C. and .. De, BÂTIMENTS qui peut représenter tous les élément de l'environnement, des faits aux actions et qui est donc très versatile. De plus, comme cela a été montré dans le chapitre 4, l'architecture BEN est modulaire. Tous les éléments ne sont pas obligatoires et peuvent être utilisés comme le souhaite le modélisateur

, Celui-ci peut n'utiliser que les modules et processus jugés nécessaires à son cas d'étude sans parasiter le calcul du comportements des agents par des notions qui n'auraient pas de sens par rapport au système étudié

. Enfin, Problématique 4 : Proposer une implémentation de cette architecture qui soit le plus simple possible vis à vis d'un public non informaticien et pouvant être utilisée pour des simulations de plusieurs centaines d'agents avec un temps d'exécution raisonnable. Réponse 4 : Pour faciliter son utilisation, l'architecture BEN a été implémentée dans la plateforme GAMA. D'une part, GAMA est une plateforme populaire dans la communauté des simulations sociales et qui est connue pour sa facilité d'utilisation. L'implémentation de l'architecture, présentée dans le chapitre 5, repose donc sur les principes du langage de programmation de la plateforme pour conserver cette facilité de prise en main. Chaque processus de l'architecture est traduit à l'aide d'un statement, facilitant l'implémentation d'un modèle défini avec BEN. L'implémentation qui est proposée est faite pour s'adapter à l'utilisateur et le contraindre au minimum. Ainsi, un grand nombre d'opérateurs et d'actions ont été définis et l'architecture possède de nombreuses options. Le modélisateur peut ainsi accéder à l'ensemble des connaissances de l'agent et travailler comme il le souhaite, soit avec une description détaillée et en utilisant de nombreux processus, soit avec des prédicats et des connaissances de plus haut niveau. Enfin, le chapitre 6 montre que BEN peut être utilisé pour modéliser une situation d'évacuation et que son implémentation offre des temps de calcul raisonnables sur plusieurs centaines d'agent (885 ms en moyenne pour simuler 1 seconde avec 1400 agents initialement dans la boite de nuit à évacuer). Ces deux exemples montrent aussi que BEN permet de définir un compor, normatifs, émotionnels et sociaux dont le fonctionnement est automatique du point de vue du modélisateur. Pour autant, l'ensemble des paramètres internes à ces moteurs se ramène aux cinq dimensions du modèle OCEAN de la personnalité, facilitant la paramétrisation du comportement des agents utilisant ces moteurs

, Perspectives Le chapitre 6 montre que BEN est utilisable à l'heure actuelle et qu'il remplit ses objectifs dans la définition de comportements d'agents sociaux pour un résultat crédible. Aussi, BEN a été utilisé sur d'autres cas d'étude par d'autres modélisateurs : pour étudier le comportement d'agriculteurs au Vietnam

, ou encore pour étudier l'évacuation d'une population lors des incendies de brousse en Australie, vol.17

, Ces différentes utilisations montrent que BEN offre des comportements plus crédibles que d'autres architectures comportementales [Tru16] et est jugé plus simple à utiliser qu'une machine à états finis, vol.17

, Le but serait de montrer que l'architecture peut s'adapter à n'importe quel contexte grâce à son formalisme basé sur le concept généraliste de prédicat pour représenter l'environnement des agents. L'utilisation de l'architecture par un public plus large permettrait aussi de récupérer des retours sur la facilité d'utilisation ainsi que sur les possibilités de comportement offertes pour des situations précises. À l'avenir, BEN pourrait être amené à évoluer. La version présentée dans cette thèse représente une base qu'il est possible de compléter. Ainsi, il pourrait être ajouté un processus permettant de gérer l, Pour autant, il serait intéressant de tester l'architecture et son implémentation sur d'autres cas d'étude, qu'il s'agisse d'évacuation ou d'autres domaines d'études

G. Andrighetto, M. Campennì, R. Conte, and M. Paolucci, On the immergence of norms : a normative agent architecture, Proceedings of AAAI symposium, social and organizational aspects of intelligence, vol.17, p.23, 2007.

G. Andrighetto, R. Conte, P. Turrini, and M. Paolucci, Emergence in the loop : Simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2007.

C. Adam, Emotions : from psychological theories to logical formalization and implementation in a BDI agent, vol.33, p.66, 2007.

