.. Récapitulatif-de-l-'expé-r-i-e-n-c-e, 8 4 4 . 2 L o g i c i e ld el o c a l i s a t i o n, p.5

W. R. Drennan, However, it seems that the Doerbecker algorithm (with estimation Ephraim and Malah by an equal to 0.2) would be the best compromise for sound recognition and localization. -M .D o r b e c k e ra n dS .E r n s t Combination of Two Channel Spectral Subtraction and Adaptive Wiener Post Filtering for Noise Reduction and Dereverberation Localization and Speech-Identification Ability of Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Phase-Preserving Amplification Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids : Without is better than with The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids, Because of the limited differences observed between the different algorithms and the vocoder performances, the determination of the best algorithm remains challenging Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filters techniques in ultimicrophone binaural hearing aids, pp.461-472, 1996.

S. M. Abel and V. H. Hay, Sound Localization the Interaction of Aging, Hearing Loss and Hearing Protection, Scandinavian Audiology, vol.16, issue.1, pp.3-12, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.402445

I. Akhoun, A. Moulin, A. Jeanvoine, M. Ménard, F. Buret et al., Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol.175, issue.2, pp.196-205, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.07.026
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00368322

T. Balkany, W. Boggess, and B. Dinner, Binaural cochlear implantation : comparison of 3m/house and nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration, Laryngoscope, issue.10, pp.981040-1043, 1988.

D. Bates, M. Maechler, and B. Bolker, lme4 : Linear mixedeffects models using S4 classes, 2012. R package version 0, pp.999999-999999

C. Beaugeant, V. Turbin, P. Scalart, and A. Gilloire, New optimal filtering approaches for hands-free telecommunication terminals, Signal Processing, vol.64, issue.1, pp.33-48, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-1684(97)00174-6

M. Berouti, B. Beranek, R. Newman, J. Schwartz, and . Makhoul, Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise, ICASSP '79. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp.208-211, 1979.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1979.1170788

M. Bhatnagar, A modified spectral subtraction method combined with perceptual weighting for speech enhancement, 2002.

F. Steven and . Boll, Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction, IEEE, vol.27, issue.2, pp.113-120, 1979.

C. Bouchard, D. I. Havelock, and M. Bouchard, Beamforming with microphone arrays for directional sources, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.125, issue.4, pp.2098-2104, 2009.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3089221

D. Andrew, G. C. Brown, and . Stecker, Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. ii. the effect of binaurally synchronous temporal jitter, J Acoust Soc Am, vol.129, issue.1, pp.293-300, 2011.

K. D. Brown and T. J. Balkany, Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review, Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, vol.15, issue.5, pp.315-318, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ef3d3e

O. Cappe, Elimination of the musical noise phenomenon with the Ephraim and Malah noise suppressor, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol.2, issue.2, pp.345-349, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/89.279283

F. Chen, The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: A study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech, Medical Engineering & Physics, vol.33, issue.8
DOI : 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.04.004

F. Chen and P. C. Loizou, Predicting the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech, Ear and Hearing, vol.32, issue.3, pp.331-338, 2011.
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ff3515

Y. C. Teresa, R. Ching, E. Massie, E. Van-wanrooy, C. Rushbrooke et al., Bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation, Cochlear Implants Int, vol.10, issue.1, pp.23-27, 2009.

C. Chouard and J. Weber, MINIMAC: A Totally Numeric 15 Channel Implanted Stimulator, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol.441, issue.7, pp.743-748, 1989.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02726.x

G. Clark, A surgical approach for a cochlear implant: An anatomical study, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, vol.87, issue.01, pp.9-15, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-4886(73)90189-1

G. Clark and R. Hallworth, A multiple-electrode array for a cochlear implant, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, vol.194, issue.07, pp.623-627, 1976.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1910239

N. Dillier, H. Bögli, and T. Spillmann, Chapter 28 Speech encoding strategies for multielectrode cochlear implants: a digital signal processor approach, Prog Brain Res, vol.97, pp.301-311, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62290-6

H. Dillon, Advanced signal processing schemes in hearing aids, Thieme, pp.187-208, 2001.

H. Dillon, Compression systems in hearing aids, Hearing aids, vol.6, pp.159-186, 2001.

M. Doerbecker and S. Ernst, Combination of two-channel spectral subtraction and adaptive wiener post-filtering for noise reduction and deverberation, European Signal Processing Conference, 1996.

