A. Abeillé and D. Godard, Deux types de prédicats complexes dans les langues romanes, Linx, issue.45, pp.167-175, 2001.

A. Abeillé and D. Godard, Les prédicats complexes dans les langues romanes, 2003.

. Godard, Les langues romanes: problèmes de la phrase simple, pp.125-184

J. Aissen, The syntax of causative constructions, 1979.

J. L. Aissen and D. M. Perlmutter, Clause Reduction in Spanish, Studies in Relational Grammar 1, p.360404, 1983.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v2i0.2283

N. Akhtar and M. Tomasello, Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology., Developmental Psychology, vol.33, issue.6, p.952965, 1997.
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.952

A. Aksu-koç and D. I. Slobin, The acquisition of Turkish The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data, pp.839-880, 1985.

S. E. Allen, Categories within the verb category: learning the causative in Inuktitut, Linguistics, vol.36, issue.4, pp.633-678, 1998.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1998.36.4.633

A. Alsina, The role of argument structure in grammar: evidence from Romance, 1996.

M. Amberber, Valency-changing and valency-encoding devices in Amharic, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.010

B. Ambridge, Assessing grammatical knowledge Research methods in child language: a practical guide (p. 113132), 2012.

B. Ambridge and J. M. Pine, Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model using an elicited imitation paradigm, Journal of Child Language, vol.33, issue.04, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000906007628

B. Ambridge, J. M. Pine, C. F. Rowland, and C. R. Young, The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children???s and adults??? graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors, Cognition, vol.106, issue.1, pp.87-129, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.015

B. Ambridge, C. F. Rowland, and J. M. Pine, Is Structure Dependence an Innate Constraint? New Experimental Evidence From Children's Complex-Question Production, Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol.32, issue.1, 2008.
DOI : 10.1080/03640210701703766

M. S. Ammon and D. I. Slobin, A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences, Cognition, vol.7, issue.1, pp.3-17, 1979.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90007-6

A. Antonov, Le bulgare: une langue slave entre centre et périphérie Communication orale présentée au colloque « Centre et périphérie, 2006.

A. Atanasova, Predstavki i predstavkovi kompleksi v sstava na poliprefigiranite glagoli v svremennija blgarski kni?oven ezik (Préfixes et complexes de préfixes dans la composition des verbes polypréfixés en bulgare littéraire moderne) Blgarski ezik (Langue bulgare), 4. Disponible sur, 2008.

L. H. Babby, Hybrid causative constructions, Causatives and transitivity, pp.343-367, 1993.
DOI : 10.1075/slcs.23.16bab

C. L. Baker, Syntactic theory and the projection problem, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.10, issue.4, pp.533-581, 1979.

M. Barlow and S. Kemmer, Usage-based models of language, 2000.

E. Bates and J. C. Goodman, On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.12, issue.56, pp.507-584, 1997.

E. Bates and B. Macwhinney, Functionalist approaches to grammar, Language acquisition: the state of the art, pp.173-218, 1982.

E. Bates and B. Macwhinney, Competition, variation, and language learning, 1987.

. Macwhinney, Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Papers presented at the 20th

E. Bates and B. Macwhinney, Functionalism and the Competition model, 1989.

&. E. Macwhinney and . Bates, The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (p. 3? 73)

R. A. Berman, Verb-pattern alternation: the interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child language, Journal of Child Language, vol.17, issue.01, pp.169-191, 1982.
DOI : 10.1017/S030500090000369X

T. G. Bever, The cognitive basis for linguistic structures Cognition and the development of language (p. 279362), 1970.

Y. Bezinska, Le prédicat complexe faire + Vinf dans une perspective diachronique et acquisitionnelle, Actes du 27e Colloque International sur le Lexique et la Grammaire (L'Aquila, pp.10-13, 2008.
DOI : 10.1051/cmlf08224

Y. Bezinska, Les causatifs dans le langage des enfants français et bulgares entre 3 et 6 ans, *UDPPDLUHHWOH[LTXHUHJDUGVFURLVpV (p. 5772). Astrakhan, Russie & GrenoblH )UDQFH 0DLVRQ G ¶pGLWLRQ GH O ¶8QLYHUVLWp G ¶(WDW G ¶$VWUDNKDQ5XVVLH, 2010.

Y. Bezinska and J. Chevrot, Acquisition des constructions causatives en bulgare et en français: production, compréhension, imitation, Actes du Colloque AcquisiLyon, 2009.

