. Si-le-développeur, Performer1" est associé à la Task Use "Task1" et "Task1" est une Task Use de "Activity1" alors "Performer1

S. Le, Performer1" est le développeur responsable deActivity 1" et "Task 1" est une Task Use de "Activity1" alors "Performer1" est responsable de

. Cette-règle-est-la-même-que-la-précédente and . Qu, elle est appliquée aux activités/ En prenant en compte le nombre important des concepts de SPEMOntology, il est possible de définir un nombre considérable de règles d'inférence. Cette partie de l'approche n'a pas été explorée dans sa totalité et des travaux plus approfondis doivent être effectués pour l'inférence de connaissances PLs. [1] Projet ACCORD. Etat de l'art sur les langages de description d'architecture (adls), ????. Disponible à l'adresse http, p.43

T. Silvia, . Acuna, E. Santiago, and F. Xavier, Software process modelling, pp.15-41

S. Teresita, A. , G. Elisa, and B. , The socio-cultural environment in the software process modeling, pp.216-231

A. Jonathan, C. Craig, and N. David, Archjava: connecting software architecture to implementation, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE '02, pp.187-197

R. John and A. , A formal approach to software architecture

A. Ilham and O. Flávio, Supporting decentralised software-intensive processes using zeta component-based architecture description language

A. Adel, K. Tahar, and S. Adel, Integrating software architecture concepts into the mda platform with uml profile

A. Vincenzo, C. Reidar, and F. Alfonso, Assessing process-centered software engineering environments

?. Juillet, Disponible à l'adresse http, ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol, vol.6, issue.35, pp.283-328

A. Fadila, A. Mohamed, and O. Mourad, Reusing approach for software processes based on software architectures, pp.366-369

A. Fadila, O. Mourad, and A. Mohamed, Spem extension with software process architectural concepts, Dans COMPSAC, vol.78, pp.215-223

A. Fadila, O. Mourad, and A. Mohamed, Domain ontology for software process description

L. G. Atlas and . Atl, Atlas transformation language, atl user manual, version 0.7, nantes " ????. Disponible à l'adresse http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?Formal, pp.4-5, 2008.

L. Atlas and . Group, Atl transformations list, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http://www.eclipse.org/m2m, pp.91-91

A. Standards, Australian standard 4651-2004: Standard metamodel for software development methodologies

A. Denis, B. Noureddine, and C. Pierre-yves, A unified framework for software process enactment and improvement, 4th International Conference on the Software Process, pp.102-138

M. Ali, B. Liming, Z. Ross, and J. , A framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods, Proceedings of the 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC '04, p.309

B. Len, C. Paul, and K. Rick, Software architecture in practice

B. Noureddine and E. Jacky, Supporting reuse and configuration for large scale software process models, 10th International Software Process Workshop, pp.35-37

B. Reda and G. Marie-pierre, A framework for classifying and comparing process technology domains, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA '07, p.5

B. Reda, G. Marie-pierre, B. Xavier, and J. Jean-marc, Vers l'Exécutabilité des Modèles de Procédés Logiciels. Disponible à l'adresse http, p.16

B. Reda, S. Andrey, G. Marie-pierre, and B. Xavier, Software process modeling and execution: The uml4spm to ws-bpel approach, EUROMICRO-SEAA, pp.314-321

B. Jesal, B. Barry, and M. Steven, Process Elements: Components of Software Process Architectures, pp.332-346

B. Pam, E. Matt, J. Mike, and V. Steve, Domain-specific software architectures for guidance, navigation and control, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol.6, issue.2, pp.201-227

B. Barry, Software process architectures, Software Architecture Workshop

B. Barry, E. Alexander, K. Julie, P. Dan, S. Archita et al., Solving the Java object storage problem, Computer, vol.31, issue.11, pp.33-44, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/2.730734

B. Barry and W. Steven, An open architecture for software process asset reuse, Proceedings of the 10th International Software Process Workshop, p.32

W. Barry and . Boehm, A spiral model of software development and enhancement, Computer, vol.21, issue.32, pp.61-72, 2016.

