G. Adomavicius, A. Et, and . Tuzhilin, Expert-Driven Validation of Rule-Based User Models in Personalization Application, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol.5, pp.1-2, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-1627-9_3

L. Amgoud, C. Et, and . Cayrol, A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Articial Intelligence, vol.34, p.197216, 2002.

L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and L. Perrussel, An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences, Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied and Practical Reasoning, p.5967, 2000.

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

J. Baget, M. Croitoru, J. Fortin, and R. Thomopoulos, Default Conceptual Graph Rules: Preliminary Results for an Agronomy Application, Proc. of ICCS'09, p.8699, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00410640

J. Baget, J. Et, and . Fortin, Default Conceptual Graph Rules, Atomic Negation and Tic-Tac-Toe, Proc. of ICCS'10, p.4255, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-14197-3_8
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00537338

J. Baget, E. Et, and . Salvat, Rules dependencies in backward chaining of conceptual graphs rules, dans Conceptual Structures : Inspiration and Application, 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, p.102116, 2006.

P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida, SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics, Artificial Intelligence, vol.168, issue.1-2, p.162210, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2005.05.006

A. Ben-david and L. Sterling, Generating rules from examples of human multiattribute decision making should be simple, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.31, issue.2, p.390396, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.066

T. J. Bench-capon, Persuasion in practical argument using valuebased argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, p.429448, 2003.

B. Bonet and H. Gener, Arguing for decisions : A qualitative model of decision making, Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Articial Intelligence (UAI'96), p.98105, 1996.

C. Bos, B. Botella, and P. Vanheeghe, Modeling and Simulating Human Behaviors with Conceptual Graphs, Proc. of ICCS'97, LNAI, p.275289, 1997.

J. Bourguet, Contribution aux méthodes d'argumentation pour la prise de décision. Application à l'arbitrage au sein de la lière céréalière, Thèse de doctorat, 2010.

J. Bourguet, L. Amgoud, and R. Thomopoulos, Towards a unied model of preference-based argumentation, dans International Symposium of Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS), p.326, 2010.

J. Bourguet, R. Thomopoulos, M. Mugnier, and J. Abécassis, An articial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy, Expert Systems With Applications, vol.40, issue.11, p.45394546, 2013.

J. Bourre, A. Bégat, M. Leroux, V. Mousques-cami, N. Pérandel et al., Valeur nutritionnelle (macro et micro-nutriments) de farines et pains fran??ais, M??decine et Nutrition, vol.44, issue.2, p.4976, 2008.
DOI : 10.1051/mnut/2008442049

D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, Decision-making process Concepts and Methods, 2009.

D. Caragea, J. Zhang, J. Bao, J. Pathak, and V. Honavar, Algorithms and software for collaborative discovery from autonomous, semantically heterogeneous , distributed information sources, dans ALT, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3734, p.1344, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11564089_5
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.132.6815

M. Chein, M. Et, and . Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing Series, 2009.

M. Dean, R. Sheperd, A. Arvola, P. Lampila, L. Lahteenmaki et al., Report on consumer expectations of health benets of modied cereal products, 2007.

S. Destercke, F. Saïs, and R. Thomopoulos, Fusion évidentielle de références et interrogation exible, dans Rencontres francophones sur la logique oue et ses applications, p.1522, 2009.

S. Dubuisson-quellier, De la routine à la délibération. les arbitrages des consommateurs en situation d'achat, Réseaux, pp.253-284, 2006.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, p.321357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis : State of the Art Surveys, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/b100605

J. Fortin, R. Thomopoulos, J. Bourguet, and M. Mugnier, Supporting Argumentation Systems by Graph Representation and Computation, Proc. of GKR-IJCAI'11, p.119136, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-29449-5_5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00768328

J. Fox, S. Et, and . Das, Safe and Sound. Articial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications, 2000.

B. R. Gaines, M. L. Et, and . Shaw, Eliciting knowledge and transferring it eectively to a knowledge-based system, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.5, p.414, 1993.