F. Lyon, Disponible sur, 2009.

Y. Bezinska, J. Chevrot, I. Novakova, and A. Nardy, L'acquisition de faire + Vinf en français: production, compréhension, imitation, Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2010.

Y. Bezinska and I. Novakova, Grammaticalisation et acquisition des constructions causatives en français et en bulgare. CogniTextes (Revue de l'Association française de linguistique cognitive), 5. Disponible sur, p.346, 2010.

D. Blagoeva, S. Koeva, and V. Murdarov, Blgarskijat ezik v digitalnata epoxa (The Bulgarian language in the digital age), 2012.

A. Blinkenberg, Le problème de la transitivité en français moderne: essai syntacticosémantique, 1960.

L. Bloom, L. Hood, and P. Lightbown, Imitation in language development: If, when, and why, Cognitive Psychology, vol.6, issue.3, pp.380-420, 1974.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90018-8

L. Bloom, E. Tinker, and C. Margulis, The words children learn: Evidence against a noun bias in early vocabularies, Cognitive Development, vol.8, issue.4, pp.431-450, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/S0885-2014(05)80003-6

H. Borer and K. Wexler, The Maturation of Syntax, Parameter setting, p.123172, 1987.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6

M. Bowerman, Learning the structure of causative verbs: a study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic and syntactic development, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, issue.8, pp.142-178, 1974.

M. Bowerman, Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs, pp.5-66, 1982.

M. Bowerman, Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development, Language acquisition: the state of the art, p.319346, 1982.

M. Bowerman and W. Croft, The acquisition of the English causative alternation, Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: implications for learnability, pp.279-308, 2008.

M. D. Braine, The Ontogeny of English Phrase Structure: The First Phase, Language, vol.39, issue.1, pp.1-13, 1963.
DOI : 10.2307/410757

M. D. Braine, Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, pp.1-104, 1976.

M. D. Braine, R. E. Brody, S. M. Fisch, M. J. Weisberger, and M. Blum, Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure?, Journal of Child Language, vol.8, issue.02, pp.313-342, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000900008084

M. D. Braine and P. J. Brooks, Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar Beyond names for things: young children's acquisition of verbs, p.353376, 1995.

P. J. Brooks and M. Tomasello, How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions, Language, vol.75, issue.4, pp.720-738, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/417731

P. J. Brooks and M. Tomasello, Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs., Developmental Psychology, vol.35, issue.1, p.2944, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.29

P. J. Brooks, M. Tomasello, K. Dodson, and L. B. Lewis, Young Children's Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs, Child Development, vol.70, issue.6, pp.1325-1337, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-8624.00097

P. J. Brooks and O. Zizak, Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity?, Journal of Child Language, vol.29, issue.04, pp.759-781, 2002.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000902005287

R. Brown, A first language: the early stages, 1973.
DOI : 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469

R. Brown and C. Fraser, The acquisition of syntax Verbal behavior and learning: problems and processes (p. 158209), 1963.

R. Brown and C. Hanlon, Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech, Cognition and the development of language, p.1153, 1970.

J. Bybee, Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form, 1985.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.9

J. Bybee, Regular morphology and the lexicon, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.11, issue.5, pp.425-455, 1995.
DOI : 10.1080/01690969308406948

J. Bybee, The Phonology of the Lexicon, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.003.0009

&. S. Barlow and . Kemmer, Usage-based models of language (p, pp.65-85

J. Bybee and J. Scheibman, The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English, Linguistics, vol.37, issue.4, pp.575-596, 1999.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.37.4.575

J. Bybee and S. Thompson, Three Frequency Effects in Syntax, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, p.378388, 1997.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293

J. T. Chamberlain, Latin antecedents of French causative faire, 1986.

A. Chan, E. Lieven, M. Tomasello, and E. German, Children's understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.20, issue.2, pp.267-300, 2009.
DOI : 10.1515/COGL.2009.015

C. Chomsky, The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10, 1969.

N. Chomsky, Verbal behavior, Language, vol.35, issue.1, pp.26-58, 1959.
DOI : 10.2307/411334

N. Chomsky, Aspects of the theory of syntax, 1965.

N. Chomsky, Trois mod??les de description du langage, Langages, vol.3, issue.9, pp.51-76, 1968.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.1968.2361

N. Chomsky, Rules and representations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.20, issue.01, pp.1-15, 1980.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04204.x

N. Chomsky, Rules and representations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.20, issue.01, 1980.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04204.x

N. Chomsky, Lectures on government and binding, 1981.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110884166

N. Chomsky, Knowledge of language: its nature, origins, and use, 1986.

N. Chomsky, The Minimalist program, 1995.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001

N. Chomsky, New horizons in the study of language and mind, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511811937

E. V. Clark, The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French, 1985.

. Slobin, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data, p.687782

B. Comrie, The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences Syntax and Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, pp.261-312, 1976.

