C. Du, 455 4.4.3-Habitudes documentaires et de recherche (Q.15, 16,17, et 18)21 et 22) et 30), Analyse des réponses du questionnaire adressé aux chercheurs, pp.13-14

). J. Annexe58, S. Schön, C. Berg, B. Kloc, . H. Batlogg-)-j et al., Ambipolar pentacene field-effect transistors and inverters A superconducting field-effect switch Fractional quantum Hall effect in organic molecular semiconductors An organic solid state injection laser A light-emitting field-effect transistor, Josephson junctions with tunable weak links High-temperature superconductivity in lattice-expanded C60 Bao, Field-effect modulation of the conductance of single molecules, pp.2338-2432, 1022.

C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, p.400, 1988.

M. Bordons and I. Gomes, Towards a single language in science ? A Spanish view, Serials, p.2189, 2004.

J. Boyer, The Founder of the first scientific journal,The Popular science monthly, p.690, 1894.

T. Braun and S. Zsindely, Growth of scientific litterature and the Barnaby Rich effect, Scientometrics, vol.7, pp.3-6529

V. Bush, As we may think, The Atlantic, Juillet 1945, 194507.

G. Chartron, Produits et services de la documentation scientifique numérique

D. David, The Book before printing: ancient, medieval and oriental, p.624, 1982.

M. Ebert, The Rise and Development of the American Medical Periodical 1797-1850, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol.40, p.3245, 1952.

F. Lucien-[-et-]-martin-henri-martin and L. , Apparition du livre, 1971.

. Fielding and H. Garrison, The medical and scientific periodicals of the 17 th and 18 th centuries, Bulletin of the History of medecine, p.296, 1934.

N. Fjällbrant, Scholarly communication : historical developements and new possibilities, Proceedings], Scholarly Communication in Focus, 1997.

. Disponible-À, se/IATUL/proceedcontents/fullpaper/nfpaper.html Francis André, Libre accès aux savoirs =open access to knowledge, 2005.

G. Eugene, Has scientific communication changed in 300 years ? , Current contents, n°8, 1980.

J. Guédon and . Claude, In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing, In: Creating the Digital Future, Proceedings of 138th ARL Membership Meeting, 2001.

. Disponible-À, htm (35) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pahtm#a1 (36) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pahtm (37) http://www.ft.com/cms/s/98f16604-31f4-11d9-97c0- 00000e2511c8,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww, 1200.

A. Christine and J. Joanna, Les Archives ouvertes : enjeux et pratiques : guide à l'intention des professionnels de l'information et de la documentation, des professionnels de l'information et de la documentation (ADBS), p.333

A. Taik-sup, Promoting multilinguism on the Internet : the Korean experience http

B. Bjork, . Roosr, . Anniki, and M. Lauri, Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly article and the share available via differents access options, ElPUBOpen scholarship : authority, community and sustainability in the age of web 2, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, pp.25-27178, 2008.

E. Canessa, . Zennaro, and E. Marco, Science disemination using open access : a compendium of selected literature on open access, Rome, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, 2008.

V. Cerf and R. Kahn, A Protocol for packets network interconnections, IEEE Transactions on communications, pp.637-648, 1974.

T. Chanier, Archives ouvertes et publication scientifique: comment metre en place l'accès libre aux résulatas de la recherche ?, 2004.

S. Y. Crawford, J. M. Hurd, and A. C. Weller, From print to electronic: the transformation of scientific communication, p.117, 1996.

D. M. Eisenhart, Publishing in the information age: a new management framework for the digital era, p.306, 1996.

. Disponible-À, research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf Francis André, Libre accès aux savoirs = Open access to knowledge, 2005.

J. Guédon, Repenser le sens de la communication scientifique : l???acc??s libre, m??decine/sciences, vol.24, issue.6-7, pp.6-7642, 2008.
DOI : 10.1051/medsci/20082467641

A. Greco and E. , The State of scholarly publishing : challenges and opportunities, Transactions publishers, p.267, 2009.

J. Jean and ?. Noël, Quand Google défie l'Europe, et une nuits, p.347, 2006.

M. Owen and J. Stewart, The Scientific article in the age of digitization, [s.l.:s.n], 2005.

J. C. Bailar, . Iii, and K. Patterson, Journal Peer Review, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.312, issue.10, pp.654-657, 1985.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198503073121023

H. H. Bauer, Beyond Velikovsky: the history of a public controversy, 1999.

B. Björk, A. Roos, and M. Lauri, Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability, Information Research, vol.14, pp.1-391

H. Blank, The Summary Moves Forward, Archives of Dermatology, vol.87, issue.4, pp.413-414
DOI : 10.1001/archderm.1963.01590160005001

C. P. Bourne, The world's technical journal literature: An estimate of volume, origin, language, field, indexing, and abstracting, American Documentation, vol.16, issue.2, pp.159-168, 1962.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.5090130202

. Disponible-À, britac.ac.uk/policy/peer-review.cfm Broad, p.288, 1987.

