R. 1. Dickinson, L. Ahmed, H. Allen, and C. , Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting, European Urology, vol.59, issue.4, pp.477-94, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.009

C. Hoeks, J. Barentsz, and T. Hambrock, Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging, Radiology, vol.261, issue.1, pp.46-66, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11091822

A. Rosenkrantz, F. Deng, and S. Kim, Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MRI for Index Lesion Localization???A Multiple-Reader Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.199, issue.4, pp.830-837, 2012.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.11.8446

J. Fitzpatrick, J. West, M. Jr, and C. , Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.17, issue.5, pp.694-702, 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/42.736021

URL : http://www.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/~image/registration/online_files/ieee_tmi_special.ps

W. Wells-3rd, P. Viola, and H. Atsumi, Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information, Medical Image Analysis, vol.1, issue.1, pp.35-51, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80004-9

F. Maes, A. Collignon, and D. Vandermeulen, Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.16, issue.2, pp.187-98, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/42.563664

URL : https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/28116/1/Maes97TMI.pdf

A. Ouzzane, P. Puech, and L. Lemaitre, Combined Multiparametric MRI and Targeted Biopsies Improve Anterior Prostate Cancer Detection, Staging, and Grading, Urology, vol.78, issue.6, pp.1356-62, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.022

Y. Mazaheri, L. Bokacheva, and D. Kroon, Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol.103, issue.Pt 1, pp.1149-57, 2010.
DOI : 10.1177/016173469802000403

URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.22347/pdf

T. Hambrock, D. Somford, and H. Huisman, Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer, Radiology, vol.259, issue.2, pp.453-61, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11091409

O. Ukimura and I. Gill, Reply from authors re: Mark Emberton. Tissue preservation may offer a harm-reduction strategy for men with early prostate cancer, Eur Urol Eur Urol, vol.62, issue.62, pp.64-70, 2012.

%. Abcfh%, F. Ai=ia<d=bj<ba@hj%, <. Ei<ydei<ba@h%, F. A>eb<d%, Q. >@hj<% et al., <%CH=EBJ%?9H;SBJIGH=%@;%JA>=H%a@I;<B<I<Bd%>cgHA<Bd%C><H;<BHFFHEH;<% =HdFD<I;<%FHJ%AI=IA<D=BJ<Ba@HJ%<BJJ@FIB=HJ%HWCF>=DHJ%CI=%FHJ%JDa@H E>EH;<%?HJ%cB>CJBHJ]%">@J%FHJ%CI<BH;<J%>;<%H@%@;H%,)*%K%NPO%"%JHF>;%FH%C=><>A>FH%?H% =>@<B;H%QJDa@H;AHJ%C>;?D=DH%"LP%$Bdd@JB>;%ISHA%GD;D=I<B>;%?H%AI=<>G=ICYBH%+$0bcOMb cNMMMP% &Da@H;AH% ?X;IEBa@H% C>gHA<B>;% ?H% A>, HJ%cB>CJBHJ%ABcFDHJ]% 39H;<=>CBH%Q!RP%A>EEH%I;IFXJH%?H%<HW<@=H%?9>=?=H%NP%HJ<%AIFA@FDH%H<%A>ECBFDH%A>EEH% @;% JA>=H% E@F<BCI=IED<=Ba@HP% &A>=H% ?9!;<=>CBH% &!% ?DdB;B<% A>EEH% &!y% !% +$0z% !% t<=I;Jz% !% 5Hz% !% "Li

$. &. Eg, 0!018(!&7!21&%'3?!EG, 5&8%$1'(+!Q&/.-!./.0&83!'(>8(/0.01&/6!21&%'3!0.$>(0'! ./+!5./5($?!:&7!'1>1>/1715./0! 5./5($! FPRSBK?CC!bJ?aY!^N*c!O;!\K_HH?!PR!5&$$(-.0(+!=10@!W-(.'&/!R5&$(!F$ ' !SJ?KY[C6!%SJ?JCCH!./+! 9OX!Fd!S!J?a, 1715.

