. Les-deux-cas-qui-nous-intéressent-ici, La chaîne de traction en (238c) devrait être celle obtenue comme chaîne optimale au terme de notre analyse car, au terme de celle-ci, le domaine pilier porteur A est toujours occupé et de plus son niveau de contraste entre /ae/ et /?/ est maintenu. (238b) ne doit pas être désigné comme scénario optimal au terme de l'analyse

P. Des-contraintes, P. In, and . Out-ne-peuvent-Être-actives-en, Une contrainte PC REL (haut) peut être active étant donné qu'en (238b), le niveau de contraste entre [i] et [e] ne se retrouve pas dans l'input. Cependant, nous nous rendons compte qu'une telle contrainte PC REL (haut) serait aussi active en (238c) pour la même raison. Cette seule contrainte PC REL (haut) ne suffit donc pas pour départager les deux scénarios en (238b) et (238c) De plus, il est nécessaire que cette contrainte PC REL (haut) soit basse dans la hiérarchie des contraintes afin de faire en sorte que le scénario (238c) soit optimal

*. Est-bloqué-par-la-contrainte, . Non-occ, and . Dp-s-'o-'), Au terme de cette première évaluation, le scénario OCC. & MAIN.CON. 1 est désigné comme scénario optimal. Notre approche fonctionne pour cette première chaîne de traction. Nous passons à (244) avec la seconde évaluation

M. Con, 2 se retrouve bloqué par cette contrainte car il ne contient pas Le scénario NON-OCC. illustre une transformation isolée, ce scénario est bloqué par la contrainte *NON-OCC.(DP P 'U'). Le scénario 'Occ. & non-Main.Con. 1' est donc désigné comme scénario optimal

*. Dp-p-)-et-les-contraintes and . C. Non-main, DP P ) est nécessaire car sinon, nous n'obtiendrions pas le bon output

S. La-contrainte, *. C. Non-main, *. Non-occ, *. Dp-p-'u-')-et, . Non-occ et al., DP P 'I') vient se placer entre les contraintes de présenceCON. 1. Dans une telle configuration, c'est le scénario NON-OCC qui est désigné comme scénario optimal. Ce n'est pas le résultat attendu pour la présente étude de cas, NON-OCC. (DP P 'U')

O. Non-main and . Con, Tableau: NoCS_DP_tableau La contrainte de présence 'u' bloque les scénarios OCC, MAIN.CON. 3, OCC. & NON- MAIN.CON. 2, OCC. & NON-MAIN.CON. 3, OCC. & MAIN.CON. 6 et OCC

*. La-contrainte and . C. Non-main, DP S 'O') assigne une marque de violation à ces deux scénarios qui les bloque. L'évaluation est terminée et le scénario OCC. & MAIN.CON. 1 est désigné comme scénario optimal. Cette étude de cas a donc montré comment les contraintes des domaines piliers permettent de rendre compte d'un cas où il est nécessaire de maintenir l'occupation d'un domaine pilier porteur mais aussi le maintien d'un niveau de contraste dans un domaine pilier de soutien, Nous retrouvons la même chose par exemple dans le changement en chaîne historique en français qui avait été abordé dans le précédent chapitre

L. , O. Main, and . Con, 1 donne ce que nous avons dans la chaîne de traction étudiée

L. , O. C. Main, O. Et, . Main, and . Con, En OCC. & MAIN.CON. 3, nous commençons cette fois avec l'étape /?/ ? [i], vient ensuite l'étape /?/ ? [?] et cela clôt ce scénario. Les trois derniers scénarios illustrent des cas de transformations isolées. Dans le scénario NON-OCC., seul /?/ change pour devenir [i], Enfin, le scénario OCC. & MAIN.CON. 5 illustre juste la transformation de259) donne les contraintes qui serviront à évaluer les scénarios. (259) donne aussi la hiérarchisation de ces contraintes. (259) Description des contraintes ' i ' : Cette contrainte assigne une marque de violation aux scénarios qui ne contiennent pas

*. Non-occ, DP P 'I' ) : Cette contrainte assigne une marque de violation si le domaine pilier porteur I de l'input se retrouve non-occupé dans l'output

O. , &. Main, and . Con, 5 [?, ?, ?] *! 260 Tableau: NZES_tableau La contrainte de présence 'i' bloque les scénarios OCC

O. Main and . Con, 5 car ces derniers ne contiennent pas de [i]. Dans le scénario NON-OCC., la seule transformation intervenant

L. and *. Non-occ, DP P 'I') bloque ce scénario Dans les scénarios OCC. & MAIN.CON. 3 la chaîne de traction partielle vide le domaine pilier de soutien E et ce dernier n'est pas rempli par la suite. En conséquence, la contrainte *NON-OCC.(DP S 'E') bloque ce scénario Au terme de l'évaluation, le scénario OCC, & MAIN.CON, vol.1

S. Ahn, An optimality approach to the Great Vowel Shift, Korean Journal of Linguistics, vol.27, issue.2, pp.153-70, 2002.