J. C. Burnham, The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.263, issue.10, pp.1323-1329, 1990.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100023003

J. Campanario and . Miguel, Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?, 4%3C302::AID-ASI6%3E3.0.CO;2-0/abstract, pp.302-3101097, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199604)47:4<302::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0

J. Campanario, . Miguel, and E. Acedo, Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.61, issue.5, pp.5-734, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.20556

M. Corredoira, &. López, C. C. Perelman, and . Ed, Against the tide: a critical review by scientists of how physics and astronomy get done, Boca Raton, vol.256, 2008.

M. Corredoira, &. López, C. C. Perelman, and . Ed, Against the tide: a critical review by scientists of how physics and astronomy get done, Boca Raton

F. Dahdouh-guebas, Neo-colonial science by the most industrialized upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing, Scientometrics, vol.56, pp.3340-341, 2003.

D. Grazia and E. Alfred, The Velikovsky Affair: The warfare of science and scientism, University books, p.260

D. Solla-price and D. , Little science, big science, Columbia University Press, 1963.

R. G. Dolby, What Can We Usefully Learn from the Velikovsky Affair?, Social Studies of Science, vol.5, issue.2, pp.165-175, 1975.
DOI : 10.1177/030631277500500203

R. Drummond, Editorial peer review:its development and rationale, In :Peer review in health sciences, BMJ Books, p.392, 2003.

A. Fabiato, Anonymity of reviewers, Cardiovascular Research, vol.28, issue.8, pp.8-1134, 1994.
DOI : 10.1093/cvr/28.8.1134

S. Fish, No bias , no merit :the case: the case against blind submission, Publications of the Modern Language Association, pp.5-739, 1988.

S. Fish, Doing what comes naturally: change, rhetoric and the practice of theory in literature and legal studies, 1989.
DOI : 10.1215/9780822381600

F. Godlee, Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.37-40, 1998.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.3.237

F. Godlee, The Ethics of peer review, Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, vol.400, 2000.

J. Guédon, Open Access Archives: from scientific plutocracy to the republic of science, IFLA Journal, vol.29, issue.2, pp.129-140
DOI : 10.1177/034003520302900204

J. Hall, Author review of reviewers., American Psychologist, vol.34, issue.9, p.798, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.34.9.798.a

S. Harnad, Implementing Peer Review on the Net: scientific Quality Control in scholarly electronic journals Scholarly publication: the electronic frontier, pp.103-108

S. Harnad, The Invisible hand of peer review Disponible à http

S. Harnad, . Post-gutenberg, and . Galaxy, The Fourth Revolution in the Means of Production of Knowledge, Public-Access Computer Systems Review, pp.1-39, 1991.

. Harnad, Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum of Scientific Inquiry, Psychological Science, vol.1, issue.6, pp.342-343, 1990.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00234.x

M. F. Katzen, The Changing appearance of research journal in science and technology: an analysis and case study, Development of science publishing in Europe

D. A. Kronick, Litterature of the life sciences : historical background, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, vol.609, issue.9, pp.869-870, 1984.

D. A. Kronick, Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.263, issue.10, pp.1321-1322, 1990.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002

E. P. Lewis, A Peerless publication, Nursing outlook, vol.28, pp.4225-226, 1980.

S. Lock, Quality assurance in medical publication, Proceedings of The Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section b-biological sciences, vol.101, pp.359-375, 1993.

M. Nutt and R. A. , The Effects of blinding on the quality of peer review, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.263, pp.1371-1376, 1990.

P. R. Manske, A review of peer review, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol.22, issue.5, pp.5-768
DOI : 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80067-6

A. J. Meadows, Communicating research, 1998.
DOI : 10.1108/S1876-0562(1997)97B

R. K. Merton, The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered, Science, vol.159, issue.3810, pp.56-63, 1968.
DOI : 10.1126/science.159.3810.56

M. Brown and H. , Peer review should not be anonymous, BMJ, vol.326, issue.7393, p.824, 2003.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.824/b

D. P. Peters, . Ceci, and C. Stephen, Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.19, issue.3, pp.187-195, 1982.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.2.5912.216

T. Richard, F. De-george, and . Woodward, Ethics and manuscript reviewing, Journal of scholarly publishing, vol.25, issue.3, pp.133-145, 1994.

A. C. Schaffner, The Future of scientific journals : lessons from the past, Information Technology Libraries, vol.13, issue.4, pp.239-248, 1994.

