. Dans-notre-cas, ), l'introduction du terme de Lagrangien augmenté dans le critère MGM n'améliore pas les résultats. Une explication peut être liée à l'acquisition des données, celles-ci sont acquises tout au tour de l'objet testé et sont donc plus informatives. Il se peut également que le ? adopté soit suffisamment grand pour que l, 1996.

J. F. Abascal, M. Lambert, D. Lesselier, and O. Dorn, Nonlinearized mapping of volumetric defects affecting a metal tube, Electromagnetic nondestructive evalutation (XII, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00788032

A. Abubakar and T. M. Habashy, Application of the MR-CSI Method for Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Triaxial Induction Measurements, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.48, issue.6, pp.1-7, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2039873

A. Abubakar, P. Van-den, and . Berg, Total variation as a multiplicative constraint for solving inverse problems, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.10, issue.9, pp.1384-1392, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/83.941862

A. Abubakar, P. Van-den, R. Berg, and . Bloemenkamp, Full three-dimensional multi-frequency electromagnetic inversion, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2001 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37229), pp.658-61, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/APS.2001.959810

A. Abubakar, S. Semenovt, V. Posukh, P. Van-den, and . Berg, Application of the multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method to real biological data, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005., 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/MWSYM.2005.1516922

A. Abubakar, T. Habashy, V. Druskin, and L. Knizhnerman, An enhanced Gauss-Newton inversion algorithm using a dual-optimal grid approach, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.44, issue.6, pp.1419-1427, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/TGRS.2006.872297

A. Abubakar, W. Hu, P. Van-den, T. Berg, and . Habashy, A finite-difference contrast source inversion method, Inverse Problems, vol.24, issue.6, p.65004, 2008.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/24/6/065004

A. Abubakar, W. Hu, P. Van-den, T. Berg, and . Habashy, A contrast source inversion method for reconstructing objects in an inhomogeneous background medium, 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/APS.2008.4619939

A. Abubakar, P. M. Van-den, and . Berg, Iterative forward and inverse algorithms based on domain integral equations for three-dimensional electric and magnetic objects, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.195, issue.1, pp.236-262, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.10.009

V. Agarwal, A. V. Gribok, and M. A. Abidi, norm penalty function, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, vol.4, issue.7, pp.785-809, 2007.
DOI : 10.1080/00401706.1993.10485033

M. Ainsworth and J. Oden, A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.142, issue.1-2, pp.1-88, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01107-3

B. Auld and J. Moulder, Review of advances in quantitative eddy current nondestructive evaluation, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol.18, issue.1, pp.3-36, 1999.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021898520626

C. A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, 1989.

P. Barrière, Y. Goussard, J. Laurin, and J. Idier, New approximate formulations for fast inversion of highly nonlinear problems in microwave tomography, 2008.

P. Barrière, J. Idier, Y. Goussard, and J. Laurin, 3-term optimization criterion for faster inversion in microwave tomography, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp.225-228, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/ISBI.2007.356829

P. Barrière, J. Idier, Y. Goussard, and J. Laurin, On algorithms based on joint estimation of currents and contrast in microwave tomography, 2009.

J. Berenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.114, issue.2, pp.185-200, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.1994.1159

M. Bertero, P. Boccacci, G. Desidera, and G. Vicidomini, Image deblurring with Poisson data: from cells to galaxies, Inverse Problems, vol.25, issue.12, p.123006, 2009.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123006

D. P. Bertsekas, Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods (Optimization and Neural Computation Series), Athena Scientific, 1996.

D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming, Athena Scientific, 1999.

J. Besag, On the statisical analysis of dirty pictures, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, vol.48, pp.259-302, 1986.

A. Blake and A. Zisserman, Visual Reconstruction, 1987.

C. Bouman and K. Sauer, A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.5, issue.3, pp.480-492, 1996.
DOI : 10.1109/83.491321

C. Bouman and K. Sauer, A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.2, issue.3, pp.296-310, 1993.
DOI : 10.1109/83.236536

J. Bowler, L. Sabbagh, and H. Sabbagh, Eddy-current probe impedance due to a surface slot in a conductor, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.26, issue.2, pp.889-892, 1990.
DOI : 10.1109/20.106460

R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, and J. Nocedal, A limited-memory algorithm for bound-constrained optimization, 1995.

