S. Bech, Methods for subjective evaluation of spatial characteristics of sound, Proceedings of the 16 th AES International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 1999.

J. Berg and F. Rumsey, Spatial attribute identification and scaling by repertory grid technique and other methods, Proceedings of the 16 th AES International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 1999.

G. Kelly, The psychology of personal constructs, 1955.

J. Berg, Evaluation of perceived spatial audio quality, Proceedings of the 9th World MultiConference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol.4, pp.10-14, 2005.

J. Berg, OPAQUE-A tool for the elicitation and grading of audio quality attributes". Presented at AES 118 th Convention, 2005.

S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound". Presented at AES 118 th Convention, 2005.

B. Ganter and R. Wille, Format Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations, 1999.

J. P. Doignon and J. C. Falmagne, Knowledge Spaces, 1999.

J. Heller, Representation and Assessment of Individual Semantic Knowledge

S. Le-bagousse, State of the art on subjective assessment of spatial sound quality AES 38th International Conference, pp.13-15, 2010.

, Psychological Research, vol.5, pp.1-37, 2000.

S. Bech and N. Zacharov, Perceptual Audio Evaluation Theory, Method and Application, 2006.

F. Rumsey, Subjective assessment of the spatial attributes of reproduced sound, Proceedings of the 15 th AES International Conference on Audio, Acoustics & Small Spaces, 1998.

P. Susini, S. Mcadams, and S. Winsberg, A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment, vol.85, pp.650-656, 1999.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01105599

C. Guastavino and B. Katz, Perceptual evaluation of multi-dimensional spatial audio reproduction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.116, issue.2, pp.1105-1115, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01780529

S. and L. Bagousse, Etude perceptive et acoustique du timbre de la voix chantée dans le contexte des répertoires de tradition orale, Ircam, 2007.

J. M. Grey, Multidimensional perceptual scaling of music timbres, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.61, pp.122-135, 1977.

A. Gabrielsson and H. Sjögren, Perceived sound quality of sound reproduction systems, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.65, issue.4, 1979.

F. Toole, Subjective measurements of loudspeaker sound quality and listener performance, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, vol.33, pp.2-32, 1985.

F. Rumsey and J. Berg, Verification and correlation of attributes used for describing the spatial quality of reproduced sound, Presented at the AES 19 th International Conference on Surround Sound, 2001.

K. Koivuniemi and N. Zacharov, Unraveling the perception of spatial sound reproduction: Language development, verbal protocol analysis and listener training, Proceedings of the AES 111 th Convention, 2001.

T. Nakayama, T. Miura, O. Kosaka, M. Okamoto, and T. Shiga, Subjective assessment of multichannel reproduction, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, vol.19, issue.9, pp.744-751, 1971.

G. Lorho, Evaluation of spatial enhancement systems for stereo headphone reproduction by preference and attribute rating". Presented at AES 118 th Convention, 2005.

J. Berg and F. Rumsey, Systematic evaluation of perceived spatial quality, Presented at the AES 24 th International Conference on Multichannel Audio, 2003.

T. H. Pedersen and N. Zacharov, How many psycho-acoustic attributes are needed, Acoustics'08, 2008.

F. Rumsey, Spatial quality evaluation for reproduced sound: terminology, meaning and a scene-based paradigm, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, vol.50, issue.9, pp.651-666, 2002.

F. Rumsey, Spatial audio and sensory evaluation techniques-context, history and aims, Proceedings of Spatial audio & sensory evaluation techniques conference, 2006.

S. Zielinski, On some biases encountered in modern listening tests, Proceedings of Spatial audio & sensory evaluation techniques conference, 2006.

S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: Scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.121, issue.1, pp.388-400, 2007.

J. Berg and F. Rumsey, Validity of selected spatial attributes in the evaluation of 5-channel microphone techniques". Presented at AES 112 th Convention, 2002.

P. Marins, F. Rumsey, and S. Zielinski, Unraveling the relationship between basic audio quality and fidelity attributes in low bit-rate multi-channel audio codecs". Presented at AES 118 th Convention, 2008.

F. Rumsey, S. Zielinski, R. Kassier, and S. Bech, On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality, Journal

J. Berg and F. Rumsey, Spatial attribute identification and scaling by repertory grid technique and other methods, AES International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 1999.

