. Le-système-est-aussi-maniable, 3.5 L'utilisation du système est intuitive et la prise en main est de quelques minutes BP.4 Le MTBF est supérieur à 500h BP.5 Le système permet l'exercice du métier de rondier par une personne à mobilité réduite Interface BI

B. Le-système-est-fiable and B. , 8 Le système est maintenable en bon état de fonctionnement Contrainte BC.1 Le système s'adapte sur le fauteuil manuel 'Le Lozère' BC.2 Le système assure la sécurité de l'utilisateur et des personnes à l'interface BC.3 Le système ne doit pas être considéré comme un fauteuil électrique BC, 2010.

. Compte-tenu-de, évaluation, les paramètres de conception (iDDPs) sont le coefficient de couple (K), le coefficient de réduction total (Nred), la masse totale de la roue (Mroue) Les indicateurs techniques (ITs) impactés par les valeurs prises par les iDDPs sont : ? La vitesse moyenne du fauteuil dans des conditions de test appelées 'test0

L. Critères-de-l-'évaluation-Étant-la, Vitesse moyenne du fauteuil', la 'Réactivité de l'assistance', 'l'Autonomie', et 'Le courant maximum à fournir', nous devons d'une part définir des fonctions de scores indiquant le niveau de satisfaction des valeurs obtenues sur les ITs précisant

R. L. Ackoff, Towards a System of Systems Concepts, Management Science, vol.17, issue.11, pp.661-671, 1971.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661

N. Albarello and J. Welcomme, 2012. « Computational Design Synthesis: A Mode- Based Approach For Complex systems, Proceedings of th ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA2012), juillet 2

T. Bahil, « Decision Analysis and Resolution (DAR), 2003.

C. A. Bana-e-costa and M. P. Chagas, A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.153, issue.2, pp.323-331, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00155-3

F. Barron, B. E. Hutton, and . Barrett, The efficacy of SMARTER ??? Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking, Acta Psychologica, vol.93, issue.1-3, pp.23-36, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8

B. Mena and . Sami, « Introduction aux méthodes multicritères d'aide à la décision, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ, sect, vol.4, issue.2, 2000.

B. Berenbach and R. Lo, An Introduction to Project and Product Traceability, INSIGHT, vol.14, issue.4, pp.38-41, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/inst.201114438

L. Berrah, J. Montmain, G. Mauris, and E. V. Cliville, Optimising industrial performance improvement within a quantitative multi-criteria aggregation framework, International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, vol.3, issue.1, pp.42-65, 2011.
DOI : 10.1504/IJDATS.2011.038805
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00566019

B. S. Blanchard, J. Et-wolter, and . Fabrycky, 5 e éd, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 2011.

E. Bonjour, S. Deniaud, M. Dulmet, and G. Harmel, A Fuzzy Method for Propagating Functional Architecture Constraints to Physical Architecture, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.131, issue.6, pp.61002-61003, 2009.
DOI : 10.1115/1.3116253
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00381061

E. Bonjour, S. Deniaud, and J. Micaëlli, A method for jointly drawing up the functional and design architectures of complex systems during the preliminary system-definition phase, Journal of Engineering Design, vol.24, issue.3, pp.305-319, 2013.
DOI : 10.1080/09544828.2012.737457
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01221283

D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, « Concepts et méthodes pour l'aide à la décision. 3, analyse multicritère, 2006.

J. P. Brans, How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.24, issue.2, pp.228-238, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5

T. R. Browning, Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol.48, issue.3, pp.292-306, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/17.946528

S. Burge, « The Systems Engineering Tool Box, p.15, 2009.

S. Burge, « A Functional Approach to Quality Function Deployment (Putting the Function back into Quality Function Deployment), p.33, 2007.

. Cerah, Spécifications Techniques Vehicules pour Handicaps Physiques, 2010.

V. Chapurlat and M. Roque, Interoperability Constraints and Requirements Formal Modelling and Checking Framework, Advances in Production Management Systems IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 338, pp.219-226, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16358-6_28
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01055850

H. Chen, F. Et-dundar, and . Kocaoglu, A sensitivity analysis algorithm for hierarchical decision models, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.185, issue.1, pp.266-288, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.029

S. Cirrus, « Discovery of Design Methodologies for the Integration of Multi-disciplinary Design Problems », 1998.

C. Vincent, H. Alain, and B. Lamia, Approche systémique et méthode multicritère pour la définition d'un système d'indicateurs de performance, Thèse de l, 2004.