L. P. Schmelkin, Peer review: Standard or delusion? Presidential Address delivered at The annual meeting of the, 2003.

D. Shatz, Peer review: a critical inquiry, Rowman &Littlefield, 2004.

C. W. Shilling, Requirements for a scientific mission-oriented information center, American Documentation, vol.2, issue.1, pp.49-53, 1963.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.5090140108

. Skoblow, Jeffey Fish on blind submission, Publications of the Modern Language Association, pp.215-216, 1989.

R. E. Sojka and H. F. Mayland, Driving science with one eye on the peer review mirror, Forum proceedingsEthics, Values, and the Promise of Science, pp.25-26

R. Spier, The history of the peer-review process, Trends in Biotechnology, vol.20, issue.8, pp.357-358, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6

P. Suber, Guide to the open access movement, 2003 Guide to the Open Access Movement, 2003.

E. A. Swanson and J. Mccloskey, The Manuscript Review Process of Nursing Journals, Image, vol.10, issue.3, pp.72-76, 1982.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1982.tb01618.x

C. Tenopir and D. W. King, Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians and publishers, Special Libraries Association, 2000.

B. Tracey and . Ed, Science Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas :Discussion paper from a Working Party on equipping the public with an understanding of peer review, Sense about science, p.61, 2004.

. Disponible-À, The effect of blinding and masking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.17280, pp.234-237, 1998.

S. Van-rooyen, Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial, BMJ, vol.318, issue.7175, pp.23-27, 1999.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23

A. M. Weinberg and . Science, Government and information : the responsabilities of the technical community and the government in the transfer of information, President's Science Advisory Committee, 1963.

A. C. Weller, Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses, Information Today, 2002.

J. M. Ziman, Public knowledge : the social dimension of science, 1968.

H. Zuckerman and R. K. Merton, Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.1-76, 1971.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188

[. ?. Acosta, Evolution of Scientific Communication, Food Science and Technology International, vol.7, issue.2, pp.183-184, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/108201320100700213

?. Acosta, . Cazares, and . Benjamin, Scientific colonialism and safari research, Clinical medecine and health research, 2000.

C. J. Alexander, . Pal, A. Leslie, and . Ed, Digital democracy : policy and politics in the wired world, 1998.

G. A. Alexandrov, The Purpose of peer review in the case of an open-access publication, Carbon Balance and Management, vol.1, issue.1, p.10, 2006.
DOI : 10.1186/1750-0680-1-10

P. G. Altbach, D. Teferra, and . Ed, Knowledge dissemination in Africa: the role of scholarly journals, 1997.

P. Altman and U. , Nouveau modèle économique pour l'édition électronique Disponible à : http

A. Ambrosi, Enjeux de mots : Regards multiculturels sur les sociétés de l'information, 2008.

D. Andersen and . Lines, Digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process, 2004.

K. Anderson, Publishing Online-Only Peer-Reviewed Biomedical Literature: Three Years of Citation, Author Perception, and Usage Experience, Disponible à, 2001.
DOI : 10.3998/3336451.0006.303

J. Andrews, . Law, and E. Derek, Digital libraries: policy, planning, and practice, 2004.

K. Antelman, Do Open access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, pp.372-382, 2004.

W. Y. Arms, What are the alternatives to peer review? Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing on the Web, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol.8, issue.1, 2002.
DOI : 10.3998/3336451.0008.103

B. Aronson, Improving Online Access to Medical Information for Low-Income Countries, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.350, issue.10, pp.966-968, 2004.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMp048009

. Arunachalam, Subbiah Information and knowledge in the age of electronic communication: a developing country perspective, Journal of Information Science, vol.2525465, issue.66, pp.465-476, 1999.

M. Atkinson, ???Peer review??? culture, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.11, issue.10, pp.193-204, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/s11948-001-0040-8

S. Bachrach, Who should own scientific papers? Science, pp.1459-1460, 1998.

C. Baldwin and D. Pullinger, What readers value in academic journals, Learned Publishing, vol.13, issue.4, pp.229-239, 2000.
DOI : 10.1087/09531510050162066

C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988.

R. M. Baum, The open-access myth, Chemical & Engineering News, vol.82, issue.23, 2004.

B. Jochai, The Wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom, p.528, 2006.

R. Berry and . Stephen, Is Electronic publishing being used in the best interests of science ? the scientist's view, Presented at the Second Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science held in Unesco House, 2001.

C. L. Borgman, From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world (digital libraries and electronic publishing), 2003.

H. Boscq, La Communication scientifique revue et corrigée par Internet, Disponible à, p.14

M. Bot, . Burgemeester, . Johan, and H. Roes, The Cost of publishing an electronic journal :a general model and a case study, D-Lib Magazine, 1998.

P. E. Bourne, Ten simple rules for getting published, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.1, issue.5, 2005.

L. Bouvier-ajam, Synthèse de l'étude d'évaluation de l'expérimentation de la mise à disposition d'ouvrages sous droits via la bibliothèque numérique de la BnF Gallica 2, 2009.

