J. L. Wang, B. Yannou, F. Alizon, and P. Yvars, A usage coverage-based approach for assessing product family design, Engineering with Computers, vol.46, issue.4
DOI : 10.1007/s00366-012-0262-1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00748702

J. L. Wang and B. Yannou, “Explicit product family indicators based on a CSP simulation of usage coverage”, International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'11), pp.10-12

J. L. Wang and B. Yannou, A market segmentation process based on usage context, International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research (KEER2010), pp.2-4, 2010.

B. Yannou, J. L. Wang, and P. A. Yvars, Simulation of the usage coverage of a given product, International Design Conference, 2010.

J. L. Wang and B. Yannou, Usage modeling for market segmentation, CONFERE 09, 2009.

J. L. Wang, B. Yannou, and F. Alizon, Proposal of extension of the commonality-diversity index indicator for product family design, CONFERE Angers, vol.08, pp.3-4, 2008.

L. He, C. Hoyle, W. Chen, B. Yannou, and J. Wang, A Framework for Choice Modeling in Usage Context-Based Design, Volume 1: 36th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, 2010.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2010-28490

B. Yannou, C. Hoyle, J. Wang, N. Rianantsoa, M. Drayer et al., Usage coverage model for choice modeling: principles and taxonomy Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004.

G. Alexouda and K. Paparrizos, A genetic algorithm approach to the product line design problem using the seller's return criterion: An extensive comparative computational study, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.134, issue.1, pp.165-178, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00246-0

F. Alizon and T. J. Marion, Product Family Design: Strategic Principles to Choose Between Product-Driven and Platform-Driven Processes, Volume 1: 34th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, p.34505, 2007.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2008-49429

F. Alizon and S. K. Moon, Three Dimensional Design Structure Matrix With Cross-Module and Cross-Interface Analyses, Volume 6: 33rd Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, p.34510, 2007.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2007-34510

F. Alizon and S. B. Shooter, Assessing and improving commonality and diversity within a product family, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s00163-009-0066-5

F. Alizon and S. B. Shooter, Henry Ford and the Model T: Lessons for product platforming and mass customization, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.34504, 2007.

F. Alizon and S. B. Shooter, Design structure matrix flow for improving identification and specification of modules, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.99524, 2006.

D. M. Anderson, B. J. Pine, and I. , Agile development for mass customization -How to develop and deliver products for mass customization, niche markets, JIT, build-to-order and flexible manufacturing, 1998.

S. P. Anderson and A. D. Palma, Discrete choice theory of product differentiation, 1992.

P. V. Balakrishnan and R. Gupta, Development of Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Product Line Designs, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol.34, issue.1, pp.468-483, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TSMCB.2003.817051

P. V. Balakrishnan and R. Gupta, An investigation of mating and population maintenance strategies in hybrid genetic heuristics for product line designs, Computers & Operations Research, vol.33, issue.3, pp.639-659, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.011

P. V. Balakrishnan and V. S. Jacob, Genetic Algorithms for Product Design, Management Science, vol.42, issue.8, pp.1105-1117, 1996.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1105

C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design rules: The power of modularity, 2000.

R. W. Belk, An Exploratory Assessment of Situational Effects in Buyer Behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.11, issue.2, pp.156-163, 1974.
DOI : 10.2307/3150553

R. W. Belk, Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.2, issue.3, pp.157-264, 1975.
DOI : 10.1086/208627

A. Belloni and R. Freund, Optimizing Product Line Designs: Efficient Methods and Comparisons, Management Science, vol.54, issue.9, pp.1544-1552, 2008.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0864

F. Berglund and A. Claesson, Utilizing the concept of a design’s bandwidth to achieve product platform effectiveness, 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, 2005.

E. Bergman, Information appliances and beyond: interaction design for consumer products, 2000.

L. Blessing and A. Chakrabarti, DRM: A design research methodology. Les Siences de la Conception, 2002.

T. R. Browning, Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol.48, issue.3, pp.292-306, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/17.946528

B. Canbaz and B. Yannou, A New Framework for Collaborative Set-Based Design: Application to the Design Problem of a Hollow Cylindrical Cantilever Beam, Volume 5: 37th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, 2011.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2011-48153

D. A. Collier, THE MEASUREMENT AND OPERATING BENEFITS OF COMPONENT PART COMMONALITY, Decision Sciences, vol.2, issue.1, pp.85-96, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/0272-6963(80)90008-X

D. Silveira, G. , and D. Borenstein, Mass customization: Literature review and research directions, International Journal of Production Economics, vol.72, issue.1, pp.1-13, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00079-7

E. Davis, Constraint propagation with interval labels, Artificial Intelligence, vol.32, issue.3, pp.281-331, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90091-9

S. Davis, From ???future perfect???: Mass customizing, Planning Review, vol.17, issue.2, pp.16-21, 1989.
DOI : 10.1108/eb054249