$. %&, >($'?! :.+1&/&815'!1'!.!%$&5, pp.2-3

!. Ia_ and !. &7, $3!+1

>. $. , &. , \. !. , $. , !. *. et al., *))-0*), *))-0*).!,&-#.!)*%!0$1.!+%!+%$!+0!2+0$!0$($0$%)&4$0!7+,'&'5$!+0!%$/*&'5$6!&4$!))*1!+0"#%K%&'!+(!&4$!2$*&'5'&.!*%#!,7$)'(')'&.!(+0!$*)4!7+,'A1$!&$,&!7+,'&'5'&.!)-&K+((\!>4$! 20"2(L'1"0($T"(/7:(#L0Q"!'%(+02,!'%!*!,'%/1$!%-2$0')*1!5*1-$!*A+-&!&4$!+5$0*11!#'*/%+,&')!*))-0*).!+(!, 2007.

>. $. , &. , and !. '. &\-!-!, 11*%)$6!70$#')

L. Dickinson, H. Ahmed, and C. Allen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting, European Urology, vol.59, issue.4, pp.477-494, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.009

C. Orczyk and H. Ahmed, What tumours should we treat with focal therapy based on risk category, grade, size and location?, Current Opinion in Urology, vol.25, issue.3, pp.212-219, 2015.
DOI : 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000170

I. Donaldson, R. Alonzi, and D. Barratt, Focal Therapy: Patients, Interventions, and Outcomes???A Report from a Consensus Meeting, European Urology, vol.67, issue.4, pp.771-777, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.018

URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.018

A. Oto, I. Sethi, and G. Karczmar, MR Imaging???guided Focal Laser Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Phase I Trial, Radiology, vol.267, issue.3, pp.932-940, 2013.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13121652

W. Van-den-bos, B. Muller, and H. Ahmed, Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer: International Multidisciplinary Consensus on Trial Design, European Urology, vol.65, issue.6, pp.1078-1083, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.001

L. Nobin, J. Orczyk, C. Deng, and F. , Prostate tumour volumes: evaluation of the agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and histology using novel co-registration software, BJU International, vol.259, issue.6 Pt 1, pp.105-112, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11091409

L. Nobin, J. Rosenkrantz, A. Villers, and A. , Image Guided Focal Therapy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visible Prostate Cancer: Defining a 3-Dimensional Treatment Margin
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01587369

B. Muller, W. Van-den-bos, and M. Brausi, Follow-up modalities in focal therapy for prostate cancer: results from a Delphi consensus project, World Journal of Urology, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-014-1475-2

A. Rosenkrantz and S. Taneja, Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Opportunities and Challenges in the Era of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The Journal of Urology, vol.188, issue.4, pp.1072-1073, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.058

J. Wysock, A. Rosenkrantz, and W. Huang, A Prospective, Blinded Comparison of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging???Ultrasound Fusion and Visual Estimation in the Performance of MR-targeted Prostate Biopsy: The PROFUS Trial, European Urology, vol.66, issue.2, pp.343-351, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.048

U. Lindner, N. Lawrentschuk, and R. Weersink, Focal Laser Ablation for Prostate Cancer Followed by Radical Prostatectomy: Validation of Focal Therapy and Imaging Accuracy, European Urology, vol.57, issue.6, pp.1111-1114, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.008

Z. Huang, M. Haider, and S. Kraft, Magnetic resonance imaging correlated with the histopathological effect of Pd-bacteriopheophorbide (Tookad) photodynamic therapy on the normal canine prostate gland, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol.47, issue.7, pp.672-681, 2006.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830677

F. Bratan, C. Melodelima, and R. Souchon, How Accurate Is Multiparametric MR Imaging in Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Volume? Radiology, p.140524, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.14140524

O. Rouvière, A. Gelet, and S. Crouzet, Prostate focused ultrasound focal therapy???imaging for the future, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol.76, issue.12, pp.721-727, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.046

B. Fei, A. Wheaton, and Z. Lee, Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.47, issue.5, pp.823-838, 2002.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/47/5/309

X. Wu, S. Dibiase, and R. Gullapalli, Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol.58, issue.5, pp.1577-1583, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.072

B. Marami, S. Sirouspour, and S. Ghoul, Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states, Medical Image Analysis, vol.21, issue.1, pp.87-103, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.media.2014.12.007

R. Toth, D. Sperling, and A. Madabhushi, Quantifying Post- Laser Ablation Prostate Therapy Changes on MRI via a Domain-Specific Biomechanical Model: Preliminary Findings, PLOS ONE, vol.117, issue.9, p.150016, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0150016.g006