J. Aitchison, Language Change : Progress or Decay?, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139151818

W. Allen and . Sidney, Vox Graeca : A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Greek, 1974.

J. C. Anceaux, The Nimboran Language : Phonology and Morphology. Nijhoff : The Hague, 1965.

J. M. Anderson and C. J. Ewen, Principles of Dependency Phonology, 1987.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511753442

R. Anttila, Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol.6, 1989.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.6

V. Apte and . Shivram, 1893. The Student's English-Sanskrit Dictionary

D. B. Archangeli, Introducing Optimality Theory, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol.28, issue.1, pp.531-52, 1999.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.531

A. Arvaniti, Greek Phonetics<BR>The State of the Art, Journal of Greek Linguistics, vol.8, issue.1, pp.97-208, 2007.
DOI : 10.1075/jgl.8.08arv

. Association-phonétique-internationale, Handbook of the International Phonetic Association : A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, 1999.

W. Awedyk and C. Hamans, VOWEL SHIFTS IN ENGLISH AND DUTCH: formal or genetic relation?, Folia Linguistica Historica, vol.21, issue.Historica vol. 8,1-2, pp.99-114, 1989.
DOI : 10.1515/flih.1989.8.1-2.99

P. Backley, An Introduction to Element Theory, 2011.

. Bakovi?, Opacity and Ordering, The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2 nd Edition, pp.40-67, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/9781444343069.ch2

P. Bamrung, A phonological study of Akha in Pa-Kha-Suk-Jai village, Tambol Mae-Sa-Long-Nok, King Amphur Mae-Fa-Luang, 1993.

A. Barton?k, Development of the Long-Vowel System in Ancient Greek Dialects, 1966.

L. Bauer, The second Great Vowel Shift?, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, vol.20, issue.02, pp.57-66, 1979.
DOI : 10.1017/S0025100300005648

R. Bermúdez-otero, Constraint interaction in language change : Quantity in English and Germanic, 1999.

A. Bertacca, THE GREAT VOWEL SHIFT AND ANGLO-FRENCH LOANWORDS: A REJOINDER TO DIENSBERG 1998, Folia Linguistica Historica, vol.10, issue.Historica vol. 21,1-2, pp.125-173, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/flih.2000.21.1-2.125

D. S. Bigham, Dialectal contact and accommodation among emerging adults in a university setting, 2008.

J. Blevins, Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511486357

. Boase-beier, K. Jean, and . Lodge, The German Language: A Linguistic Introduction, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470773499

C. Boberg, The Canadian shift in Montreal, Language Variation and Change, vol.16, issue.02, pp.133-54, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/00437956.1960.11659724

W. Braune, Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Halle. Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte 5, 1886.

/. Braune and . Reiffenstein, Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 15. Aufl. Halle. Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte 5, 2004.

. Bromberger, M. Sylvain, and . Halle, Why Phonology is Different, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.20, issue.1, pp.51-70, 1989.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110871258.150

R. W. Brown and E. H. Lenneberg, A study in language and cognition., The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol.49, issue.3, pp.454-62, 1954.
DOI : 10.1037/h0057814

W. Bruckner, Die Sprache der Langobarden, 1895.

K. Brugmann, Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs-und Flexionslehre der Indogermanischen Sprachen, Erster Band : Einleitung und Lautlehre. 2ème éd, 1897.