C. Adam and B. Gaudou, Bdi agents in social simulations : a survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.30, p.42, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01363962

F. Amblard and D. Phan, Modélisation et simulation multi-agents : Applications pour les Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société, Hermes science publ, issue.7, 2006.

F. Amblard, J. Rouchier, P. Bommel, F. Varenne, and D. Phan, Evaluation et validation de modèles multi-agents, p.111, 2006.

A. Magda, Emotion and personality, p.31, 1960.

C. Adam, P. Taillandier, J. Dugdale, and B. Gaudou, Bdi vs fsm agents in social simulations for raising awareness in disasters : A case study in melbourne bushfires, International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), vol.9, issue.1, p.120, 2017.

B. Atiyeh, Brazilian kiss nightclub disaster. Annals of burns and fire disasters, vol.26, p.112, 2013.

R. Axelrod, Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences, Simulating social phenomena, vol.2, p.13, 1997.

M. D. Byrne and J. R. Anderson, Perception and action. The atomic components of thought, vol.16, p.42, 1998.

. Sigal-g-barsade, The ripple effect : Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.47, issue.4, p.36, 2002.

J. Barylick, Killer Show : The Station Nightclub Fire, America's Deadliest Rock Concert. UPNE, vol.113, p.117, 2012.

L. Bègue, J. Beauvois, D. Courbet, D. Oberlé, J. Lepage et al., Personality predicts obedience in a milgram paradigm, Journal of Personality, vol.83, issue.3, p.74, 2015.

F. Bellifemine, F. Bergenti, G. Caire, and A. Poggi, Jade-a java agent development framework, Multi-Agent Programming, pp.125-147

. Springer, , 2005.

N. Becu, P. Bommel, C. L. Page, and F. Bousquet, Cormas, une plate-forme multi-agent pour concevoir collectivement des modèles et interagir avec les simulations, Journées Francophones sur les Systèmes Multi-Agents (JFSMA). Cépaduès, vol.2, p.11, 2016.

F. Bousquet, I. Bakam, H. Proton, and C. L. Page, Cormas : common-pool resources and multi-agent systems, International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, p.11, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-64574-8_469

T. Bickmore and J. Cassell, Relational agents : a model and implementation of building user trust, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.38, 2001.

J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, Z. Huang, and L. Van-der-torre, The boid architecture : conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires, Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents, vol.18, p.71, 2001.

T. Bosse, R. Duell, Z. Ali-memon, J. Treur, C. Van-der et al., Multi-agent model for mutual absorption of emotions, ECMS, vol.22, p.62, 2009.

T. Balke and N. Gilbert, How do agents make decisions ? a survey, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.17, issue.4, p.26, 2014.

P. Brown and . Stephen-c-levinson, Politeness : Some universals in language usage, vol.4, p.38, 1987.

J. Bradley, C. Best, and . Lebiere, Cognition and multi-agent interaction : From cognitive modeling to social simulation, vol.17, p.23, 2006.

F. Bousquet, C. L. Page, and J. Müller, Modélisation et simulation multi-agent, Assises nationales du GDR I3, 2002.

M. Bratman, Intentions, plans, and practical reason, vol.49, p.69, 1987.

J. Brauer, The visualworks development environment, Programming smalltalk-Object-orientation from the beginning, p.11, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-658-06823-3_5

L. Breton, GranuLab : Un système d'aide à la découverte scientifique pour la physique des milieux granulaires, vol.6, 2002.

M. Balmer, M. Rieser, K. Meister, D. Charypar, N. Lefebvre et al., Matsim-t : Architecture and simulation times. Multiagent systems for traffic and transportation engineering, p.16, 2009.

J. Bruner, A study of thinking, vol.25, p.27, 2017.

M. Bourgais, P. Taillandier, L. Vercouter, and C. Adam, Emotion modeling in social simulation : A survey, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.21, issue.2, p.31, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01758755

G. Boella, L. Van-der-torre, and H. Verhagen, Introduction to normative multiagent systems, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, vol.12, issue.2-3, p.17, 2006.

B. Walter and . Cannon, The james-lange theory of emotions : A critical examination and an alternative theory, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.39, issue.1/4, p.31, 1927.

. Raymond, The scree test for the number of factors, Multivariate behavioral research, vol.1, issue.2, p.34, 1966.

C. Chivas and J. Cescon, Formalisation du savoir et des outils dans le domaine des risques majeurs (dra-35)-toxicité et dispersion des fumées d'incendie phénoménologie et modélisation des effets, INERIS, p.102, 2005.

