!. Fill, !with!the!results!of!the!functional!analysis! (rules!for!filling!in!the!body!of!the!matrix!are!explained!after!Figure!36).! A method to envision highly constrained architectural zones in the design of multi-physics systems for severe operating conditions ? Ph

!. From and !. Mpds-!-method, !the!method!generated!thirty?eight!new!concepts!that! were!ranked!to!be!at!least!as!good!as!the!worst!among!those!conceived!by!the!engineers.! This!ranking!showed!that!nine!of!the!top!ten!concepts!were!generated!by!our!approach.! The!design!team!proceeded!with!the!fifteen! " best " !concepts,!which!were!partitioned!into! three!technological!groups:! ? Group!1!is!composed!of!concepts!created!by!the!engineers!before!application!of! the! method.! The! main! advantage! is! that! they! use! existing! modules;! the! disadvantages! are! that! the! concepts! are! not! all! multifunctional,! and! their! motions!are!discontinuous.! ? Group! 2! mixes! concepts! created! by! the! engineers! with! those! generated! by! the! method.! These! concepts! have! the! advantages! of! being! compact,! having! a! small! diameter,!and!being!continuous!in!their!motions,!but!they!involve!technical!risks! and!take!a!long!time!to!develop!(engineering).! ? Group! 3! is! composed! exclusively! of! concepts! generated! by! our! approach

!. From, of!results!is!the!biggest!difficulty!in!the!application! of!such!an!approach!in!an!industrial!context.!The!engineers!and!architects!continue!to! try!to!push!their!preferred!solution!forward.!The!results!of!the!MPDS!method!must!be! stable,!considering!that!experts!can!be!biased!in!their!evaluation

!. The and . Schlumberger, design!process!(Product!Life! Cycle! Process):! the! generation! and! the! evaluation! of! concepts! follow! the! functional! analysis! and! structural! product! breakdown.! Moreover,! our! approach! is! a! support! tool! for! design! teams! for! the! detection! and! resolution! of! multi?physics! design! problems! identified! in! our! analyses! (HOLLEY! ;! HOLLEY).! This! incorporation! of! design! problem! lessons! learned! into! the! design! process! is! in! line! with! the! fundamental! objective! of! Schlumberger's! new! design! process!

!. The, !. Excel, and . Platform, ! This! application! is! not! yet! fully! automated:!data!must!be!filled!in!by!hand,!inviting!possible!mistakes,!and!connectivity! maps!must!be!computed!manually.!Our!platform!must!be!improved!for!faster!and!more! reliable!results

!. Based, !. Typology, !. Mpds-!-method, !. Sosa, !. !. Sosa et al., only!manages!physical!connections.! It!may!be!of!interest!to!manage!more!than!physical!connections!to!be!able!to!cover!the! overall! collaborative! design! difficulties.! The! first! step! is! to! extend! the! class! of! connections!managed!by!the!MPDS!method!to!the!five!types!of!dependencies!identified! by! spatial,! structural,! energy,! material,! and! data.! The! data! model! must! be!, 2003.

A. References&, !. A. , !. H. Christofol, !. Organized, !. Criticality et al., ! How! Nature! Works:! The! Science! of! Self?!When!systems!engineering!fails?toward!complex!systems! engineering! Complex! systems! and! evolutionary! engineering!Linked:!the!New!Science!of!Networks,!Perseus!Books! "Scale?free! networks, International! Conference! on! Systems,The! Statistical! Mechanics! of! Complex! Product!Development:!Empirical!and!Analytical!Results Complexity! and! robustness.! National! Academy!of!Science!USA.! References!!, 1996.

D. , *. T. , *. B. Yannou, and *. , * Etat* de* l'art* sur* les* méthodes* de* représentation+ de+ produit+ et+ d'analyse+ de+ l'impact+ d'un+ changement+ en+ conception.!Laboratoire!de!Génie!Industriel, 2008.

D. , !. M. , and !. H. Borjesson-!, ! Participatory! Dependence! Structure! MAtrix! Approach, ! Dependence! Structure! Matrix! (DSM), 2001.