B. Comrie, Language universals and language typology, 1981.

E. H. Courtney, Child acquisition of Quechua causatives and change-of-state verbs, 2002.

D. Creissels, Syntaxe générale: une introduction typologique 1, Catégories et constructions, vol.1, 2006.

D. Creissels, Syntaxe générale: une introduction typologique 2, La phrase, vol.2, 2006.

W. Croft, Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001

W. Croft, Radical construction grammar The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, p.211232, 2013.

W. Croft and A. Cruse, Cognitive linguistics, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511803864

J. Damourette and É. Pichon, Des mots à la pensée: essai de grammaire de la langue française, Le, vol.5, 1911.

C. P. Dancey and J. Reidy, Statistiques sans maths pour psychologues, SPSS pour Windows, QCM et exercices corrigés, 2007.

K. J. Danell, Remarques sur la construction dite causative: faire (laisser, voir, entendre, sentir) + infinitif, 1979.

J. Desclés and Z. Guentchéva, Causalit??, Causativit??, Transitivit??, Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the occasion of his 70th birthday, pp.7-27, 1998.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110913750.7

H. Diessel, The acquisition of complex sentences, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511486531

H. Diessel, Grammaticalization and language acquisition The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (p, pp.130-141, 2011.

H. Diessel, Construction grammar and first language acquisition The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, p.347364, 2013.

A. Dineva, Semantika na kauzativnite glagoli v blgarski ezik (Semantique des verbes causatifs en bulgare) Blgarski ezik (Langue bulgare), p.140148, 1985.

R. M. Dixon, A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003

&. A. Dixon and . Aikhenvald, Changing valency: case studies in transitivity (p. 30? 83)
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511627750

K. Dodson and M. Tomasello, Acquiring the transitive construction in English: the role of animacy and pronouns, Journal of Child Language, vol.25, issue.3, p.605622, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000998003535

S. Döpke, Competing language structures: the acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children, Journal of Child Language, vol.25, issue.3, pp.25-555, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000998003584

C. Dugua, Liaison, segmentation lexicale et schémas syntaxiques entre 2 et 6 ans: un modèle développemental basé sur l'usage (Thèse de doctorat), 2006.

J. L. Elman, E. Bates, M. H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-smith, D. Parisi et al., Rethinking innateness: a connectionist perspective on development, 1996.

M. J. Farrar, Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes, Journal of Child Language, vol.12, issue.03, pp.607-624, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000900008163

M. J. Farrar, Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition., Developmental Psychology, vol.28, issue.1, p.9098, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.90

J. Feuillet, Typologie des langues balkaniques, Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe, p.899923, 1998.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110804485.899

J. Feuillet, Introduction à la typologie linguistique, 2006.

R. A. Figueira, On the development of the expression of causativity: a syntactic hypothesis, Journal of Child Language, vol.8, issue.01, pp.109-127, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80023-3

C. J. Fillmore and P. Kay, Construction grammar, 1993.

C. J. Fillmore, P. Kay, and M. C. Connor, Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone, Language, vol.64, issue.3, pp.501-538, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/414531

S. Flynn and B. Lust, Acquisition of relative clauses: developmental changes in their heads, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, pp.33-45, 1980.

J. A. Fodor, Three reasons for not deriving « kill » from « cause to die, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.1, issue.4, pp.429-438, 1970.

C. Fraser, U. Bellugi, and R. Brown, Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.2, issue.2, pp.121-135, 1963.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80076-6

W. Frawley, Linguistic semantics, 1992.

D. Gaatone, Les pronoms conjoints dans la construction factitive, p.165182, 1976.

M. Gawe?ko, + infinitif dans les langues romanes et quelques autres, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, vol.53, issue.2-3, pp.117-138, 2006.
DOI : 10.1556/ALing.53.2006.2-3.2

J. Giry-schneider, Les nominalisations en français: l'opérateur « faire, 1978.

T. Givón, Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code, Studies in Language, vol.15, issue.1, pp.85-114, 1991.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.110.07giv

T. Givón, Markedness in Grammar: Distributional, Communicative and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic Structure, Studies in Language, vol.15, issue.2, pp.335-370, 1991.
DOI : 10.1075/sl.15.2.05giv

T. Givón, The genesis of syntactic complexity, 2009.
DOI : 10.1075/z.146

J. B. Gleason and N. B. Ratner, The development of language, 2009.

A. E. Goldberg, Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure, 1995.

A. E. Goldberg, Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language, 2006.

A. E. Goldberg, Constructionist approaches, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002

R. M. Golinkoff and K. Hirsh-pasek, Reinterpreting children's sentence comprehension: toward a new framework The Handbook of Child Language, pp.430-461, 1995.