S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound, Presented at AES 118 th Convention, 2005.

J. M. Grey, Multidimensional perceptual scaling of music timbres, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.61, pp.122-135, 1977.

, Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems, ITU-R Recommendation BS.1116-1, 1997.

I. Recommendation and B. S. , Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, pp.1534-1535, 2003.

T. Letowski, Sound Quality Assessment: Concepts and Criteria, 1821.

J. Berg and F. Rumsey, Systematic evaluation of perceived spatial quality, AES 24 th International Conference on Multichannel Audio, 2003.

S. Le-bagousse, C. Colomes, and M. Paquier, State of the art on subjective assessment of spatial audio quality, AES International Conference on Sound Quality Evaluation, pp.13-15, 2010.

J. H. Ward, Hierarchical Grouping to optimize an objective function, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.58, pp.236-244, 1963.

S. Bech and N. Zacharov, Perceptual Audio Evaluation Theory, Method and Application, 2006.

F. Rumsey, Subjective assessment of the spatial attributes of reproduced sound" presented at the 15 th AES International Conference on Audio, Acoustics & Small Spaces, 1998.

S. Zielinski, P. Brooks, and F. Rumsey, On the use of graphic scales in modern listening tests, 2007.

J. Carroll and J. J. Chang, analyses of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of 'EckartYoung' decomposition, Psychometrika, vol.35, pp.283-319, 1970.

, Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, ITU-R Recommendation BS.1534, 2003.

S. Le-bagousse, M. Paquier, and C. Colomes, State of the art on subjective assessment of spatial sound quality, AES Int. Conf. on Sound Quality Evaluation, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827806

S. Le-bagousse, M. Paquier, and C. Colomes, Families of sound attributes for assessment of spatial audio, AES 129th Convention, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827799

P. Marin, F. Rumsey, and S. Zielinski, Unraveling the relationship between basic audio quality and fidelity attributes in low bit-rate multi-channel audio codecs, AES 124th Convention, 2008.

, Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems, ITU-R Recommendation BS.1116, 1997.

B. S. Itu-r-recommendation, Multichannel stereophonic sound system with and without accompanying picture, Tech. Rep, vol.775, 1994.

E. 3324, EBU evaluations of multichannel audio codecs, European Broascasting Union, Tech. Rep, 2007.

A. Mason, D. Marston, F. Kozamernik, and G. Stoll, EBU tests of multi-channel audio codecs, AES 122th Convention, 2007.

S. Zielinski, P. Brooks, and F. Rumsey, On the use of graphic scales in modern listening tests, AES 123th Convention, 2007.

F. Rumsey, S. Zielinski, R. Kassier, and S. Bech, On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.118, issue.2, pp.968-976, 2005.

. , Table des figures I.1 Représentation des signaux incidents aux oreilles ipsilatérale (point A) et controlatérale (point B) (Moulin, 2011)

. , Configuration 5.1 (ITU-R BS.775-2, 2006)

, Principales étapes d'une méthode de test, p.22, 2008.

, Exemple d'interface issue de CRC (SEAQ) pour la méthode ITU-R BS

, Exemple d'interface de CRC (SEAQ) pour la méthode ITU-R BS, p.25, 1997.

, Exemple de fiche d'évaluation donnée aux auditeurs, EBU Tech, vol.3286, issue.6, p.27, 1997.

. , Représentation des résultats sous la forme d'un diagramme radar, vol.3286, 1997.

. , Echelles proposées par la recommandation ITU-R BS

. Zielinski, 30 I.10 Exemple de dispersion des sujets par l'utilisation de l'échelle de dégradation, Synthèse des résultats obtenus pour vérifier la linéarité des termes utilisés dans les échelles de qualité, 2007.

). .. , Exemple de grille-répertoire pour un sujet, p.34, 2005.

). .. , , p.37, 2003.