A. Briggs and P. Burke, Social history of the media: From Gutenberg to the Internet, 2010.

T. Brody, . Harnad, . Stevan, and L. Carr, Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.329, issue.8, pp.1060-10720503020, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.20373

D. Brown, Scientific communication and the dematerialization of scholarship, Proquest CSA, Discovery Guides, 2007.

T. Brown and E. , Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas: discussion paper from a Working party on equipping the public with an understanding of peer review, Sense about Science , XI-51 p. (Disponible à, 2000.

M. Buckland and Z. Liu, History of information science Historical studies in information science, Association for Information Science and Technology, pp.272-295, 1998.

P. Burke, A Social history of knowledge : from Gutenberg to Diderot, p.246, 2000.

I. Butterworth and . Ed, The Impact of electronic publishing on the academic community, [workshop organised by] Wenner -Gren Foundation [and] Academia Europaea, 1998.

. Butler, Declan The Writing is on the web for science journals in print, Nature, vol.39721, issue.6716, pp.195-200, 1999.

J. Cain, Why be my colleague???s keeper? Moral justifications for peer review, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.325, issue.4, pp.531-540, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/s11948-999-0053-2

E. Canessa, . Zennaro, and E. Marco, Science dissemination using Open Access : a compendium of selected literature on Open Access, Trieste , ICTP -The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, 2008.

A. Cetto and . Maria, Sharing scientific knowledge through publications : what do developing countries have to offer ? World conference on science : Science for the twenty first century : a new commitment, Forum I -Programme thematic meetings-I.6 Sharing scientific knowledge, Organised by UNESCO and International Council on Science, Disponible à, 1999.

G. Chartron and A. Du, marché" de l'article scientifique, impacts du numérique, L'Edition électronique : vers de nouveaux modes d'évaluation de la recherche ?

G. Chartron and J. Salaün, Expertise de ressources pour l'édition de revues numériques (Disponible à : http://revues.enssib.fr

G. Chartron, Nouveaux modèles pour la communication scientifique ? Colloque Une nouvelle donne pour les revues scientifiques ? 19-20 Novembre, 1997.

G. Chartron and J. Salaün, La Reconstruction de l'économie politique des publications scientifiques, pp.32-42, 2000.

D. E. Chubin and E. J. Hackett, Peerless science: peer review and U. S. science policy Albany, 1990.

N. A. Constantine, Peer review process, Encyclopedia of Epidemiology, pp.795-797, 2009.

H. Daniel, Guardians of science: fairness and reliability of peer review, p.140, 1993.

L. De and J. F. Vega, La Communication scientifique à l'épreuve de l'Internet : l'émergence d'un nouveau modèle, p.253, 2000.

D. Vries and J. , Peer review: the holy cow of science A Century of science publishing, pp.231-244, 2001.

M. Dominy, . Bradley, . Jean-claude, and J. Bhatt, Peer Review in the Google Age: Is technology changing the way science is done and evaluated ?, Unpublished) [Presentation PPT] (Disponible à, 2006.

L. Dowler, Gateways to knowledge -the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning & research, 1997.

H. Doyle, A. Gass, and K. Rebecca, Open Access and Scientific Societies, PLoS Biology, vol.112, issue.5, pp.549-550, 2004.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020156

A. S. Duff, Some post-war models of the information chain, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol.29, issue.4, pp.179-187, 1997.
DOI : 10.1177/096100069702900402

L. Duncan, Scientific publication system in social science: a study of the operation of leading professional journals in psychology, sociology, and social work, 1979.

K. Eason, . Richardson, . Sue, and L. Yu, Patterns of use of electronic journals, Journal of Documentation, vol.56, issue.5, pp.477-504, 2000.
DOI : 10.1108/EUM0000000007124

E. L. Eisenstein, The Printing press as an agent of change, 1982.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781107049963

R. Ekman, R. E. Quandt, and . Ed, Technology and scholarly communication, p.431, 1999.

J. J. Esposito, The devil you don???t know: The unexpected future of Open Access publishing, First Monday, vol.9, issue.8, p.1163, 1083.
DOI : 10.5210/fm.v9i8.1163

D. Fanelli, Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data, PLoS ONE, vol.5, issue.4, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.t002

A. Forsyth, On Writing and Tenure, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol.19, issue.1, pp.98-103, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/0739456X9901900110

R. H. Fletcher and S. W. Fletcher, Evidence for the effectiveness of peer review, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.312, issue.1, pp.35-50, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/s11948-997-0015-5

E. H. Fredriksson and . Ed, A Century of science publishingDisponible à : http://ebooks.iospress, p.312, 2001.

Y. Gargouri, Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research, PLoS ONE, vol.5, issue.10, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.s002

W. D. Garvey, Communication : the essence of science: facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers, and students, 1979.

