J. E. Albrecht and C. Clifton, Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases, Memory & Cognition, vol.31, issue.3, pp.599-610, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62738-7
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03201166.pdf

A. Argenti and M. Charolles, The Effect of Position on Understanding: Preposed vs Inserted'selon X'('according to X'), AMLaP 2011-Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00661755

M. Ariel, Referring and accessibility, Journal of Linguistics, vol.11, issue.01, pp.65-87, 1988.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7_3

J. E. Arnold, J. G. Eisenband, S. Brown-schmidt, and J. C. Trueswell, The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking, Cognition, vol.76, issue.1, pp.76-89, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00073-1

N. Asher and L. Wang, Underspecification, Ambiguity and anaphora with plurals, 2003.
DOI : 10.3765/salt.v0i0.2879

M. Asnès and L. Kupferman, ??v??nements, pr??dicats, arguments??: quelques points de rep??re, Langages, vol.169, issue.1, pp.7-33, 2008.
DOI : 10.3917/lang.169.0007

R. H. Baayen, D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.59, issue.4, pp.390-412, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
URL : http://www.mpi.nl/world/persons/private/baayen/publications/baayenDavidsonBates.pdf

L. W. Barsalou, Ad hoc categories, Memory & Cognition, vol.8, issue.3, pp.211-227, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

B. Salah-tlili and I. , Contribution à l'étude des 'verbes symétriques' en français contemporain, 2007.

M. Bianco and C. Schnedecker, Reprise Pronominale Plurielle et Construction Cognitive des « Complexes Référentiels, 2000.

J. Boons, A. Guillet, C. Leclère, and M. Gross, Librairie Droz, La structure des phrases simples en français, 1976.

A. Borillo, Remarques sur les verbes sym??triques fran??ais, Langue fran??aise, vol.11, issue.1, pp.17-31, 1971.
DOI : 10.3406/lfr.1971.5544
URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/lfr_0023-8368_1971_num_11_1_5544.pdf

K. Borthen, On how we interpret plural pronouns, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.42, issue.7, pp.1799-1815, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.008

L. Bosveld-de-smet, Du pluriel au massif: Référence (pro-) nominale plurielle: aspects linguistiques et psycholinguistiques, pp.363-378, 2000.

M. Carreiras, Plural Pronouns and the Representation of Their Antecedents, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.2, issue.1, pp.53-87, 1997.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.373

M. Charolles, Coherence as a principle in the interpretation of discourse. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, pp.71-98, 1983.

M. Charolles, Cohésion, cohérence et pertinence du discours, Travaux de linguistique, vol.29, issue.112, pp.125-151, 1995.

M. Charolles, La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Editions Ophrys, 2002.

M. Charolles, Cohérence, pertinence et intégration conceptuelle Des discours aux textes: Modèles et analyses, pp.39-74, 2005.

M. Charolles and L. Sprenger-charolles, Les paradoxes de la résolution immédiate des pronoms, 1989.

I. Choi-jonin, La préposition avec: opérateur de (dé) composition. Scolia, pp.109-129, 1995.

C. Jr, C. Frazier, and L. , Interpreting conjoined noun phrases and conjoined clauses: Collective versus distributive preferences, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.65, issue.9, pp.1760-1776, 2012.

A. T. Corbett and F. R. Chang, Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents, Memory & Cognition, vol.16, issue.3, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80027-3

F. Corblin, Les formes de reprise dans le discours: anaphores et chaînes de référence, 1995.

F. Cornish, Anaphoric relations in English and French: a discourse perspective (Croom Helm Ltd), 1986.

M. Dalrymple, M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo, and S. Peters, Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.21, issue.2, pp.159-210, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005330227480

S. Dehaene, La bosse des maths (15 ans après), 2010.

A. Dimitriadis, The Event Structure of Irreducibly Symmetric Reciprocals In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, pp.327-354, 2008.

A. Dimitriadis, Irreducible symmetry in reciprocal constructions In Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, pp.5-39, 2008.