V. Bubeník, The Phonological Interpretation of Ancient Greek : A pandialectal analysis, 1983.
DOI : 10.3138/9781442632646

C. Buck and . Darling, The Greek Dialects : Grammar, Selected Inscriptions, Glossary, 1965.

E. Buckley, Phonetics and phonology in Gallo-Romance palatalisation, Transactions of the Philological Society, vol.45, issue.1, pp.31-65, 2009.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110802399

R. E. Callary, Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois, Language in Society, vol.1, issue.02, pp.155-70, 1975.
DOI : 10.2307/452819

L. Campbell, Phonological Features: Problems and Proposals, Language, vol.50, issue.1, pp.52-65, 1974.
DOI : 10.2307/412009

F. Cercignani, The Consonants of German : Synchrony and Diachrony. Milan ; Italie, 1979.

Y. Chen, Phonological Opacity in Pendau: A Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.49-60, 2015.
DOI : 10.20354/B4414110019

M. Cho and S. Lee, Ordering problems in phonological acquisition, Studies in Phonetics Phonology and Morphology, vol.6, issue.1, pp.137-57, 2000.

N. Chomsky, Current issues in linguistic theory In The Structure of Language, pp.50-118, 1964.

N. Chomsky and M. Halle, The Sound Pattern of English, Studies in Language, 1968.

S. Clarke, E. Ford, and Y. Amani, The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence, Language Variation and Change, vol.7, issue.02, pp.209-237, 1995.
DOI : 10.1075/veaw.g11

G. N. Clements, The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I : Between the grammar and the physics of speech, pp.283-333, 1990.

E. Cook, The Patterns of Consonantal Acquisition and Change in Chipewyan (D??ne S????in??), International Journal of American Linguistics, vol.72, issue.2, pp.236-63, 2009.
DOI : 10.1086/507166

J. Crothers, Typology and universals of vowel systems, Universals of human language, pp.93-152, 1978.

M. Crowhurst, A Flip-Flop in Sirion?? (Tupian): The Mutual Exchange of /i i??/, International Journal of American Linguistics, vol.66, issue.1, pp.57-75, 2000.
DOI : 10.1086/466406

G. W. Davis, Toward a Progression Theory of the Old High German Consonant Shift, Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol.21, issue.03, pp.197-241, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511486357

G. W. Davis and G. K. Iverson, Segment Organization in the High German Consonant Shift, American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures, vol.106, issue.02, pp.111-136, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/416481

G. W. Davis, K. Gregory, J. C. Iverson, and . Salmons, PERIPHERALITY AND MARKEDNESS IN THE SPREAD OF THE HIGH GERMAN CONSONANT SHIFT, Beitr??ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), vol.42, issue.2, 1999.
DOI : 10.1159/000261734

S. Davis, Some analytic issues in Optimality Theory, The Linguistic Review, vol.17, pp.2-4, 2000.

D. Boer and B. , The Origins of Vowel Systems. Studies in the Evolution of Language, 2001.

D. Decker, S. Paul, and . Mackenzie, Slept through the ice : A further look at lax vowel lowering in Canadian English, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 2000.

D. Lacy and P. , Markedness and faithfulness constraints, The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, pp.1491-1512, 2011.

A. De-rop, Grammaire du lomongo : Phonologie et morphologie Léopoldville : Éditions de l'Université, 1958.

D. Vos and F. , Essential Tagalog Grammar, 2011.

B. Diensberg, LINGUISTIC CHANGE IN ENGLISH THE CASE OF THE GREAT VOWEL SHIFT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PHONOLOGICAL ALTERNATIONS DUE TO THE WHOLESALE BORROWING OF ANGLO-FRENCH LOANWORDS, Folia Linguistica Historica, vol.72, issue.Historica vol. 19,1-2, pp.103-120, 1998.
DOI : 10.1515/flih.1998.19.1-2.103

D. A. Dinnsen and J. A. Barlow, On the characterization of a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition, Journal of Child Language, vol.25, issue.1, pp.61-94, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000997003322

D. A. Dinnsen, M. O. Kathleen, J. A. Connor, and . Gierut, The puzzle-puddle-pickle problem and the Duke-of-York gambit in acquisition, Journal of Linguistics, vol.37, issue.03, pp.503-528, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022226701001062

E. Dobson and . John, English Pronunciation 1500-1700, 1957.

P. J. Donegan and D. Stampe, The study of natural phonology, Current Approaches to Phonological Theory, 1979.

M. S. Dryer, Order of subject, object and verb, The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, 2011.

. Comrie, Leipzig : Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

D. Durian and M. J. Gordon, What are we talking about when we talk about vowel shifts?, 2011.

A. J. Ellis, 1889. On Early English Pronunciation

J. Endzelin, Lettische Grammatik, 1922.

J. H. Esling and H. J. Warkentyne, Retracting of /??/ in Vancouver English, Focus on Canada, pp.229-275, 1993.
DOI : 10.1075/veaw.g11.11esl