R. Conte and C. Castelfranchi, Cognitive and social action. Garland Science, p.22, 2016.

C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, M. Catholijn, J. Jonker, and . Treur, Deliberative normative agents : Principles and architecture, International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, p.22, 1999.

P. Coquillard, R. C. David, T. Hill, and . Sime-ngando, Modélisation et simulation d'écosystèmes : des modèles déterministes aux simulations à évènements discrets, 1997.

R. Philip, H. J. Cohen, and . Levesque, Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial intelligence, vol.42, issue.2-3, p.44, 1990.

L. Nancy, L. C. Collins, and . Miller, Self-disclosure and liking : a meta-analytic review, Psychological bulletin, p.69, 1994.

I. Cil and M. Mala, A multi-agent architecture for modelling and simulation of small military unit combat in asymmetric warfare, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.37, issue.2, pp.1331-1343, 2010.

N. Collier, Repast : An extensible framework for agent simulation. The University of Chicago's Social Science Research, vol.36, p.10, 2003.

C. Cioffi-revilla, S. Paus, S. Luke, J. L. Olds, and J. Thomas, Mnemonic structure and sociality : a computational agent-based simulation model, Proceedings of the Conference on Collective Intentionality IV, pp.1-11, 2004.

A. Damasio, Descartes' Error, Emotion Reason and the Human Brain. Grosset/Putnam, vol.36, p.42, 1994.

P. Davidsson, Agent based social simulation : A computer science view, Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, vol.5, issue.1, 2002.

F. Dignum, V. Dignum, and C. Jonker, Towards agents for policy making, International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, vol.18, p.23, 2008.

F. Dignum, Autonomous agents with norms, Artificial intelligence and law, vol.7, issue.1, p.41, 1999.

C. Joseph-de-rivera and . Grinkis, Emotions as social relationships, Motivation and emotion, vol.10, issue.4, p.68, 1986.

. Hans-jurgen-eysenck, Manual of the Eysenck personality inventory, p.34, 1964.

J. Hans, M. W. Eysenck, and . Eysenck, Personality and individual differences, p.34, 1987.

S. El-tawil, J. Fang, B. Aguirre, and E. Best, A computational study of the station nightclub fire accounting for social relationships, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.20, issue.4, p.117, 2017.

J. Hans and . Eysenck, Dimensions of personality, vol.5, p.34, 1950.

J. Hans and . Eysenck, Biological dimensions of personality. Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research, p.34, 1990.

E. Hans-jurgen, Dimensions of personality : 16, 5 or 3 ?-criteria for a taxonomic paradigm, Personality and individual differences, vol.12, issue.8, p.50, 1991.

. Bibliographie,

S. Freud, J. Breuer, A. Berman, and J. Breuer, Études sur l'hystérie. Presses universitaires de France, vol.25, p.26, 1956.

J. Ferber, Les systèmes multi-agents : vers une intelligence collective. InterEditions, 1997.

H. Nico, P. Frijda, E. T. Kuipers, and . Schure, Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness, Journal of personality and social psychology, vol.57, issue.2, p.31, 1989.

J. Paul-forgas, Affect in social judgments and decisions : A multiprocess model, Advances in experimental social psychology, vol.25, pp.227-275, 1921.

H. Gardner, Histoire de la révolution cognitive, p.42, 1993.

P. Gebhard, Alma : a layered model of affect, Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol.21, p.23, 2005.

P. Jack and . Gibbs, Norms : The problem of definition and classification, American Journal of Sociology, vol.70, issue.5, p.39, 1965.

K. Gill and E. A. Laposata, Factors impacting injury and fatality in the station nightclub fire, vol.114, p.117, 2010.

J. Gratch and S. Marsella, A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion, Cognitive Systems Research, vol.23, p.43, 1920.

J. Gratch and S. Marsella, Evaluating a computational model of emotion, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol.11, issue.1, pp.23-43, 2005.

J. Gratch, Socially situated planning, Socially Intelligent Agents, p.37, 2002.

N. Gilbert and K. Troitzsch, Simulation for the social scientist. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), vol.2, p.9, 2005.

A. Grignard, P. Taillandier, and B. Gaudou, Duc An Vo, Nghi Quang Huynh, and Alexis Drogoul. GAMA 1.6 : Advancing the Art of Complex Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation, vol.79, p.80, 2013.

