T. Cases and .. , 106 5.4.1 Cantilever Beam Bending Example, p.107

G. E. Box and N. R. Draper, Empirical model-building and response surfaces, 1987.

D. Ullman, Less fudging on fudge factors: a statistical approach to determining safety factors provides a more realistic estimate of just how big or strong a part must be, Machine Design, vol.58, p.107, 1986.

M. Mohaghegh, Evolution of Structures Design Philosophy and Criteria, Journal of Aircraft, vol.23, issue.9, pp.814-831, 2005.
DOI : 10.2514/8.3664

Y. T. Wu and W. Wang, Efficient probabilistic design by converting reliability constraints to approximately equivalent deterministic constraints, J. Integr. Des. Process Sci, vol.2, issue.4, pp.13-21, 1998.

Y. T. Wu, Y. Shin, R. Sues, and M. Cesare, Safety-factor based approach for probability-based design optimization, 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, pp.199-342, 1522.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01836565

X. Du and W. Chen, Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.58, issue.2, pp.225-233, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-2569(70)90064-9
URL : http://ideal.mech.northwestern.edu/pdf/SORA_structure.pdf

P. Zhu, F. Pan, W. Chen, and F. A. Viana, Lightweight design of vehicle parameters under crashworthiness using conservative surrogates, Computers in Industry, vol.64, issue.3, pp.280-289, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compind.2012.11.004

S. Mahadevan and R. Rebba, Inclusion of Model Errors in Reliability-Based Optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.102, issue.4, pp.936-944, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.017

C. Kim and K. K. Choi, Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Response Surface Method With Prediction Interval Estimation, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.45, issue.12, pp.121-401, 2008.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2204972

M. C. Kennedy and A. O. Hagan, Bayesian calibration of computer models, Proceedings of the royal society A: mathematical, physical and engineering science, pp.425-464, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9868.00294

W. Available, Y. Chen, K. Xiong, S. Tsui, and . Wang, A design-driven validation approach using Bayesian prediction models Available: https, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.130, issue.2, p.21101, 2008.

D. Huang, T. T. Allen, W. I. Notz, and R. A. Miller, Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol.44, issue.1, pp.369-382, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-3799-8

Z. Qian, C. C. Seepersad, V. R. Joseph, J. K. Allen, and C. J. Wu, Building Surrogate Models Based on Detailed and Approximate Simulations, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.36, issue.4, pp.668-677, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5
URL : http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/statistics/papers/04-26.pdf

P. Z. Qian and C. J. Wu, Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy Experiments, Technometrics, vol.50, issue.2, pp.192-204, 2008.
DOI : 10.1198/004017008000000082

Y. Xiong, W. Chen, and K. Tsui, A New Variable-Fidelity Optimization Framework Based on Model Fusion and Objective-Oriented Sequential Sampling, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.130, issue.11, pp.111-401, 2008.

E. Zio and G. E. Apostolakis, Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.54, issue.2-3, pp.225-241, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00078-6

D. Villanueva, R. T. Haftka, and B. V. Sankar, Including the Effect of a Future Test and Redesign in Reliability Calculations, AIAA Journal, vol.4, issue.12, pp.2760-2769, 2011.
DOI : 10.1504/IJRS.2010.035577

T. Matsumura and R. T. Haftka, Reliability Based Design Optimization Modeling Future Redesign With Different Epistemic Uncertainty Treatments, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.135, issue.9, pp.91-97, 2013.
DOI : 10.1115/1.4024726

D. Villanueva, R. T. Haftka, and B. V. Sankar, Accounting for future redesign to balance performance and development costs, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.124, pp.56-67, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.013

M. Mohaghegh, Validation and Certification of Aircraft Structures, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2005.
DOI : 10.2514/6.2005-2162

N. B. Price, T. Matsumura, R. T. Haftka, and N. H. Kim, Deciding How Conservative A Designer Should Be: Simulating Future Tests and Redesign, 16th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, 2014.
DOI : 10.2514/6.2012-1933