URL : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150016

C. Orczyk, H. Rusinek, and A. Rosenkrantz, Preliminary experience with a novel method of three-dimensional co-registration of prostate cancer digital histology and in??vivo multiparametric MRI, Clinical Radiology, vol.68, issue.12, pp.652-658, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.010

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01768423

A. Oto, I. Sethi, and G. Karczmar, MR Imaging???guided Focal Laser Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Phase I Trial, Radiology, vol.267, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13121652

S. Taneja, J. Bennett, and J. Coleman, Final Results of a Phase I/II Multicenter Trial of WST11 (TOOKAD® Soluble) Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (VTP) for

J. Hajnal, N. Saeed, and A. Oatridge, Detection of Subtle Brain Changes Using Subvoxel Registration and Subtraction of Serial MR Images, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol.19, issue.5, pp.677-691, 1995.
DOI : 10.1097/00004728-199509000-00001

L. Lemieux, U. Wieshmann, and N. Moran, The detection and significance of subtle changes in mixed-signal brain lesions by serial MRI scan matching and spatial normalization, Medical Image Analysis, vol.2, issue.3
DOI : 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80021-2

R. Woods, S. Grafton, and C. Holmes, Automated Image Registration: I. General Methods and Intrasubject, Intramodality Validation, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol.22, issue.1, pp.139-152, 1998.
DOI : 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027

R. Woods, S. Grafton, and J. Watson, Automated Image Registration: II. Intersubject Validation of Linear and Nonlinear Models, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol.22, issue.1, pp.153-165, 1998.
DOI : 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00028

A. Collignon, F. Maes, and D. Delaere, Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory, 1995.

F. Maes, A. Collignon, and D. Vandermeulen, Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.16, issue.2, pp.187-198, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/42.563664

URL : https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/28116/1/Maes97TMI.pdf

P. Viola and W. Wells, Alignment by maximization of mutual information, Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.16-23, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/iccv.1995.466930

URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/9918/2/40073866-MIT.pdf

W. Wells, P. Viola, and H. Atsumi, Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information, Medical Image Analysis, vol.1, issue.1, pp.35-51, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80004-9

B. Park, A. Mikheev, Z. Wadghiri, and Y. , Optimal target VOI size for accurate 4D coregistration of DCE-MRI Available at, pp.97881-97881, 2016.
DOI : 10.1117/12.2214675

E. Gibson, C. Crukley, and M. Gaed, Registration of prostate histology images to ex vivo MR images via strand-shaped fiducials, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol.71, issue.6, pp.1402-1412, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO;2-L

P. Patel, J. Chappelow, and J. Tomaszewski, Spatially weighted mutual information (SWMI) for registration of digitally reconstructed ex vivo whole mount histology and in vivo prostate MRI, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp.6269-6272
DOI : 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091547

D. Hawkes, D. Barratt, and J. Blackall, Tissue deformation and shape models in image-guided interventions: a discussion paper, Medical Image Analysis, vol.9, issue.2, pp.163-175, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.media.2004.11.007

Y. Hu, T. Carter, and H. Ahmed, Modelling Prostate Motion for Data Fusion during Image-guided Interventions Available at, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2011.

Y. Hu, D. Morgan, and H. Ahmed, A Statistical Motion Model Based on Biomechanical Simulations for Data Fusion during Image-Guided Prostate Interventions, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, vol.11, pp.737-744, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_88

3. Table3, dIBJI;<% DAY>% I@% '$+o-,1% 7B>EI=hH=% i>=hB;G% 2=>@C% C=>C>JH% @;H% dH@BFFH% ?H% =>@<H% ?D<IBFFDH% C>@=% F9DEH=GH;AH% H<% FI% SIFB?I<B>;% ?H% F9BEIGH=BH%H;%<I;<%a@H%cB>EI=a@H@=]%3I%A>==DFI<B>;%K%F9YBJ<>F>GBH%H<%cB>F>GBH%E>FDA@FIB=H% IB;JB%a@H%FH%<=IB<HEH;<%?9BEIGH%<BH;;H;<%@;H%CFIAH%?H%C=HEBH=%>=?=H%?I, R%J%AHJ%d@<@=HJ% B