M. Dorman, . Pc-loizou, and T. Z. Fitzke, The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6???20 channels, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.104, issue.6, pp.3583-3588, 1998.
DOI : 10.1121/1.423940

D. Doyle, Some comments on the use of Wiener filtering for the estimation of evoked potentials, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol.38, issue.5, pp.533-537, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90196-0

C. C. Dunn, W. Noble, R. S. Tyler, M. Kordus, B. J. Gantz et al., Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noise, Ear and Hearing, vol.31, issue.2, pp.31296-298, 2010.
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c12383

C. Camille, . Dunn, S. Richard, S. Tyler, . Oakley et al., Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation, Ear Hear, vol.29, issue.3, pp.352-359, 2008.

Y. Ephraim and D. Malah, Speech enhancement using optimal nonlinear spectral amplitude estimation, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP '83, pp.1118-1121, 1983.

Y. Ephraim and D. Malah, Speech enhancement using a minimum-mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol.32, issue.6, pp.1109-1121, 1984.
DOI : 10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164453

Y. Ephraim and D. Malah, Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol.33, issue.2, pp.443-445, 1985.
DOI : 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164550

G. Fant, Speech Sounds and Features, 1973.

T. Francart, J. Brokx, and J. Wouters, Sensitivity to Interaural Level Difference and Loudness Growth with Bilateral Bimodal Stimulation, Audiology and Neurotology, vol.13, issue.5
DOI : 10.1159/000124279

T. Francart, A. Lenssen, and J. Wouters, Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.130, issue.5, pp.2817-2843, 2011.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3641414

T. Francart, T. Van-den-bogaert, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters, Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.126, issue.6, pp.3209-3213, 2009.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3243304

A. Jeanvoine-bibliographie35 and ]. R. Frosch, Introduction to Cochlear Waves. VDF, Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 2010.

N. Soha, R. Y. Garadat, G. Litovsky, F. Yu, and . Zeng, Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech, J Acoust Soc Am, vol.126, issue.5, pp.2522-2535, 2009.

M. J. Goupell, P. Majdak, and B. Laback, Median-plane sound localization as a function of the number of spectral channels using a channel vocoder, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.127, issue.2, pp.990-1001, 2010.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3283014

M. Hansen, Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility, Ear and Hearing, vol.23, issue.4, pp.369-80, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00012

W. House, I. Goals of the cochlear implant, The Laryngoscope, vol.84, issue.11, pp.1883-1887, 1974.
DOI : 10.1002/lary.5540841104

Y. Hu and P. C. Loizou, Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms, Speech Communication, vol.49, issue.7-8, pp.588-601, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.specom.2006.12.006

L. Johnsson, F. House, and . Linthicum, Bilateral cochlear implants : histological findings in a pair of temporal bones, Laryngoscope, vol.89, issue.5, pp.759-762, 1979.

F. Kallel, M. Frikha, M. Ghorbel, A. B. Hamida, and C. Berger-vachon, Dual-channel spectral subtraction algorithms based speech enhancement dedicated to a bilateral cochlear implant, Applied Acoustics, vol.73, issue.1, pp.12-20, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.06.010

S. Kamath and P. Loizou, A multi-band spectral subtraction method for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.2002.5745591

G. Kim, Y. Lu, Y. Hu, and P. C. Loizou, An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.126, issue.3
DOI : 10.1121/1.3184603

B. P. Kimberley, R. Dymond, and A. Gamer, Bilateral digital hearing aids for binaural hearing, Ear Nose Throat J, vol.73, issue.3, pp.176-179, 1994.

D. J. Kistler and F. L. Wightman, A model of head???related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum???phase reconstruction, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.91, issue.3, pp.1637-1647, 1992.
DOI : 10.1121/1.402444

K. Kokkinakis, C. Philipos, and . Loizou, Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.127, issue.5, pp.3136-3144, 2010.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3372727

M. Kompis and N. Dillier, Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. I. Prediction of the signal-to-noise-ratio improvement, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.109, issue.3, pp.1123-1133, 2001.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1338557

J. C. Lafon, Le test phonétique, 1958.

D. T. Lawson, B. S. Wilson, M. Zerbi, C. Van-den-honert, C. C. Finley et al., Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor, Am J Otol, vol.19, issue.6, pp.758-761, 1998.