C. M. Delbert and J. S. Neil, Handbook of research design and social measurement, 2002.

A. Ericsson and G. Erixon, Controlling design variants: Modular product platforms, 1999.

A. Ertas and J. Jones, The Engineering Design Process, 1996.

B. Faltings, Arc-consistency for continuous variables, Artificial Intelligence, vol.65, issue.2, pp.363-376, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)90022-1
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.17.1291

A. Garrido and E. Onaindia, Planning and scheduling in an e-learning environment, 2008.

E. P. Green and V. Srinivasan, Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.5, issue.2, pp.103-123, 1978.
DOI : 10.1086/208721

M. G. Green and J. S. Linsey, Frontier Design: A Product Usage Context Method, Volume 4a: 18th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, 2006.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2006-99608

M. G. Green and R. P. Palani, Product Usage Context: Improving Customer Needs Gathering and Design Target Setting, Volume 3a: 16th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, p.57498, 2004.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2004-57498

M. G. Green and J. Tan, Effects of product usages context on consumer product preferences ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.85438, 2005.

S. K. Gupta and A. K. Samuel, Integrating market research with the product development process: a step towards design for profit, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.21202, 2001.

C. Hart, Mass customization: conceptual underpinnings, opportunities and limits, International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol.6, issue.2, pp.36-45, 1995.
DOI : 10.1108/09564239510084932

G. A. Hazelrigg, A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.120, issue.4, pp.653-658, 1998.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2829328

L. He and C. Hoyle, A framework for choice modelling in usage context-based design, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.28490, 2010.

J. Hoffmann and J. Mathieu, Evaluating design as a system of representations: the moderating role of representation towards the use of new technologies, International Product Development Management Conference, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00760533

J. Hoffmann and G. Roehrich, The role of anticipation of usage and intention of usage in the evaluation of new product. AFM conference, 2006.

K. Holtta-otto and O. De-weck, Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints, Concurrent Engineering, vol.15, issue.2, pp.113-126, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/1063293X07078931
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571207

K. M. Holtta and M. P. Salonen, Comparing three different modularity methods, 2003.

C. Hoyle, W. Chen, B. Ankenman, and N. Wang, Optimal Experimental Design of Human Appraisals for Modeling Consumer Preferences in Engineering Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.131, issue.8, 2009.

G. Q. Huang, Design for X: concurrent engineering imperatives, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3985-4

C. Huffman and M. J. Houston, Goal-Oriented Experiences and the Development of Knowledge, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.20, issue.2, pp.190-207, 1993.
DOI : 10.1086/209343

J. X. Jiao and M. M. Tseng, Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices, Journal of Engineering Design, vol.11, issue.3, pp.225-243, 2000.
DOI : 10.1080/095448200750021003

C. Johnson, Who Buys Custom Consumer Products? Why Custom Product Buyers Could Be Your Most Important Consumers, 2006.

R. Kohli and R. Sukumar, Heuristics for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis, Management Science, vol.36, issue.12, pp.1464-1478, 1990.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.36.12.1464

S. Kota and K. Sethuraman, A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.122, issue.4, pp.403-410, 2000.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1320820

P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, Principles of marketing, 2009.

L. Luo, Product Line Design for Consumer Durables: An Integrated Marketing and Engineering Approach, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.48, issue.1, 2011.
DOI : 10.1509/jmkr.48.1.128

M. V. Martin and K. Ishii, Design for Variety, p.1610, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-5579-7_6

M. V. Martin and K. Ishii, Design for Variety, p.4359, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-5579-7_6

S. Mesihovic and J. Malmqvist, A Process-Oriented Approach for Management of Product Configuration Models, Volume 1: 30th Design Automation Conference, 2004.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2004-57384

M. H. Meyer and A. P. Lehnerd, The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership, 1997.

J. J. Michalek and F. M. Feinberg, Realizable product line design optimization: coordinating marketing and engineering models via analytical target cascading, Marketing Science, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00102.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.318.2013

J. J. Michalek and F. M. Feinberg, Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading*, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.53, issue.1, pp.42-62, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-8116(94)90033-7
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.318.2013

Y. Moghaddam and G. Wang, Applying constraint programming for design space reduction in metamodeling based optimization. CIRP International Design Seminar, 2006.

R. E. Moore, Interval analysis, 1966.

K. Otto and K. Holtta-otto, A multi-criteria assessment tool for screening preliminary product platform concepts, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol.125, issue.1, pp.59-75, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10845-007-0004-1

K. N. Otto and K. L. Wood, Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development, 2001.

G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering design: A systematic approach, 1999.

F. Piller and A. Kumar, Mass customization: providing custom products and services with mass production efficiency, Journal of financial, vol.transformation, pp.126-131, 2008.

