Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

La reconnaissance malheureuse : de l’individu au collectif

Abstract : Recognition is typically presented either as a success, or as a failure. However the many challenges presented to Western democratic societies require that we look for a way out of is tragic duality. How can one escape the misfortune of recognition? Recognition is the foundational concept of a diverse array of theories and policies. It is based on the interplay among various identities and cultures which collectively constitute diversity. Diversity is the concept on which official and unofficial policies of pluralism, that is to say policies to promote diversity, are based. This is the heart of a significant problem at the intersection of politics, sociology and philosophy. On the one hand, recognition crystallizes factors of diversity. On the other hand, diversity as characterized by a proliferation of cultures that are fluid and potentially variable over time, blocks the recognition process. How then to combine diversity and recognition? Diversity prevents recognition and recognition prevents diversity. One precludes the other. Introducing the notion of failure in the interplay between diversity and recognition permits one to identify the most problematic areas: the very foundation of recognition, the terms of non-recognition, and the issue of violence which is the real blind-spot of the most common theories and policies. From these difficulties, and after an exercise in deconstruction, we propose a reconstruction of the concept of recognition, a renewed track, consisting of the sections underpinned by the postulate of the radical self-determination of individuals and groups. The first aspect rests on separation. Separation is resistance to conformity and conversion in the form, for example of an obligation to forced assimilation. The second aspect concerns diversity as a premise for a new policy of recognition conceived from the standpoint of diversity. The effects of this new policy are more significant at the individual level than at the collective level. The third aspect relates to the importance of the past assigned to recognition. This redesigned concept of recognition is without reconciliation, without atonement, and without compensation. This is not to ignore past tragedies, quite the contrary; but rather to take them into account in order to look to the future.
Document type :
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [449 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Abes Star :  Contact
Submitted on : Thursday, August 23, 2018 - 4:01:06 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 23, 2020 - 4:45:31 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, November 24, 2018 - 2:06:24 PM


Version validated by the jury (STAR)


  • HAL Id : tel-01860680, version 1



Eva Segura. La reconnaissance malheureuse : de l’individu au collectif. Philosophie. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2015. Français. ⟨NNT : 2015USPCB186⟩. ⟨tel-01860680⟩



Record views


Files downloads