.. Les-connecteurs-de-discours, 82 3.1.2.1 Catégories de connecteurs

.. De-discours, 90 3.2.1 Ressources lexicales de marqueurs discursifs, p.91, 1996.

.. Dans-ce-chapitre-contrast, auxquelles nous avons consacré une partie du chapitre précédent Jusqu'ici, nous avons essentiellement présenté différents ensembles de relations de discours et décrit certaines Sommaire 6, p.157

.. Inférences-dans-le-cas-de-concession-et-de-violation, 158 6.2.1 Inférence d'une relation de la classe causale, p.161

.. Pas-d-'inférence-de-relations-de-la-classe-adversative, 163 6.2.2.1 Pour la prémisse Result(?, ?) ? Concession(?, ?) . . . . . 163 6.2.2.2 Pour la prémisse Result(?, ?) ? Violation(?, ?), p.165

P. Annotation-des, 166 6.3.1 Données extraites et données annotées, p.168

. Dans-ce-chapitre, nous présentons l'étude de trois structures discursives, ayant pour point commun de faire intervenir la relation Result et une relation de la classe adversative

. Discours-comme-en, cette insertion n'est pas toujours possible lorsque Narration est marquée par puis ? c'est-à-dire lorsque l'on a Strong Narration. Pour Bras et al., l'insertion n'est possible que dans les cas où l'éventualité introduite en (?) n'implique pas la fin de Poststate(e ? ). C'est le cas ici : l'état résultant de l, un événement est donc « inséré peut être glosé par Paul ne travaille plus dans l'entreprise de Max, 2001.

. Dans-ces-discours, Result(?, ?) ? Explanation(?, ?), par les connecteurs donc et parce que On observe que le premier discours construit est cohérent. Il semble que dans ce cas, on puisse considérer que la relation Result(?, ?) est inférée

. Observons-donc-ce and . Qu, il se passe lorsque l'on supprime le marquage de la relation Explanation(?, ?) par parce que. Pour la première configuration, on construit un discours incohérent ? voir (316) En ce qui concerne la seconde configuration, la suppression de parce que aboutit à la construction d'un discours incohérent ? voir (317) Comme l'ordre des unités n'a pas changé

. La-cohérence-du-discours-en, 317) semble permise par le fait que l'on peut attacher (?) à l'unité (?), ou à l'unité complexe formée par (?) et (?)

A. Abeillé and D. Godard, The Grande Grammaire du Français Project, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10). Valletta, Malta : European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2010.

A. Abeillé, . Clément, and . Lionel, Building a Treebank for French, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1_10

S. Afantenos and N. Asher, Testing SDRT's Right Frontier. Pages 1?9 of : Huang, 23rd international Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 2010.

S. Afantenos, . Asher, . Nicholas, . Benamara, . Farah et al., An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organisation : the ANNODIS corpus, Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12 European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00976087

J. Allen, Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals, Communications of the ACM, 1983.

L. Alonso, I. Castellón, and L. Padró, X-Tractor : A Tool For Extracting Discourse Markers, Pages 100?105 of : LREC 2002 workshop on Linguistic Knowledge Acquisition and Representation : Bootstrapping Annotated Language Data, 2002.

J. Anscombre and O. Ducrot, Deux mais en fran??ais?, Lingua, vol.43, issue.1, pp.23-40, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(77)90046-8
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(77)90046-8

N. Asher, Troubles on the Right Frontier. Pages 29?52 of : Aurnague, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning (SEM- 05), 2005.
DOI : 10.1075/pbns.172.02ash

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations , and Commonsense Entailment, pp.437-493, 1993.

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Logics of Conversation, 2003.

N. Asher and L. Roussarie, Intégration de la sémantique dynamique et de théories structurales dans l'interprétation du discours : la SDRT, Interpréter en contexte, traité ic2, pp.229-263, 2005.