S. Caorsi, A. Massa, M. Pastorino, A. Randazzo, and A. Rosani, A Reconstruction Procedure for Microwave Nondestructive Evaluation Based on a Numerically Computed Green's Function, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.53, issue.4, pp.987-992, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TIM.2004.831446
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01169724

H. Carfantan and A. Mohammad-djafari, An overview of nonlinear diffraction tomography within the bayesian estimation framework, pp.107-124, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0105764

H. Carfantan, A. Mohammad-djafari, and J. Idier, Single site update algorithm for nonlinear diffraction tomography, ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing -Proceedings, pp.2837-2840, 1997.

H. Carfantan, Approche bayésienne pour un problème inverse non linéaire en imagerie à ondes diffractées, Thèse de doctorat, 1996.

H. Carfantan and A. Mohammad-djafari, A Bayesian framework for nonlinear diffraction tomography, IEEE EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP'97, 1997.

F. Champigny, Inspection en service des REP. Techniques de l'ingénieur, 2005.

P. Charbonnier, L. Blanc-feraud, G. Aubert, and M. Barlaud, Two deterministic half-quadratic regularization algorithms for computed imaging, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing, pp.168-172, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIP.1994.413553

P. Charbonnier, L. Blanc-feraud, G. Aubert, and M. Barlaud, Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.6, issue.2, pp.298-311, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/83.551699

L. Chatellier, S. Dubost, and F. Peisey, Application de la méthode de caractérisation par, 2006.

P. Chaturvedi and R. Plumb, Electromagnetic imaging of underground targets using constrained optimization. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol.33, issue.3, pp.551-561, 1995.

W. C. Chew, Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media, 1999.

W. C. Chew and Y. M. Wang, Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.9, issue.2, pp.218-225, 1990.
DOI : 10.1109/42.56334

P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. North-Holland, 1978.

P. Ciuciu, J. Idier, and J. Giovannelli, Regularized estimation of mixed spectra using a circular Gibbs-Markov model, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol.49, issue.10, pp.492202-2213, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/78.950776
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-00333745

D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Applied Mathematical Sciences 93, pp.3-93, 1992.

M. Davoust, L. L. Brusquet, and G. Fleury, Robust estimation of flaw dimensions using remote field eddy current inspection, Measurement Science and Technology, vol.17, issue.11, pp.3006-3014, 2006.
DOI : 10.1088/0957-0233/17/11/021
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00257932

L. Denis, F. Tupin, J. Darbon, and M. Sigelle, SAR Image Regularization With Fast Approximate Discrete Minimization, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.18, issue.7, pp.1588-1600, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2009.2019302
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ujm-00380535

A. Devaney and G. Sherman, Nonuniqueness in inverse source and scattering problems, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.30, issue.5, pp.1034-1037, 1982.
DOI : 10.1109/TAP.1982.1142902

D. Donoho, Compressed sensing. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol.52, issue.4, pp.1289-1306, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00369486

D. D. Reis, M. Lambert, and D. Lesselier, Eddy-current evaluation of three-dimensional defects in a metal plate, Inverse Problems, vol.18, issue.6, pp.1857-1871, 2002.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/325

S. Dubost and M. El-guedri, Méthode de reconstruction 3D de défauts à partir de mesures CF : Application à la caractérisation de défauts débouchant dans les plaques de partition des GV, Note EDF, EDF, 2008.

S. Dubost, L. Chatellier, F. Peisey, Y. Goussard, and R. Guichard, Characterization of small surface-breaking defects with eddy current sensor measurements, Proc. ECNDT, 2006.