N. Price, N. H. Kim, R. Haftka, M. Balesdent, S. Defoort et al., Deciding Degree of Conservativeness in Initial Design Considering Risk of Future Redesign, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.138, issue.11, 2016.
DOI : 10.1115/1.4034347
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-01351036

N. B. Price, M. Balesdent, S. Defoort, R. L. Riche, N. H. Kim et al., Simulating Future Test and Redesign Considering Epistemic Model Uncertainty, 18th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, 2016.
DOI : 10.1002/9781118136188.ch7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01386664

M. Balesdent, L. Brevault, N. Price, S. Defoort, R. Le-riche et al., Advanced Space Vehicle Design Taking into Account Multidisciplinary Couplings and Mixed Epistemic/Aleatory Uncertainties, Space Engineering: Modeling and Optimization with Case Studies, 2016.
DOI : 10.1109/AERO.2012.6187395
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01475842

M. H. Faber, On the Treatment of Uncertainties and Probabilities in Engineering Decision Analysis, Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, vol.23, issue.3, pp.243-248, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/09617353.2002.11690749

A. O. Hagan and J. E. Oakley, Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.85, issue.1-3, pp.239-248, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.014

A. Der-kiureghian and O. Ditlevsen, Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, pp.105-112, 2009.

S. Ferson, C. A. Joslyn, J. C. Helton, W. L. Oberkampf, and K. Sentz, Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.85, issue.1-3, pp.355-369, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023

S. Ferson and L. R. Ginzburg, Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.54, issue.2-3, pp.133-144, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00071-3

S. Ferson, V. Kreinovich, L. Ginzburg, D. S. Myers, and K. Sentz, Constructing probability boxes and Dempster-Shafer structures, Sandia National Laboratories, 2002.
DOI : 10.2172/809606

J. C. Helton, J. D. Johnson, and W. L. Oberkampf, An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.85, issue.1-3, pp.39-71, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.025

J. Kadane and L. J. Wolfson, Experiences in elicitation Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician, pp.3-19, 1998.

T. Nilsen and T. Aven, Models and model uncertainty in the context of risk analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.79, issue.3, pp.309-317, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00239-9

W. L. Oberkampf, S. M. Deland, B. M. Rutherford, K. V. Diegert, and K. F. Alvin, Estimation of total uncertainty in modeling and simulation, Sandia National Laboratories, 2000.

R. Haftka, Combining global and local approximations, AIAA Journal, vol.29, issue.9, pp.1523-1525, 1991.
DOI : 10.1090/S0025-5718-1977-0431719-X

K. J. Chang, R. T. Haftka, G. L. Gary, and K. Pi-jen, Sensitivity-based scaling for approximating structural response, Journal of Aircraft, vol.23, issue.2, pp.283-288, 1993.
DOI : 10.2514/3.10768

S. E. Gano, J. E. Renaud, and B. Sanders, Hybrid Variable Fidelity Optimization by Using a Kriging-Based Scaling Function, AIAA Journal, vol.43, issue.11, pp.2422-2433, 2005.
DOI : 10.1142/9789812812957_0008

S. E. Gano, J. E. Renaud, H. Agarwal, and A. Tovar, Reliability-based design using variable-fidelity optimization, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol.36, issue.3-4, pp.247-260, 2006.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2829499
URL : http://www.gano.name/shawn/papers/SDM_2005_VFRBDO.pdf

M. G. Hutchison, E. R. Unger, W. H. Mason, B. Grossman, and R. T. Haftka, Variable-complexity aerodynamic optimization of a high-speed civil transport wing, Journal of Aircraft, vol.1, issue.1, pp.110-116, 1994.
DOI : 10.2514/3.10768

N. O. Siu and G. E. Apostolakis, Probabilistic models for cable tray fires, Reliability Engineering, vol.3, issue.3, pp.213-227, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0143-8174(82)90031-2

E. Acar, R. T. Haftka, and N. H. Kim, Effects of Structural Tests on Aircraft Safety, AIAA Journal, vol.48, issue.10, pp.2235-2248, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00158-008-0277-9