%. , ;. <yd=icbh%, and A. , >@SHFFH%J<=I<DGBH%?H%<=IB<HEH;<%H<%J>;%J@AATJP%<I;<%d>;A<B>;;HF%a@9>;A>F>GBa@HP% ?DCH;?%?H%FI%C=DABJB>;%?@%CFI;;B;G%<YD=ICH@<Ba@H%H<%?H%FI%ABcFH]% 3HJ%<=ISI@W%?H%AH<<H%<YTJH%H<%J@cJDa@H;<J%Q`LR%>;<%E>;<=D%@;H%?BddD=H

K. <=ib<h=% and Q. Dsif@h=, %3I%d>=EH%?H%F9DSIF@I<B>;%=HJ<H%K%?D<H=EB;H=P%J9>dd=I;<%FI%C>JJBcBFB<D%?H%=HGBJ<=HJ% C=>JCHA<BdJ%>@%?9@;%HJJIB%AFB

J. Ia<bsh% and &. =h, d>=AH% F9@<BFBJI<B>;% ?H% F9BEIGH=BH%?I;J%FH%J@BSB%?@%AI;AH=%?H%FI%C=>J<I<H]%% 3HJ% <HAY;Ba@HJ% ?H% =HAIFIGH% F>;GB<@?B;IF% ?DSHF>CCDHJ% ?I

A. B>eba@h%, Q. B>f>gba@h%>@%i@%a>-;-<=ib=h%fi%j<icbfb<d%ci=%, and A. , 0>FFHGH%3>;?>;P%$HCI=<EH;<%>d%&@=GH=X%I;?%,;<H=SH;<B>;IF%&ABH;AHJP%H<%?H%#;BSH=JB<X% 0>FFHGH%3>;?>;%1>JCB<IFJP%"YH%C=>J<I<H%#;B<P%$HCI=<EH;<%>d%#=>F>GX]%0HJ%B;J<B<@<B>;J% @;BSH=JB<IB=H%H<%Y>JCB<IFBT=H%>;<%?DE>;<=D%FH@=%HWAHFFH;AH%?I;J%FH@=%CI=<H;I=BI<%J@=%FI% <YDEI<Ba@H%?@%AI;AH=%?H%C=>J<I<H]% 3HJ%C>JJBcBFB<DJ%?H%A>FFIc>=I<B>;%J9>dd=H;<%?I;J%?HJ%?>EIB;HJ%?H%=HAYH=AYH%H<% ?H%J>B;J%SI=BDJ%?H%cB>F>GBH%E>FDA@FIB=H%Q0H, BSH=JB<X%<=H%d>=%*>FHA@FI=%, vol.33, issue.6, p.0

$. =%, *. Baif%, E. Gb, $. , *. Baif% et al., %LMNU%K%#03%?9@;%;>@SHFFH%H;<B<D%e%0H;<H=%d>=%&@=GBAIF% I;?% ,;<H=SH;<B>, H% ?H% =HG=>@CH=% C=>cFDEI<Ba@H% ?9B;GD;BH=BH% H<% AFB

J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit, S. Eser, C. Mathers et al., Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the, Int J Cancer. 1 mars avr, vol.13662, issue.22, p.95108, 1980.
DOI : 10.1002/ijc.29210

URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.29210/pdf

J. Mcneal, Normal Histology of the Prostate, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.12, issue.8, p.61933, 1988.
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-198808000-00003

J. Johansson, O. Andren, S. Andersson, P. Dickman, L. Holmberg et al., Natural History of Early, Localized Prostate Cancer, JAMA, vol.291, issue.22, p.27139, 2004.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.291.22.2713

J. Epstein, P. Walsh, M. Carmichael, and C. Brendler, Pathologic and Clinical Findings to Predict Tumor Extent of Nonpalpable (Stage T1 c) Prostate Cancer, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.271, issue.5, p.36874, 1994.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1994.03510290050036

T. Stamey, F. Freiha, J. Mcneal, E. Redwine, A. Whittemore et al., Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer, Cancer, vol.140, issue.S3, p.9338, 1993.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO;2-L

L. Franks, Latent carcinoma of the prostate, The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, vol.liii, issue.2, p.60316, 1954.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1947.62890170001007

D. Gleason, Classification of prostatic carcinomas, Cancer Chemother Rep. mars, vol.50, issue.3, p.1258, 1966.

H. Welch, D. Gorski, and P. Albertsen, Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System Trends in Metastatic Breast and Prostate Cancer ? Lessons in Cancer Dynamics, Am J Surg Pathol. févr New England Journal of Medicine. 29 oct, vol.40373, issue.1018, p.2445216857, 2015.