N. Asher and L. Vieu, Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations, Lingua, vol.115, issue.4, pp.591-610, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.017
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.017

N. Asher, . Aurnague, . Michel, . Bras, . Myriam et al., De l'espace-temps dans l'analyse du discours. Sémiotiques, pp.11-62, 1995.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00672325

N. Asher, . Hardt, . Daniel, and J. Busquets, Discourse parallelism, ellipsis, and ambiguity, Journal of Semantics, vol.18, issue.1, pp.1-25, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/18.1.1
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.15.1226

N. Asher, . Venant, . Antoine, P. Muller, and S. Afantenos, Complex discourse units and their semantics, Constraints in discourse, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00661427

M. Aurnague and L. Vieu, A three-level approach to the semantics of space, Semantics of Prepositions : From Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing, pp.393-439, 1993.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110872576.393
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00462578

J. Bateman, K. Rondhuis, and . Jan, Coherence relations: Towards a general specification, Discourse Processes, pp.3-49, 1997.
DOI : 10.1080/01638539209544800

A. Beaulieu-masson, Quels marqueurs pour parasiter le discours ? Cahiers de linguistique française, pp.45-71, 2002.

Y. Bestgen and S. Piérard, Validation d'une méthodologie pour l'étude de deux types de marqueurs de la segmentation dans un grand corpus de textes, Traitement Automatique des Langues, vol.47, issue.2, pp.89-110, 2006.

. Biran, . Or, and O. Rambow, IDENTIFYING JUSTIFICATIONS IN WRITTEN DIALOGS BY CLASSIFYING TEXT AS ARGUMENTATIVE, International Journal of Semantic Computing, vol.05, issue.04, pp.363-381, 2011.
DOI : 10.1142/S1793351X11001328

E. Black, S. Abney, D. Flickenger, C. Gdaniec, R. Grishman et al., Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars, Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language , HLT '91, 1991.
DOI : 10.3115/112405.112467

A. Borillo, Quelques remarques sur quand connecteur temporel. Langue française, pp.71-91, 1988.

M. Bras, Entre relations temporelles et relations de discours, 2008.

M. Bras and N. Asher, Le raisonnement non monotone dans la construction de la structure temporelle de textes en français, Pages 223?234 of : Actes du 9ème congrès de l'AFCET RF-IA, 1994.

M. Bras and A. Le-draoulec, Quelques candidats au statut de "connecteur temporel". Cahiers de grammaire, pp.219-237, 2006.

M. Bras and A. Le-draoulec, D'abord marqueur de structuration du discours, Journal of French Language Studies, vol.115, issue.02, 2009.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024117423963
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00959689

M. Bras, L. Draoulec, A. Vieu, and L. , Temporal information and discourse relations in narratives, Proceedings of the workshop on Temporal and spatial information processing -, 2001.
DOI : 10.3115/1118238.1118245

M. Bras, L. Draoulec, A. Vieu, and L. , Connecteurs et temps verbaux dans l'interprétation temporelle du discours : le cas de puis en interaction avec l'imparfait et le passé simple. Cahiers Chronos, pp.71-97, 2003.

M. Bras, L. Draoulec, A. Asher, and N. , Evidence for a Scalar Analysis of Result in SDRT from a Study of the French Temporal Connective alors. Pages 75?79 of : SPRIK Conference : Explicit and implicit information in text, 2007.

M. Bras, . Prévot, . Laurent, and M. Vergez-couret, Quelles relations de discours pour les structures ??num??ratives ?, Congr??s Mondial de Linguistique Fran??aise 2008, 1945.
DOI : 10.1051/cmlf08225
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00635337/document

M. Bras, L. Draoulec, A. Asher, and N. , A Formal Analysis of the French Temporal Connective alors. Structuring information in discourse : the explicit/implicit dimension, Oslo Studies in Language, vol.1, issue.1, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00903205

G. Brown and G. Yule, Discourse analysis, 1983.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511805226

B. Bruce, A model for temporal references and its application in a question answering program, Artificial Intelligence, vol.3, pp.1-25, 1972.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(72)90040-9

B. Busquets and J. , Discourse Contrast : Types and Tokens. Language, Representation and Reasoning. Memorial Volume to Isabel Gómez Txurruka, pp.103-123, 2007.

