M. Les and T. , 10 1.2.1. Qui sont-elles ? 10 1.2.2. D'où viennent-elles ? Où les trouver ?, p.12

M. Le-processus-décisionnel-de-détermination-des and .. Le-processus-de-séville, Les groupes de travail techniques (TWG)

.. Application-de-la-méthodologie, 108 1.1. Étape 1 : Définition du périmètre et des variables d'étude108 1.1.1. Variable de normalisation, p.113

.. Application-À-l-'échelle-internationale, 144 2.1. Étape 1 : Définition du périmètre et des variables d'étude, p.147

.. Perspectives-du-travail-de-recherche, 171 3.1, Mise en oeuvre dans le Processus de, p.171

.. Variables-descriptives, 201 3.1. Proportions de produits fabriqués 201 3.2. Proportion de produits entrants, p.203

M. Bortolini, M. Gamberi, A. Graziani, C. Mora, and A. Regattieri, Multi-parameter analysis for the technical and economic assessment of photovoltaic systems in the main European Union countries. Energy Convers, Manag, vol.74, pp.117-128, 2013.

T. Bréchet and H. Tulkens, Beyond BAT: Selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.90, issue.5, pp.1790-1801, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.012

A. L. Carretero, J. De-la-rosa, and D. Sanchez-rodas, Applying statistical tools systematically to determine industrial emission levels associated with the best available techniques, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.112, pp.4226-4236, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.037

A. Cikankowitz, Méthodologie d'évaluation des performances environnementales de techniques en vue de les comparer puis de les valider " meilleures techniques disponibles, Thèse de doctorat). École Nationale Supérieure des Mines, 2008.

A. Cikankowitz and V. Laforest, Using BAT performance as an evaluation method of techniques, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.42, pp.141-158, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.005
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-00756442

. Code-de-l-'environnement, Code de l'environnement ? Article L511-1, 2011.

M. E. Conti, R. Ciasullo, M. B. Tudino, and E. J. Matta, The industrial emissions trend and the problem of the implementation of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, vol.25, issue.3, pp.151-161, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.055

H. De-chefdebien, BAT & BREF : WI-BREF ? BATs pour l'incinération, 2006.

A. Derden and D. Huybrechts, Brominated flame retardants in textile wastewater: reducing Deca-BDE using best available techniques, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.53, pp.167-175, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.013

A. Derden, P. Vercaemst, and R. Dijkmans, Best available techniques (BAT) for the fruit and vegetable processing industry, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol.34, issue.4, pp.261-271, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00110-0

R. Dijkmans, Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.8, issue.1, pp.11-21, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00308-X

D. Evrard, V. Laforest, J. Villot, and R. Gaucher, Best Available Technique assessment methods: a literature review from sector to installation level, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.121, pp.72-83, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.096
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-01275243

J. Geldermann and O. Rentz, The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of BAT according to the IPPC-directive, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.12, issue.4, pp.389-402, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00032-5

E. Georgopoulou, V. Hontou, N. Gakis, Y. Sarafidis, S. Mirasgedis et al., BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.16, issue.3, pp.359-373, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.002

G. Giner-santonja, P. Aragonés-beltrán, and J. Niclós-ferragut, The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.25, pp.86-95, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.012

M. Glasson-cicognani and A. Berchtold, Imputation des données manquantes : Comparaison de différentes approches, 2010.

A. Halog, F. Schultmann, and O. Rentz, Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.9, issue.5, pp.387-394, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00080-9

T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, G. Sherlock, M. Eisen, P. Brown et al., Imputing missing data for gene expression arrays. Division of, Biostatistics, 1999.

V. Ibáñez-forés, M. D. Bovea, and A. Azapagic, Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): methodology and??application in the ceramic tiles industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.51, pp.162-176, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.020

V. Ibáñez-forés, M. D. Bovea, and V. Pérez-belis, A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.70, pp.259-281, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082

M. Kabak, E. Köse, O. K?r?lmaz, and S. Burmao?lu, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to assess building energy performance. Energy Build, pp.382-389, 2014.

V. Laforest, Assessment of emerging and innovative techniques considering best available technique performances, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol.92, pp.11-24, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.009
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-01062043

V. Laforest, Applying Best Available Technologies in environmental management accounting : from the definition to an assessment method, in : Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production, pp.29-48, 2008.

V. Laforest and R. Gaucher, Industrial Emisson Directive (IED) and Best Available Techniques, Directive sur les émissions industrielles (IED) et meilleures techniques disponibles, 2015.

G. Mavrotas, E. Georgopoulou, S. Mirasgedis, Y. Sarafidis, D. Lalas et al., An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization, Energy Economics, vol.29, issue.4, pp.953-973, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.002

H. Nguyen, S. Z. Dawal, Y. Nukman, and H. Aoyama, A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.41, issue.6, pp.3078-3090, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.039

M. J. Nicholas, R. Clift, A. Azapagic, F. C. Walker, and D. E. Porter, Determination of ???Best Available Techniques??? for Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol.78, issue.3, pp.193-203, 2000.
DOI : 10.1205/095758200530637

P. Gallardo and J. R. , Ecodesign of large-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems with multi-objective optimization and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA), 2013.