K. Hodge, J. Mcneal, and T. Stamey, Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate):6670. 12. Walsh PC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach, J Urol. juill, vol.142, issue.1, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38663-9

F. Recommandations-en-onco-urologie, J. Hugosson, M. Roobol, T. Tammela, S. Ciatto et al., CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study, Progrès en Urologie. nov N Engl J Med, vol.23360, p.13208, 2009.

G. Andriole, E. Crawford, I. Grubb, . Rl, S. Buys et al., Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial):13109. 16. More on Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 13 oct, vol.360375384, issue.13159959, p.202735, 2009.

T. Wilt, M. Brawer, K. Jones, M. Barry, W. Aronson et al., 16 août 2012 Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer, The US Preventive Services Task Force, p.59560520313141524, 2012.

J. Noldus, M. Graefen, A. Haese, R. Henke, P. Hammerer et al., Stage Migration in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer, European Urology, vol.38, issue.1, p.748, 2000.
DOI : 10.1159/000020255

J. Hu, X. Gu, S. Lipsitz, M. Barry, D. Amico et al., Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors The changing face of lowrisk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management, JAMA. 14 oct N Engl J Med. 20 mars J Clin Oncol, vol.30235822, issue.1412, pp.155764-2421419, 2004.

L. Klotz, L. Zhang, A. Lam, R. Nam, A. Mamedov et al., Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience Radical prostatectomy findings in patients in whom active surveillance of prostate cancer fails, J Clin Oncol. J Urol. J Urol, vol.28178182, pp.12631-2722748, 2007.

A. Kanthabalan, M. Emberton, A. Hu-de-la-rosette, J. Ahmed, H. Barentsz et al., Biopsy strategies for selecting patients for focal therapy for prostate cancer, Current Opinion in Urology, vol.24, issue.3, p.20917775809613, 2006.
DOI : 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000046

N. Abraham, N. Mendhiratta, S. Taneja, P. Puech, L. Lemaitre et al., Patterns of Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Contemporary Clinical Practice, Multiparametric MRI and Targeted Biopsies Improve Anterior Prostate Cancer Detection, Staging, and Grading, p.135662, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084

J. Schiffmann, J. Connan, G. Salomon, K. Boehm, B. Beyer et al., Tumor volume in insignificant prostate cancer: Increasing threshold gains increasing risk Orczyk C a, Emberton M a, Ahmed HU a. What tumours should we treat with focal therapy based on risk category, grade, size and location?, Prostate. 4 oct Current Opinion in Urology. mai, vol.3525, issue.3, p.2129, 2014.
DOI : 10.1002/pros.22889

M. Valerio, Y. Cerantola, S. Eggener, H. Lepor, T. Polascik et al., New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review, European Urology, vol.71, issue.1, p.1734, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.044

M. Valerio, H. Ahmed, M. Emberton, N. Lawrentschuk, M. Lazzeri et al., The Role of Focal Therapy in the Management of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, European Urology, vol.66, issue.4
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.048

J. Haffner, E. Potiron, S. Bouyé, P. Puech, X. Leroy et al., Peripheral zone prostate cancers: Location and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology, The Prostate, vol.70, issue.9, p.27682, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/pros.20881

S. Bouye, E. Potiron, P. Puech, X. Leroy, L. Lemaitre et al., Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: Zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology, The Prostate, vol.89, issue.9
DOI : 10.1002/pros.20859

P. Nevoux, A. Ouzzane, H. Ahmed, M. Emberton, R. Montironi et al., Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series, BJU International, vol.106, issue.4, pp.10513-4051723, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09436.x

URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10776.x/pdf

V. Mouraviev, A. Villers, D. Bostwick, T. Wheeler, R. Montironi et al., Understanding the pathological features of focality, grade and tumour volume of early-stage prostate cancer as a foundation for parenchyma-sparing prostate cancer therapies: active surveillance and focal targeted therapy, BJU International, vol.19, issue.7, p.107485, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-008-1153-0

J. Haffner, E. Potiron, S. Bouye, P. Puech, X. Leroy et al., Peripheral zone prostate cancers: Location and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology, The Prostate, vol.70, issue.9, p.27682, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/pros.20881

A. Villers, J. Mcneal, F. Freiha, and T. Stamey, Multiple cancers in the prostate. Morphologic features of clinically recognized versus incidental tumors, Cancer, vol.147, issue.9, p.23138, 1992.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19921101)70:9<2313::AID-CNCR2820700917>3.0.CO;2-T

W. Liu, S. Laitinen, S. Khan, M. Vihinen, J. Kowalski et al., Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer Dynamic Contrast Enhanced, Pelvic Phased Array Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Localized Prostate Cancer for Predicting Tumor Volume: Correlation With Radical Prostatectomy Findings, Nat Med. mai The Journal of Urology. Décembre, vol.15176, issue.56, pp.55965-4524327, 2006.