J. Busquets, . Asher, . Nicholas, and L. Vieu, La SDRT : une approche de la cohérence du discours dans la tradition de la sémantique dynamique, pp.73-101, 2001.

M. Candito, . Crabbé, . Benoit, . Denis, . Pascal et al., Analyse syntaxique du français : des constituants aux dépendances, 2009.

L. Carlson and D. Marcu, Discourse Tagging Reference Manual, Information Sciences Institute, 2001.

L. Carlson, . Marcu, . Daniel, M. Okurowski, and . Ellen, Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Pages 1?10 of, Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. SIGDIAL, 2001.

N. Chambers and D. Jurafsky, Jointly combining implicit constraints improves temporal ordering, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '08, 2008.
DOI : 10.3115/1613715.1613803
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.8158

M. Charolles, Cohésion, cohérence et pertinence du discours, Travaux de linguistique, vol.29, pp.125-151, 1995.

M. Charolles, L'encadrement du discours ? univers, champs, domaines et espace. Cahiers de recherche linguistique, pp.1-73, 1997.

M. Charolles, Framing adverbials and their role in discourse cohesion, from connection to forward labelling, Proceedings of Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 2005.

H. H. Clark, Using Language, 1996.

C. Cleverdon, The ASLIB CRANFIELD RESEARCH PROJECT ON The COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY OF INDEXING SYSTEMS, Pages 421?431 of : Proceedings of aslib, 1960.
DOI : 10.1108/eb049778

C. Cojocariu and C. Rossari, Constructions of the type la cause/la raison/la preuve + utterance : grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else, Journal of pragmatics, vol.40, pp.1435-1454, 2008.

. Da-cunha, . Iria, . Torres-moreno, . Juan-manuel, and G. Sierra, On the development of the RST Spanish Treebank. Pages 1?10 of, Proceedings of the 5th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 2011.

L. Danlos, Connecteurs et relations causales, Langue française, pp.92-127, 1988.
DOI : 10.3406/lfr.1988.4739

L. Danlos, Discourse Dependency Structures as Constrained DAGs. Pages 127?135 of, Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00082851

L. Danlos, Capacité générative forte de RST, pp.169-198, 2006.

L. Danlos, Strong generative capacity of RST, SDRT and discourse dependency DAGSs. Pages 69?95 of, Constraints in Discourse III, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00524739

L. Danlos, D-STAG : un formalisme d'analyse automatique de discours basé sur les tag synchrones, Revue tal, vol.50, pp.1-30, 2009.

L. Danlos, Connecteurs de discours adverbiaux : problèmes à l'interface syntaxe-sémantique, 31th International Conference on Lexis and Grammar, 2012.

L. Danlos and P. Hankach, Right Frontier Constraint for discourses in non canonical order. Pages 69?95 of, Constraints in Discourse III, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00524740

L. Danlos and O. Rambow, Discourse Relations and Propositional Attitudes, Constraints In Discourse, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00614763

L. Danlos, . Antolinos-basso, . Diégo, . Braud, . Chloé et al., Vers le FDTB : French Discourse TreeBank, Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, 2012.

L. Degand, . Fagard, and . Benjamin, Alors between Discourse and Grammar. The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language, pp.29-56, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00664720

L. Degand, A. Simon, and . Catherine, On identifying basic discourse units in speech : theoretical and empirical issues. Revue Discours, 2009.

P. Denis and J. Baldridge, Global joint models for coreference resolution and named entity classification, Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 42, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00514302

P. Denis and P. Muller, Comparison of different algebras for inducing the temporal structure of texts, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. COLING '10, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00511586

D. Eugenio, . Barbara, J. D. Moore, . Paolucci, and . Massimo, Learning features that predict cue usage. Pages 80, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter, 1997.

Q. Do, . Xuan, Y. Chan, and D. Roth, Minimally Supervised Event Causality Identification, Proceedings of EMNLP, 2011.

R. Dooley and S. Levinsohn, Analyzing discourse : A manual of basic concepts, 2001.

D. Prendinger and . Helmut, A Novel Discourse Parser Based on Support Vector Machine Classification. Pages 665?673 of, Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP. Suntec, 2009.