T. Lfukube, Discrimination of synthetic vowels by using tactile vocoder and a comparison to that of an eight-channel cochlear implant, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.36, issue.11, pp.1085-91, 1989.
DOI : 10.1109/10.40815

N. Li and P. C. Loizou, Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.123, issue.4, pp.59-64, 2008.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2884086

J. Lim and A. Oppeenheim, Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.67, issue.12, pp.1586-1604, 1979.
DOI : 10.1109/PROC.1979.11540

L. Lin, W. H. Holmes, and E. Ambikairajah, Speech denoising using perceptual modification of Wiener filtering, Electronics Letters, vol.38, issue.23, pp.1486-1487, 2002.
DOI : 10.1049/el:20020965

P. C. Loizou and G. Kim, Reasons why current speech-enhacement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions

P. C. Loizou, Speech enhancement : theory and practice. Signal processing and communications, 2007.

C. Philipos and . Loizou, Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants, Adv Otorhinolaryngol, vol.64, pp.109-143, 2006.

R. Martin, Spectral subtraction based on minimum statistics, pp.1182-1185, 1994.

R. Mcaulay and M. Malpass, Speech enhancement using a soft-decision noise suppression filter, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol.28, issue.2, pp.137-145, 1980.
DOI : 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163394

A. W. Mills, On the Minimum Audible Angle, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.30, issue.4, pp.237-246, 1958.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1909553

A. W. Mills, Lateralization of High???Frequency Tones, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.32, issue.1, pp.132-134, 1960.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1907864

C. Brian and . Moore, An introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, Fifth Edition, 1995.

A. C. Neuman, A. Haravon, N. Sislian, and S. B. Waltzman, Sound-Direction Identification with Bilateral Cochlear Implants, Ear and Hearing, vol.28, issue.1, pp.73-82, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/01.aud.0000249910.80803.b9

R. Nouvian, D. Malinvaud, T. Van-den-abbeele, J. Puel, P. Bonfils et al., Physiologie de l'audition. Oto-rhino-laryngologie, pp.20-30, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00094975

R. C. Oldfield, The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, vol.9, issue.1, pp.97-113, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

E. S. Olson, H. Duifhuis, and C. R. Steele, Von B??k??sy and cochlear mechanics, Hearing Research, vol.293, issue.1-2
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.017

D. Poeppel, The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as ???asymmetric sampling in time???, Speech Communication, vol.41, issue.1, pp.245-255, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3

B. Becky, . Poon, K. Donald, V. Eddington, H. Noel et al., Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants : Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing, J Acoust Soc Am, vol.126, issue.2, pp.806-815, 2009.

R. Development and C. Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010.

L. Rayleig, On our perception of sound direction, Physiolosophical Magazine Series, vol.6, issue.1374, pp.214-232, 1907.

C. Richard, . Jeanvoine, . Veuillet, H. Moulin, . Thai et al., Exploration of the auditory system in humans : From click to speech auditory brainstem responses, Neurophysiol Clin, vol.40, pp.5-6267, 2010.

T. Ricketts and P. Henry, Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluaci??n de un auxiliar auditivo de micr??fono direccional adaptable, International Journal of Audiology, vol.6, issue.2, pp.100-112, 2002.
DOI : 10.1044/jshr.3801.211

H. Saoud, G. Josse, E. Bertasi, E. Truy, M. Chait et al., Brain-Speech Alignment Enhances Auditory Cortical Responses and Speech Perception, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.32, issue.1, pp.275-281, 0144.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3970-11.2012

P. Scalart and J. V. Filho, Speech enhancement based on a priori signal to noise estimation, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings, pp.629-632, 1996.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1996.543199

B. U. Seeber, U. Baumann, and H. Fastl, Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.116, issue.3, pp.1698-1709, 2004.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1776192

R. Shannon, F. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid, Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues, Science, vol.270, issue.5234, pp.303-311, 1995.
DOI : 10.1126/science.270.5234.303

E. Shaw, Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.56, issue.6, pp.1848-61, 1974.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1903522

F. Simmons, Cochlear Implants, Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol.89, issue.1, pp.66-69, 1969.
DOI : 10.1001/archotol.1969.00770020063011

M. Skinner, L. Holden, and T. Holden, Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the speack speech-coding strategy, Annals of Otology, Rinology and Laringology, vol.104, pp.307-311, 1995.