J. Dotlacil, Anaphora and distributivity: A study of same, different, reciprocals and others, 2010.

D. Dowty, Collective predicates, distributive predicates and all, Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL, pp.97-115, 1987.

D. Dowty, Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, pp.547-619, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/415037

D. R. Dowty, Thematic Roles and Semantics, Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.340-354, 1986.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1878

J. Dubois and F. Dubois-charlier, Synonymie syntaxique et classification des verbes fran??ais, Langages, vol.31, issue.128, pp.51-71, 1997.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.1997.2133
URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/lgge_0458-726x_1997_num_31_128_2133.pdf

O. Ducrot and J. Schaeffer, Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Seuil), 1995.

K. Ehrlich and K. Rayner, Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.22, issue.1, pp.75-87, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80007-3

C. Eschenbach, C. Habel, M. Herweg, and K. Rehkämper, Remarks on plural anaphora, Proceedings of the fourth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics -, pp.161-167, 1989.
DOI : 10.3115/976815.976837
URL : http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/E/E89/E89-1022.pdf

N. Evans, Reciprocals and semantic typology, 2011.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.98

D. Farkas, Vers une typologie sémantique des syntagmes nominaux, Typologie des groupes nominaux, pp.17-46, 2001.

L. Feigenson and S. Carey, On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays, Cognition, vol.97, issue.3, pp.295-313, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.010

F. Ferreira and K. K. Mcclure, Parsing of Garden-path Sentences with Reciprocal Verbs, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.12, issue.2, pp.273-306, 1997.
DOI : 10.1080/016909697386862

C. J. Fillmore, l968. The case for case. by E. Bach and R. Harms, l-88, 1968.

C. J. Fillmore, The case for case reopened. Syntax and semantics, pp.59-82, 1977.

J. François, L. Pesant, D. Leeman, and D. , Pr??sentation de la classification des Verbes Fran??ais de Jean Dubois et Fran??oise Dubois-Charlier, Langue fran??aise, vol.153, issue.1, pp.3-19, 2007.
DOI : 10.3917/lf.153.0003

S. C. Garrod and A. J. Sanford, THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES, Journal of Semantics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.21-41, 1982.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/1.1.21

S. Garrod, D. Freudenthal, and E. Boyle, The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.33, issue.1, p.39, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1994.1003

S. Garrod and A. Sanford, Incrementality in discourse understanding, Incremental Interpretation, vol.11, pp.99-122, 1995.

C. Garvey and A. Caramazza, Implicit causality in verbs, Linguistic inquiry, vol.5, issue.3, pp.459-464, 1974.

M. Gernsbacher, Comprehending conceptual anaphors, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.14, issue.2, pp.81-105, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90294-9
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241273/pdf

M. A. Gernsbacher, Mechanisms that improve referential access, Cognition, vol.32, issue.2, pp.99-156, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467536/pdf

M. A. Gernsbacher and D. J. Hargreaves, Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.27, issue.6, pp.699-717, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2

M. A. Gernsbacher, D. J. Hargreaves, and M. Beeman, Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.28, issue.6, pp.735-755, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5

L. R. Gleitman, Coordinating Conjunctions in English, Language, vol.41, issue.2, pp.260-293, 1965.
DOI : 10.2307/411878

L. R. Gleitman, H. Gleitman, C. Miller, and R. Ostrin, Similar, and similar concepts, Cognition, vol.58, issue.3, pp.321-376, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00686-9

D. Godard, Problèmes syntaxiques de la coordination et propositions récentes dans les grammaires syntagmatiques, Langages, issue.4, pp.3-24, 2005.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.2005.2640
URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/lgge_0458-726x_2005_num_39_160_2640.pdf

A. E. Goldberg, D. M. Casenhiser, and N. Sethuraman, Learning argument structure generalizations, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.14, issue.3, pp.289-316, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000997003358
URL : http://www.princeton.edu/~adele/Princeton_Construction_Site/Publications_files/goldberg et al. 2004 learning argument structure generalizations.pdf