E. Even-simkin and Y. Tobin, The Regularity of the " Irregular " Verbs and Nouns in English, 2013.
DOI : 10.1075/sfsl.66

D. Everett and . Leonard, Aspectos da fonologia do Pirahã, Mémoire, 1979.

C. J. Ewen, Dependency relations in phonology, The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 1995.

E. Flemming, Auditory representations in phonology, 1995.

J. Fourquet, Les mutations consonantiques du germanique : Essai de position des problèmes, 1948.

A. Fox, Problems with phonological chains, Journal of Linguistics, vol.33, issue.02, pp.289-310, 1976.
DOI : 10.1080/00437956.1952.11659416

J. Fulcrand, A reanalysis of the great English vowel shift under contrast preservation theory, pdf Gamkrelidze, Thomas V., and Vja?eslav V. Ivanov, pp.533-71, 1973.
DOI : 10.17250/khisli.32.3.201512.002

M. Giancarlo, The Rise and Fall of the Great Vowel Shift? The Changing Ideological Intersections of Philology, Historical Linguistics, and Literary History, Representations, vol.76, issue.1, pp.27-60, 2001.
DOI : 10.1525/rep.2001.76.1.27

J. A. Gierut and A. H. Champion, Interacting error patterns and their resistance to treatment, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol.13, issue.6, pp.421-452, 1999.

A. C. Gimson, . Arnold, K. Goblirsch, and . Gustav, An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English Lautverschiebungen in den Germanischen Sprachen, 1962.

K. Goblirsch and . Gustav, Consonant Strength in Upper German Dialects, 2012.
DOI : 10.1075/nss.10

J. Goldsmith, Harmonic phonology, The Last Phonological Rule, pp.21-60, 1993.

J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, and A. C. Yu, The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2 nd Edition, 2011.

E. Gordon, L. Campbell, J. Hay, M. Maclagan, A. Sudbury et al., New Zealand English : Its Origin and Evolution, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511486678

. Gordon, The Midwest and the West In Handbook of Varieties of English : The Americas and Caribbean, Phonology, vol.1, 2005.

M. Grammont, Traité de phonétique. 9ème éd. [1ère éd, 1933.

A. Green and . Dubach, The promotion of the unmarked : Representing sound change in Optimality Theory, p.380, 1998.

T. D. Griffen, Analysis by prosodic constraint II -German affricates, Aspects of Dynamic Phonology, pp.123-171, 1985.

J. Grimm, Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. -3. Auflage. [1. Aufl : 1848, 1868.

C. Gussenhoven and H. Jacobs, Understanding Phonology, 2011.

E. Gussman, Recoverable derivations and phonological change, Lingua, vol.40, issue.4, pp.281-303, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(76)90081-4

C. Hagège, La structure des langues. Que sais-je?, 1982.

R. Hagiwara, Abstract, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, vol.17, issue.2-3, pp.127-168, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/S0954394500000995

M. Haspelmath, Against markedness (and what to replace it with), Journal of Linguistics, vol.42, issue.01, pp.25-70, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022226705003683

B. Hayes, A metrical theory on stress rules The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, 1980.

N. P. Himmelmann, Tagalog In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, pp.350-76, 2005.

C. F. Hockett, A Manual of Phonology, 1955.

D. Holt and . Eric, Optimality Theory and Language Change, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3

P. Honeybone, Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English, English Language and Linguistics, vol.5, issue.02, pp.213-262, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S1360674301000223

P. Honeybone and J. Salmons, The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, 2015.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.001.0001

P. J. Hopper, Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European, Glossa, vol.7, issue.2, pp.141-66, 1973.

E. Hume, Markedness, The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, pp.79-106, 2011.
DOI : 10.4159/harvard.9780674434929

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137972

J. R. Hurford, The Origins of Language : A Slim Guide, 2014.

L. M. Hyman, Universals in phonology The Linguistic Review, 2007.

K. Hyunsoon, G. N. Clements, and M. Toda, The feature [strident] Phonology and Phonetics, Features in Phonology and Phonetics : Posthumous Writings by Nick Clements and Coauthors, pp.179-94, 2015.