C. Polders, L. Van-den-abeele, A. Derden, and D. Huybrechts, Methodology for determining emission levels associated with the best available techniques for industrial waste water, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.29, issue.30, pp.29-30, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.008

M. T. Rodríguez, L. C. Andrade, P. M. Bugallo, and J. J. Long, Combining LCT tools for the optimization of an industrial process: Material and energy flow analysis and best available techniques, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol.192, issue.3, pp.1705-1719, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.003

T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Network Process, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/0-387-33987-6_1

H. Schollenberger, M. Treitz, and J. Geldermann, Adapting the European approach of Best Available Techniques: case studies from Chile and China, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.16, issue.17, pp.1856-1864, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.007

D. J. Stekhoven and P. Buhlmann, MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.112-118, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597

F. Testa, T. Daddi, M. R. De-giacomo, F. Iraldo, and M. Frey, The effect of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control regulation on facility performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.64, pp.91-97, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.003

J. Van-caneghem, C. Block, H. Van-hooste, and C. Vandecasteele, Eco-efficiency trends of the Flemish industry: decoupling of environmental impact from economic growth, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.18, issue.14, pp.1349-1357, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.019

R. Dijkmans, Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.8, issue.1, pp.11-2110, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00308-X

V. Laforest, Applying best available technologies in environmental management accounting: from the definition to an assessment method. In: Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production, pp.29-47, 2008.

V. Laforest, Assessment of emerging and innovative techniques considering best available technique performances. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 92, Decision Aid Framework for the assessment of impacts from the introduction of Best Available Techniques in industry (DAF- BAT) (Final Project Report Executive Summary), pp.11-24, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-01062043

.. Search-method-for-the-literature-review and B. , 77 4.2. BAT-related methods at industrial sector level 77 4.2.2. Methods for BAT comparison 78 4.3. BAT-related methods at installation level 79 4.3.2. Technique selection for an installation 79 4.3.3. Performance evaluation according to local conditions 79 4.4. From sectorial to installation level: a step-by-step approach: scope and objective definition: knowledge of the sector studied 3: identification of representative installations: selection of BATs and determination of, BATAELs, p.81

D. Aloini, R. Dulmin, and V. Mininno, A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.41, issue.5, pp.41-2157, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.014

M. Barros, A. Mag-an, S. Vali~-no, P. Bello, J. Casares et al., Identification of best available techniques in the seafood industry: a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.17, issue.3, pp.391-399, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.012

T. Br-echet and H. Tulkens, Beyond BAT: Selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.90, issue.5, pp.1790-1801, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.012

A. Cikankowitz and V. Laforest, Using BAT performance as an evaluation method of techniques Concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, 141e158. Council directive 96, pp.257-283, 1996.

R. Dijkmans, Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.8, issue.1, pp.11-21, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00308-X

G. Giner-santonja, P. Aragon-es-beltr-aan, and J. Nicl-os-ferragut, The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.25, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.012

V. Ib-a~-nez-for-es, M. Bovea, and A. Azapagic, Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): methodology and??application in the ceramic tiles industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.51, pp.162-176, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.020

V. Ib-a~-nez-for-es, M. D. Bovea, and V. Belis, A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.70, pp.259-281, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082

M. Kabak, E. K?-ose, O. Kirilmaz, and S. Burmao-glu, A fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach to assess building energy performance. Energy Build, pp.382-389, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.059

V. Laforest, Applying best available technologies in environmental management accounting: from the definition to an assessment method, Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production, pp.29-47, 2008.

V. Laforest and R. Gaucher, Industrial Emisson Directive (IED) and Best Available Techniques Directive sur les emissions industrielles (IED) et meilleures techniques disponibles Available from, p.15, 2015.

G. Mavrotas, E. Georgopoulou, S. Mirasgedis, Y. Sarafidis, D. Lalas et al., An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization, 953e973. National Observatory of Athens Decision Aid Framework for the Assessment of Impacts from the Introduction of Best Available Techniques in Industry (Final project report executive summary, National Observatory of Athens), p.39, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.002

M. T. Rodríguez, L. C. Andrade, P. B. Bugallo, and J. C. Long, Combining LCT tools for the optimization of an industrial process: Material and energy flow analysis and best available techniques, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol.192, issue.3, pp.1705-1719, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.003

R. Dijkmans, Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.8, issue.1, pp.11-21, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00308-X

V. Laforest, Assessment of emerging and innovative techniques considering best available technique performances. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 92, pp.11-24, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-01062043

D. Stekhoven and P. Buhlmann, MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.112-120, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597

G. Mavrotas, E. Georgopoulou, S. Mirasgedis, Y. Sarafidis, D. Lalas et al., An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization, Energy Economics, vol.29, issue.4, pp.953-973, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.002