W. Gdoura, Le Libre accès dans les universités arabes: opinions et pratiques des chercheurs et des éditeurs , World Library and Information Congress, 75th IFLA General Conference and Council, pp.23-27, 2009.

E. F. Gehringer, Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135), 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/FIE.2000.897675

P. Ginsparg, First steps towards electronic research communication in physics, Solaris, nº 3, Disponible à, 1996.

A. Goldman, Knowledge in a social world, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/0198238207.001.0001

. Gomes, . Suely, and J. Meadows, Perceptions of Electronic Journals in British Universities, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol.29, issue.3, pp.3174-181
DOI : 10.3138/JSP-029-03-174

G. E. Gorman and E. Grosch, Scholarly publishing in an electronic era Reply to " ten simple rules for getting published, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.3, issue.9, 2007.

A. G. Gross, H. Joseph, E. Reidy, and M. S. , Communicating science: the scientific article from the 17th century to the present, 2009.

J. Guédon, Beyond core journals and licenses: the paths to reform scientific publishing, Association of Research Libraries , n°, pp.1-8, 2001.

D. Haank, Is Electronic publishing being used in the best interests of science ? the publisher's view, Presented at the Second Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science held in Unesco House, 2001.

B. N. Hague, B. D. Loader, and . Ed, Digital democracy: discourse and decision making in the information age, 1999.

C. Hajjem, S. Harnad, and Y. Gingras, Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact (Disponible à : http://arxiv, p.606079

S. Harnad and ?. , The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access, Serials Review, vol.21, issue.1, pp.310-314, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/00987913.2004.10764930

S. Harnad, Advancing science by self-archiving refereed research (Disponible à : http://eprints.soton.ac.uk, 252619.

S. Harnad and E. , E-KNOWLEDGE, Computer Law & Security Review, vol.16, issue.2, pp.78-87, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0267-3649(00)88298-9

S. Harnad, For whom the gate tolls ? how and why to free the refereed research literature online through author/institution self-archiving, now (Disponible à

S. Harnad, Free at last: the future of peer-reviewed journals, D-Lib Magazine, 1999.

S. Harnad, Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access (Disponible à

S. Harnad and E. , Peer commentary on peer review: a case study in scientific quality control, 1982.

S. Harnad, The Self-archiving initiative : freeing the refereed research literature online Nature, Disponible à, pp.1024-1025, 2001.

S. Harnad, Universal FTP archives for esoteric science and scholarship: a subversive proposal Scholarly journals at the crossroads: a subversive proposal for electronic publishing J, 1995.

. Harnad, . Stevan, and T. Brody, Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals, D-Lib Magazine, 2004.

R. A. Hatch, The Scientific revolution-paradigm lost ? OAH Magazine of History, pp.34-3908, 1989.

A. Heck and E. , Electronic publishing for physics and astronomy
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-0055-4

I. Horowitz and . Louis, Communicating ideas: the crisis of publishing in a post-industrial society, 1986.

C. House, Scientific publications: free for all ? The Stationery Office, Disponible à, p.188, 2004.

H. Jones, . Anne, F. Mclellan, and . Ed, Ethical issues in biomedical publication, 2000.

S. Huet, Open access : du rêve au cauchemarDisponible à : http://sciences.blogs.liberation.fr/home, Libération, vol.10, pp.4-2013, 2013.

J. M. Hurd, The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.283, issue.14, pp.1279-1283, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1

D. N. Jackson, J. Rushton, and E. Philippe, Scientific excellence: origins and assessment, 1987.

A. Johns, The Nature of the book: print and knowledge in the making, 2000.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226401232.001.0001

R. K. Johnson, A Question of access :SPARC, BioOne, and society-driven electronic publishing , D-Lib Magazine, 2000.

B. Kahin, H. R. Varian, and . Ed, Internet publishing and beyond : the economics of digital information and intellectual property, 2000.

R. T. Kaser, If Information wants to be free . . . then who's going to pay for it ? D-Lib Magazine, 2000.

D. W. King and C. Tenopir, Economic cost model of scientific scholarly journal publishing Proceedings of ICSU Press Workshop on Economics, real costs and benefits of electronic publishing in science-a technical study, Session 2 : Economics factors and costs analyses of online access to primary scientific research and databases,Keble College, 1998.

R. Kling and E. Callahan, Electronic journals, the internet, and scholarly communication (Disponible à : https://scholarworks, 1087.

R. Kling and G. Mckim, Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.12, issue.14, pp.1306-1320, 1098.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T

I. Kuchma, Open Access policies in developing and transition countries, Presented at Interactive Facilitation Meeting on Open Access, 2011.