W. J. Idsardi, Clarifying opacity, The Linguistic Review, vol.16, issue.2-4, pp.337-50, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.337

J. Ito and A. Mester, Japanese Morphophonemics : Markedness and Word Structure, 2003.

G. K. Iverson and J. C. Salmons, Fundamental Regularities in the Second Consonant Shift, Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol.34, issue.01, pp.45-70, 2006.
DOI : 10.1075/nowele.34.04lan

R. Jakobson, N. S. Trubetzkoy's Letters and Notes. The Hague, 1975.

R. Jakobson, C. Gunnar, M. Fant, and M. Halle, Preliminaries to Speech Analysis : The Distinctive Features and their Correlates, 1951.

K. Jesney and . Christine, Chain shift in phonological acquisition, Thèse de Doctorat, 2005.

O. Jespersen, Lehrbuch der Phonetik, 1904.

K. Johnson, Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, Phonetica, vol.61, issue.1, 1997.
DOI : 10.1159/000078663

P. A. Johnston and . Jr, LASS???S LAW AND WEST GERMANIC VOWEL SHIFTS, Folia Linguistica Historica, vol.23, issue.Historica vol. 10,1-2, pp.199-261, 1989.
DOI : 10.1515/flih.1989.10.1-2.199

D. Jones, An Outline of English Phonetics, Language, vol.32, issue.3, 1922.
DOI : 10.2307/410583

R. Kager, Optimality Theory. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge, 1999.

S. Kawahara, Similarity among variants : Output-variant correspondence Mémoire de licence, International Christian University, 2002.

J. Kaye, Opacity and recoverability in phonology, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, vol.4, issue.02, pp.134-183, 1974.
DOI : 10.2307/412375

J. Kaye, J. Lowenstamm, and J. Vergnaud, The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government, Phonology, vol.11, pp.305-333, 1985.
DOI : 10.7202/602483ar

W. Kehrein, Phonological Representation and Phonetic Phasing : Affricates and Laryngals, 2002.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110911633

B. Keil, Frisian phonology, 2003.

F. Kenschaft, Course project : The Great English Vowel Shift Phonology in Generative Grammar, Kenstowicz, Michael J. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics Cambridge (Mass, vol.7, 1994.

M. J. Kenstowicz and C. W. Kisseberth, Unmarked bleeding orders, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, vol.1, pp.8-28, 1971.

R. Keulen, A broader view on phonological change in Limburgian dialect Abstract presented at the 18th Conference of the Student Organisation of Linguistics in Europe (ConSOLE XVIII), 2009.

R. D. King, Push chains and drag chains, 1969.

P. Kiparsky, How Abstract is Phonology? Indiana University Linguistics Club. ???. 1971a. Historical Linguistics : A Survey of Linguistic Science, 1968.

R. Kirchner, Going the distance : Synchronic chain shifts in Optimality Theory, 1995.

C. W. Kisseberth, On the functional unity of phonological rules, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.1, issue.3, pp.291-306, 1970.

F. Kluge, An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language, 1891.

S. Ko, Vowel contrast and vowel harmony shift in the Mongolic languages, Language Research, vol.47, issue.1, pp.23-43, 2011.

G. Köbler, Neuhochdeutsch-Althochdeutches Wörterbuch, 2006.

P. Kretschmer, Die Urgeschichte der Germanen und die Germanische Lautverschiebung, Wiener Prähistorische Zeitschrift, vol.19, pp.269-80, 1932.

G. Kristoffersen, The Phonology of Norwegian. The Phonology of the World's Languages, 2000.

G. Kroonen, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series, Alexander Lubotsky, vol.11, 2013.

W. Labov, Principles of Linguistic Change : Internal Factors, 1994.
DOI : 10.1002/9781444327496

W. Labov, S. Ash, and C. Boberg, The Atlas of North American English : Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change, 2006.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110167467

P. Ladefoged and I. Maddieson, Vowels in the world's languages, Journal of Phonetics, vol.18, pp.93-122, 1990.

G. Lakoff, Cognitive phonology, The Last Phonological Rule, pp.117-162, 1993.

C. Langstrof, Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the Intermediate Period of New Zealand English, Language Variation and Change, vol.6, issue.02, pp.141-64, 2006.
DOI : 10.1044/jshr.0602.111

R. Lass, On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge, 1980.

L. Lasso-de and J. S. Vega, Sobre la historia de las vocales largas en griego, Emérita, vol.24, pp.261-93, 1956.

E. Lawrance, A shift in focus : A new, geolinguistic perspective on the Canadian Shift (an old version revisited), 2002.

J. Lee and . Yong, The Great Vowel Shift in Optimality Theory http://hompi.sogang.ac.kr/linguistics/%EC%96%B8%EC%A0%95%EC %82%AC6/%EC%9D%B4%EC%A3%BC%EC%98%81(%EC%B5%9C%EC %A2%85).pdf ??? The Great Vowel Shift in Optimality Theory, Language & Information Society, vol.6, pp.84-10600000001239, 2004.