A. Collignan, « Méthode d'optimisation et d'aide à la décision en conception mécanique: Application à une structure aéronautique, 2011.

J. -. Condorcet, Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat marquis de. 1785. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix

C. Cornu, « Contribution à la prise en compte de l'interopérabilité pour le déploiement de processus complexes dans une grande entreprise: proposition d'un guide méthodologique outillé pour les processus d'Ingénierie Système, 2012.

C. A. Costa, J. Bana, and . Vansnick, « Cardinal Value Measurement with Macbeth ». In Decision Making: Recent Developments and Worldwide Applications, édité par Stelios H. Zanakis, Georgios Doukidis, et Constantin Zopounidis, vol.45, pp.317-329, 2000.

P. Couturier, M. Lô, and V. Chapurlat, « Evaluation et relations de traçabilité en Ingénierie Système, 10 ème Congrès International de Génie Industriel, 2013.

P. Couturier, M. Lo, and . Mouelhi, Evaluation Process Support in Mechatronics Design, Volume 3: 2011 ASME/IEEE International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, Parts A and B, 2011.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2011-48111
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00804916

G. Cusimano, Optimization of the choice of the system electric drive-device???transmission for mechatronic applications, Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol.42, issue.1, pp.48-65, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.02.003

M. Danilovic and T. R. Browning, Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices, International Journal of Project Management, vol.25, issue.3, pp.300-314, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003

G. Derringer, R. Et, and . Suich, « Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables, Journal of Quality Technology, sect, vol.12, issue.4, 1980.

W. Edwards and F. Hutton-barron, SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.60, issue.3, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1994.1087

M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux, A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization, OR Spectrum, vol.22, issue.4, pp.425-460, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/s002910000046
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00462047

?. Ertu?rul and M. Güne?, « Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for Machine Selection Advances in Soft Computing 41, Analysis and Design of Intelligent Systems using Soft Computing Techniques, édité par Patricia Melin, pp.638-648, 2007.

J. Estefan, « Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) methodologies ». INCOSE- TD-2007-003-01I, International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), 2008.

A. Faisandier, Ingénierie des Systèmes complexes -Démarches et processus techniques, MAP Système -Edition, vol.1, 2005.

C. Féliot, « Modélisation de systèmes complexes : intégration et formalisation de modèles, Thèse de doctorat, 1997.

R. Felix, « Multicriteria decision making (mcdm): Management of aggregation complexity through fuzzy interactions between goals or criteria, International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU), pp.1431-1437, 2008.

S. Finger and J. Dixon, A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes, Research in Engineering Design, vol.24, issue.1, pp.51-67, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01580003

S. Finger and J. R. Dixon, A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle, Research in Engineering Design, vol.24, issue.1, pp.121-137, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01580205

S. Fiorèse and J. Meinadier, Découvrir et comprendre l'ingénierie système. Association française d'ingénierie système, 2012.

P. C. Fishburn, Utility Theory, Management Science, vol.14, issue.5, pp.335-378, 1968.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.14.5.335

F. Fleurey and A. Solberg, A Domain Specific Modeling Language Supporting Specification, Simulation and Execution of Dynamic Adaptive Systems, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp.606-621, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/MIC.2007.2

S. Friedenthal, A. Moore, and R. Steiner, A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language, 2011.

J. Fülöp, « Introduction to Decision Making Methods ». Laboratory of Operations Research and Decision Systems, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, p.15, 2005.

J. S. Gero, U. Et, and . Kannengiesser, « Towards a situated Function-Behaviour-Structure framework as the basis of a theory of designing, 2000.

P. Giorgini, J. Mylopoulos, E. Nicchiarelli, and R. Sebastiani, Reasoning with Goal Models, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp.167-181, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45816-6_22

E. C. Harrington, « The desirability function, Industrial quality control, pp.494-498, 1965.

J. Hauser and D. Clausing, « The house of quality », In Harvard Business Review, 1988.

D. K. Hitchins, Systems Engineering a 21st Century Systems Methodology, 2007.

A. Imoussaten, « Modélisation et pilotage de la phase de délibération dans une décision collective -vers le management d' d'activités à risques, Thèse de, p.250, 2011.

A. Imoussaten, J. Montmain, A. Rico, and . Et-fabien-rico, « Un modèle dynamique pour la simulation de l'issue d'un débat, Rencontres francophones sur la logique floue et ses applications, 2010.