P. Dular, R. Sabariego, and L. Krähenbühl, A perturbation finite element method for efficiently calculating skin and proximity effects in any conductive material, Actes de la 5ème conférence européenne sur les méthodes numériques en électromagnétisme Numelec, pp.658-61, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00398425

J. Dumont-fillon, Contrôle non destructif (CND) Techniques de l'ingénieur, 1996.

J. Dussault, Improved convergence order for augmented penalty algorithms, Computational Optimization and Applications, vol.29, issue.4, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10589-007-9159-0

O. Feron, B. Duchene, and A. Mohammad-djafari, Microwave imaging of piecewise constant objects in a 2d-te configuration, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol.26, pp.3-4167, 2007.

J. Fessler and S. Booth, Conjugate-gradient preconditioning methods for shift-variant PET image reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.8, issue.5, pp.688-699, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/83.760336

J. Fessler, E. Ficaro, N. Clinthorne, and K. Lange, Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.16, issue.2, pp.166-175, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/42.563662

B. Fornberg, Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids, Mathematics of Computation, vol.51, issue.184, pp.699-706, 1988.
DOI : 10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0935077-0

A. Fortin and A. Garon, Les éléments finis : de la théorie à la pratique, 2011.

A. Franchois and C. Pichot, Microwave imaging-complex permittivity reconstruction with a Levenberg-Marquardt method, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.45, issue.2, pp.203-215, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/8.560338
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00986336

L. Garnero, A. Franchois, J. Hugonin, C. Pichot, and N. Joachimowicz, Microwave imaging-complex permittivity reconstruction-by simulated annealing, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.39, issue.11, pp.1801-1807, 1991.
DOI : 10.1109/22.97480
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01384946

D. Geman, Random fields and inverse imaging, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/bfb0103042

S. Geman and D. E. Mcclure, Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction, Proceedings of the 46-th Session of the ISI, Bulletin of the ISI, pp.22-26, 1987.

W. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. Spiegelhalter, Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice, 1996.

C. Gilmore, A. Abubakar, W. Hu, T. Habashy, P. Van-den et al., Microwave Biomedical Data Inversion Using the Finite-Difference Contrast Source Inversion Method, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.57, issue.5, pp.1528-1538, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TAP.2009.2016728

Y. Goussard and R. Guichard, Imagerie de défauts débouchants par courants de Foucault, 2001.

Y. Goussard and R. Guichard, Tomographie par courants de Foucault : Inversion d'un milieu 3D, 2003.

Y. Goussard and R. Guichard, Inversion 3D en tomographie par courants de Foucault, 2004.

Y. Goussard and R. Guichard, Inversion 3D en tomographie par courants de Foucault, 2005.

Y. Goussard and R. Guichard, Etude de la caractérisation de défauts débouchants intervenant dans les composants métalliques lorsque la taille des défauts débouchants est inférieure à 5mm, 2007.

R. F. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods, 1993.
DOI : 10.1109/9780470544631

I. Hsiao, W. Wang, and G. Gindi, Performance comparison of smoothing and gamma priors for transmission tomography, Nuclear Science Symposium, pp.860-864, 1999.

J. Jin, The finite element method in electromagnetics, 1993.

R. Kindermann and J. L. Snell, Markov Random Fields and Their Applications, AMS, vol.1, 1980.
DOI : 10.1090/conm/001

S. Kirkpatrick, D. G. Jr, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by Simulated Annealing, Science, vol.220, issue.4598, pp.671-680, 1983.
DOI : 10.1126/science.220.4598.671

R. E. Kleinman, P. M. Van-den, and . Berg, A modified gradient method for two- dimensional problems in tomography, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol.42, issue.1, pp.17-35, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0377-0427(92)90160-Y

R. E. Kleinman, P. M. Van-den, and . Berg, An extended range-modified gradient technique for profile inversion, Radio Science, vol.32, issue.5, pp.877-884, 1993.
DOI : 10.1029/93RS01076

V. Kolmogorov and R. Zabih, What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.26, issue.2, pp.147-159, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262177

E. Kriezis, T. Tsiboukis, S. Panas, and J. Tegopoulos, Eddy currents: theory and applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp.1559-1589, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/5.168666
URL : http://dspace.lib.ntua.gr/handle/123456789/37459

C. Labat, Algorithmes d'optimisation de critères pénalisés pour la restauration d'images. Application à la déconvolution de trains d'impulsions en imagerie ultrasonore, Thèse de doctorat, 2006.