M. Egg and G. Redeker, How Complex is Discourse Structure ? In : Calzolari (Conference Chair), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2010.

M. Gerber, . Gordon, . Andrew, . Sagae, and . Kenji, Open-domain Commonsense Reasoning Using Discourse Relations from a Corpus of Weblog Stories, Pages 43?51 of : Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 First International Workshop on Formalisms and Methodology for Learning by Reading, 2010.

A. Gordon, . Kozareva, . Zornitsa, and M. Roemmele, SemEval- 2012 Task 7 : Choice of Plausible Alternatives : An Evaluation of Commonsense Causal Reasoning, The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 2012.

B. Grosz and C. Sidner, Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse, Computational Linguistics, vol.12, pp.175-204, 1986.

B. Gröte, . Lenke, . Nils, and M. Stede, Ma(r)king concessions in English and German, Proceedings of the Fifth European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 1995.
DOI : 10.1080/01638539409544883

. Hall, . Mark, . Frank, . Eibe, . Holmes et al., The WEKA data mining software, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol.11, issue.1, pp.10-18, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1656274.1656278

M. Halliday and R. Hasan, Cohesion in English, 1976.

H. Hernault, . Prendinger, D. A. Helmut, . Ishizuka, and . Mitsuru, HILDA: A Discourse Parser Using Support Vector Machine Classification, Dialogue & Discourse, vol.1, issue.3, pp.1-33, 2010.
DOI : 10.5087/dad.2010.003

J. Hitzeman, . Moens, . Marc, and C. Grover, Algorithms for Analysing the Temporal Structure of Discourse. Pages 253?260 of : European chapter, 1995.

J. R. Hobbs, On the coherence and structure of discourse, Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1985.

L. Horn, On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, 1972.

E. Hovy, Parsimonious and Profligate Approaches to the Question of Discourse Structure Relations, Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Language Generation, 1990.

E. Hovy, Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations, Artificial Intelligence, vol.63, issue.1-2, pp.341-385, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(93)90021-3
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.42.3498

E. Hovy and E. Maier, Parsimonious and Profligate : How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations ?, 1995.

J. Jayez and C. Rossari, Donc et les consécutifs, des systèmes de contraintes différentiels, Linguisticae investigationes, XX, pp.117-143, 1996.

J. Jayez and C. Rossari, Pragmatic Connectives as Predicates. The Case of Inferential Connectives, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-017-2746-4_10
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00157212

H. Kamp, Ev??nements, repr??sentations discursives et r??f??rence temporelle, Langages, vol.15, issue.64, pp.34-64, 1981.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.1981.1884

G. Katz, . Arosio, and . Fabrizio, The annotation of temporal information in natural language sentences. Pages 1?15 of : Proceedings of the workshop on Temporal and spatial information processing, TASIP '01, 2001.

A. Kehler, Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.23, issue.6, pp.533-575, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005677819813

A. Knott, A Data-Driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations, 1996.

A. Knott, Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. Pages 127?151 of Text representation : Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 2001.
DOI : 10.1075/hcp.8.08kno
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.48.6559

S. Kuroda, Le jugement cat??gorique et le jugement th??tique : exemples tir??s de la syntaxe japonaise, Langages, vol.8, issue.30, pp.81-110, 1973.
DOI : 10.3406/lgge.1973.2229
URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/lgge_0458-726x_1973_num_8_30_2229.pdf

L. Draoulec and A. , Avant que/de: possibles passages ?? la connexion temporelle, Journal of French Language Studies, vol.15, issue.2, pp.131-151, 2005.
DOI : 10.1017/S095926950500205X

A. Lee, . Prasad, . Rashmi, . Joshi, . Aravind et al., Complexity of Dependencies in Discourse : Are Dependencies in Discourse More Complex Than in Syntax ?, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, 2006.