B. Terezinha, B. , J. L. Risco, and B. , A method to define an object oriented software process architecture, Software Engineering Conference, Australian, pp.650-655

S. James, C. Walt, and S. , Modeling and simulating software acquisition process architectures, Journal of Systems and Software, vol.59, issue.49, pp.343-354

C. Benoît, C. Xavier, C. Alain, and C. Bernard, Towards a rigorous process modeling with spem, ICEIS, issue.3 11, pp.530-533

C. M. Benoît, S. Cossentino, B. Gaglio, . Henderson-sellers, and V. Seidita, Ingénierie dirigée par les modèles (idm) État de l?art. Rapport technique A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparaison, 11 The International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods In Systems Analysis and Design EMMSAD 06, pp.165-201

C. Bernard, C. Xavier, T. Dan, T. , D. T. Bich et al., To component engineering of reuse process, Génie logciel, pp.8-18

C. Bernard, T. Dan, T. Xavier, C. , D. T. Bich et al., Rhodes, a process component centered software engineering environment, ICEIS, pp.253-260

C. Xavier and C. Bernard, Pbool: an object-oriented language for definition and reuse of enactable processes. Software -Concepts and Tools, pp.47-62

C. Bill, M. I. Kellner, and O. Jim, Process modeling, Commun. ACM, vol.35, issue.8, p.14

D. Fei, L. Tong, Z. Na, Y. Yong, and H. Bi, Evolution process component composition based on process architecture, International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops, pp.1097-1100

D. Samir, E. Jacky, and A. Mahfoud, APEL: a graphical yet executable formalism for process modeling Automated Software Engineering, pp.61-96

R. Thomas and F. , Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures

F. Brian and . Bibliographie, Software crisis 2.0, IEEE Computer, vol.45, issue.4 21, pp.89-91

F. Alfonso, Software process: a roadmap, Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, ICSE '00, pp.41-43

G. Lizbeth, Une approche à base de composants pour la modélisation des procédés logiciels

G. David, Software architecture: a roadmap, Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, ICSE '00, pp.91-101

G. David, A. Robert, and O. John, Exploiting style in architectural design environments. SIGSOFT Softw, Eng. Notes, vol.19, issue.5, pp.175-188, 195274.

G. David, A. Robert, and O. John, Architectural mismatch or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts, Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering, ICSE '95, pp.179-185

G. David, R. T. Monroe, and W. David, Foundations of component-based systems. chapitre Acme: architectural description of component-based systems, pp.47-67

G. David and D. E. Perry, Special Issue on Software Architecture, IEEE, vol.22, p.22

G. David and S. Mary, An introduction to software architecture. Rapport technique, p.70

G. Kevin, T. E. Lindquist, K. Harry, and D. Jean-claude, Component-based software process support, pp.196-199

A. Kevin, T. E. Gary, and . Lindquist, Cooperating process components, 23rd International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC '99, p.218

A. Kevin, T. E. Gary, and . Lindquist, Distributed architectures for process component support, Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conf. on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, ISAS'99, p.37

L. Groenewegen and G. Engels, Reuse of software process fragments is reuse of software too, Proceedings 10th International Software Process Workshop, p.13
DOI : 10.1109/ISPW.1996.654373

H. Jianying, Y. Haihua, L. Chao, and J. Maozhong, A framework of ontology supported knowledge representation in software process, p.58

A. S. Hitomi, G. Alan, B. , and R. N. Taylor, Endeavors, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering , ICSE '97, p.36
DOI : 10.1145/253228.253491

S. Watts, M. I. Humphrey, and . Kellner, Software process modeling: principles of entity process models, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, ICSE '89, pp.331-342

I. Adrian and S. Carine, Framework for agile methods classification, pp.91-102

J. C. Derniame, . A. Kaba, and . J. Tankoano, Une approche incrémentale d'évolution des modèles de procédés de développement de logiciels, Proceedings of the second African Conference on research in computer science, CARI'94] M. I. KELLNER. Connecting reusable software process elements and components, pp.351-365

L. Li, Q. Yuzhong, K. N. Hareton, and . Leung, A software process ontology and its application, Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering(SWESE), ????, p.58

L. Jacques, A structured conceptual and terminological framework for software process engineering, pp.41-53

C. David, . Luckham, and V. James, An event-based architecture definition language, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.21, issue.9, pp.717-734

M. Jeff and K. Jeff, Dynamic structure in software architectures, SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol.21, issue.25, pp.3-14

M. Nenad, D. S. Rosenblum, and R. N. Taylor, A language and environment for architecture-based software development and evolution

M. Nenad and R. N. Taylor, A framework for classifying and comparing architecture description languages, SIGSOFT FSE, pp.60-76

M. Nenad and R. N. Taylor, A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.26, pp.70-93

R. Nikunj, . Mehta, M. Nenad, and P. Sandeep, Towards a taxonomy of software connectors

M. Oren and K. Shmuel, Using aspects to support the software process: Xp over eclipse

R. T. Monroe, Capturing software architecture design expertise with armani. Rapport technique, p.30, 1998.

Ñ. Verónica, A. Robert, and D. Abraham, Software process improvement and certification of a small company using the ntp 291 100 (mo- prosoft)