P. C. Gordon, B. J. Grosz, and L. A. Gilliom, Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse, Cognitive Science, vol.9, issue.3, pp.311-347, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90355-2

P. C. Gordon, R. Hendrick, K. Ledoux, and C. L. Yang, Processing of Reference and the Structure of Language: An Analysis of Complex Noun Phrases, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.21, issue.4, pp.353-379, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01069043

S. B. Greene, G. Mckoon, and R. Ratcliff, Pronoun resolution and discourse models., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.18, issue.2, p.266, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.266
URL : http://star.psy.ohio-state.edu/html/coglab/People/roger/pdf/Papers/exppsylearn92b.pdf

Z. Guentchéva and N. Rivière, 12. Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in French, p.561, 2007.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.71.19gue

M. Haspelmath, Further remarks on reciprocal constructions, pp.2087-2115, 2007.

C. Heycock and R. Zamparelli, Friends and Colleagues: Plurality, Coordination, and the Structure of DP, Natural Language Semantics, vol.1, issue.4, 2003.
DOI : 10.1075/la.22.10zam

M. Hickmann, Children's discourse: person, time, and space across languages, 2003.

M. Hickmann, Coherence, cohesion, and context: Some comparative perspectives in narrative development, Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (S, 2004.

M. Hickmann, S. Schimke, and S. Colonna, Learning to refer to entities in discourse : a cross linguistic perspective, The Acquisition of Reference, pp.181-212, 2015.

M. Hielscher and J. Müsseler, Anaphoric Resolution of Singular and Plural Pronouns: The Reference to Persons Being Introduced by Different Co-ordinating Structures, Journal of Semantics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.347-364, 1990.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/7.4.347

P. J. Hopper and S. A. Thompson, Transitivity in grammar and discourse. language, pp.251-299, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/413757

R. Huddleston, On classifying anaphoric relations, Lingua, vol.45, issue.3-4, pp.333-354, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(78)90030-X

R. Jackendoff, Parts and boundaries, Cognition, vol.41, issue.1-3, pp.9-45, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X

P. N. Johnson-laird, Mental Models in Cognitive Science, Cognitive Science, vol.18, issue.2, pp.71-115, 1980.
DOI : 10.1037/h0060520
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4/pdf

S. Kahane, Une modélisation des dites alternances de portée des quantifieurs par des opérations de combinaison des groupes nominaux, p.419

M. Kail, Coréférence et thématisation. L'année Psychologique, pp.411-427, 1979.

H. Kamp and U. Reyle, From Discourse to Logic, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-2066-1

B. Kaup, S. Kelter, and C. Habel, Representing referents of plural expressions and resolving plural anaphors, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.10, issue.4, pp.405-450, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162

S. Kemmer, Making Oppositions in Verbal and Nominal Collectives, pp.85-95, 1993.
DOI : 10.3406/flang.1993.1307
URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/flang_1244-5460_1993_num_1_2_1307.pdf

W. Kintsch, Text comprehension, memory, and learning., American Psychologist, vol.49, issue.4, p.294, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.294

G. Kleiber, Anaphore associative, lexique et référence Ou Un automobiliste peut-il rouler en anaphore associative? In Anaphores pronominales et nominales. Études pragma-sémantiques, pp.27-42, 2001.

S. Koh, C. Jr, and C. , Resolution of the Antecedent of a Plural Pronoun: Ontological Categories and Predicate Symmetry, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.46, issue.4, pp.830-844, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.2001.2829

I. Kruitwagen, E. B. Poortman, and V. Seggev, Reciprocal verbs as collective predicate concepts, 2016.

B. Laca and L. Tasmowski, Distributivité et interprétations dépendantes des expressions d'identité, Typologie des groupes nominaux, pp.17-46, 2001.