A. Lee, . Prasad, . Rashmi, A. Joshi, and B. Webber, Departures from Tree Structures in Discourse : Shared Arguments in the Penn Discourse Treebank The Penn Discourse Treebank. Pages 1?8 of : Constraints in discourse iii, 2008.

Z. Lin, H. Ng, . Tou, and . Kan, Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank, Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Volume 1, EMNLP '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1699510.1699555

Z. Lin, H. Ng, . Tou, . Kan, and . Min-yen, Automatically evaluating text coherence using discourse relations, Pages 997?1006 of : Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics : Human Language Technologies, 2011.

A. Louis, A. K. Joshi, . Prasad, . Rashmi, and A. Nenkova, Using entity features to classify implicit discourse relations. Pages 59?62 of, Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference, The 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 2010.

. Mani, . Inderjeet, . Verhagen, . Marc, . Wellner et al., Machine learning of temporal relations. Pages 753?760 of, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.

W. Mann and S. Thompson, Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization, Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, vol.8, issue.3, pp.243-281, 1988.
DOI : 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243

D. Marcu, Building up rhetorical structure trees, Pages 1069?1074 of : Proceedings of 13th national conference on artificial intelligence, 1996.

D. Marcu, The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts, 1997.

D. Marcu, The Rhetorical Parsing of Unrestricted Texts: A Surface-based Approach, Computational Linguistics, vol.20, issue.2, pp.395-448, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/415076

D. Marcu, The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization, 2000.

D. Marcu and A. Echihabi, An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , ACL '02, 2002.
DOI : 10.3115/1073083.1073145

M. P. Marcus, . Santorini, . Beatrice, M. Marcinkiewicz, and . Ann, Building a large annotated corpus of english : The Penn Treebank, Computational Linguistics, vol.19, issue.2, pp.313-330, 1993.

J. Martin, English Text : System and Structure, 1992.
DOI : 10.1075/z.59

J. Moeschler, L'expression de la causalité en français. Cahiers de linguistique française, pp.11-42, 2003.

C. Molinier, Connecteurs et marqueurs énonciatifs : Les compléments figés formés à partir du nom propos. Pages 15?31 of : Actes du colloque grammaires et lexiques comparés, 2003.

J. Moore and M. Pollack, A problem for RST : the need for multilevel discourse analysis, Computational Linguistics, vol.18, issue.4, pp.537-544, 1992.

P. Muller, . Afantenos, . Stergos, . Denis, . Pascal et al., Constrained decoding for text-level discourse parsing. Pages 1883?1900 of : The CO- LING 2012 Organizing Committee, Proceedings of COLING 2012, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00750611

T. Nakamura, Observations sur la prédication : prédicat verbal, prédicat nominal avec verbe support et prédicat nominal sans verbe support, Actes du colloque international supports et prédicats non verbaux dans les langues du monde, 2009.

J. Nivre and M. Scholz, Deterministic dependency parsing of English text, Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics , COLING '04, 2004.
DOI : 10.3115/1220355.1220365

A. Névéol, Étude du connecteur « d'autant plus que » dans une optique de génération automatique, 2002.

L. E. Oversteegen, On the pragmatic nature of causal and contrastive connectives, Discourse Processes, pp.51-85, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(92)90002-S

M. Piot, Les connecteurs du français. Linguisticae investigationes, XVII, pp.141-160, 1993.

E. Pitler and A. Nenkova, Using syntax to disambiguate explicit discourse connectives in text, Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers on, ACL-IJCNLP '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1667583.1667589

E. Pitler, A. Louis, and A. Nenkova, Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text, Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2, ACL-IJCNLP '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1690219.1690241

L. Polanyi, A Theory of Discourse Structure and Discourse Coherence, 21st Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 1985.

L. Polanyi and R. Scha, A syntactic approach to discourse semantics. Pages 413?419 of, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. COLING '84, 1984.

L. Polanyi and M. Van-den-berg, Logical Structure and Discourse Anaphora Resolution, Workshop on the relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference. 37th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 1999.