E. Hatfield, J. T. Cacioppo, and R. Rapson, Emotional contagion. Current directions in psychological science, vol.2, p.52, 1993.

A. E. Henninger, R. M. Jones, and E. Chown, Behaviors that emerge from emotion and cognition : implementation and evaluation of a symbolicconnectionist architecture, Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, p.20, 2003.

H. Cars and . Hommes, Interacting agents in finance, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, issue.1, 2006.

N. Howden, R. Rönnquist, A. Hodgson, and A. Lucas, Jack intelligent agents-summary of an agent infrastructure, 5th International conference on autonomous agents, 2001.

F. Jomi, J. Hübner, O. Simao-sichman, and . Boissier, A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems, In Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, vol.17, p.41, 2002.

K. Isbister, Better game characters by design : A psychological approach, Elsevier, p.38, 2006.

W. Jager, Enhancing the realism of simulation (eros) : On implementing and developing psychological theory in social simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.20, issue.3, p.15, 2017.

H. Jones, J. Saunier, and D. Lourdeaux, Personality, emotions and physiology in a BDI agent architecture : The PEP-> BDI model, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol.02, pp.263-266, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00462097

M. Randolph-m-jones, J. E. Tambe, P. Laird, and . Rosenbloom, Intelligent automated agents for flight training simulators, vol.17, p.31, 1993.

H. Jiang, J. M. Vidal, and . Huhns, EBDI : an architecture for emotional agents, Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, p.23, 1920.

K. Kravari and N. Bassiliades, A survey of agent platforms, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.18, issue.1, p.11, 2015.

W. Kaye-blake, C. Schilling, and E. Post, Validation of an agricultural mas for southland, new zealand, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.17, issue.4, 2014.

D. I. Adam, J. E. Kramer, J. Guillory, and . Hancock, Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.111, issue.24, p.36, 2014.

D. Keltner and J. Haidt, Social functions of emotions, p.68, 2001.

B. Knutson, Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, p.68, 1996.

H. Kohut, Forms and transformations of narcissism, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic association, vol.14, issue.2, p.37, 1966.

M. Kollingbaum, Norm-governed practical reasoning agents, vol.18, p.23, 2005.

J. Kreft, C. Picioreanu, W. T. Julian, M. Wimpenny, and . Van-loosdrecht, Individual-based modelling of biofilms, Microbiology, vol.147, issue.11, pp.2897-2912, 2001.

L. John, The Soar cognitive architecture, p.28, 2012.

S. Luke, C. Cioffi-revilla, L. Panait, K. Sullivan, and G. Balan, Mason : A multiagent simulation environment, SIMULATION, vol.81, issue.7, p.10, 2005.

M. Lhommet, D. Lourdeaux, and J. Barthès, Never alone in the crowd : A microscopic crowd model based on emotional contagion, Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol.2, p.22, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00658016

M. Lhommet, D. Lourdeaux, and J. Barthès, Foule sentimentale : influence des caractéristiques individuelles sur la contagion émotionnelle. Revue d, Intelligence Artificielle, vol.26, issue.3, p.43, 2012.

A. John-e-laird, P. Newell, and . Rosenbloom, Soar : An architecture for general intelligence, Artificial intelligence, vol.28, p.42, 1987.

V. Montenegro, D. Adamatti, M. V. Scholl, B. Corrêa, and M. Zinelli, Multi-agent simulation of a real evacuation scenario : Kiss nightclub and the panic factor, EUMAS, vol.100, p.111, 2017.

E. G. Macatulad and A. C. Blanco, 3dgis-based multi-agent geosimulation and visualization of building evacuation using gama platform. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, p.97, 2014.

N. Malleson, A. Heppenstall, and L. See, Crime reduction through simulation : An agent-based model of burglary. Computers, environment and urban systems, vol.34, pp.236-250, 2010.

A. George and . Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two : Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological review, vol.63, issue.2, p.27, 1956.

S. Milgram, Behavioral study of obedience, The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, vol.67, issue.4, p.61, 1963.

R. Robert and O. Mccrae, An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications, Journal of personality, vol.60, issue.2, p.65, 1992.

I. Briggs-myers, M. H. Mccaulley, and R. Most, Manual, a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator, vol.34, p.43, 1985.

J. Meyer and . Wieringa, Deontic logic in computer science normative system specification, p.17, 1993.

. Karen-l-myers, User guide for the procedural reasoning system, SRI International AI Center Technical Report, vol.13, p.23, 1997.