G. Lakoff and S. Peters, Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates, Modern studies in, pp.113-142, 1969.

F. Landman, Groups, I, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.12, issue.5, pp.559-605, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00627774

F. Landman, Groups, II, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.11, issue.6, pp.723-744, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00632603

P. Lasersohn, Events in the Semantics of Collectivizing Adverbials, pp.273-292, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_11

G. Lazard, L'actance, 1994.

G. Link, The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms : A Lattice-Theoretical Approach In Meaning, use and interpretation of language, p.127144, 1983.

G. Link, Hydras: On the logic of relative constructions with multiple heads. Varieties of formal semantics, p.323, 1984.

G. Magri, Collective nouns without groups, Proceedings of IATL, pp.183-202, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00751143

A. Mari, Intensional Epistemic Wholes: A Study in the Ontology of Collectivity, The compositionality of Meaning and Content, pp.189-212, 2005.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110323627.189

A. Mari, Sous-spécification et interprétation contextuelle Hermès, pp.81-106, 2005.

W. D. Marslenwilson, L. K. Tyler, and C. Koster, Integrative Processes in Utterance Resolution, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.32, issue.5, pp.647-666, 1993.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1993.1033

F. Moltmann, Plural Reference and Reference to a Plurality. A reassessment of the linguistic facts, Ms. IHPST, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716327.003.0006

L. M. Moxey, A. J. Sanford, P. Sturt, and L. I. Morrow, Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.51, issue.3, pp.51-346, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.001

L. M. Moxey, A. J. Sanford, A. I. Wood, and L. M. Ginter, When do we use ???they??? to refer to two individuals? Scenario mapping as a basis for equivalence, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.50, issue.1, pp.79-120, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/7.4.365

A. Oliver and T. Smiley, Strategies for a Logic of Plurals, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.51, issue.204, pp.289-306, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2001.00231.x

R. Pasero, P. Sabatier, . Stéfanini, and . Marie-hélène, Syntaxe et s??mantique formelle des constructions verbales exprimant des relations sym??triques, Langages, vol.179, issue.3, pp.179-180, 2010.
DOI : 10.3917/lang.179.0115

N. D. Patson and F. Ferreira, Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.60, issue.4, pp.464-486, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.003
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707846/pdf

M. Riegel, J. Pellat, and R. Rioul, Grammaire méthodique du français (3'edition), 2008.

M. Riegel, J. Pellat, and R. Rioul, Grammaire méthodique du français, Presse universitaire de France, 2011.

F. Rigalleau and D. Caplan, Effects of Gender Marking in Pronominal Coindexation, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, vol.53, issue.1, pp.23-52, 2000.
DOI : 10.1080/027249800390655

E. Rosch and C. B. Mervis, Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, vol.7, issue.4, pp.573-605, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9

A. J. Sanford and S. C. Garrod, The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension, Discourse processes, pp.159-190, 1998.
DOI : 10.1080/14640747908400750

A. J. Sanford and A. C. Graesser, Shallow Processing and Underspecification, Discourse Processes, pp.99-108, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90033-C

A. J. Sanford and F. Lockhart, Description Types and Method of Conjoining as Factors Influencing Plural Anaphora: a Continuation Study of Focus, Journal of Semantics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.365-378, 1990.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/7.4.365

S. Saulnier, Les Nombres, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00490821

C. Schapira, Pr??position et conjonction ? Le cas de Avec, Travaux de linguistique, vol.44, issue.1, pp.89-100, 2002.
DOI : 10.3917/tl.044.0089

C. Schnedecker, Nom propre et chaînes de référence, Librairie KLINCKSIECK, 1997.

C. Schnedecker, ?? propos des emplois r??gis d'Avec, Travaux de linguistique, vol.44, issue.1, pp.101-113, 2002.
DOI : 10.3917/tl.044.0101

C. Schnedecker and M. Charolles, Les référents évolutifs: points de vue ontologique et phénoménologique, pp.197-227, 1993.

J. Searle, Collective Intentions and Actions, Intentions in Communication (P.R. Cohen, J, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511606366.007

J. Segui and M. Kail, Le traitement des phrases localement ambiguës : l'attribution de la coréférence des pronoms, Le langage, construction et actualisation (M.Moscato &, 1985.