E. , !. G. , and !. J. Gally-!, !"Degeneracy!and!complexity!in!biology! systems!"Map!of!Complexity!Science, Proc.!Natl.!Acad.!Sci, 2001.

G. , !. M. , !. F. Deubzer, and !. , ! Graph! Representation! of! Physical! Effects!Networks!in!Conceptual!Design, International!Conference!on!Engineering! Design!?!ICED.!Stanford!University, 2009.

H. , !. V. Document, and . Schlumberger, ! Schlumberger! Disciplines! Audit, 2008.

K. , !. R. , !. C. Eckert, and !. , ! Viewpoints! and! Views! in! Engineering! Change! Management.! Workshop! on! Complexity! in! Design! and! Engineering, pp.188-192, 2005.

K. , !. R. , !. C. Eckert, and !. , Matrices!or!node?link!diagrams:!which! visual!representation!is!better!for!visualising!connectivity!models, Information! Visualization, vol.6276, issue.5, 2006.

K. , !. E. , !. N. Caldwell, and !. , !Using!a!Matrix?Based!Approach! to! model! Change! Propagation, Design! Strucutre! Matrix! Conference! ?! DSM.!, 2009.

L. , !. L. , !. D. Alderson, and !. , !"Towards!a!theory!of!scale?free!fraphs:! definition,!properties!and!implications, 2004.

L. , !. U. , !. M. Maurer, and !. , !Structural!Complexity!Management!?! An!Approach!for!the!Field!of!Product!Development, 2008.

M. , !. O. , and !. D. Braha-!, !"On!the!Complexity!of!the!Design!Synthesis! Problem, IEEE!Transactions!on!Systems,!Man!and!Cybernetic!, vol.26150, issue.1142, 1996.

!. H. Mcmanus and !. R. Millard-!, !Value!Stream!Analysis!and!Mapping! for! product! development.! ICAS, 2002.

P. , !. G. , !. W. Beitz, and . Springer, !Engineering!Design, 1996.

P. , !. C. , and !. J. Malak-!, ! An! Investigation! of! Set?Based! Design! from! a! Decision!Analysis!Perspective, ASME!Design!Automation!Conference, 2006.

S. , !. C. , !. K. Madhavan, and !. , !An!industrial!trial!of!a!Set?Based! approach!to!collaborative!design, 2008.

S. , !. R. , !. C. Paredis, !. Pittsburgh, !. Pa et al., !Interaction!Modeling!in!Systems!Design.! ASME!Design!Engineering!Technical!Conferences! "Selection,! tinkering,! and! emergence! in! complex!networks, Complexity!, vol.82033, 2001.

S. , !. M. , !. S. Eppinger, and !. , ! "Identifying! Modular! and! Integrative! Systems! and! Their! Impact! on! Design! Team! Interactions, Journal! of! Mechanical! Design!, vol.125, 2003.

S. , !. D. , and !. A. Aharony-!, ! Introduction! to! Percolation! Theory, 1994.

T. , !. I. , !. B. Stojadinovic, and !. , !Exploration!of!Set?Based!Design! for!reinforced!concrete!structures, 2007.

V. !. Bertalanffy and !. L. , AN OUTLINE OF GENERAL SYSTEM THEORY, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol.I, issue.2, 1950.
DOI : 10.1093/bjps/I.2.134

W. , !. A. , !. J. Liker, and !. , !"The!Second!Toyota!Paradox:!How!delaying! decisions! can! make! better! cars! faster, ! SLOAN! Management! Review!, vol.36, issue.3 43, p.61, 1995.

W. , !. A. , !. J. Liker, and !. , ! "Toyota's! Principles! of! Set?Based! Concurrent!EngineeringCollective!Dynamics!of!'Small?world'! Networks, !SLOAN!Management!Review!Nature!, vol.40393, issue.26684, 1998.

W. , !. D. , !. D. Wynn, and !. , ! Synthesis! Of! Product! Architectures! Using! A! DSM/DMM?Based! Approach, Design! Structure! Matrix! Conference,! DSM'08.! Stocklholm,!Sweden, 2008.

Z. , !. R. , !. J. Cha, and !. , ! A! Conceptual! Design! Model! Using! Axiomatic! Design,!Functional!Basis!and!TRIZ, 2007.