J. Michael, . North, . Tom-r-howe, T. Nicholson, J. R. Collier et al., A declarative model assembly infrastructure for verification and validation, Advancing social simulation : The first world congress, pp.129-140, 2007.

E. J. Norling, Modelling human behaviour with BDI agents, vol.28, p.43, 2009.

A. Ortony, A. Gerald-l-clore, and . Collins, The cognitive structure of emotions, vol.32, p.65, 1990.

M. Occello, Méthodologie et architectures pour la conception de systèmes multi-agents. Mémoire d'Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches, 2003.

A. Ortony, W. Kessen, and F. Craik, Memories, Thoughts and Emotions : Essays in Honour of George Mandler. LEA, vol.38, p.68, 1991.

A. Ortony, On making believable emotional agents believable, p.34, 2002.

M. Ochs, N. Sabouret, and V. Corruble, Simulation de la dynamique des émotions et des relations sociales de personnages virtuels, Revue des Sciences et Technologies de l'Information-Série RIA : Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, vol.23, p.39, 2009.

M. Ochs, N. Sabouret, and V. Corruble, Simulation of the dynamics of nonplayer characters' emotions and social relations in games, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, vol.1, issue.4, p.67, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01793296

K. R. Popper, Objective knowledge : An evolutionary approach. Ox-43, 1972.

P. Ivan-pavlov, Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex, Annals of neurosciences, vol.17, issue.3, p.26, 2010.

A. Pokahr, L. Braubach, and W. Lamersdorf, Jadex : A bdi reasoning engine, Multi-agent programming, 2005.

P. Philippot and . Robert-s-feldman, Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships, The regulation of emotion, p.38, 2004.

H. Prendinger and M. Ishizuka, Social role awareness in animated agents, Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents, p.38, 2001.

L. Panait and S. Luke, A pheromone-based utility model for collaborative foraging, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on, pp.36-43, 2004.

. Anand-s-rao, Agentspeak (l) : Bdi agents speak out in a logical computable language, European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, p.30, 1996.

J. A. Rincon, . Costa, J. Novais, and C. Carrascosa, A dynamic emotional model for agent societies, Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection, vol.21, p.31, 2016.

M. P. Anand-s-rao and . Georgeff, Bdi agents : from theory to practice, ICMAS, vol.95, p.29, 1995.

D. Rousseau and B. Hayes-roth, A social-psychological model for synthetic actors, Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents, vol.37, p.38, 1998.

W. Rand, J. Herrmann, B. Schein, and N. Vodopivec, An agentbased model of urgent diffusion in social media, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.18, issue.2, 2015.

A. James, A. Russell, and . Mehrabian, Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions, Journal of research in Personality, vol.31, p.43, 1977.

R. Rönnquist, The goal oriented teams (gorite) framework. In International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems, p.16, 2007.

S. Nur-raihan-ramli, M. Razali, and . Osman, An overview of simulation software for non-experts to perform multi-robot experiments, p.97, 2015.

A. Marie-rocheblave-spenlé, La notion de rôle en psychologie sociale : étude historico-critique. Presses universitaires de France, vol.37, p.44, 1962.

G. Santos, . Benigno, and . Aguirre, A critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models, p.100, 2004.

R. Bastin-tony, S. Savarimuthu, and . Cranefield, A categorization of simulation works on norms, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, p.40, 2009.

N. Michelle, B. Shiota, D. Campos, M. Keltner, and . Hertenstein, Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships. The regulation of emotion, p.68, 2004.

D. Servat, Application aux processus de ruissellement, infiltration et érosion, vol.6, 2000.

F. Schweitzer and D. Garcia, An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities, The European Physical Journal B, vol.21, p.31, 2010.

J. Simpson, Simulations are not models, 2006.

F. Burrhus and . Skinner, The behavior of organisms : An experimental analysis. BF Skinner Foundation, p.27, 1990.

I. Sakellariou, P. Kefalas, and I. Stamatopoulou, Enhancing netlogo to simulate bdi communicating agents, Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol.12, p.43, 2008.

A. Craig, R. S. Smith, and . Lazarus, Emotion and adaptation. Handbook of personality : Theory and research, vol.33, p.121, 1990.