R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-pasek, K. M. Cauley, and L. Gordon, The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm, Journal of Child Language, vol.2, issue.01, pp.23-45, 1987.
DOI : 10.2307/1128237

H. Goodluck, The act-out task Methods for assessing children's syntax (p, pp.147-162, 1998.

H. Goodluck and S. Tavakolian, Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses, Cognition, vol.11, issue.1, pp.1-27, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90002-6

A. Gopnik and S. Choi, Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: nouns are not always learned before verbs Beyond names for things: young children's acquisition of verbs (p, pp.63-80, 1995.

G. Gougenheim, Etude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française, 1929.

M. Gross, Grammaire transformationnelle du français. Syntaxe du verbe, 1968.

T. Grüter, Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French (Thèse de doctorat), 2006.

M. T. Guasti, R. Thornton, and K. Wexler, Negation in children's questions: the case of English, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.228-239, 1995.

Z. Guenadieva-mutaftchieva, Podþinitelnijat sjuz 'da' v svremennija blgarski ezik (La conjonction de subordination 'da' en bulgare moderne), Sofia: BAN (Académie Bulgare des Sciences, 1970.

Z. Guentchéva, La place du moyen dans les constructions réflexives en bulgare, Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, pp.359-379, 1997.

S. Gueorguiev, Blgarska morfologija (Morphologie du bulgare) Veliko Tarnovo: Abagar, 1993.

J. Haiman, Iconic and Economic Motivation, Language, vol.59, issue.4, pp.781-819, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/413373

M. Halliday, An introduction to functional grammar, 1985.

I. Haralampiev, Istoriþeska gramatika na blgarskija ezik (Grammaire historique de la langue bulgare), 2001.

M. Haspelmath, More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations, 1993.
DOI : 10.1075/slcs.23.05has

L. K. Heilenman and J. L. Mcdonald, Processing Strategies in L2 Learners of French: The Role of Transfer, Language Learning, vol.59, issue.15, pp.507-557, 1993.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00626.x

A. Hernandez, P. Li, and B. Macwhinney, The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.9, issue.5, pp.220-225, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.003

K. Hirsh-pasek and R. M. Golinkoff, The origins of grammar: evidence from early language comprehension, 1996.

J. Hochberg, Children's judgements of transitivity errors, Journal of Child Language, vol.60, issue.02, pp.317-334, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6

T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, Construction grammar: introduction The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, p.114, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0001

L. Hood and P. M. Lightbown, What do children do when asked to « Say what I say »: does elicited imitation measure linguistic knowledge, Allied Health and Behavioral Sciences, issue.1, pp.195-219, 1978.

D. C. Howell, Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines, 1998.

N. M. Hyams, Language acquisition and the theory of parameters, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5

M. Iliescu, Le factitif dans les langues romanes, Romanistik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, pp.3-14, 1996.

D. Ivanova-mirtcheva and I. Haralampiev, Istorija na blgarskija ezik (Histoire de la langue bulgare), 1999.

M. Kail, Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, p.77117, 1989.

M. Kail, Acquisition syntaxique et diversité linguistique, L'acquisition du langage. Le langage en développement: au-delà de trois ans, pp.9-44, 2000.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.fayol.2000.02.0009

M. Kail, Le développement morphosyntaxique du langage: recherches inter-langues, 2004.
DOI : 10.3406/psy.1983.28483

T. Kurteva, Otnovo za semantikata na glagolnata predstavka 'raz-' v svremennija blgarski ezik (Retour sur la sémantique du préfixe verbal 'raz-' en bulgare moderne), 2004.