A. J. Keane, Wing Optimization Using Design of Experiment, Response Surface, and Data Fusion Methods, Journal of Aircraft, vol.21, issue.4, pp.741-750, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-2089-4

M. C. Kennedy and A. O. Hagan, Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available, Biometrika, vol.87, issue.1, pp.1-13, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/87.1.1

M. J. Bayarri, J. O. Berger, R. Paulo, J. Sacks, J. A. Cafeo et al., A Framework for Validation of Computer Models, Technometrics, vol.49, issue.2, 2007.
DOI : 10.1198/004017007000000092

P. D. Arendt, D. W. Apley, and W. Chen, Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.41, issue.10, pp.100-908, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.028

G. E. Muller and C. J. Schmid, Factor of Safety-USAF Design Practice, DTIC Document, Tech. Rep, 1978.

J. J. Zipay, C. T. Jr, and C. E. Larsen, The Ultimate Factor of Safety for Aircraft and Spacecraft - Its History, Applications and Misconceptions, 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2016.
DOI : 10.2514/6.2016-1715

D. G. Ullman, The mechanical design process Available: http://maelabs.ucsd, 1992.

J. Tu, K. K. Choi, and Y. H. Park, A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.36, issue.4, pp.557-564, 1999.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2829499

B. J. Bichon, M. S. Eldred, L. P. Swiler, S. Mahadevan, and J. M. Mcfarland, Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions, AIAA Journal, vol.26, issue.2, pp.2459-2468, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/JMEMS.2004.825308

V. Dubourg, Adaptive surrogate models for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization Available: https://tel.archives-ouvertes, p.697026, 2011.

E. Acar, A. Kale, R. T. Haftka, and W. J. Stroud, Structural Safety Measures for Airplanes, Journal of Aircraft, vol.01, issue.1, pp.30-38, 2006.
DOI : 10.2514/1.14381

E. Acar, R. T. Haftka, and T. F. Johnson, Tradeoff of Uncertainty Reduction Mechanisms for Reducing Weight of Composite Laminates, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.27, issue.3, pp.266-274, 2007.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1814639

A. G. Watson and R. J. Barnes, Infill sampling criteria to locate extremes, Mathematical Geology, vol.15, issue.no. 3, pp.589-608, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-4856-9

D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch, Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, vol.13, issue.4, pp.455-4921008306431147, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008306431147

M. Schonlau, Computer experiments and global optimization, 1998.

M. J. Sasena, P. Papalambros, and P. Goovaerts, Exploration of Metamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization, Engineering Optimization, vol.34, issue.3, pp.263-278, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/03052150211751

M. J. Sasena, P. Y. Papalambros, and P. Goovaerts, The use of surrogate modeling algorithms to exploit disparities in function computation time within simulation-based optimization, 4th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001.

J. Parr, C. M. Holden, A. I. Forrester, and A. J. Keane, Review of efficient surrogate infill sampling criteria with constraint handling, 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, pp.1-10, 2010.

J. Villemonteix, E. Vazquez, and E. Walter, An informational approach to the global optimization of expensive-to-evaluate functions, Journal of Global Optimization, vol.10, issue.5, pp.509-534, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00354262

F. O. Hoffman and J. S. Hammonds, Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessments: The Need to Distinguish Between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty Due to Variability, Risk Analysis, vol.57, issue.104, pp.707-712, 1994.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00281.x

M. E. Patépat´paté-cornell, Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.54, issue.2-3, pp.95-111, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1

I. C. Wright, A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design, Design Studies, vol.18, issue.1, pp.33-42, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00029-4

T. A. Jarratt, C. M. Eckert, N. H. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson, Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature, Research in engineering design, pp.103-124, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00029-4

P. J. Clarkson, C. Simons, and C. Eckert, Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.pp., issue.5, pp.788-797, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589

G. A. Ollinger and T. F. Stahovich, RedesignIT???A Model-Based Tool for Managing Design Changes, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.24, issue.2, pp.208-216, 2004.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1666888