A. Imoussaten, J. Montmain, F. Trousset, and C. Labreuche, « Multicriteria improvement of options, European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, 2011.

J. Gausemeier and E. S. Moehringer, « VDI 2206 -A New Guideline For The Design Of Mechatronic Systems, Mechatronic Systems, A proceedings volume from the 2nd IFAC Conference, 2002.

R. L. Keeney and E. H. Raffia, Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. Wiley& Sons, 1976.

S. Königs, G. Frederick, A. Beier, R. Figge, and . Stark, Traceability in Systems Engineering ??? Review of industrial practices, state-of-the-art technologies and new research solutions, Advanced Engineering Informatics, pp.924-940, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.aei.2012.08.002

C. Labreuche and M. Grabisch, A value for bi-cooperative games, International Journal of Game Theory, vol.33, issue.3, pp.409-438, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s00182-008-0126-5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00308738

C. Law, « Using fuzzy numbers in educational grading system ». Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp.311-323, 1996.

L. Moigne and J. Louis, La modélisation des systèmes complexes, 1990.

F. Limayem and B. Yannou, « La méthode SPEC: Suivi de Performances en cours de Conception, Congrès international AFAV 2000 : Les hommes et le management par la valeur, p.10, 2000.

S. Li, « Rank reversal properties of multicriteria decision making models, p.86, 2010.

M. Lô and P. Couturier, A Metamodel of Evaluation in Systems Engineering: Application to a Mechatronic Design, Proceeding of 14th symposium on Information Control in Manufacturing, pp.1562-1567, 2012.
DOI : 10.3182/20120523-3-RO-2023.00192

P. Lonchampt, « Co-évolution et processus de conception intégrée de produits : Modèle et support de l'activité de conception, 2004.

D. Long, A Primer For Model-Based Systems Engineering, 2012.

D. Long and Z. Scott, A Primer For Model-Based Systems Engineering, 2011.

J. Long, Relationships between, Common Graphical Representations in System Engineering, 2002.

M. W. Maier, The Art of Systems Architecting, Third Edition, 2009.

R. J. Malak, J. Matthew-aughenbaugh, J. J. Et-christiaan, and . Paredis, Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design, Computer-Aided Design, vol.41, issue.3, pp.214-227, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004

S. J. Mellor, MDA Distilled: Principles of Model-driven Architecture, 2004.

C. Mészáros, T. Et, and . Rapcsák, On sensitivity analysis for a class of decision systems, Decision Support Systems, vol.16, issue.3, pp.231-240, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-9236(95)00012-7

A. Mohammadi, A. Mohammadi, M. Mohammadi, and E. A. Mohammadi, « ELECTRE Decision Making Method with Triangular Fuzzy Numbers, Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, vol.5, issue.12, p.1180, 2011.

J. Montmain and S. Sahraoui, « How to improve the overall industrial performance in a multi-criteria context, Proceedings IPMU 2008, 12th International Conference on Information processing and Management of uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008.

O. Mouelhi, « Contribution à l'optimisation multiobjectif en conception multidisciplinaire », 2010.

V. C. Moulianitis, N. A. Aspragathos, and A. J. Dentsoras, A model for concept evaluation in design??????an application to mechatronics design of robot grippers, Mechatronics, vol.14, issue.6, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2003.09.001

K. Ng, A critical analysis of current engineering design methodologies from a decision making perspective, Intelligent Production Machines and Systems, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008045157-2/50067-5

G. Pahl, W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, K. Grote, and K. Wallace, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2007.

J. Penalva and . Michel, « La modélisation par les systèmes en situation complexe, Thèse de doctorat, 1997.

F. Pfister, V. Chapurlat, M. Huchard, C. Nebut, and J. Wippler, A proposed meta-model for formalizing systems engineering knowledge, based on functional architectural patterns, Systems Engineering, vol.3, issue.1, pp.321-332, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/sys.21204
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00804260

F. Y. Phillips, R. Et, and . Srivastava, « Committed Costs vs, Uncertainty in New Product Development ». IC 2 Institute Working Papers WP, 1993.