J. Sohn, N. S. Kim, and W. Sung, A statistical model-based voice activity detection, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol.6, issue.1, pp.1-3, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/97.736233

A. Spriet, Adaptive filtering techniques for noise reduction and acoustic feedback cancellation in hearing aids, 2004.

A. Spriet, L. Van-deun, K. Eftaxiadis, J. Laneau, M. Moonen et al., Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM??? in the Nucleus Freedom??? Cochlear Implant System, Ear and Hearing, vol.28, issue.1, pp.62-72, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/01.aud.0000252470.54246.54

R. Stapells, D. , T. W. Picton, and A. D. Smith, Normal hearing thresholds for clicks, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.72, issue.1, pp.74-79, 1982.
DOI : 10.1121/1.388026

M. A. Stone, C. Füllgrabe, and B. C. Moore, High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.126, issue.5, pp.2155-2158, 2009.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3238159

V. Tjomov and G. Gershuni, A model to describe the results of psychoacoustical experiments on steady-state stimuli, Analiz Rechevykh Signalov Chelovekom, Nauka, pp.36-49, 1971.

E. Truy, H. Thai-van, L. Collet, S. Gallego, and E. Ionescu, Binaural cochlear implantation : general concept, surgical technique and electrophysiology, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, vol.119, issue.3, pp.150-158, 2002.

E. Truy, E. Ionescu, P. Ceruse, and S. Gallego, The Binaural Digisonic Cochlear Implant: Surgical Technique, Otology & Neurotology, vol.23, issue.5, pp.704-709, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00017

R. S. Tyler, C. C. Dunn, S. A. Witt, and W. G. Noble, Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants, Ear and Hearing, vol.28, issue.Supplement, pp.86-90, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153e2

R. S. Tyler, C. C. Dunn, S. A. Witt, and J. P. Preece, Update on bilateral cochlear implantation, Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, vol.11, issue.5, pp.388-393, 2003.
DOI : 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00014

R. Udrea, N. Vizireanu, and S. Ciochina, An improved spectral subtraction method for speech enhancement using a perceptual weighting filter, Digital Signal Processing, vol.18, issue.4, pp.581-586, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.dsp.2007.08.002

T. Van-den-bogaert, S. Doclo, and M. Moonen, The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source 146

T. Van-den-bogaert, S. D. Wouters, and M. Moonen, The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.124, issue.1, pp.484-497, 2008.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2931962

T. Van-den-bogaert, S. D. Wouters, and M. Moonen, Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.125, issue.1, pp.360-371, 2009.
DOI : 10.1121/1.3023069

T. Van-den-bogaert, T. J. Klasen, M. Moonen, L. Van-deun, and J. Wouters, Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: Without is better than with, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.119, issue.1, pp.515-526, 2006.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2139653

R. Van-hoesel, M. Böhm, J. Pesch, A. Vandali, R. D. Battmer et al., Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.123, issue.4, pp.2249-2263, 2008.
DOI : 10.1121/1.2875229

R. Van-hoesel, R. Ramsden, and M. Odriscoll, Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User, Ear and Hearing, vol.23, issue.2, pp.137-149, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00006

J. M. Richard and . Van-hoesel, Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants, Audiol Neurootol, vol.9, issue.4, pp.234-246, 2004.

J. M. Richard, G. L. Van-hoesel, R. Y. Jones, and . Litovsky, Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users : effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation, J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, vol.10, issue.4, pp.557-567, 2009.

J. M. Richard, R. S. Van-hoesel, and . Tyler, Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants, J Acoust Soc Am, vol.113, issue.3, pp.1617-1630, 2003.

B. D. Veen and K. M. Buckley, Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering, IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol.5, issue.2, pp.4-24, 1988.
DOI : 10.1109/53.665

N. Verhaert, D. S. Lazard, D. Gnansia, J. P. Bébéar, P. Romanet et al., Speech Performance and Sound Localization Abilities in Neurelec Digisonic?? SP Binaural Cochlear Implant Users, Audiology and Neurotology, vol.17, issue.4, pp.256-266, 2012.
DOI : 10.1159/000338472

N. Virag, Single channel speech enhancement based on masking properties of the human auditory system, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol.7, issue.2, pp.126-137, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/89.748118

D. Walter, A posteriori " wiener filtering " of average evoked responses, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, vol.27, p.61, 1968.

J. Yang, Frequency domain noise suppression approaches in mobile telephone systems, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, pp.363-366, 1993.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319313

E. Zwickerandh, Psychacoustics : Facts and Models, Series in Information Sciences, 1999.