Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Gnose et totalitarisme : le problème du mal et la responsabilité

Abstract : What moral qualification can be attributed to Nazi criminals? Are they crazy? Can we blame them unreservedly for their actions? If we can not make totalitarian evil imputable like the gnostic evil, the assimilation of totalitarianism to a Gnostic recidivism by Eric Voegelin invites us to think freshly about the problem of the responsibility of mass criminals. On the one hand, "situationism", which implies that it is the situation that transforms individuals into mass murderers and "dispositionalism" that designates the importance that individual dispositions can have for mass criminals, and On the other hand, the illusion and the ideology characterized, both by the exclusion of reality, make the question of the imputation of genocidal criminals complex. If the latter can not be exculpated, the complexity of the question of their imputation is undeniable. This complexity is perhaps an invitation to reconsider the underlying cause of this type of evil: the gnostic dualism of good and evil, whose own is to want to put an end to evil. But the rage to end evil leads often to barbarism.
Document type :
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [240 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Abes Star :  Contact
Submitted on : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 - 11:59:05 AM
Last modification on : Friday, January 17, 2020 - 12:12:01 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, November 22, 2018 - 1:36:07 PM


Version validated by the jury (STAR)


  • HAL Id : tel-01858715, version 1



Alexis Dossa Afagnon. Gnose et totalitarisme : le problème du mal et la responsabilité. Philosophie. Université de Strasbourg, 2018. Français. ⟨NNT : 2018STRAC002⟩. ⟨tel-01858715⟩



Record views


Files downloads