T. Pimmler, S. D. Udo, and . Eppinger, Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions, 1994.

S. Pugh, Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, 1990.

T. Quirante, Y. Ledoux, and E. P. Sebastian, Multiobjective optimization including design robustness objectives for the embodiment design of a two-stage flash evaporator, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol.12, issue.4, pp.29-39, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s12008-011-0134-8

F. Roos, H. Johansson, and J. Wikander, Optimal selection of motor and gearhead in mechatronic applications, Mechatronics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.63-72, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2005.08.001

B. Roy, « Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode electre) ». Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de, Recherche Opérationnelle, vol.8, pp.57-75, 1968.
DOI : 10.1051/ro/196802v100571

T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, 1980.

D. Scaravetti, « Formalisation préalable d'un problème de conception, pour l'aide à la décision en conception préliminaire, Thèse de l'Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Métiers : 175 p, 2004.

M. J. Scott and E. K. Antonsson, « Aggregation functions for engineering design tradeoffs ». Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp.253-264, 1998.

Z. Scott, White paper: 9 Laws of Effective Systems Engineering, 2012.

H. Simon and . Alexander, The New Science of Management Decision, 1960.
DOI : 10.1037/13978-000

D. Steinberg, F. Budinsky, M. Paternostro, and E. Merks, EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework Part of the Eclipse Series series, 2008.

R. Steuer, Y. Egon, and . Qi, « Computational investigations evidencing multiple objectives in portfolio optimization ». In Multi-objective programming and goal programming : theory and applications, proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Multi-Objective Programming: Theory & Applications (MOPGP'02), held in Nara, Japan on, pp.35-44, 2002.

S. Stevens and . Smith, On the Theory of Scales of Measurement, Science, vol.103, issue.2684, p.2684, 1946.
DOI : 10.1126/science.103.2684.677

N. Suh and . Pyo, The principles of design, 1990.

J. Tacnet, M. Batton-hubert, and J. Dezert, « Analyse multicritères et fusion d'information pour l'expertise et la gestion intégrée des risques naturels en montagne, 2010.

T. Tomiyama, A Classification of Design Theories and Methodologies, Volume 4a: 18th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, 2006.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2006-99444

T. Tomiyama, P. Gu, Y. Jin, D. Lutters, . Ch et al., Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications, Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications, pp.543-565, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003
URL : http://doc.utwente.nl/73037/1/Tomiyama09design.pdf

V. Torra, « The WOWA operator and the interpolation function W*: Chen and Otto's interpolation method revisited ». Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp.389-396, 2000.

H. Trabelsi, P. Yvars, J. Louati, and E. M. Haddar, Effectiveness of an interval computation approach to the dynamic simulation of a MacPherson Suspension system, 2012 9th France-Japan & 7th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics (MECATRONICS) / 13th Int'l Workshop on Research and Education in Mechatronics (REM), pp.78-85, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/MECATRONICS.2012.6450991

E. Triantaphyllou, B. Kovalerchuk, L. Mann, and G. M. Knapp, Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol.3, issue.1, pp.16-28, 1997.
DOI : 10.1108/13552519710161517

E. Triantaphyllou and A. Sánchez, « A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods* ». Decision Sciences, pp.151-194, 1997.

N. Troussier, Rapport de HDR -De la conception mécanique à la conception collaborative et robuste des systèmes mécatroniques : une approche combinant maîtrise des performances des systèmes techniques et gestion des connaissances, 2010.

D. Ullman, The Ideal Engineering Decision Support System, 2000.

V. Beek, T. J. Mustafa, S. Erden, and T. Tomiyama, « Modular design of mechatronic systems with function modeling, pp.850-863, 2010.

É. Vareilles, M. Aldanondo, A. Codet-de-boisse, T. Coudert, P. Gaborit et al., How to take into account general and contextual knowledge for interactive aiding design: Towards the coupling of CSP and CBR approaches, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol.25, issue.1, pp.31-47, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.09.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00760363

C. Weber, « Theory of Technical Systems (TTS) -Its Role for Design Theory And Methodology and Challenges in the Future, 2008.

E. Wood and . Antonsson, Computations with Imprecise Parameters in Engineering Design: Background and Theory, Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design, vol.111, issue.4, 1989.
DOI : 10.1115/1.3259045

D. Wyatt, D. C. Wynn, and P. J. Wynn, « Comparing representations for product architecture design through life-cycle evaluation methods, 2009.

B. Yannou, La conception industrielle de produits, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00289266

B. Yannou, H. Christofol, D. Jolly, and N. Troussier, « Conception robuste Ingénierie de l'évaluation et de la décision, La conception industrielle de produit, 2008.