K. Lee, Kwukesa Kaysel [Outline of the History of the Korean Langage, 1972.

. Lee, R. Ki-moon, and . Ramsey, A History of the Korean Languages, 2011.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511974045

S. Lee, Chain shift in second language phonological acquisition, Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, vol.4, issue.1, pp.175-99, 2000.

Y. Lee, Constraint combinations and phonological opacity, Studies in Phonetics Phonology and Morphology, vol.20, issue.2, pp.187-206, 2014.

W. P. Lehmann, Proto-Indo-European Phonology, 1952.

J. Léonard, J. Fulcrand, and . Paraître, Modeling simplexity versus complexity : Mazatec inflectional classes. A diasystemic approach, Inflectional Class Complexity in the Oto-Manguean Languages

J. Leussen, Emergent optimal vowel systems Mémoire, University of Amsterdam, 2008.

P. Lieberman, Uniquely Human. The Evolution of Speech, Thought and Selfless Behavior, 1971.

D. Lightfoot, How to Set Parameters : Arguments from Language Change, 1991.

J. Bibliographie-liljencrants and B. Lindblom, Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast, Language, vol.48, issue.4, pp.839-62, 1972.
DOI : 10.2307/411991

Y. Lin, C. J. Marc-van-oostendorp, E. V. Ewen, and K. Hume, Affricates, The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, pp.367-90, 2011.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110955293

B. Lindblom, On the origin and purpose of discreteness and invariance in sound patterns, Invariance and Variability of Speech Processes, 1986.

B. Lindblom, D. Krull, and J. Stark, Use of place and manner dimensions in the SUPERB-UPSID, database : Some patterns of in(ter)dependence, pp.39-42, 1992.

B. Lindblom and I. Maddieson, Phonetic universals in consonant systems, Language, Speech and Mind, pp.62-78, 1988.

P. M. Lloyd, From Latin to Spanish : Historical Phonology and Morphology of the Spanish Language, 1987.

A. ?ubowicz, Contrast preservation in phonological mappings, Thèse de Doctorat, 2003.

K. Luick, Historische Grammatik der Englischen Sprache, 1921.

I. R. Mackay, Phonetics : The Science of Speech Production, Second Edition, 1987.

M. Maclagan, An acoustic study of New Zealand English vowels The New Zealand Therapists, Journal, vol.12, pp.34-42, 1982.

M. Maclagan and J. Hay, The rise and rise of New Zealand English DRESS, Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, pp.183-88, 2004.

M. Maclagan and J. Hay, Getting fed up with our feet: Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English ???short??? front vowel shift, Language Variation and Change, vol.2, issue.01, pp.1-25, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/S0954394599111025__S0954394599111025

I. Maddieson, Patterns of Sounds, 1984.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511753459

?. Ian and K. Precoda, Bilabial and labio-dental fricatives in Ewe Updating UPSID, UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, vol.78, pp.199-215, 1990.

P. Marcq and T. Robin, Linguistique historique de l'allemand, 1997.

A. Martinet, Occlusives and affricates with reference to some problems of Romance philology, pp.116-138, 1949.

M. Masapollo, L. Polka, and L. Ménard, Asymmetries in vowel perception: Effects of formant convergence and category ???goodness???, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.137, issue.4, pp.2385-89, 2015.
DOI : 10.1121/1.4920678

D. J. Mastronarde, Introduction to Attic Greek Matter, Florian. 2014a Realisation of /kh/ as an affricate in Bernese German, 1993.

G. Mazzon, The study of language varieties in diachrony and synchrony, or : On methodological cross-fertilization, 1997.

J. J. Mccarthy, The parallel advantage : Containment, consistency, and alignment Handout of paper read at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop I, 1993.

J. J. Mccarthy and A. Prince, Prosodic Morphology, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00069-9

M. Millar, R. , and L. Trask, Trask's Historical Linguistics, 2013.

A. Mcmahon, The Emergence of the optimal? Optimality Theory and sound change, The Linguistic Review, vol.17, issue.2-4, pp.2-4, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.231

A. Meillet, Caractères généraux des langues germaniques. Cambridge Library Collection, 1917.

E. Meineke and J. Schwerdt, Einführung in das Althochdeutsche, 2001.

L. Menn, Note on the acquisition of affricates and fricatives, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, vol.6, 1973.