J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, G. Haber, X. Leroy et al., Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection, Disponible sur, p.21426475, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2412051866

J. Fütterer, A. Briganti, D. Visschere, P. Emberton, M. Giannarini et al., Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature, European Urology, vol.68, issue.6, p.104553, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013

L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, E. Poncelet, S. Bouye, X. Leroy et al., Dynamic contrastenhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings, Eur Radiol, vol.19, p.47080, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-008-1153-0

V. Panebianco, F. Barchetti, A. Sciarra, A. Ciardi, E. Indino et al., Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: A randomized study, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, vol.33, issue.1, pp.17-17, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.013

L. Dickinson, H. Ahmed, C. Allen, J. Barentsz, B. Carey et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting, MR) Imaging?Ultrasound Fusion and Visual Estimation in the Performance of MR-targeted Prostate Biopsy, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.009

A. Rosenkrantz, S. Kim, R. Lim, N. Hindman, F. Deng et al., Prostate Cancer Localization Using Multiparametric MR Imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert Scales, PI-RADS Prostate Imaging ? Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2, pp.1640-2011, 2012.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13122233

A. Rosenkrantz, S. Mendrinos, J. Babb, and S. Taneja, Prostate Cancer Foci Detected on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging are Histologically Distinct From Those Not Detected, The Journal of Urology, vol.187, issue.6
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.074

P. Puech, D. Mouton, X. Leroy, C. Ballereau, and L. Lemaitre, Disponible sur: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii Dynamic Contrast Enhanced, Pelvic Phased Array Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Localized Prostate Cancer for Predicting Tumor Volume: Correlation With Radical Prostatectomy Findings, The Journal of Urology. Décembre, vol.176, issue.6, p.24327, 2006.

S. Verma, B. Turkbey, N. Muradyan, A. Rajesh, F. Cornud et al., Overview of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.198, issue.6, p.127788, 2012.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.12.8510

A. Rosenkrantz, S. R. Taneja, P. Tofts, G. Brix, D. Buckley et al., be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI):10920. 62 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols, AJR Am J Roentgenol. janv J Magn Reson Imaging. sept, vol.20210, issue.13, pp.22332-63, 1999.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.13.10699

T. Franiel, L. Lüdemann, R. B. Rehbein, H. Staack, A. Taupitz et al., and corresponding histologic features Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology, Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, pp.485944817-6556377, 2008.

T. Franiel, L. Ludemann, B. Rudolph, E. Lutterbeck, B. Hamm et al., Differentiation of Prostate Cancer From Normal Prostate Tissue: Role of Hotspots in Pharmacokinetic MRI and Histologic Evaluation, Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies, pp.16986-6767581, 2016.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.09.3233

A. Rosenkrantz, M. Triolo, J. Melamed, H. Rusinek, S. Taneja et al., Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol.66, issue.1, 2014.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1225::AID-CNCR2820660624>3.0.CO;2-X

URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4696491?pdf=render

H. Ahmed, A. Bosaily, L. Brown, R. Gabe, R. Kaplan et al., Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study, The Lancet, vol.389, issue.10071, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1

URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32401-1

H. Ahmed, Y. Hu, T. Carter, N. Arumainayagam, E. Lecornet et al., Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy, The Journal of Urology, vol.186, issue.2, p.45864, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.147

Y. Mazaheri, L. Bokacheva, D. Kroon, O. Akin, H. Hricak et al., Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol.103, issue.Pt 1, p.114957, 2010.
DOI : 10.1177/016173469802000403

URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.22347/pdf

D. Hawkes, M. Soulié, G. Portier, and L. Salomon, Algorithms for radiological image registration and their clinical application Pt 3):34761. 74 Principes oncologiques du contrôle local de la tumeur primitive, J Anat. oct Progrès en Urologie. nov, vol.19325, issue.15, pp.91832-75, 1998.