M. C. Lafollette, Stealing into print: fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing paperback, 1996.

S. Lawrence, Online or invisible ? Nature, p.521, 2001.

G. J. Lankhorst and F. Franchignoni, The ???impact factor??? ??? an explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals, Clinical Rehabilitation, vol.32, issue.2, pp.2115-118, 2001.
DOI : 10.1191/026921501676657944

L. Saux and A. , La Communication scientifique électronique, Bulletin des bibliothèques de France, vol.46, issue.6, pp.118-119, 2001.

L. Crosnier and . Hervé, Bibliothèques numériques In Enjeux de mots : regards multiculturels sur les sociétés de l'information, 2008.

L. Crosnier and . Hervé, Documents numériques et cyberinfrastructure, Introduction à la table ronde Atelier ARTIST sur les pratiques du document numérique scientifique, 10 e Colloque International sur le Document Electronique (CIDE), pp.2-4, 2007.

L. Crosnier and . Hervé, Economie de l'immatériel : abondance, exclusion et biens communs, Hermès, La Revue, vol.2, issue.45, pp.51-59, 2006.

L. Crosnier and L. Hervé, Journaux scientifiques électroniques ou la communication de la science à l'heure du réseau mondial, Colloque La communication de l'IST dans l'enseignement supérieur et la recherche : l'effet Renater, Internet, vol.16, issue.17, 1995.

L. Crosnier and . Hervé, Moteurs de recherche et bibliothèques numériques , Introduction à une tableronde, Troyes le 3 juin 2005 (Disponible à

L. Crosnier and N. Hervé, Colloque Numériser et valoriser en région le patrimoine écrit et Graphique : bibliotheques, musées, archives, pp.22-23, 2005.

L. Crosnier and . Hervé, Tentative de definition du vectorialisme, p. 133-152 In : Traitements et pratiques documentaires : vers un changement de paradigme ? Actes de la deuxième conférence Document numérique et Société, 2008.

L. Lin, L. Xiwen, and Z. Xiaolin, Open Access practice in national science library, Chinese Academy of Science,World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Council, Disponible à, pp.23-27, 2009.

A. E. Lin, Writing for Scientific Publication: Tips for Getting Started, Clinical Pediatrics, vol.35, issue.4, pp.295-300, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/000992280604500401

S. Lock, A Difficult balance : edotorial peer review in medecine, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, vol.172, 1985.

H. Lustig, Electronic publishing: the role of a large scientific society, UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic publishing in science, pp.19-23

C. A. Lynch, Institutional repositories essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age, Association of Research Libraries Bimonthly Report, n° 226, pp.327-336, 2003.

C. R. Macclure, . Hernon, and U. Peter, S. scientific and technical information policies (STI) : views and perspectives, 1989.

M. Owen and J. , The new dissemination of knowledge: digital libraries and institutional roles in scholarly publishing, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol.9, issue.3, pp.275-288, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/1350178022000015113

C. Macknight, Electronic journals : what do users think of them ?, Proceedings of the International symposium on research development and preactice in digital libraries, 1997.

. Mahé, . Annaïg, . Andrys, . Christine, and G. Chartron, How French researchers are making use of electronic journals : a case study conducted at the Pierre et Marie Curie and Denis Diderot universities, Journal of Information Science, vol.262163, issue.506, pp.291-302, 2000.

M. J. Mahoney, Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognitive therapy and research, pp.161-175, 1977.

. Mainguy, . Gaell, M. R. Motamedi, and D. Mietchen, Peer review -the newcomers'perspective, PLos Biology, vol.3, issue.9, pp.1534-1535, 2005.

B. Martin, Suppression stories Fund for intellectual dissent, 1997.

R. Melero and F. López-santoveña, Referees'attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers, Food Science and Technology International, vol.7, issue.6, pp.521-527, 2001.

F. Merceur, Fonctionnements et usages d'une archive institutionnelle, 2008.

C. T. Miller and J. C. Harris, Scholarly Journal Publication: Conflicting Agendas for Scholars, Publishers, and Institutions, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol.35, issue.2, pp.73-91, 2004.
DOI : 10.3138/jsp.35.2.73

R. Molz and . Kathleen, Civic space/Cyberspace: The American public library in the information age, 2001.

G. Moran, Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication (contemporary studies in information management, policy, and services), 1998.

J. Moses and M. Dertouzous, The Computer age: a twenty-year view, 1980.

F. Nawrocki, L. Protocole, and O. Ses-usages-en-bibliothèque, Rapport de recherche, étude, Infotheque francophone , ressources en ligne et actualités scientifiques francophones Disponible à : http://www.infotheque.info/cache/7877/www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/dll/OAI- PMH.htm Nikitenko

G. Nielsen-norman, How users read on the webDisponible à : http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-users-read-on, 1997.

G. Nielsen-norman, PDF: unfit for human consumptionDisponible à : http://www.nngroup.com/articles/pdf-unfit-for-human-consumption, 2003.