T. U. Pimmler and S. D. Eppinger, Integration analysis of product decompositions, 1994.

B. J. Pine, Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition, 1993.

S. Ratneshwar and A. D. Shocker, Substitution in Use and the Role of Usage Context in Product Category Structures, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.28, issue.3, pp.281-295, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/3172864

S. Ratneshwar and L. Warlop, The role of usage context in consumer choice: a problem-solving perspective Advances in consumer research, pp.377-382, 1993.

T. Reichenbacher, Adaptive methods for mobile cartograph. 21st International Cartographic Conference, 2003.

C. Shih and . Venkatesh, Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model, Journal of Marketing, vol.68, issue.1, pp.59-72, 2004.
DOI : 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.59.24029

Z. Siddique and D. W. Rosen, On the applicability of product variety design concepts to automotive platform commonality, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 1998.

T. W. Simpson and F. Alizon, Frameworks for product family design and development, Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, vol.15, issue.2, pp.187-199, 2007.

T. W. Simpson and T. Marion, Platform-Based Design and Development: Current Trends and Needs in Industry, Volume 1: 32nd Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, 2006.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2006-99229

T. W. Simpson and T. J. Marion, A cost-based methodology for evaluating product platform commonality sourcing decisions with two examples, International Journal of Production Research, vol.45, issue.22, pp.5285-5308, 2007.

T. W. Simpson and J. D. Peplinski, Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations, Engineering with Computers, vol.17, issue.2, pp.129-150, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/PL00007198

T. W. Simpson and Z. Siddique, Product platform and product family design: methods and applications, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/0-387-29197-0

R. K. Srivastava, Usage-situational influences on perceptions of product-markets: 103 theoretical and empirical issues, Advances in Consumer Research, vol.8, pp.106-111, 1981.

C. Stadler and S. Hosnedl, Development and application of modular function deployment, Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference, pp.241-246, 2002.

A. Sullivan and M. S. Steven, Economics: Principles in action, 2003.

H. J. Thevenot and F. Alizon, An Index-based Method to Manage the Tradeoff between Diversity and Commonality during Product Family Design, Concurrent Engineering, vol.15, issue.2, pp.127-139, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/1063293X07079318
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571209

H. J. Thevenot and T. W. Simpson, Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison, Journal of Engineering Design, vol.39, issue.2, pp.99-119, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/0272-6963(86)90026-4

H. J. Thevenot and T. W. Simpson, A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family, Journal of Engineering Design, vol.13, issue.6, pp.577-598, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/0272-6963(86)90026-4

J. Tiihonen and T. Lehtonen, Modeling configurable product families. 4th WDK Workshop on Product Structuring, 1998.

E. Tsang, Foundations of constraint satisfaction, 1993.

M. M. Tseng and J. Jiao, Mass customization, in: Handbook of industrial engineering, technology and operation management, 2001.

K. Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy, vol.24, issue.3, pp.419-440, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3

K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product design and development, 2000.

E. A. Vanveen and J. C. Wortmann, Generic Bills of Material in Assemble-to-Order Manufacturing, International Journal of Production Research, vol.25, issue.11, pp.1645-1658, 1987.

J. G. Wacker and M. Trelevan, Component part standardization: An analysis of commonality sources and indices, Journal of Operations Management, vol.6, issue.2, pp.219-244, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0272-6963(86)90026-4

W. , J. L. , and B. Yannou, A market segmentation process based on usage context, 2010.

J. L. Wang and B. Yannou, Explicit product family indicators based on a constraint programming simulation of usage coverage, International Conference on Research into Design, 2011.

H. J. Wassenaar and W. Chen, An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.125, issue.3, pp.490-497, 2003.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1587156

H. J. Wassenaar and W. Chen, Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.127, issue.4, pp.514-523, 2005.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1897408

B. Yannou and R. Awedikian, A plug-and-contract mechanism for a robust assessment of design concepts. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p.85457, 2005.

B. Yannou and W. Chen, Usage Coverage Model for Choice Modeling: Principles, Volume 5: 35th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B, 2009.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2009-87534

B. Yannou and H. Christofol, La conception industrielle de produits, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00289266

B. Yannou and G. Harmel, A Comparative Study of Constraint Programming Techniques Over Intervals in Preliminary Design, Volume 1: 30th Design Automation Conference, p.57152, 2004.
DOI : 10.1115/DETC2004-57152

B. Yannou and T. W. Simpson, Towards a conceptual design explorer using metamodeling approaches and constraint programming. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2003.

B. Yannou and J. Wang, Simulation of the usage coverage of a given product, 2010.

R. K. Yin, Case study research -design and methods, 1994.

P. Yvars, Using constraint satisfaction for designing mechanical systems, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol.7, issue.1, pp.161-167, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s12008-008-0047-3

P. Yvars, A CSP approach for the network of product lifecycle constraints consistency in a collaborative design context, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol.22, issue.6, pp.961-970, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.engappai.2008.11.006