M. Lambert, Te Scattering By a Cylindrical Dielectric Obstacle Buried in a Half-Space: a H-Field-Based Solution Method, Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol.11, issue.3, pp.1217-1239, 1998.
DOI : 10.1163/156939398X00313
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00366158

A. Litman, D. Lesselier, and F. Santosa, A level-set approach for eddy current imaging of defects in a conductive half-space, Inverse Problems of Wave Propagation and Diffraction. Proceedings of the Conference, pp.250-62, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0105775

H. Lu, Y. Kim, and J. Anderson, Improved Poisson Intensity Estimation: Denoising Application Using Poisson Data, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.13, issue.8, pp.1128-1135, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2003.822606

S. Magnier, P. Mora, and A. Tarantola, Finite differences on minimal grids, GEOPHYSICS, vol.59, issue.9, pp.1435-1443, 1994.
DOI : 10.1190/1.1443700

A. Massa, M. Donelli, F. De-natale, S. Caorsi, and A. Lommi, Planar Antenna Array Control With Genetic Algorithms and Adaptive Array Theory, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.52, issue.11, pp.2919-2924, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TAP.2004.837523
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01169714

M. Mitchell, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, 1996.

V. Monebhurrun, D. Lesselier, B. Duchêne, A. Ruosi, M. Valentino et al., Eddy current non-destructive evaluation using SQUIDs, Electromagnetic nondestructive evalutation (III, 1999.

V. Monebhurrun, Formulation intégrale de volume et inversion non linéaire, 1997.

M. Nikolova and A. Mohammad-djafari, Eddy current tomography using a binary Markov model, Signal Processing, vol.49, issue.2, pp.119-132, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1684(95)00151-4

J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical optimization Springer series in operations research and financial engineering, 2006.

S. Paillard, G. Pichenot, M. Lambert, H. Voillaume, and N. Dominguez, A 3D Model for Eddy Current Inspection in Aeronautics: Application to Riveted Structures, AIP Conference Proceedings, pp.265-272, 2007.
DOI : 10.1063/1.2717982
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01103872

D. K. Pickard, Inference for Discrete Markov Fields: The Simplest Nontrivial Case, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.19, issue.397, 1987.
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478394

D. Premel and A. Baussard, Eddy-current evaluation of three-dimensional flaws in flat conductive materials using a Bayesian approach, Inverse Problems, vol.18, issue.6, pp.1873-89, 2002.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/326

D. Prémel and A. Mohammad-djafari, Eddy current tomography in cylindrical geometry, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.31, issue.3, pp.312000-2003, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/20.376435

W. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, 1992.

C. Ramananjaona, M. Lambert, D. Lesselier, and J. Zolesio, Shape reconstruction of buried obstacles by controlled evolution of a level set: from a min-max formulation to numerical experimentation, Inverse Problems, vol.17, issue.4, pp.1087-1111, 2001.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/17/4/335

I. T. Rekanos, T. P. Theodoulidis, S. M. Panas, and T. D. Tsiboukis, Impedance inversion in eddy current testing of layered planar structures via neural networks, NDT & E International, vol.30, issue.2, pp.69-74, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00047-3

L. Rudin and S. Osher, Total variation based image restoration with free local constraints, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing, pp.31-35, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIP.1994.413269

A. Ruosi, M. Valentino, G. Pepe, V. Monebhurrun, D. Lesselier et al., SQUIDs and eddy-current NDE: a comprehensive investigation from real data to modelling, Measurement Science and Technology, vol.11, issue.11, pp.1639-1648, 2000.
DOI : 10.1088/0957-0233/11/11/314

R. V. Sabariego and P. Dular, A Perturbation Approach for the Modeling of Eddy Current Nondestructive Testing Problems With Differential Probes, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.43, issue.4, pp.1289-1292, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2007.892398