D. Genest, Extension du modèle des graphes conceptuels pour la recherche d'informations, 2000.

E. Ginon, Y. Lohérac, C. Martin, P. Combris, and S. Issanchou, Eect of bre information on consumer willingness to pay for french baguettes, Food Quality and Preference, vol.20, p.343352, 2009.

J. Gottsegen, Using argumentation analysis to assess stakeholder interests in planning debates, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol.22, issue.4, pp.365-379, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00049-0

S. Guillaume, B. Et, and . Charnomordic, Learning interpretable fuzzy inference systems with spro, Information Sciences, 2011.

O. Haemmerlé, P. Buche, and R. Thomopoulos, The MIEL system: Uniform interrogation of structured and weakly-structured imprecise data, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol.1, issue.1, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10844-006-0014-z

O. Haemmerlé, B. Et, and . Carbonneill, Interfacing a relational database using conceptual graphs, dans DEXA '96 : Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, IEEE Computer Society, p.499, 1996.

I. Johnson, J. Abécassis, B. Charnomordic, S. Destercke, and R. Thomopoulos, Making Ontology-Based Knowledge and Decision Trees Interact: An Approach to Enrich Knowledge and Increase Expert Confidence in Data-Driven Models, Proc. of KSEM'10, p.304316, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_29
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00538795

S. Kaci, L. Et, and . Van-der-torre, Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.48, issue.3, p.730751, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800647

J. Kietz, A. Maedche, and R. Volz, A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet, dans Proceedings of EKAW- 2000 Workshop "Ontologies and Text, dans Springer Lecture Notes in Articial Intelligence (LNAI, 1937.

S. Klarman, U. Endriss, and S. Schlobach, Abox abduction in the description logic alc, J. Autom. Reasoning, vol.46, issue.1, p.4380, 2011.

S. Kraus, K. Sycara, and A. Evenchik, Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence, vol.104, issue.1-2, p.169, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2

T. Layat, Place du pain dans l'équilibre alimentaire, Pratiques en nutrition, p.4550, 2011.

L. A. Maguire and L. G. Boiney, Resolving Environmental Disputes: a Framework Incorporating Decision Analysis and Dispute Resolution Techniques, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.42, issue.1, pp.31-48, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/jema.1994.1058

N. Maillot, M. Et, and . Thonnat, Ontology based complex object recognition, Image and Vision Computing, vol.26, p.102113, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00502361

G. Mansingh, K. Osei-bryson, and H. Reichgelt, Using ontologies to facilitate post-processing of association rules by domain experts, Information Sciences, vol.181, issue.3, pp.419-434, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ins.2010.09.027

G. A. Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two : Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, vol.63, p.8197, 1956.

A. D. Moor, J. Park, and M. Croitoru, Argumentation map generation with conceptual graphs : the case for essence, CS-TIW at International Conference on Conceptual Structures, p.5869, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00410627

B. Moulin and H. Irandoust, Extending the Conceptual Graph Approach to Represent Evaluative Attitudes in Discourse, dans International Conference on Conceptual Structures, p.140153, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-48659-3_8

S. Muggleton, L. D. Et, and . Raedt, Inductive Logic Programming: Theory and methods, The Journal of Logic Programming, vol.19, issue.20, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0743-1066(94)90035-3
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0743-1066(94)90035-3

M. Mugnier, Knowledge Representation and Reasonings Based on Graph Homomorphism, Proc. ICCS'00, LNAI, p.172192, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/10722280_12
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.2987

Y. Papakonstantinou, S. Abiteboul, and H. Garcia-molina, Object fusion in mediator systems, dans VLDB, p.413424, 1996.

V. Parekh, J. J. Et, and . Gwo, Mining Domain Specic Texts and Glossaries to Evaluate and Enrich Domain Ontologies, dans International Conference of Information and Knowledge Engineering, 2004.