R. Eliot, D. M. Smith, and . Mackie, Social psychology, p.68, 2014.

R. Sun, E. Merrill, and T. Peterson, From implicit skills to explicit knowledge : A bottom-up model of skill learning, Cognitive science, vol.25, issue.2, p.42, 2001.

D. Singh, L. Padgham, and B. Logan, Integrating bdi agents with agent-based simulation platforms, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol.30, issue.6, p.15, 2016.

S. Schachter and J. Singer, Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state, Psychological review, vol.69, issue.5, p.31, 1962.

R. Klaus, K. R. Scherer, P. Scherer, and . Ekman, On the nature and function of emotion : A component process approach. Approaches to emotion, p.31, 1984.

T. Stratulat, Systèmes d'agents normatifs : concepts et outils logiques, p.41, 2002.

R. Sun, Cognition and multi-agent interaction : From cognitive modeling to social simulation, vol.2, p.17, 2006.

R. Sun, The importance of cognitive architectures : An analysis based on clarion, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol.19, issue.2, pp.159-193, 2007.

J. Svennevig, Getting acquainted in conversation : a study of initial interactions, vol.22, p.55, 2000.

P. Taillandier, M. Bourgais, P. Caillou, C. Adam, and B. Gaudou, A situated BDI agent architecture for the GAMA modelling and simulation platform, 17th International Workshop on Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, vol.43, p.79, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01690132

P. Taillandier, M. Bourgais, P. Caillou, C. Adam, and B. Gaudou, A bdi agent architecture for the gama modeling and simulation platform, Luis Gustavo Nardin and Luis Antunes, p.97, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01391002

P. Taillandier, M. Bourgais, A. Drogoul, and L. Vercouter, Using parallel computing to improve the scalability of models with bdi agents, Social Simulation Conference, p.98, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01573385

J. Treuil, A. Drogoul, and J. Zucker, Modélisation et simulation à base d'agents : exemples commentés, outils informatiques et questions théoriques. Dunod, vol.1, p.9, 2008.

J. Tsai, N. Fridman, E. Bowring, M. Brown, S. Epstein et al., Escapes : evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison, The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol.2, p.19, 2011.

G. Therborn, Back to norms ! on the scope and dynamics of norms and normative action, Current Sociology, vol.50, issue.6, p.40, 2002.

. Bibliographie,

J. Tubbs and B. Meacham, Egress design solutions : A guide to evacuation and crowd management planning, vol.113, p.117, 2007.

F. Taillandier, A. Micolier, P. Taillandier, and . Li-bim, , 2017.

C. Truong, Integrating cognitive models of human decision-making in agentbased models : an application to land use planning under climate change in the Mekong river delta, p.120, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01543066

C. Quang, P. Truong, B. Taillandier, M. Q. Gaudou, T. Vo et al., Exploring agent architectures for farmer behavior in land-use change. a case study in coastal area of the vietnamese mekong delta, International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, vol.95, p.120, 2015.

R. Tuomela, The importance of us : A philosophical study of basic social notions, vol.39, p.52, 1995.

H. Van-dyke, R. Parunak, S. Bisson, R. Brueckner, J. Matthews et al., A model of emotions for situated agents, Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol.21, p.23, 1920.

C. Natalie-van-der-wal, D. Formolo, M. Mark-a-robinson, T. Minkov, and . Bosse, Simulating crowd evacuation with socio-cultural, cognitive, and emotional elements, Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII, p.22, 2017.

M. Valette and B. Gaudou, Modeling a real-case situation of egress using bdi agents with emotions and social skills, PRIMA, p.117, 2018.

. John-b-watson, Psychology as the behaviorist views it, Psychological review, vol.20, issue.2, p.27, 1913.

D. Watson and L. A. Clark, On traits and temperament : General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model, Journal of personality, vol.60, issue.2, p.34, 1992.

A. Marilyn, J. E. Walker, S. Cahn, and . Whittaker, Improvising linguistic style : Social and affective bases for agent personality, Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents, vol.37, p.38, 1997.

U. Wilensky and . Evanston, Netlogo : Center for connected learning and computerbased modeling, Northwestern Univ, vol.2, p.11, 1999.

M. Wooldridge, An introduction to multiagent systems, vol.1, 2009.

F. López-y-lópez, M. Luck, and M. Inverno, A normative framework for agent-based systems, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, vol.12, issue.2-3, p.52, 2006.

. Robert-b-zajonc, Social facilitation, Science, vol.149, issue.3681, p.38, 1965.