I. Kutsarov, Lekcii po blgarska morfologija, 1997.

M. Labelle, Predication, WH-Movement, and the Development of Relative Clauses, Language Acquisition, vol.1, issue.1, pp.95-119, 1990.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327817la0101_4

G. Lakoff, Irregularity in syntax, 1970.

G. Lakoff, Women, fire, and fangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind, 1987.

B. Lamiroy, Auxiliaires, langues romanes et grammaticalisation, Langages, vol.33, issue.135, pp.33-45, 1999.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.1999.2201
URL : https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/155708/1/1999-Aux_Langages.pdf

B. Lamiroy, La construction causative en faire et??le??marquage diff??rentiel de l???objet en fran??ais, Autour des verbes: constructions et interprétations, p.318, 2013.
DOI : 10.1075/lis.29.03lam

B. Lamiroy and M. Charolles, Les clitiques accusatifs versus datifs dans les constructions causatives en faire, Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, pp.12-15, 2010.
DOI : 10.1051/cmlf/2010206

R. W. Langacker, Disponible sur Foundations of cognitive grammar: theoretical prerequisites, Juillet, vol.1, 1987.

R. W. Langacker, A usage-based model, Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, pp.127-163, 1988.

R. W. Langacker, Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar, 1990.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110857733

R. W. Langacker, Foundations of cognitive grammar: descriptive application, 1991.

R. W. Langacker, A dynamic usage-based model Usage-based models of language Stanford, pp.1-63, 2000.

R. W. Langacker, Cognitive grammar, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp.538-542, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/b978-0-08-042580-1.50060-x

M. Larjavaara, Présence ou absence de l'objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain (Thèse de doctorat), 2000.

S. Lauer, Periphrastic causative verbs in English: what do they mean? Stanford University, Disponible sur, 2010.

M. Lemmens, Les constructions causatives sans objet: un complément à l'analyse récente de Goldberg, Cercles, Occasional Papers Series, vol.2, pp.117-138, 2005.

E. H. Lenneberg, The Biological Foundations of Language, Hospital Practice, vol.2, issue.12, 1967.
DOI : 10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799

B. Levin and M. Hovav, Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface, 1995.

E. Lieven and S. Stoll, Language, Handbook of Cultural Developmental Science, p.143160, 2010.

H. Lin and J. S. Tsay, Acquiring causatives in Taiwan Southern Min, Journal of Child Language, vol.11, issue.02, p.467487, 2008.
DOI : 10.2307/414149

B. Lust, S. Flynn, and C. Foley, What children know about what they say: elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children's syntax Methods for assessing children's syntax (p, pp.55-76, 1998.

J. Lyons, Linguistique générale: introduction à la linguistique théorique, 1970.

B. Macwhinney, The Competition model, Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Papers presented at the 20th Annual Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition, p.249308, 1987.

B. Macwhinney, Competition and connectionism The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, pp.422-457, 1989.

B. Macwhinney, Competition and lexical categorization, 1989.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.61.14mac

B. Macwhinney, Competition in language and thought, 1989.

&. S. Tryphon and . Dionnet, Genève: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget, Language and cognition, vol.10, p.6174

B. Macwhinney, The emergence of language, 1999.

B. Macwhinney, A unified model of language acquisition, 2005.

. Degroot, Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, p.4967

B. Macwhinney and E. Bates, The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 1989.

B. Macwhinney, H. Feldman, K. Sacco, and R. Valdés-pérez, Online Measures of Basic Language Skills in Children with Early Focal Brain Lesions, Brain and Language, vol.71, issue.3, pp.71-400, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/brln.1999.2273

M. Maratsos, R. Gudeman, P. Gerard-ngo, and G. Dehart, A study in novel word learning: the productivity of the causative, Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Papers presentend at the 20th Annual Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition, p.89113, 1987.

V. A. Marchman and E. Bates, Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis, Journal of Child Language, vol.34, issue.02, pp.339-366, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/414151

G. F. Marcus, S. Vijayan, S. B. Rao, and P. M. Vishton, Rule learning by sevenmonth-old infants, Science, issue.5398, pp.283-77, 1999.
DOI : 10.1126/science.283.5398.77

C. Martinot, Acquisition et reformulation, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00640994

C. Martinot and A. H. Ibrahim, La reformulation: un principe universel d'acquisition, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00126485

Y. Matsumoto, A reexamination of the cross-linguistic parameterization of causative predicates: Japanese perspectives, Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Disponible sur, 1998.

E. L. Newport and R. N. Aslin, Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies, Cognitive Psychology, issue.48, p.127162, 2004.

E. L. Newport, R. N. Aslin, and M. D. Hauser, Learning at a distance: statistical learning of non-adjacent regularities in humans and tamarin monkeys, pp.2-4, 2001.

E. L. Newport, M. D. Hauser, G. Spaepen, and R. N. Aslin, Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate, Cognitive Psychology, vol.49, issue.2, p.85117, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.12.002

J. Nichols, Direct and oblique objects in Chechen-Ingush and Russian Objects: towards a theory of grammatical relations (p, pp.183-209, 1984.