P. P. Silvester and R. L. Ferrari, Finite Element for Electrical Engineers, 1996.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139170611

F. Sirois and F. Roy, Computation of 2-D current distribution in superconductors of arbitrary shapes using a new semi-analytical method, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol.17, issue.3, pp.3836-3845, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/TASC.2007.902117

A. Skarlatos, G. Pichenot, D. Lesselier, M. Lambert, and B. Duchene, Numerical modeling of eddy current nondestructive evaluation of ferromagnetic tubes via in integral equation approach, 12th International Workshop on Electromagnetic Non Destructive Evaluation (ENDE 07), 2007.

K. A. Slaney, M. , and L. L. , Limitations of Imaging with First-Order Diffraction Tomography, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.32, issue.8, pp.860-874, 1984.
DOI : 10.1109/TMTT.1984.1132783

M. Soleimani, W. R. Lionheart, A. J. Peyton, X. Ma, and S. R. Higson, A three-dimensional inverse finite-element method applied to experimental eddy-current imaging data, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.42, issue.5, pp.1560-1567, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/TMAG.2006.871255

T. Sollier and J. Lechien, Caractérisation de défauts débouchants par cf, 2003.

T. Sollier and D. Premel, Synthèse de l'action CEA-EDF 131 en 2002. evaluation des performances du contrôle CF sur défauts débouchants, 2002.

S. Song and Y. Shin, Eddy current flaw characterization in tubes by neural networks and finite element modeling, NDT & E International, vol.33, issue.4, pp.233-243, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00046-8

S. Sotthivirat and J. Fessler, Image recovery using partitioned-separable paraboloidal surrogate coordinate ascent algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.11, issue.3, pp.306-317, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/83.988963

L. Souriau, B. Duchêne, D. Lesselier, and R. E. Kleinman, Modified gradient approach to inverse scattering for binary objects in stratified media, Inverse Problems, vol.12, issue.4, pp.463-481, 1996.
DOI : 10.1088/0266-5611/12/4/009
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00641670

M. Tao and J. Yang, Alternating direction algorithms for total variation deconvolution in image reconstruction, 2009.

P. Thomas, Eléments finis pour l'ingénieur. Tec et Doc, 2006.

A. Trillon, Inversion données CF par modèle différences finies. Research rep, 2009.

A. Trillon, A. Girard, J. Idier, Y. Goussard, F. Sirois et al., EDDY CURRENT TOMOGRAPHY BASED ON A FINITE DIFFERENCE FORWARD MODEL WITH ADDITIVE REGULARIZATION, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 2009.
DOI : 10.1063/1.3362478

P. M. Van-den, A. Berg, and . Abubakar, Contrast Source Inversion Method: State of Art, Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol.34, pp.189-218, 2001.
DOI : 10.2528/PIER01061103

P. M. Van-den, A. Berg, and . Abubakar, Inverse scattering and its application to medical imaging and subsurface sensing, Radio Sci. Bull, vol.303, pp.869-877, 2002.

P. M. Van-den, R. Berg, and . Kleinman, Total variation enhanced modified gradient algorithm for profile reconstruction, Inverse Problems, vol.11, issue.3, pp.5-10, 1995.

P. M. Van-den, R. Berg, and . Kleinman, A contrast source inversion method, Inverse Problems, vol.13, issue.6, pp.1607-1627, 1997.

P. Van-den-berg, A. Abubakar, and T. Habashy, Integral and finite-difference formulations of the contrast source inversion method, 2009 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, pp.144-147, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/ICEAA.2009.5297562

Y. Wang and W. C. Chew, Reconstruction Of Permittivity Distribution Using The Born Iterative And Distorted Born Iterative Methods For Geophysical Applications, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, pp.379-382, 1990.
DOI : 10.1109/IGARSS.1990.688501