. , Interface de test pour la MDS

. Courbe-du-stress and R. .. Du,

. , Espace perceptif, dimension 1 et 2

. , Interface de test pour la catégorisation libre

. , Interface de test utilisée pour l'évaluation de la qualité globale, p.54

. , Interfaces de test utilisées pour l'évaluation de chaque attribut, p.55

D. .. Espace, Interface de test utilisée pour la présentation simultanée des attributs Timbre

. .. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% obtenus par les différentes versions selon le mode de présentation des attributs Timbre Espace et Défauts successivement (Groupe 1) et simultanément (Groupe 2), p.56

. , III.5 Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% des différentes versions pour chaque attribut évalué

. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% de la version "ancreS" pour chaque extrait evalué lors de l'évaluation de l'attribut Espace, p.59

, Table des figures

. , Qualité globale, valeurs prédites vs valeurs observées

, Exemple d'utilisation du module de synthèse binaurale "VLEncoder, p.64

. , Séquence de clics et bruit rose ajoutés à la version originale pour créer l'ancrage Défauts

. , Description de l'ancrage spatial

. .. Attribut, 66 IV.5 Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour l'évaluation de la qualité globale, Description des ancrages spécifiques à chaque

. .. Attributs, 68 IV.7 Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% de l'ancrage spatial pour l'évaluation de l'Espace, IV.6 Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour les 3

, Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% de l'ancrage spatial et des quatre codages en fonction de chaque extrait pour l'évaluation de l'Espace, p.70

, Prédiction de la qualité globale : valeurs observées vs valeurs prédites, p.71

. , AncreS" lors de l'évaluation de l'attribut Espace dans les chapitres, Moyennes et intervalles de confiance obtenus par

. , Perception de la réduction de l'image sonore

. , Mouvement circulaire du son de la gauche vers la droite avec les correspondances temporelles

. .. Attribut-espace, 80 V.5 Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour chaque version lors de l'évaluation de l'attribut Espace

, InvR/L" pour les six extraits évalués à la fois dans le chapitre IV et dans le chapitre en cours, p.81

. , InvR/L" pour les huit extraits évalués, Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% de la version

. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour chaque version et chaque extrait lors de l'évaluation de l'attribut Espace

. , Tracé des coefficients ? et ?

, Interface de test pour l'évaluation de la qualité globale, p.85

. , Interface de test pour l'évaluation des trois attributs de qualité : Timbre, Espace

, Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour la qualité globale, p.86

. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour la qualité globale sur les 7 extraits évalués dans les deux tests

. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour les trois attributs Timbre, vol.87

, Moyennes de chaque versions en fonction des extraits pour l'attribut Espace, vol.88

. , Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour l'attribut Espace sur les 7 extraits évalués dans les deux tests

, VII.1Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour la qualité globale, p.92

. , VII.2Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour la qualité globale en comparaison les résultats du chapitre VI

. , VII.3Moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% pour les trois attributs.. .. .. 93 VII.4Comparaison des moyennes et intervalles de confiance à 95% avec les résultats du chapitre VI

.. .. Viii.1-l'échelle-de-qualité,

, Interface de test pour l'évaluation de la qualité globale, p.99

, Interface de test pour l'évaluation du Timbre, de l'Espace et des Défauts, p.100

. , Liste des tableaux I.1 Notation des haut-parleurs

. , Échelle catégorielle de la méthode EBU Tech 3286

. , Synthèse d'études sur les attributs de qualité

. , Liste d'attributs proposée pour la catégorisation

.. .. , 42 II.6 Noms des familles d'attributs donnés par les testeurs, Classification des attributs selon les dimensions 1

. , Valeurs du post-hoc de Tukey entre la version, Original

, Valeurs de corrélation entre les quatre attributs de qualité, p.59

, Les valeurs du post-hoc LSD de Fisher entre les huit versions évaluées, p.68

, Valeurs de corrélation entre les quatre attributs de qualité, p.71

. .. Iv, 72 IV.6 Valeurs de corrélation entre les quatre attributs de qualité calculées uniquement sur les quatre codages, Comparaison des coefficients ? obtenus

. , Corrélation entre les quatre attributs de qualité

. , Corrélation en tenant compte uniquement des quatre codages (sans ancres, sans l'original)

. , 95 VII.4Comparaison des coefficients ? obtenus chapitre IV, VI et VII en prenant en compte uniquement les codages

V. R. Bibliographie-algazi, C. Avendano, and R. O. Et-duda, Elevation localization and headrelated transfer function analysis at low frequencies, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.109, pp.1110-1122, 2001.

V. R. Algazi, R. O. Duda, R. Duraiswami, N. A. Gumerov, and Z. Tang, Approximating the head-related transfer function using simple geometric models of the head and torso, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.112, pp.2053-2064, 2002.