N. Pernelle, M. Rousset, and V. Ventos, Automatic construction and renement of a class hierarchy over multi-valued data, dans Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, p.386398, 2001.

M. Popescu, D. Et, and . Xu, Data Mining in Biomedicine Using Ontologies , 1 re éd, p.9781596933705, 2009.

J. Quinlan, Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning, vol.1, issue.1, p.81106, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00116251

J. Quinlan, C4. 5 : programs for machine learning, 1993.

R. Development and C. Team, R : A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009.

F. Saïs, N. Pernelle, and M. Rousset, L2r : A logical method for reference reconciliation, dans AAAI, p.329334, 2007.

F. Saïs, R. Et, and . Thomopoulos, Reference fusion and exible querying, dans ODBASE-OTM Conferences, p.15411549, 2008.

F. Saïs, R. Et, and . Thomopoulos, Une méthode exible de fusion de références, p.7784, 2008.

F. Saïs, R. Thomopoulos, and S. Destercke, Ontology-driven possibilistic reference fusion, dans ODBASE-OTM Conferences, p.10791096, 2010.

E. Salvat, Theorem proving using graph operations in the conceptual graphs formalism, Proc. of ECAI'98, p.356360, 1998.

S. Sendall, W. Et, and . Kozaczynski, Model transformation: the heart and soul of model-driven software development, IEEE Software, vol.20, issue.5, pp.42-45, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/MS.2003.1231150

J. Slavin and H. Green, Diatery bre and satiety, British Nutrition Foundation, vol.32, issue.1, p.3242, 2007.

G. Stumme, A. Hotho, and B. Berendt, Semantic web mining : State of the art and future directions, J. of Web Semantics, vol.4, p.124143, 2006.

K. Sycara, Persuasive argumentation in negotiation, Theory and Decision, vol.12, issue.3, p.203242, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00162699

R. Thomopoulos, J. Baget, and O. Haemmerlé, Conceptual Graphs as Cooperative Formalism to Build and Validate a Domain Expertise, Proc. of ICCS'07, p.112125, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_9
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00195272

R. Thomopoulos, J. Baget, and O. Haemmerlé, Coopération de connaissances hétérogènes pour la construction et la validation de l'expertise d'un domaine, Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l'Information, pp.12-167186, 2008.

R. Thomopoulos, B. Charnomordic, B. Cuq, and J. Abécassis, Articial intelligence-based decision support system to manage quality of durum wheat products, Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, p.179190, 2009.

R. Thomopoulos, M. Et, and . Croitoru, Aide à la décision en ingénierie inverse : une approche s'appuyant sur l'argumentation, Revue d'intelligence articielle, pp.4-5, 2013.
DOI : 10.3166/ria.27.493-513

R. Thomopoulos, S. Destercke, B. Charnomordic, I. Johnson, and J. Abécassis, An iterative approach to build relevant ontology-aware data-driven models, Information Sciences, vol.221, p.452472, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.015
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00835215

R. Thomopoulos, D. Paturel, and S. Quéré, Un système d'argumentation avec contextes et indicateurs pour analyser un dispositif d'approvisionnement en circuit court, 2013.

T. A. Tilley, R. J. Cole, P. Becker, and P. W. Eklund, A Survey of Formal Concept Analysis Support for Software Engineering Activities, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11528784_13

W. Van-melle, A. Scott, J. Bennett, and M. Peairs, The EMYCIN manual, 1981.

S. Vesic, L. D. Par, C. Raedt, D. Bessière, P. Dubois et al., Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation, dans ECAI, p.810815, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_33
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00868350

M. Vialette, A. Pinon, B. Leporq, C. Dervin, and J. Membré, Metaanalysis of food safety information based on a combination of a relational database and a predictive modeling tool, Risk Analysis, vol.25, issue.1, p.7583, 2005.

L. Young, Application of Baking Knowledge in Software Systems, dans Technology of Breadmaking -2nd edition, p.207222, 2007.