M. Wanin, Evaluation non destructive de la qualité des matériaux (Partie 1), 2001.

A. Wirgin, The inverse crime, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00001084

D. Wu, J. Chen, and C. Liu, Comparison of Different Finite-difference Schemes of Modeling Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Fields for Hydrocarbon Exploration, PIERS Online, vol.3, issue.2, pp.145-148, 2007.
DOI : 10.2529/PIERS060906130556

N. Yusa, W. Cheng, Z. Chen, and K. Miya, Generalized neural network approach to eddy current inversion for real cracks, NDT & E International, vol.35, issue.8, pp.609-614, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00048-8

C. Zhu, R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, and J. Nocedal, Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol.23, issue.4, pp.550-560, 1997.
DOI : 10.1145/279232.279236

R. Zorgati, B. Duchêne, D. Lesselier, and F. Pons, Eddy current testing of anomalies in conductive materials. I. Qualitative imaging via diffraction tomography techniques, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.27, issue.6, pp.4416-4437, 1991.
DOI : 10.1109/20.278657
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00643928

R. Zorgati, B. Duchêne, D. Lesselier, and F. Pons, Eddy current testing of anomalies in conductive materials. II. Quantitative imaging via deterministic and stochastic inversion techniques, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.1850-1862, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/20.141295
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00643928

R. Zorgati, Catalogue de méthodes inverses en contrôle non destructif, Note EDF

P. Zwamborn, Scattering by objects with electric constrast Table des figures I, 1997.

C. Comparaison-entre-les-données, C. Par-le-modèle, and D. , parties réelle (a) et imaginaire (b)

.. De-?, 109 VIII.12 Effet de la régularisation sur la reconstruction par EF-Basique pour le défaut de 2 mm de profondeur, VIII.11 Critère en fonction, p.110

.. De-profondeur, 112 VIII.15 Comparaison des EQR et du critère primal entre les méthodes de reconstruction pour le défaut de 1 mm de profondeur 113 VIII.16 Comparaison entre les méthodes de reconstruction pour le défaut de 2 mm de profondeur 114 VIII.17 Comparaison entre les méthodes de reconstruction pour le défaut de 2 mm de profondeur 115 VIII.18 Evolution de ? CSI au cours des itérations pour les défauts de 1 mm et 2 mm de profondeur 116 VIII.20 Comparaison entre les méthodes de reconstruction pour les défauts de 1 mm et 2 mm de profondeur en termes de nombre d'itérations, Effet de la régularisation sur la reconstruction par EF-Basique pour le défaut long110 VIII.14 Comparaison des résultats de reconstruction entre les méthodes pour le défaut de 1 mm 115 VIII.19 Comparaison entre les méthodes de reconstruction pour le défaut de 2 mm de profondeur avec le même ? CSI final 116 VIII.21 Diagrammes de la profondeur estimée (a) et du temps (b) en fonction de la profondeur du défaut à estimer pour les méthodes EF-Basique et EF-CSI avec ou sans réglage automatique de ?, p.119

.. Critère-en-fonction-de-?, 124 IX.6 Reconstructions pour la méthode EF-Basique (a) et EF-AL-Basique (b) 124 IX.7 EQR et critère primal J NL (x) pour la méthode EF-Basique et pour la méthode, p.125

E. Résultats-de-reconstruction-par, E. Ef-al-basique, E. Avec-réglage-automatique-de-?, and .. , 129 IX.14 Diagrammes de la profondeur estimée (a) et du temps (b) en fonction de la profondeur du défaut à estimer pour les méthodes

T. Transformation, 150 G.1 Reconstructions avec la méthode EDF-EPM pour le défaut de 1 mm, 163 G.2 Reconstructions avec la méthode EDF-EPM pour le défaut de 2 mm . . . . . . 163 G.3 Reconstructions avec la méthode EDF-EPM pour le défaut long . . . . . . . . . 164 G.4 Reconstructions, p.164

.. Conductivité-relative-en-fonction-de-la-résistivité-relative, 180 I.6 Reconstructions pour la méthode EF-CI-Basique pour le défaut de 1 mm de profondeur avec régularisation sur x ?

E. Critère, Basique pour le défaut de 1 mm de profondeur