V. R. Algazi, R. O. Duda, and D. M. Et-thompson, The use of head-and-torso models for improved spatial sound synthesis, 2002.

H. Autti and J. Biström, Mobile audio-from mp3 to aac and further, Multimedia Seminar : Mobile Multimedia Application Platforms, 2004.

D. W. Batteau, The role of pinna in human localization, Proc. R. Soc. London, pp.158-180, 1967.

S. Bech, Methods for subjective evaluation of spatial characteristics of sound, presented at the 16th AES International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 1999.

J. Berg, Opaque-a tool for the elicitation and grading of audio quality attributes, 2005.

J. Berg, Evaluation of perceived spatial audio quality, Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol.4, pp.10-14, 2006.

J. Berg and F. Et-rumsey, Spatial attribute identification and scaling by repertory grid technique and other methods, 16th AES International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 1999.

J. Berg and F. Et-rumsey, In search of the spatial dimensions of reproduced sound : Verbal protocol analysis and cluster analysis of scaled verbal descriptors, 2000.

J. Berg and F. Et-rumsey, Verification and correlation of attributes used for describing the spatial quality of reproduced sound, 19th AES International Conference on Surround Sound, 2001.

J. Berg and F. Et-rumsey, Systematic evaluation of perceived spatial quality, 24th AES International Conference on Multichannel Audio, 2003.

I. Borg and P. Et-groenen, Modern multidimensional scaling : Theory and applications, 2005.

. Bibliographie,

K. Brandenburg, Mp3 and aac explained, presented at the 17th International Conference on High-Quality Audio Coding, 1999.

S. Busson, Individualisation d'indices acoustiques pour la synthèse binaurale, 2006.

J. Carroll and J. Chang, Analyses of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of 'eckart-young' decomposition, Psychometroka, vol.35, pp.283-319, 1970.

P. Cheminée and D. Dubois, Le sentir et le dire : concepts et méthodes en psychologie, 2009.

S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.54, pp.815-826, 2006.

S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound : Sacling auditory attributes underlying listener preferenceextraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.121, pp.388-400, 2007.

P. Cossette, L'organisation : Une perspective cognitiviste (Les Presses de l'Université Laval), 2004.

C. P. Dancey, J. Reidy, and N. Et-traduction-de-gauvrit, Statistiques sans maths pour psychologues : SPSS pour Windows, QCM et exercices corrigés, 2007.

J. Doignon and J. Et-falmagne, Knowledge Spaces, 1998.

R. O. Duda and W. L. Martens, Range dependence of the response of a spherical head model, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.104, pp.3048-3058, 1998.

, Ebu report on the subjective listening tests of some commercial internet audio codecs. document bpn 029, 2000.

, Mushra-method for subjective listening tests of intermediate audio quality. draft ebu recommandation, b/aim 022 (rev.8)/bmc 607rev, 2000.

, Listening conditions for the assessment of sound programme material : monophonic and two-channel stereophonic, Europeen Broadcasting Union, vol.3276, 1997.

, Assessment methods for the subjective evaluation of the quality of sound programme material-music, EBU Tech, vol.3286, 1997.

, Assessment methods for the subjective evaluation of the quality of sound programme material-multichannel, EBU Tech 3286 Supp, vol.1, 2000.

T. Etame, Conception de signaux de référence pour l'évaluation de la qualité perçue des codeurs de la parole et du son, 2008.

A. Gabrielsson and H. Et-sjögren, Perceived sound quality of sound reproduction systems, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.65, pp.1019-1033, 1979.

B. Ganter, R. Wille, and C. Et-franzke, Formal Concept Analysis : Mathematical Foundations, 1997.

J. Grey, Multidimensional perceptual scaling of music timbres, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.61, pp.122-135, 1977.

C. Guastavino and B. Katz, Perceptual evaluation of multi-dimensional spatial audio reproduction, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.116, pp.1105-1115, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01780529

P. Guillon, Individualisation des indices spectraux pour la synthèse binaurale : recherche et exploitation des similarités inter-individuelles pour l'adaptation ou la reconstruction de hrtf, 2009.

R. Guski, Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information, Acta Acustica, vol.83, pp.765-774, 1997.

J. Hebrank and D. Wright, Spectral cues used in the localization of sound sources on the median plane, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.56, pp.1829-1834, 1974.