R. M. Neustadt, . Videotext, . Torndike, . Me, . K. Usa-]-g et al., The Birth of electronic publishing: legal and economic issues in telephone 160 pages Odlyzko, Andrew, Competition and cooperation: libraries and publishers in the transition to electronic scholarly journals, Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol.4, issue.4, 1982.

A. Odlyzko, The Economics of Electronic Journals, First Monday, vol.2, issue.8, 1998.
DOI : 10.5210/fm.v2i8.542

A. M. Odlyzko, Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.42, issue.1, pp.71-122, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1004

A. Okerson and . Ed, Filling the pipeline and paying the piper Association of Research Libraries, Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Scholarly publishing on the electronic networks, 1994.

A. Okerson, Six Flavors of Open Access: Successes and Possibilities for STM Journals, LIBER Quarterly, vol.14, issue.3-4, pp.339-3477785, 2004.
DOI : 10.18352/lq.7785

R. P. Parks, The Faustian grip of academic publishing, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol.9, issue.3, pp.317-335, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/1350178022000015122

J. Peters, The Hundred years war started today: an exploration of electronic peer review, Journal of Electronic Publising, vol.1, issue.1, 1996.

. Peugeot, . Valérie, P. Ed, and . Savoir, santé-agriculture-industrie-culture : le développement face aux biens communs de l'information et de la propriété intellectuelle, 2005.

N. Pignard, Les Nouvelles formes de publication scientifique sur Internet : la remise en cause du modèle éditorial traditionnel, [s.l.], [s, 2000.

A. Piolat and J. Vauclair, Le processus d'expertise ??ditoriale avant et avec Internet, Pratiques Psychologiques, vol.10, issue.3, pp.255-272, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S1269-1763(04)00041-0

U. Pöschl, Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation, LIBER Quarterly, vol.19, issue.3-4, pp.293-314, 2010.
DOI : 10.18352/lq.7967

U. Pöschl, Open access interactive peer review enhances journal quality (Disponible à

U. Pöschl, Open Access: scientific quality assurance by interactive peer review & public discussion, Disponible à, p.17, 2004.

U. Pöschl and T. Koop, Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance, Information Services & Use, vol.28, pp.105-107, 2008.

L. X. Polastron, La Grande numérisation: y a-t-il une pensée après le papier ?, 2006.

R. Poynder, The Answer to the machine is in the machine, In Caught in a web: intellectual property in cyberspace, 2001.

R. Poynder and E. , Caught in a web: intellectual property in cyberspace, 2001.

R. Poynder, Ten years after, Information Today, vol.21, 2004.

R. Poynder, The War in Europe (Disponible à : http://poynder.blogspot.com, 2007.

M. Prévot and L. , Publication scientifique à accès libre: de l'idéal aux modalités concrètes : application aux sciences de la terre, Disponible à, p.14

M. Pupique, Peer Review My Foot!, Journal of Biological Rhythms, vol.17, issue.2, p.194, 2002.
DOI : 10.1177/074873002129002384

D. Rennie, Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review, Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication

M. Rice, Toward enhancing the social benefits of electronic publishing: report of an Aspen Institute planning meeting, Feb, 1987.

P. Roberts, Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet, First Monday, vol.4, issue.4, p.5
DOI : 10.5210/fm.v4i4.661

L. Robinson, . Karamuftuoglu, and . Murat, The Nature of information science : changing models, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science -" Unity in diversity " -Part, 2010.

T. Roger and . Pedauque, Le Document à la lumière du numérique :forme , texte ,medium comprendre le rôle du document numérique dans l'émergence d'une nouvelle modernité, 2006.

R. Rosenzweig, The Road to Xanadu: Public and Private Pathways on the History Web, The Journal of American History, vol.88, issue.2, pp.548-579, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2675105

. Rusch-feja, . Diann, and U. Siebeky, Evaluation of Usage and Acceptance of Electronic Journals, D-Lib Magazine, vol.5, issue.10, 1999.
DOI : 10.1045/october99-rusch-feja

J. Salaün, Que cache l'augmentation des tarifs des revues scientifiques ? Les transformations de la circulation des articles scientifiques, CERSI/ENSSIB, Document de travail -version du, pp.2-10

. Disponible-À, net.ma/maalama-textuelle/sciences-de-l- information/industries-de-l-information/edition/que-cache-l-augmentation-des-tarifs-des-revues- scientifiques-les-transformations-de-la-circulation-des-articles-scientifiques)

E. Sandewall, Maintaining live discussion in two-stage open peer review, Frontier in Computational Neuroscience, p.2012, 3282940.

N. A. Sathe, J. L. Grady, . Giuse, and B. Nunzia, Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes, Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol.90, issue.2, pp.235-243, 2002.

V. Scaria, Peer review of scholarly communication in health: Perspectives in the Internet age, Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, vol.1, issue.21, 2003.