R. Prasad, . Dinesh, . Nikhil, . Lee, . Alan et al., The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2008.

L. Prévot and L. Vieu, The Moving Right Frontier. Pages 53?66 of, Constraints in Discourse III, 2008.

L. Prévot, L. Vieu, and N. Asher, Une formalisation plus pr??cise pour une annotation moins confuse: la relation d'??laboration d'entit??, Journal of French Language Studies, vol.115, issue.02, pp.207-228, 2009.
DOI : 10.1017/S0959269505002073

. Péry-woodley, . Marie-paule, . Asher, . Nicholas, . Enjalbert et al., Annodis : une approche outillée de l'annotation de structures discursives (poster), Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, 2009.

G. Redeker, Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.14, issue.3, pp.367-381, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90095-U

B. Reese, . Hunter, . Julie, . Denis, . Pascal et al., Reference Manual for the Analysis and Annotation of Rhetorical Structure, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00514933

J. Rey, Approche argumentative des textes scientifiques??: la traduction de or en espagnol, Meta: Journal des traducteurs, vol.44, issue.3, pp.411-428, 1999.
DOI : 10.7202/003946ar

A. Rodríguez, N. De-weghe, . Van, P. Maeyer, and . De, Simplifying Sets of Events by Selecting Temporal Relations, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_18

C. Roze, LexConn : une base lexicale des connecteurs discursifs du français, 2009.

C. Roze, . Danlos, . Laurence, and P. Muller, LEXCONN: A French Lexicon of Discourse Connectives, Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse, 2010.
DOI : 10.4000/discours.8645
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00511615

C. Roze, . Danlos, . Laurence, and P. Muller, Lexconn : a French Lexicon of Discourse Connectives. Revue Discours, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00511615

K. Sagae, Analysis of discourse structure with syntactic dependencies and data-driven shift-reduce parsing, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies, IWPT '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1697236.1697253

B. Sagot, The Lefff, a freely available and large-coverage morphological and syntactic lexicon for French, 7th international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00521242

G. Sampson and . Babarczy, A test of the leaf-ancestor metric for parse accuracy, Natural Language Engineering, vol.9, issue.4, pp.365-380, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/S1351324903003243

T. Sanders, . Spooren, . Wilbert, and L. Noordman, Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations, Discourse processes, pp.1-35, 1992.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305000900003238

T. Sanders, . Spooren, . Wilbert, and L. Noordman, Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.4, issue.2, pp.93-134, 1993.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.93

R. Scha and L. Polanyi, An augmented context free grammar for discourse . Pages 573?577 of, Proceedings of the 12th conference on computational linguistics -volume 2. COLING '88, 1988.

D. Schiffrin, Discourse markers, 1987.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511611841

A. Setzer and R. Gaizauskas, Annotating Events and Temporal Information in Newswire Texts, 2000.

A. Setzer, R. Gaizauskas, and M. Hepple, Using Semantic Inferences for Temporal Annotation Comparison, Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-4), 2003.

S. Siegel and J. Castellan, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 1988.

. Somasundaran, . Swapna, . Namata, . Galileo, J. Wiebe et al., Supervised and unsupervised methods in employing discourse relations for improving opinion polarity classification, Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Volume 1, EMNLP '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1699510.1699533

R. Soricut and D. Marcu, Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology , NAACL '03, 2003.
DOI : 10.3115/1073445.1073475
URL : http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/N/N03/N03-1030.pdf

W. Spooren, Some aspects of the form and interpretation of global contrastive coherence relations, 1989.

W. Spooren and T. Sanders, The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.40, issue.12, pp.2003-2026, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021

C. Sporleder and A. Lascarides, Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: an assessment, Natural Language Engineering, vol.5, issue.03, pp.369-416, 2008.
DOI : 10.1017/S1351324901002728

M. Stede, DiMLex : A Lexical Approach to Discourse Markers, Exploring the Lexicon ? Theory and Computation, 2002.

M. Stede, The Potsdam Commentary Corpus. Pages 96?102 of, Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, 2004.

M. Stede, Connective-based local coherence analysis, Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Semantics in Text Processing, STEP '08, 2008.
DOI : 10.3115/1626481.1626499

M. Stede, RST revisited : Disentangling nuclearitySubordination' versus 'coordination' in sentence and text ? A cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language Companion Series, 2008.