L. Chen, A. Macwan, and S. Li, Model-based Rapid Redesign Using Decomposition Patterns, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.27, issue.3, pp.283-294, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

B. Hamraz, N. H. Caldwell, and P. Clarkson, A Multidomain Engineering Change Propagation Model to Support Uncertainty Reduction and Risk Management in Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.22, issue.10, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/CMV.2005.11

F. I. Romli and M. Y. Harmin, Use of Monte Carlo method to estimate subsystem redesign risk for complex products: aircraft redesign case study, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol.87, issue.6, pp.563-570, 2015.
DOI : 10.1177/0092070398261006

C. Roser and D. Kazmer, Risk effect minimization using flexible product and process design Available: http://www.allaboutlean.com/wp-content/uploads A flexible design methodology, Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Las Vegas, Nevada: ASME Roser DETC-Risk-Effect-Minimization Preprint.pdf [76] C. H. Roser, pp.383-94, 1999.

D. Available, J. Kazmer, and . Rinderle, Roser DISSERTATION-A-Flexible-Design-Methodology An Economic Design Change Method, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.125, issue.2, pp.233-239, 2000.

B. D. Youn and K. K. Choi, Selecting Probabilistic Approaches for Reliability-Based Design Optimization, AIAA Journal, vol.15, issue.4, pp.124-131, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980615)42:3<517::AID-NME370>3.0.CO;2-L

Z. Jiang, W. Chen, Y. Fu, and R. Yang, Reliability-Based Design Optimization with Model Bias and Data Uncertainty, SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, vol.6, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.4271/2013-01-1384

C. Eckert, C. Earl, S. Lebjioui, and O. Isaksson, Components Margins through the Product Lifecycle, Product Lifecycle Management for Society, ser. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp.39-47, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-41501-2_5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01461910

A. C. Thornton, Optimism vs. Pessimism: Design Decisions in the Face of Process Capability Uncertainty, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.117, issue.3, pp.313-321, 1998.
DOI : 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1956.tb03809.x

N. Hansen, The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review in Towards a new evolutionary computation, pp.75-102, 2006.

J. S. Agte, J. Sobieszczanski-sobieski, and R. R. Sandusky, Supersonic Business Jet Design Through Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis, SAE Technical Paper Series, 1999.
DOI : 10.4271/1999-01-5622

R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, The Journal of Risk, vol.2, issue.3, pp.21-42, 2000.
DOI : 10.21314/JOR.2000.038

J. C. Helton, J. Chiì-es, and P. Delfiner, Treatment of uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems Risk analysis Available: http://onlinelibrary, Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, pp.483-511, 1994.

J. Bect and E. Vazquez, STK: a Small (Matlab/Octave) Toolbox for Kriging, 2014.

F. Castellini, Multidisciplinary design optimization for expendable launch vehicles Available: https, p.56841, 10589.

S. Gordon and B. J. Mcbride, Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications I: Analysis, NASA Lewis Research Center, Tech. Rep, 1994.

B. J. Mcbride and S. Gordon, Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications II. Users Manual and Program Description, NASA Lewis Research Center, Tech. Rep, 1996.

R. Rohrschneider, Development of a mass estimating relationship database for launch vehicle conceptual design, AE8900 Special Project, School of Aerospace Engineering, 2002.

W. B. Blake, Missile Datcom: User's Manual-1997 FORTRAN 90 Revision, DTIC Document, Tech. Rep, 1998.

D. E. Koelle, Handbook of Cost Engineering and Design of Space Transportation Systems: With TransCost 8.2 Model Description; Statistical-analytical Model for Cost Estimation and Economic Optimization of Launch Vehicles, TCS - TransCostSystems, 2013.

D. Neufville and S. Scholtes, Flexibility in engineering design, ser. Engineering systems Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/univflorida/Doc?id=10524447 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Nathaniel Price was born in St He graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida (UF) in 2012. As an undergraduate he held internships with E&S Consulting, Inc. in St. Augustine, Florida and Space Exploration Technologies, p.190, 1988.