J. Heller, Representation and assessment of individual semantic knowledge, Method of Psychological Research, vol.5, pp.1-37, 2000.

P. Hofman, J. V. Riswick, and A. V. Opstal, Relearning sound localization with new ears, Nature Neuroscience, vol.1, pp.417-421, 1998.

, Reference zero for the calibration of pure air tone conduction audiometers, p.389, 1985.

. Iso/iec, Information technology-coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1,5 mbit/s-part 3 : Audio, pp.11172-11175, 1993.

. Iso/iec, Information technology-generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio-part 7 : Advanced audio coding (aac), pp.13818-13825, 2006.

. Iso/iec, Information technology-coding of audio-visual objects-part 3 : Audio", International Organization for Standardization, pp.14496-14499, 2005.

I. Bs, Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems, p.1116, 1997.

I. Bs, Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, p.1284, 2003.

I. Bs, Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, p.1534, 2003.

I. Bibliographie and . Bs, Multichannel stereophonic sound system with and without accompanying picture, vol.775, 2006.

I. Bt, Studies toward the unification of picture assessment methodology, pp.1082-1083, 1990.

I. Bt, Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television picture, pp.500-511, 2002.

I. , Wideband coding of speech at around 16 kbit/s using adaptive multi-rate wideband (amr-wb), pp.722-724, 2002.

I. , Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applicationsmethod for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, p.910, 1999.

B. Jones and P. Mcmanus, Graphic scaling of qualitative terms, SMPTE Journal, vol.95, pp.1166-1171, 1986.

G. Kelly, The psychology of personal constructs, 1955.

D. J. Kistler and F. L. Et-wightman, A model of head related transfer function based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.91, pp.1637-1647, 1992.

V. Koehl and M. Paquier, A comparative study on different assessment procedures applied to loudspeaker sound quality, pp.1448-1457, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00842647

K. Koivuniemi and N. Zacharov, Unraveling the perception of spatial sound reproduction : Language development, verbal protocol analysis and listener training, 2001.

J. B. Kruskal, Nonmetric multidimensional scaling : a numerical method, Psychometrika, vol.29, pp.115-129, 1964.

J. B. Kruskal and M. Et-wish, Multidimensional Scaling, 1978.

A. Kulkarni, S. K. Isabelle, and H. Et-colburn, On the minimum-phase approximation of head-related transfer functions, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 1995.

M. Lavandier, P. Herzog, and S. Et-meunier, Comparative measurements of loudspeakers in a listening situation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.123, pp.77-87, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00206058

M. Lavandier, S. Meunier, and P. Herzog, Identification of some perceptual dimensions underlying loudspeaker dissimilarities, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.123, pp.4186-4198, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00345218

M. Lavandier, S. Meunier, and P. Herzog, Perceptual and physical evaluation of differences among a large panel of loudspeakers, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00093751

H. Lawless and H. Et-heymann, Sensory evaluation of food : priciples and practices, 1998.

L. Bagousse, S. Colomes, C. Et-paquier, and M. , State of the art on subjective assessment of spatial audio quality, 38th AES International Conference on Sound Quality Evaluation (Pitea), 2010.

L. Bagousse, S. Paquier, M. Et-colomes, and C. , Assessment of spatial audio quality based on sound attributes, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827941

T. Letowski, Sound quality assessment : Concepts and criteria, 1989.

G. Lorho, Evaluation of spatial enhancement systems for stereo headphone reproduction by preference and attribute rating, 2005.

G. Lorho, Individual vocabulary profiling of spatial enhancement systems for stereo headphone reproduction, 2005.

G. Lorho, Perceived quality evaluation an application to sound reproduction over headphones, 2010.

J. Makinen, B. Bessette, S. Bruhn, P. Ojala, R. Salami et al., Amrwb+ : a new audio coding standard for 3rd generation mobile audio services, IEEE ICASSP, vol.2, pp.1109-1112, 2005.

P. Marins, F. Rumsey, and S. Et-zielinski, The relationship between selected artifacts and basic audio quality in perceptual audio codecs, 2006.

P. Marins, F. Rumsey, and S. Et-zielinski, The relationship between basic audio quality and selected artefacts in perceptual audio codecs-part ii : Validation experiment, 2007.

P. Marins, F. Rumsey, and S. Et-zielinski, Unravelling the relationship between basic audio quality and fidelity attributes in low bit-rate multi-channel audio codecs, 2008.