J. Mielke, M. Armstrong, and E. Hume, Looking through opacity, Theoretical Linguistics, vol.24, issue.1-2, 2003.
DOI : 10.1515/thli.29.1-2.123

V. Miglio, Interactions between markedness and faithfulness constraints in vowel systems, Thèse de Doctorat, 1999.

V. Miglio and B. Moren, Merger Avoidance and Lexical Reconstruction, Optimality Theory and Language Change, pp.191-228, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-010-0195-3_8

D. Minkova, A Historical Phonology of English, 2014.

K. Mohanan and . Puthanveettil, Lexical phonology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981.

J. Montreuil, Contrast preservation theory and historical change Historical Romance Linguistics : Retrospective and Perspectives, pp.111-140, 2006.

Y. Morin and . Charles, Histoire des systèmes phonique et graphique du français, Romanische Sprachgeschichte. Ein Internationales Handbuch zur Geschichte des Romanischen Sprachen online version, pp.2907-2933, 2006.

W. G. Moulton, Bloomfield as dialectologist, Leonard Bloomfield : Critical Assessments of Leading Linguists, pp.167-82, 1999.

B. E. Newton, Ordering paradoxes in phonology, Journal of Linguistics, vol.10, issue.01, pp.31-53, 1971.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022226700002796

R. Noske, The Grimm-Verner push chain and Contrast Preservation Theory, Phonological Explorations : Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues, pp.63-86, 2012.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110295177.63

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01191430

J. Padgett, Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.21, issue.1, pp.39-87, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021879906505

B. Palmada, From place to continuancy In Leiden in Last : HIL Phonology Papers I, pp.299-313, 1995.

S. Parker, Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority, Journal of Phonetics, vol.36, issue.1, pp.55-90, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.003

J. Pokorny, Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3 vols Bern : Francke. [2007 online version : https, 1959.

A. Prince and P. Smolensky, Optimality Theory : Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar Rutgers University : New Brunswick : New Jersey. [2002 ROA version : http://roa.rutgers, 1993.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470759400

R. Rhodes, Eastern Ojibwa-Chippewa-Ottawa Dictionary, 1985.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110864342

A. Rialland, R. Ridouane, and H. Van-der-hulst, Features in Phonology and Phonetics : Posthumous Writings by Nick Clements and Coauthors Phonology and Phonetics, 2015.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110399981

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01287717

I. Roca, Derivations and Constraints in Phonology, 1997.

R. Roeder and L. Philadelphia, The Canadian Shift in Toronto, 2007.

E. Rosh-heider, Universals in color naming and memory., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.93, issue.1, pp.10-20, 1972.
DOI : 10.1037/h0032606

J. Rubach, Glide and Glottal Stop Insertion in Slavic Languages: A DOT Analysis, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.27, issue.2, pp.271-317, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/S095267570000141X

E. Sagey, The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology, Thèse de Doctorat, 1986.

. Sadlier-brown, M. Emily, and . Tamminga, The Canadian Shift : Coast to coast, Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 2008.

J. Salmons, A History of German, 2012.

J. C. Salmons and H. , Structuralist historical phonology : Systems in segmental change, The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, pp.32-46, 2015.

B. D. Samuels, Nothing to lose but the chains : Rethinking vocalic chain shifting, 2006.

N. Sanders, Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon Doctoral dissertation, 2003.

R. H. Sanders, German : Biography of a Language, 2010.

H. Sandøy, The typological development of the Nordic languages I : Phonology In The Nordic Languages : An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, pp.1852-71, 2005.

E. D. Sapir, Language : An Introduction to the Study of Speech, 1921.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139629430

F. Saussure and . De, Cours de linguistique générale, 1916.

P. Schrijver, The High German Consonant Shift and language contact, Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics (SSGL), vol.38, pp.217-266, 2011.

R. Schrodt, Die germanische Lautverschiebung und ihre Stellung im Kreise der indogermanischen Sprachen. Wiener Arbeiten zur germanischen Altertumskunde und Philologie 1, 1974.

R. Schützeichel, Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. 7, Aufl. Berlin, 2012.

J. Schwartz, L. Boë, N. Vallée, and C. Abry, Major trends in vowel system inventories, Journal of Phonetics, vol.25, issue.3, pp.233-53, 1997.
DOI : 10.1006/jpho.1997.0044

P. Sedlak, Typological considerations of vowel quality systems, Working Papers on Language Universals, vol.1, pp.1-40, 1969.