H. Nilsson-ehle, OBSERVATIONS SUR LA SOUDURE SYNTAXIQUE DU GROUPE ???FAIRE + INFINITIF???, Studia Linguistica, vol.2, issue.1-3, pp.93-118, 1948.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1948.tb00461.x

R. Nitsolova, Blgarskijat glagol: obzor (Le verbe bulgare: aperçu général), 1976.

I. Novakova, Fonctionnement compar?? de l'aspect verbal en fran??ais et en bulgare, Revue des ??tudes slaves, vol.73, issue.1, pp.7-23, 2001.
DOI : 10.3406/slave.2001.6696

I. Novakova, Le factitif français: approche syntaxique, sémantique et contrastive (français-bulgare). Tranel (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique), p.93113, 2002.

I. Novakova, « Bouge ta ville! » De l'emploi transitif de verbes intransitifs avec un sens causatif, pp.141-145, 2005.

I. Novakova, La transitivation causative (approche contrastive et typologique), 2006.

C. Lebaud, &. K. Paulin, and . Ploog, Constructions verbales et production de sens (p. 115?126), pp.26-28, 2006.

I. Novakova, Faire + Vinf: une analyse fonctionnelle, 2010.

I. Novakova, Quels enjeux pour la linguistique contrastive? Sur l'exemple des constructions causatives en français et en bulgare, 2010.

I. Novakova, Syntaxe et sémantique des constructions causatives, Actes du Colloque International: Les catégories verbales dans les langues romanes, p.274287, 2010.

I. Novakova, Syntaxe et sémantique des prédicats (approche contrastive et fonctionnelle) (Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches), 2010.

R. Okabe, Child causatives: acquisition of bi-clausal structures in Japanese (Thèse de doctorat), 2008.

Y. Pentchev, Sintaksis na svremennija blgarski kni?oven ezik (Syntaxe du bulgare littéraire moderne), 1998.

A. T. Pérez-leroux, M. Pirvulescu, and Y. Roberge, Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon, Lingua, vol.118, issue.3, pp.370-398, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002

D. M. Perlmutter, Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, p.157190, 1978.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198

J. Piaget, La construction du réel chez l'enfant, 1937.

J. Piaget, La représentation du monde chez l'enfant, 1947.

J. Piaget, Le jugement et le raisonnement chez l'enfant, 1947.

J. Piaget, La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant, 1948.

J. Piaget, Six études de psychologie, 1964.

M. Piatelli-palmarini, Théories du langage, théories de l'apprentissage: le débat entre Jean Piaget et Noam Chomsky, 1979.

S. Pinker, Language learnability and language development, 1984.

S. Pinker, Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure, 1989.

S. Pinker, The language instinct: how the mind creates language, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/e412952005-009

C. Piñón, Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation, Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, issue.76, pp.273-293, 2001.

J. Pollock, Langage et cognition: introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative, 1997.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.pollo.1998.01

Y. Pometkova, Nominalizacii v obektna pozicija km kauzativni glagoli (Nominalisations en position d'objet avec des verbes causatifs), Arnaudov sbornik Ruse: Leni An, p.478483, 2008.

B. Pottier, Linguistique générale, 1974.

C. Pye, A Cross-linguistic approach to the causative alternation Other children, other languages: issues in the theory of language acquisition, p.243263, 1994.

E. Roegiest, Degrés de fusion dans la construction factitive des langues romanes, Verbe et phrase dans les langues romanes: mélanges offerts à Louis Mourin, pp.271-288, 1983.

M. Rothemberg, Les verbes à la fois transitifs et intransitifs en français contemporain, 1974.

C. F. Rowland, J. M. Pine, E. Lieven, and A. L. Theakston, Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech We would like to thank all the families who took part in the research reported here. The collection and transcription of the data presented here was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, Grant Number R000236393., Journal of Child Language, vol.30, issue.3, pp.609-635, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000903005695

N. Ruwet, Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, 1972.

J. R. Saffran, R. N. Aslin, and E. L. Newport, Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants, Science, vol.274, issue.5294, pp.274-1926, 1996.
DOI : 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926

M. Sarkar, Saute ça. The acquisition of the faire faire causative by first and second language learners of French, 2000.

M. Sarkar, causative by first and second language learners of French, Annual Review of Language Acquisition, vol.2, pp.157-201, 2002.
DOI : 10.1075/arla.2.07sar

M. Saxton, Negative evidence and negative feedback: immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech, First Language, vol.27, issue.1, pp.221-252, 2000.
DOI : 10.1177/014272370002006001

M. Saxton, B. Kulcsar, G. Marshall, and M. Rupra, Longer-term effects of corrective input: an experimental approach, Journal of Child Language, vol.25, issue.3, pp.701-721, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000998003559

M. Shibatani, Causativization, Syntax and Semantics: Japanese Generative Grammar, p.239294, 1975.

M. Shibatani, The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus Syntax and Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, p.139, 1976.