A. Mason, D. Marston, F. Kozamernik, and G. Stoll, Ebu tests of multi-channel audio codecs, 2007.

S. Meltzer and G. Moser, He-aac v2 mpeg-4-audio coding for today's digital media world, 2006.

S. Moulin, Évaluation subjective de la qualité sonore en écoute binaurale, Master's thesis, 2011.

T. Naes and E. Et-risvik, Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science, 1996.

T. Nakayama, T. Miura, O. Kosaka, M. Okamoto, and T. Et-shiga, Subjective assessment of multichannel reproduction, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.19, pp.744-751, 1971.

N. Bibliographie-narita, Graphic scaling and validity of japanese descriptive terms used in subjective evaluation tests, SMPTE Journal, vol.102, pp.616-622, 1993.

T. Pedersen and N. Zacharov, How many psycho-acoustic attributes are needed ?, 2008.

J. M. Pernaud, Spatialisation du son par les techniques binaurales : Application aux services de télécommunications, 2003.

J. Pernaux, Spatialisation du son par les techniques binaurales : application aux services de télécommunications, 2003.

L. Rayleigh, On our perception of sound direction, pp.214-232, 1907.

F. Rumsey, Subjective assessment of the spatial attributes of reproduced sound, presented at the 15th AES International Conference on Audio, Acoustics & Small Spaces, 1998.

F. Rumsey, S. Zielinski, R. Kassier, and S. Et-bech, On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.118, pp.968-976, 2005.

R. Schatz, S. Egger, and K. Et-masuch, The impact of test duration on user fatigue and reliability of subjective quality ratings, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.60, pp.63-73, 2012.

E. Shaw and R. Teranishi, Sound pressure generated in an external-ear replica and real human ears by a nearby point source, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, vol.44, pp.240-249, 1968.

G. Soulodre and M. Lavoie, Subjective evaluation of large and small impairments in audio codecs, 17th AES International Conference on High-Quality Audio Coding, 1999.

P. Susini, S. Mcadams, and S. Et-winsberg, A multidimensional technique for sound quality assessment, Acta Acustica, vol.85, pp.650-656, 1999.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01105599

Y. Takane, F. Young, and J. D. Et-leeuw, Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling : an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features, Psychometrika, vol.42, pp.7-67, 1977.

K. Teunissen, The validity of ccir quality indicators along a graphical scale, SMPTE journal, vol.105, pp.144-149, 1996.

F. Toole, Subjective measurements of loudspeaker sound quality and listener performance, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.33, pp.2-32, 1985.

J. Tournois and P. Dickes, Pratique de l'échelonnement multidimensionnel : de l'observation à l'interprétation, 1993.

M. Virtanen, N. Gleiss, and M. Et-goldstein, On the use of evaluative category scales in telecommunications, Proceedings of Human Factors in Telecommunications (Melbourne), 1995.

J. Ward, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc, vol.58, pp.236-244, 1963.

A. Watson, Assessing the quality of audio and video components in desktop multimedia conferencing, 1999.

M. Wolters, K. Kjorling, D. Homm, and H. Et-purnhagen, A closer look into mpeg-4 high efficiency aac, 2003.

B. Yannou and P. Deshayes, Intelligence et innovation en conception de produits et services (Editions L'Harmattan), 2006.

S. Zielinski, On some biases encountered in modern listening tests, Spatial audio & sensory evaluation techniques conference, 2006.

S. Zielinski, P. Brooks, and F. Et-rumsey, On the use of graphic scales in modern listening tests, 2007.

S. Zielinski, P. Hardisty, C. Hummersone, and F. Et-rumsey, Potential biases in mushra listening tests, 2007.

S. Zielinski, F. Rumsey, and S. Et-bech, Comparison of quality degradation effects caused by limitation of bandwidth and by down-mix algorithms in consumer multichannel audio delivery systems, 2003.

S. Zielinski, F. Rumsey, and S. Et-bech, On some biases encountered in modern audio quality listening tests-a review, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.56, pp.427-451, 2008.

S. K. Zielinski, F. Rumsey, R. Kassier, and S. Et-bech, Comparison of basic audio quality and timbral and spatial fidelity changes caused by limitation of bandwidth and by down-mix algorithms in 5.1 surround audio systems, J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.53, pp.174-192, 2005.