. Université de Lyon, 2018. Français. ⟨NNT : 2018LYSE2068⟩. ⟨tel-01983340⟩



Record views


Files downloads