A. C. Schaffner, The Future of scientific journals: lessons from the past, Information Technology and Libraries, vol.13, issue.4, pp.239-247, 1994.

D. Schauder, Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.45, issue.2, pp.73-100, 1994.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199403)45:2<73::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-5

J. Schmidt, Reflexions sur quelques nouveaux modeles de communication scientifique [s.l.],[s, 2003.

R. Smith and O. Up, Opening up BMJ peer review, BMJ, vol.318, issue.7175, pp.4-5, 1999.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4
URL : http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/318/7175/4

G. Soete and A. Salaba, Measuring the cost effectiveness of journals : ten years after Barschall (Disponible à : http:/ www.wisc

D. Solomon, Talking Past Each Other: Making Sense of the Debate over Electronic Publication, First Monday, vol.7, issue.8, 2002.
DOI : 10.5210/fm.v7i8.978

M. Sosteric, . Shi, . Yuwei, and O. Wenker, Electronic First: The Upcoming Revolution in the Scholarly Communication System, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol.7, issue.2, 2001.
DOI : 10.3998/3336451.0007.203

S. Ltd, Economic analysis of scientific research publishing (a report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust), p.41, 2004.

P. Suber, Who should control access to research literature ? SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 2004.

J. Suls and M. , René The Air we breathe: a critical look at practices and alternatives in the peer-review process, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol.4, issue.1, p.p, 2009.

T. Sumner, B. Shum, and S. , Open peer review & argumentation: loosening the paper chains on journals, Ariadne , n° 5, 1996.

E. Svenonius, The Intellectual foundation of information organization (digital libraries and electronic publishing), 2000.

A. Swan, ???What authors want???, Learned Publishing, vol.12, issue.2, pp.170-172, 1999.
DOI : 10.1087/09531519950145878

M. Szklo, Quality of scientific articles, Revista de Sa??de P??blica, vol.40, issue.spe, pp.30-35, 2006.
DOI : 10.1590/S0034-89102006000400005

T. Edejer and T. , Disseminating health information in developing countries: the role of the internet, BMJ, vol.321, issue.7264, p.797, 2000.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.321.7264.797

M. Thelwall, Digital libraries and multi-disciplinary research skills (Disponible à : http://libres

C. Tenopir, . Hitchcock, . Brenda, and A. Pillow, Use and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies, on Library and Information Resources, 2003.

C. Tenopir and D. W. King, Lessons for the future of journals, Nature, vol.413, issue.6857, pp.672-674
DOI : 10.1038/35099602

S. Thiel, The Online Newspaper: A Postmodern Medium, The Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol.4, issue.1, 1998.
DOI : 10.3998/3336451.0004.110

J. E. Till, Peer Review in a Post-Eprints World: A Proposal, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol.2, issue.3, 2000.
DOI : 10.2196/jmir.2.3.e14

T. Alvin, Future shock, 1984.

. London, United Kingdom National Commission for UNESCO secrétariat, p.31, 2008.

. Van-de-sompel and ?. Herbert, Rethinking Scholarly Communication, D-Lib Magazine, vol.10, issue.9, 2004.
DOI : 10.1045/september2004-vandesompel

V. Ed, Libres savoirs: les biens communs de la connaissance : produire collectivement, 2011.

H. J. Voorbij, Searching scientific information on the Internet: A Dutch academic user survey, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.14, issue.7, pp.598-615, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:7<598::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-6

E. Wager, . Godlee, . Fiona, and T. Jefferson, How to survive peer review, BMJ Books, 2002.

T. J. Walker, Free internet access to traditional journals, American Scientist, vol.86, issue.5, 1998.

K. S. Warren, Coping with the biomedical literature : a primer for the scientist and clinician, 1981.

A. Wellerstein, Panorama de l'offre éditoriale en matière de revues électroniques en sciences humaines et sociales disponibles via Internet, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Institut National des Techniques de la Documentation, p.103

R. S. Westfall, The Scientific RevolutionDisponible à : http://web.clas.ufl, Sci-Rev/SCI-REV-Home/05- RSW-Sci-Rev.htm), 1986.

J. Willinsky, The Access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship, 2005.

J. Willinsky, Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly Publishing, First Monday, vol.7, issue.11
DOI : 10.5210/fm.v7i11.1006

A. Wojciechowska, Usage des archives ouvertes dans les domaines des mathématiques et de l'informatique, Documentaliste-Sciences de l'Information, pp.294-302, 2006.

T. Ya?ar and . Güleda, Mapping the structure and evolution of electronic publishing as a research field using co-citation analysis, 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, pp.16-18, 2010.

K. Yiotis, The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications, Information Technology and Libraries, vol.24, issue.4, p.157, 2005.
DOI : 10.6017/ital.v24i4.3378

J. R. Young, High Wire press transforms publication of scientific journals, The Chronicle of higher education, 1997.