M. Stede, Discourse processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 2011.

M. Stede and C. Umbach, DiMLex : A lexicon of discourse markers for text generation and understanding, Pages 1238?1242 of : Proceedings of the Joint 36th Meeting of the ACL and the 17th Meeting of COLING, 1998.

R. Subba and B. Di-eugenio, An effective Discourse Parser that uses Rich Linguistic Information. Pages 566?574 of : Proceedings of Human Language Technologies, The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 2009.

E. Sweetser, From etymology to pragmatics : metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511620904

X. Tannier and . Muller, Evaluation Metrics for Automatic Temporal Annotation of Texts, Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00292202

P. The and . Group, The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0. Annotation Manual, 2008.

. Van-dijk and . Teun, Text and context : explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse, 1980.

J. Van-kuppevelt, Main structure and side structure in discourse, Linguistics, vol.33, issue.4, pp.809-833, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1995.33.4.809

S. Verberne, . Boves, . Lou, . Oostdijk, . Nelleke et al., Evaluating discourse-based answer extraction for why-question answering, Pages 735?736 of : Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. SIGIR '07, 2007.

M. Vergez-couret, Étude en corpus des réalisations linguistiques de la relation d'Élaboration, 2010.

M. Verhagen, Times Between The Lines, 2004.

M. Verhagen, Temporal Closure in an Annotation Environment, Language Resources and Evaluation, vol.42, issue.1, pp.2-3, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10579-005-7884-5

M. Verhagen, . Gaizauskas, . Robert, . Schilder, . Frank et al., SemEval2007 task 15 : TempEval temporal relation identification, p.2007, 2007.

Y. Versley, Discovery of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Discourse Connectives via Annotation Projection, Proceedings of Workshop on on the Annotation and Exploitation of Parallel Corpora (AEPC), 2010.

L. Vieu, On blocking : The rhetorical aspects of content-level discourse relations and their semantics. Pages 263?282 of : Aurnague, Language, Representation and Reasoning, 2007.

L. Vieu, On the semantics of discourse relations, Constraints In Discourse, 2011.

L. Vieu and L. Prévot, Background in Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. Pages 485?494 of : Workshop Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, 11th conference on Natural Language Processing (TALN), 2004.

L. Vieu, . Bras, . Myriam, . Asher, . Nicholas et al., Locating adverbials in discourse, Journal of French Language Studies, vol.15, issue.2, pp.173-193, 2005.
DOI : 10.1017/S0959269505002073
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00671743

L. Vieu, . Bras, L. Myriam, A. Draoulec, and N. Asher, Adverbiaux de localisation comme introducteurs de topiques de discours, 2006.

M. Vilain, . Burger, . John, . Aberdeen, . John et al., A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme, Proceedings of the 6th conference on Message understanding , MUC6 '95, 1995.
DOI : 10.3115/1072399.1072405

B. Webber, Discourse Deixis and Discourse Processing, 1988.
DOI : 10.3115/982023.982037

B. Webber, Multiple discourse connectives in a lexicalized grammar of discourse . Third international workshop on computational semantics, pp.229-249, 1999.

B. Webber, . Joshi, . Aravind, . Stone, . Matthew et al., Anaphora and Discourse Structure, Computational Linguistics, vol.14, issue.2, pp.545-587, 2003.
DOI : 10.1080/01690969108406940

B. Wellner, . Pustejovsky, . James, . Havasi, . Catherine et al., Classification of discourse coherence relations, Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, SigDIAL '06, 2006.
DOI : 10.3115/1654595.1654618

D. Wilson and D. Sperber, Forme linguistique et pertinence. Cahiers de linguistique française, pp.345-359, 1990.

D. Wilson and D. Sperber, Linguistic form and relevance, Lingua, vol.90, issue.1-2, pp.1-25, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5

G. Winterstein, La dimension probabiliste des marqueurs de discours. Nouvelles perspectives sur l'argumentation dans la langue, 2010.