M. Shibatani, Introduction, 2002.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.48.04shi

. Shibatani, ?22), Typological Studies in Language, p.1

M. Shibatani and P. Pardeshi, The causative continuum, Typological Studies in Language, pp.85-126, 2002.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.48.07shi

R. Simone and D. Cerbasi, Types and diachronic evolution of Romance causative constructions, Romanische Forschungen, vol.113, issue.4, pp.441-473, 2001.

H. Sinclair-de-zwart, Developmental psycholinguistics, Studies in cognitive development: essays in honor of Jean Piaget, pp.315-336, 1969.

R. Slabakova, Bulgarian preverbs: aspect in phrase structure, Linguistics, vol.35, issue.4, pp.673-704, 1997.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.673

D. I. Slobin, Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar, 1973.

D. I. Slobin, Talking perfectly: discourse origins of the present perfect, Perspectives on grammaticalization, p.119133, 1994.

D. I. Slobin, Language evolution, acquisition and diachrony: probing the parallels The evolution of language out of pre-language, pp.375-392, 2002.

D. I. Slobin, From ontogenesis to phylogenesis: what can child language tell us about language evolution Biology and knowledge revisited: from neurogenesis to psychogenesis (p, pp.255-285, 2005.

D. I. Slobin and C. A. Welsh, Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics, Studies of Child Language Development, pp.485-497, 1973.

J. J. Song, Toward a typology of causative constructions, 2001.

J. J. Song, Causatives: Semantics, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp.265-268, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01027-0

J. J. Song, Nonperiphrastic causative constructions The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Disponible sur, 2013.

J. J. Song, Periphrastic causative constructions The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Disponible sur, p.110, 2013.

M. Staro, B. Bokus, and M. Kail, Online sentence processing in Polish children and adults, Studies in the Psychology of Child Language, pp.227-245, 2005.

L. Tesnière, Eléments de syntaxe structurale, 1959.

R. Thornton, Elicited production Methods for assessing children's syntax (p, pp.77-102, 1998.

M. Tomasello, First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development, 1992.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511527678

M. Tomasello, Cognitive linguistics, A Companion to Cognitive Science, pp.477-487, 1998.

M. Tomasello, Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, pp.209-253, 2000.

M. Tomasello, First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.11, issue.1-2, pp.61-82, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.2001.012

M. Tomasello and J. Call, Primate cognition, 1997.

C. Touratier, La sémantique, 2000.

C. Uúurelu, La grammaticalisation des opérateurs factitifs en roumain. Revue roumaine de linguistique, pp.159-166, 2011.

A. Vaillant, Grammaire comparée des langues slaves, Phonétique, vol.1, 1950.

A. Vaillant, Grammaire comparée des langues slaves, La syntaxe, vol.5, 1977.

V. Valian, Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children, Cognition, vol.40, issue.1-2, pp.21-81, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90046-7

M. Vasilyeva, H. Waterfall, and L. Gómez, Using Priming Procedures with Children, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/9781444344035.ch11

I. E. Hoff, Research methods in child language: a practical guide, pp.162-176
DOI : 10.1002/9781444344035

M. Wilmet, Grammaire critique du français (Cinquième édition entièrement revue, 2010.

P. Zesiger, L. C. Zesiger, M. Arabatzi, L. Baranzini, S. Cronel-ohayon et al., The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension, Applied Psycholinguistics, vol.1, issue.04, pp.31-571, 2010.
DOI : 10.3406/psy.1977.28180

T. De, P. De, and . Codage, Construction factitive Construction factitive canonique F1 La fille fait rire le bébé

E. Fait-rigoler-le-bébé, Il fait sauter le robot

*. Elle, le (la fille) fait pleurer.;*Elle (le papa) la fait rire

. Constr, factitive + 1 ou 2 arg(s) (genre faux); verbe hors protocole, p.4

. Constr, factitive + 1 arg. juste + 1 arg. faux (synt); verbe hors protocole, p.6

*. Elle, Elle (le papa) fait manger *à la grande soeur. Construction factitive + 1 arg. juste + 1 arg. absent F8 Il fait rire + Ø