E. O. Selkirk, The role of prosodic categories in English word stress, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.11, issue.3, pp.563-605, 1980.

E. Sievers, Grundzüge der Phonetik, 1881.

G. Silva and . Romling-da, A feature geometric analysis of Pirahã phonology and tonology (Mura), Revista Linguística, vol.10, issue.2, pp.1-20, 2014.

A. B. Smit, Phonologic Error Distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, vol.36, issue.3, pp.533-580, 1993.
DOI : 10.1044/jshr.3603.533

P. Smolensky, Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity, 1993.

J. J. Song, Linguistic typology and language universals, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics, pp.401-417, 2016.

M. Stefanuto and N. Vallée, Consonant systems : From universal trends to ontogenesis, Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp.1973-76, 1999.

K. Stevens, The quantal nature of speech : Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data, Human Communication : A Unified View, 1972.

K. Stevens and S. J. Keyser, Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants, Language, vol.65, issue.1, pp.81-106, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/414843

T. Strand and . Randina, Varieties in dialogue : Dialect use and change in rural Valdres, Norway, 2009.

W. Streitberg, Urgermanische Grammatik: Einführung in das Vergleichende Studium der Altgermanischen Dialekte, 1896.

D. Stuart, M. M. Graham, and . Haltod, The Phonology of the Word in Modern Standard Mongolian, <i>WORD</i>, vol.7, issue.1, pp.65-99, 1957.
DOI : 10.1080/00437956.1957.11659629

J. Svantesson, A. Tsendina, A. Karlsson, and V. Franzén, The Phonology of Mongolian. The Phonology of the World's Languages, 2005.

C. Sylestine, H. Hardy, and T. Montler, Dictionary of the Alabama Language, 1993.

O. Szemerényi, The Attic 'Rückverwandlung' or atomism and structuralism in action, Scripta Minora, pp.1338-56, 1968.

S. Teodorsson, The Phonemic System of the Attic Dialect, pp.400-340, 1974.

L. Threatte, The Grammar of Attic Inscriptions, Phonology, vol.1, 1980.

N. S. Troubetzkoy, Zur Allgemeinen Theorie des Phonologischen Vokalsystems, Travaux Du Cercle Linguistique de Pragues, vol.1, pp.39-67, 1929.

P. Trudgill, Dialects in Contact, 1986.

P. Trudgill, E. Gordon, and G. Lewis, New-dialect formation and Southern Hemisphere English: The New Zealand short front vowels, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol.2, issue.1, pp.35-51, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9481.00029

M. Tzakosta and J. Vis, Phonological representations of consonant sequences : The case of affricates vs. 'true' clusters, 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics for Language and Communication (ACLC), pp.558-73, 2007.

N. Vallée, Systèmes vocaliques : De la typologie aux prédictions, Thèse de Doctorat non-publiée, 1994.

. Van-der-hulst, N. Harry, and . Ritter, The SPE-heritage of Optimality Theory, The Linguistic Review, vol.17, issue.2-4, pp.2-4, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.259

M. Van-oostendorp, The Theory of Faithfulness. manuscrit non-publié, 2005.

. Van-oostendorp, C. J. Marc, E. Ewen, and . Hume, The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/9781444335262

M. Vihman, From prespeech to speech : On early phonology, Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, vol.12, pp.230-274, 1976.

C. I. Watson, M. Maclagan, and J. Harrington, Acoustic evidence for vowel change in New Zealand English, Language Variation and Change, vol.12, issue.1, pp.51-68, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/S0954394500121039

U. Weinreich, W. Labov, and M. I. Herzog, Empirical foundations for a theory of language change, Directions for Historical Linguistics : A Symposium, pp.95-195, 1968.

J. C. Wells, Accents of English, 1982.

A. Williams and P. Kerswill, Dialect levelling : Change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull, Urban Voices : Accent Studies in the British Isles, pp.141-62, 1999.

W. D. Whitney, The relation of vowel and consonant, Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol.8, p.390, 1865.

J. Wright, A Primer of the Gothic Language Oxford : Clarendon Press. ???. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar, 1892.

N. Yamaha, On characterizing the english great vowel shift, Lingua, vol.62, issue.1-2, pp.43-69, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(84)90005-6