Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Autopromotion, paradoxe et réécriture dans l'oeuvre d'Ortensio Lando

Abstract : The aim of this study is to analyse the work and thought of Italian humanist Ortensio Lando (c. 1506 – c. 1553). This writer has been rediscovered by critics in the 1970s, mostly thanks to Fay’s and Grendler’s studies, and today many researchers are interested by paradox and ambiguity in his works. But, except for the Paradossi, his literary production remains mostly unknown. For this reason we considered the whole Lando’s corpus, about 27 works, in order to propose a monographic study of this writer.We also focused on Ortensio Lando’s biography, of which we have only few documents, and on the theory that he was an Augustinian monk who committed apostasy and fled to France.The analysis of Lando’s works has permitted to define three research axes:1)Self-promotionLando used different pseudonyms. We assume that this strategy was not only a way to cover his identity, but also a self-promotion stratagem of which we analysed the rhetorical function. Lando knew how to exploit printing innovations and he showed how they could be used to build his eccentric writer’s image.2)ParadoxThe Paradossi are considered as the first vernacular paradoxical work, a successful literary genre in 16th century. Literary criticism reconstructed the way paradoxical tradition was reworked by Humanism, especially through Lucian of Samosata, and has defined its main issues, like the “donkey’s praise” and the critical of learning. But so far, little consideration has been given to others paradoxical Lando’s works and there’s still no satisfying interpretation of the reason behind this strategy. Several assumptions considered Lando as an anti-humanist, anti-Ciceronian and anti-Erasmian writer, but we believe that paradox doesn’t carries a sceptical rejection of any opinion or a criticism against Humanistic heritage; paradox is rather a denunciation of intellectual dogmatism.3)RewritingEven if Lando cannot be considered as an anti-humanist, he clearly lived in times of intellectual crisis and paradigmatic shift in literary models. We will analyse the relationship between Lando and classical culture by parody and imitation, and the relationship between the writer and humanistic culture that remains, despite criticism, the focus of his work. We will also focus on the reasons behind the long and erudite catalogues that Lando copies, especially from Ravisius’s Officina, by proposing to link this practice to the parody of uncritical classical imitation, as in the case of paradoxical literature.
Document type :
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [548 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : ABES STAR :  Contact
Submitted on : Thursday, December 20, 2018 - 9:13:07 AM
Last modification on : Friday, March 25, 2022 - 9:42:53 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, March 22, 2019 - 12:15:42 PM


Version validated by the jury (STAR)


  • HAL Id : tel-01961586, version 1



Federica Greco. Autopromotion, paradoxe et réécriture dans l'oeuvre d'Ortensio Lando. Littératures. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2018. Français. ⟨NNT : 2018GREAL008⟩. ⟨tel-01961586⟩



Record views


Files downloads