R. Mehta, N. , and N. Medvidovic, Understanding software connector compatibilities using a connector taxonomy, First Workshop on Software Design and Architecture, p.27

. Omg-object and G. Management, Meta Object Facility mof 2.0 core specification, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http://uml3.ru/content/omg-spec/mof/06-01-01.pdf. 10 [87] OMG Object Management GROUP. Object Constaints Language, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http, ] OMG Object Management GROUP. Software Systems Process Engineering Metamodel, v2.0, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http, pp.2008-2012

L. Olivier and . Goaer, The Institute of ELECTRICAL et Eletronics ENGINEERS Ieee standard glossary of software engineering terminology, pp.17-91

O. Leon, Software processes are software too, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering, ICSE '87, ????. V, V, 13, IV, IV [97] Mourad OUSSALAH. Ingénierie des composants logiciels , Principes et fondements. Vuibert, ????. 27, p.45

M. Chabane, O. Adel, S. Tahar, and K. , Software connectors reuse in component-based systems, Dans IRI, pp.543-550

J. Enrique and P. , Heavyweight extensions to the uml metamodel to describe the c3 architectural style, SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol.28, pp.5-5, 1963.

D. E. Perry and A. L. Wolf, BIBLIOGRAPHIE Foundations for the study of software architecture

F. Plásil, D. Bálek, R. J. Sofa, and /. Dcup, Architecture for component trading and dynamic updating, Proceedings of the International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, CDS '98, p.43

S. Nassima, Evolution Structurelle dans les Architectures Logicielles à base de Composants

?. France, Disponible à l'adresse http, Thèse de Doctorat

S. Djamal and S. , Environnement de procédé extensible pour l?orchestration Application aux services web, Thèse de Doctorat

S. Walt, Process Models in Software Engineering, Encyclopedia of Software Enginee- ring

S. Bradley and G. David, Acmestudio: Supporting style-centered architecture development, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE '04, pp.165-704

S. Mary, D. Robert, D. V. Klein, T. L. Ross, D. M. Young et al., Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.21, issue.25, pp.314-335

S. Adel, méta-modélisation dans le domaine de l?architecture logicielle

?. Thèse-de-doctorat, . Iso, and E. Iec-software, Metamodel for development methodologies. iso/iec 24744, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http Human, social and organisational influences on the software process, ????. Disponible à l'adresse http, pp.163-109

G. Halit, S. Mieczyslaw, and M. Kokar, An owl ontology for representing the cmmi-sw model. ????. Disponible à l'adresse http

S. Gernot, Why is process modelling so difficult? Dans EWSPT '94, Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Software Process Technology, pp.163-166

S. Muhammad, U. Cathy, M. Emilia, and S. Stefan, Software process improvement success factors for small and medium web companies: A qualitative study

S. Roh, K. Kim, and T. Jeon, Architecture modeling language based on

S. Clemens, Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming

T. Dan, F. Robert, and R. Bernhard, Limitations of agile software processes, Third International Conference On Extreme Programming And Flexible Processes In Software Engineering (XP2002), pp.43-46

A. Inge and W. , A process centred environment for cooperative software engineering, Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, SEKE '02, pp.469-472

Y. Takahira, K. Satoshi, M. Kaori, and S. Tomohiko, A process-centered software engineering environment using ontologies

Y. Takami, Modeling software processes by using process and object ontologies, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Automated software engineering (formerly: KBSE), ASE '97, p.319

K. Zuhairi and Z. , Process modeling languages: A literature review, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, vol.14, issue.2 8, pp.26-37

K. Zuhairi and Z. , A survey and analysis of process modeling languages, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, vol.17, issue.9, pp.68-89

K. Zuhairi, Z. Peter, and L. , Taxonomy of process modeling languages

Z. Apostolos, I. Valérie, C. Kloukinas, V. Khoi, and N. , Towards a base uml profile for architecture description, Proceedings of the ICSE Workshop on Architecture and UML, pp.22-26

L. De, Description du style client-serveur à l'aide, p.31

M. Le-niveau, Les modèles de procédés logiciels

M. Le-niveau, Les métamodèles de procédés logiciels

M. Le-niveau, Les méta-métamodèles de procédés logiciels

S. .. Le-métamodèle, Systems and Software Process Engineering Metamodel)

.. Ingénierie-par-la-réutilisation-des-procédés-logiciels and P. De, 81 4.4.1 La recherche et acquisition des connaissances de l'architecture, p.84

.. Évaluation-de-l-'approche-aosp, 85 4.5.1 Évaluation de l'approche AoSP selon l'axe procédé logiciel 85 4.5.2 Évaluation de l'approche AoSP selon l'axe architecture logicielle, p.86