. Constr, factitive + 1 arg. juste + 1 arg. absent; verbe hors protocole, p.9

. Constr, factitive + 1 arg. (genre faux) + 1 arg. absent; verbe hors protocole, p.11

*. Il-(-la-fille-)-fait-rigoler and +. , Expression de la conséquence Action/Etat causataire + argument(s) présent(s) et juste(s) CEE3

. Le-bébé-rit, Elle boit le lait; Il pleure.; Le gros robot

. Il-se-casse, Il est cassé.; La mamie, elle danse.; Le bébé se nourrit/s'amuse

. Il-le-pousse-pour-qu-'il-tombe and . Le, Une grimace pour qu'il rie, le bébé. Donner à Vinf Donner + à + Infinitif + arguments présents et justes D1 Le papa donne à boire à la fille. ; Il lui donne à boire

+. Donner, Infinitif + argument(s) (genre faux, p.2

+. Donner, +. Infinitif, and +. Arg, faux (syntaxe); verbe hors protocole, p.4

+. Donner, Infinitif + 1 argument juste + 1/2 argument(s) absent(s) D5

+. Donner and +. Infinitif, 1 argument (genre faux) + 1/2 argument(s) absent(s) D6

+. Ø. Il-montre, Il a tué + Ø.; Ø + tue la mouche

. Surgénér, + 1 arg. (genre faux) + 1 arg. absent; verbe hors protocole, p.7

*. Elle, Hercule) fait attaquer + Ø + avec des bâtons ( C'est Hercule qui attaque le lion )

*. Il and +. Le-fait-montrer, Verbe lexical à l'infinitif (ellipses de la factitive)

+. Hercule-a-fait-mort, Expression de la cause Action causateur + argument(s) présent(s) et juste(s) CER1

. Hercule-tabasse-le-lion, Il le frappe avec son bâton. ; Il tape le lion

. Action, (s)/objet(s) juste(s) + arg.(s)/objet(s) absent(s) CER4

+. Il-a-donné-un-coup, Il a frappé + Ø.; Il tape (a tapé) + Ø. Expression de la conséquence Etat causataire exprimé par se faire + Vinf (passif) CEE1

. Il-est-mort and . Le-lion, Il est tombé, le lion.; Il est assommé

I. Sur-critères-sémantico-syntaxiques, T. De, . Production, . De, and . Codage, Mécanisme lexical Lexical + argument(s) présent(s) et juste(s) L1

. Kenguroto-xrani-meþeto-le-kangourou-nourrit-le-petit-ours, Kakata zabavljava bebeto -la grande soeur amuse le bébé. Malkijat robot sbarja golemija -le petit robot renverse le grand

/. Kakata-razveseljava-bebeto-la-grande-soeur-fait-que-le-bébé-soit-gai and . Joyeux, da (conj) + préfixe "raz-" + arguments absents M3 da razsmiva/da razsmee + Ø -faire rire + Ø

. Raztancuva-ja-, il) fait en sorte qu'elle commence à danser. Razt?va go -(elle) fait en sorte qu'il soit triste

. Préfixes-causatifs-inappropriés, + arg(s) prés. et juste(s) M5

+. Karam, . Sn, and . Da, conj) + Vprés + arg(s) prés. et juste(s)-inciter qn à ce que V présent P1

+. Karam, . Sn, and . Da, Vprés (hors protocole, pertinent d'après le DA) + arg(s) prés. et juste(s) P2

+. Karam and . Da, Vprés + position non conventionnelle du causataire P3 *Baba Jaga kara da tancuva -litt: Baba Jaga (il) incite à ce qu

+. Pravja and . Da, conj) + Vprés + causataire présent -faire + Vinf P5

+. Szdava and . Da-plaþe, da (conj) + V2prés. + arguments absents P8 da tancuva/da igrae -qu'(il/elle) danse (danser); da padne -qu'(il/elle) tombe (tomber) da (conj) + V2prés. (hors protocole, pertinent d'après le DA) + arguments absents P9 da se usmixva/da se radva -qu'(il/elle) sourie/soit gai

. Causativité-avec-verbe-labile, þupja, sþupvam ýupja/Sþupvam (casser) + arg(s) prés. et juste(s) CU ýupi/Sþupva robota -(il) casse le robot. Expression de la cause Action causateur + arg(s) prés. et juste(s) CER1

S. Cer5-sme?ki-des-blagues and I. , Sur critères sémantico-syntaxiques Verbe modal + da + V présent V modal + SN + da (conj) + V2prés. + argument(s) présent(s) et juste(s) MO