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, La pertinence : communication et cognition, 1989.

L. Stassen, And-languages and with-languages. Linguistic Typology, pp.1-54, 2000.

R. Stevenson, The role of salience in the production of referring expressions: A psycholinguistic perspective Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation, pp.167-192, 2002.

L. Talmy, The relation of grammar to cognition, Proceedings of the 1978 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing -, pp.14-24, 1978.
DOI : 10.3115/980262.980266

L. M. Tovena, When Small Is Many in the Event Domain, Lexis, vol.6, issue.6, pp.41-58, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00746307

A. Tversky, Features of similarity., Psychological Review, vol.84, issue.4, p.327, 1977.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327

N. Vaillette, The Distributive Entailments of Collective Predicates, 1998.

T. A. Van-dijk, W. Kintsch, and T. A. Van-dijk, Strategies of discourse comprehension, 1983.

Z. Vendler, Verbs and Times, The Philosophical Review, vol.66, issue.2, pp.143-160, 1957.
DOI : 10.2307/2182371

D. Willems, Syntaxe, lexique et sémantique: les constructions verbales, 1981.

Y. Winter, Atoms and Sets: A Characterization of Semantic Number, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.33, issue.3, pp.493-505, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005354323136

Y. Winter, The Reciprocity-Symmetry Generalization: Proto-Roles and the Organization of Lexical Meanings, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, vol.11, pp.245-274, 2016.

L. Label, item de test est suivi du classement du prédicat non symétrique avec lequel contraste le prédicat symétrique selon qu'il s'interprète collectivement (groupe contraste Symétrique, Collectif : S/C) ou pas (groupe contraste Symétriques/Non Collectif : S/NC)

J. Lucas, boycottent les incitations à consommer ? T10-C L'éducation nationale n'a pas le monopole des formations

R. and E. Réservent, une table dans un bon restaurant ? T16-C Les activités de plein air sont l'occasion de faire du bivouac

S. Patrick, découvrent des odeurs de pin et de jasmin ? T17-C Les achats de logements sont un baromètre de la vie économique

M. and J. Traînent, escalier par désoeuvrement ? T20-NC Les premières lueurs du petit matin pointent à l'horizon

S. and O. Du, porte à porte dans les cités dortoirs ? Items utilisés dans MFirst-I T1-NC La montagne n'est pas que le royaume de la glisse au grand air

. La-montagne-n, est pas que le royaume de la glisse au grand air, Robin déprime à Courchevel avec Audrey dès l'ouverture de la station

J. Lucas, boycottent les incitations à consommer ? T10-C L'éducation nationale n'a pas le monopole des formations

R. and E. Réservent, une table dans un bon restaurant ? T16-C Les activités de plein air sont l'occasion de faire du bivouac

S. Patrick, découvrent des odeurs de pin et de jasmin ? T17-C Les achats de logements sont un baromètre de la vie économique

E. Simon and . Assument-le-côté-fastueux-de-la-soirée, T21-NC La maison familiale est remplie de chuchotements inhabituels

. La-montagne-n, est pas que le royaume de la glisse au grand air, Robin et Audrey cohabitent à Courchevel dès l'ouverture de la station

. La-montagne-n, est pas que le royaume de la glisse au grand air, Robin et Audrey dépriment à Courchevel dès l'ouverture de la station

. Ivan, Adèle convolent à l'église luthérienne en toute discrétion

. Ivan, Adèle retournent à l'église luthérienne en toute discrétion

. La-phrase-d, La phrase amorce est segmentée en trois parties : la coordination sujet, le prédicat et le circonstanciel La phrase cible est également segmentée en trois parties : le pronom de reprise et le verbe, l'objet direct ou indirect et un circonstanciel rattaché soit au groupe nominal précédent soit au groupe verbal. La phrase tampon est segmentée en deux, le sujet d'une part

L. Expressions-syntaxiques-et-lexicale-de-la-réciprocité and .. , 80 2.2.1.1 Les constructions pronominales réciproques, p.86