H. Schmid, J. Mcneal, C. Orczyk, A. Mikheev, A. Rosenkrantz et al., An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer Imaging of prostate cancer: a platform for 3D co-registration of in-vivo MRI ex-vivo MRI and pathology, Disponible sur, pp.18491-78, 1992.

J. Epstein, Prognostic Significance of Tumor Volume in Radical Prostatectomy and Needle Biopsy Specimens, The Journal of Urology, vol.186, issue.3, p.7907, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2695

H. Ahmed, A. Freeman, A. Kirkham, M. Sahu, R. Scott et al., Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Phase I/II Trial, The Journal of Urology, vol.185, issue.4, p.124654, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.079

C. Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, oct, vol.27, p.379423, 1948.
DOI : 10.1145/584091.584093

F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.16, issue.2, p.18798, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/42.563664

URL : https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/28116/1/Maes97TMI.pdf

J. Mcneal, A. Villers, E. Redwine, F. Freiha, and T. Stamey, Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Cancer, vol.54, issue.6, p.122533, 1990.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1225::AID-CNCR2820660624>3.0.CO;2-X

E. Sala, E. Mema, Y. Himoto, H. Veeraraghavan, J. Brenton et al., Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging, Morphometric and pathologic features of early stages, pp.14551-85310, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.013

URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc5503113?pdf=render

A. Amico, R. Whittington, S. Malkowicz, D. Schultz, K. Blank et al., Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update, Prostate Lesions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, p.32532144551, 1997.

Y. Zhang, C. Wu, M. Bao, H. Li, X. Wang et al., MR-based prognostic nomogram for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol.281, issue.2, p.58696, 2017.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-016-4230-9

J. Epstein, Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive, Am J Surg Pathol. juill, vol.14, issue.7, p.62632, 1990.
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-199007000-00003

L. Nobin, J. Rosenkrantz, A. Villers, A. Orczyk, C. Deng et al., Image Guided Focal Therapy for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visible Prostate Cancer: Defining a 3- Dimensional Treatment Margin Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Histology Co-Registration Analysis. The Journal of Urology How accurate is multiparametric MR imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer volume? Radiology, août avr Magnetic Resonance Imaging Eur Urol. 24 juin, vol.194275, issue.94, p.14454, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01587369

&. P2-'@8k0:-q-'@8-/-o09k2-'d2-'@393@, A2'@2::2'Q:4A2S':2D'T42'AQO0/0'73r l'article L.1121;>'A2'D3, du 9 août 2004 et l'article R.1121;I'A4'AQ@92:'I55G;?JJ'A4'IG'3190D'I55G'A4'!, p.2912

. En-revanche, information qu'il est prévu de 92K2::92'34'73:02/:F' ' ^%&J@#V&W<B%&d'agréer, C@5VB%#<6&:%V&V47#"4

7. $. 1+&%, 2B05'&5'&*'7+1+?'&%$12-%05+1-2"&+331-4$, &D&$('&303$1+2-0(&5'&3*0#2+2'720%-'&202+1'&3>:&#$6'22'&D&$('&#2*+2-)-7+2-0

$. =a&-i1-, ##& 20&#'1'72&>!=&2+*?'2#&S-2B0$2&70%3*0%-#-(?&5'2', -2+2-9'&%+3#A&F#&+&%$12-3+*+%'2*-7& +33*0+7B:&2B'&L(2*03H&K70*'&-#&+331-'5&-(&+&3-102&70B0*2&+2&2-%'&0)&@-03#H&+(5&#B0S'5&#0%'&3027+(2&7+(7'*A&UH&30#-2-9'1H&70**'1+2-(?&S-2B&2B'& N1'+#0(&K70*'&+(5&2B'&%+8-%+1&70*'&1'(?2B&0)&7+(7'*:&L(2*03H&K70*'&3+*2-7-3+2'#&0)&#2*+2-)#2*+2-0(&-(&2B'&10(?-2$5-(+1&)0110S&$3&0)&+(&'%'*?'(2&2B'*+3H:& #+-5&)'+*#&20& @'&+33*03*-+2'1H&%05'11'5&@H&#2*+2-0(:&2B'(&03'(-(?&30##-@-1-2-'#&20&?$-5'&)$*2B'*&70, pp.7-72