.. Faiblesses-de-la-théorie-top-down, 165 3.1. La « Twofoldness » de l'expérience des images, ., p.170

T. Adajian, The definition of art [Electronic Version], 2007.

D. A. Allport, Selection for action: Some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action, Perspectives on perception and action Hillsdale, 1987.

M. K. Babcock and J. J. Freyd, Perception of Dynamic Information in Static Handwritten Forms, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.101, issue.1, pp.111-130, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/1422797

M. C. Beardsley, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, 1958.

M. C. Beardsley, Is Art Essentially Institutional?, Culture and Art, 1976.

M. Beardsley and C. , THE AESTHETIC POINT OF VIEW, Metaphilosophy, vol.1, issue.1, 1982.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1970.tb00784.x

M. C. Beardsley, An Aesthetic definition of art, What is art, 1983.

C. Bell, Art, 1915.

I. Biederman, Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding., Psychological Review, vol.94, issue.2, pp.115-147, 1987.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115

I. Biederman and J. G. Kim, 17000 Years of Depicting the Junction of Two Smooth Shapes, Perception, vol.113, issue.1, pp.161-164, 2008.
DOI : 10.1068/p5907

P. Bloom, Intention, history, and artifact concepts, Cognition, vol.60, issue.1, pp.1-29, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00699-0

S. Bosbach, J. Cole, W. Prinz, and G. Knoblich, Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation, Nature Neuroscience, vol.12, issue.10, pp.1295-1297, 2005.
DOI : 10.1038/nrn894

M. Brass and C. Heyes, Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.9, issue.10, pp.489-495, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007

J. S. Bruner and J. M. Anglin, Beyond the information given : studies in the psychology of knowing, 1974.

N. Carroll, On Kendall Walton's Mimesis as Make-Believe Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, pp.383-387, 1991.

N. Carroll, Essence, Expression, and History, Danto and His Critics, 1993.
DOI : 10.1002/9781118253045.ch8

N. Carroll, Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction, 1999.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203197233

N. Carroll, Aesthetic Experience Revisited, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol.42, issue.2, pp.145-168, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.2.145
URL : http://bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/42/2/145

N. Carroll, The philosophy of motion pictures, 2008.

R. Casati, Methodological Issues in the Study of the Depiction of Cast Shadows: A Case Study in the Relationships Between Art and Cognition, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.32, issue.2, pp.163-174, 2004.
DOI : 10.1068/p3051

R. Casati and A. Pignocchi, Mirror and canonical neurons are not constitutive of aesthetic response, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.11, issue.10, pp.11-410, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.007

B. Calvo-merino, C. Jola, D. E. Glaser, and P. Haggard, Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.17, issue.3, pp.911-922, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003

P. Cavanagh, Attention routines and the architechture of selection, Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, pp.13-28, 2004.

P. Cavanagh, The artist as neuroscientist, Nature, vol.6, issue.7031, pp.301-307, 2005.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680

L. L. Chao and A. Martin, Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream, NeuroImage, vol.12, issue.4, pp.478-484, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635

C. Cagli, R. Coraggio, P. Napoletano, and P. , : a bio-inspired robotic portraitist, Digital Creativity, vol.22, issue.1, pp.24-33, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90023-4

D. Cohen and A. S. Bennett, Why can't most people draw what they see ? Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, pp.609-621, 1997.

R. G. Collingwood, The principles of art, 1938.

L. Craighero, A. Bello, L. Fadiga, and G. Rizzolatti, Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures, Neuropsychologia, vol.40, issue.5, pp.492-502, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00134-8

L. Craighero, L. Fadiga, C. A. Umiltà, and G. Rizzolatti, Evidence for visuomotor priming effect, NeuroReport, vol.8, issue.1, pp.347-349, 1996.
DOI : 10.1097/00001756-199612200-00068

B. Croce, Breviario di estetica, 1903.

G. Currie, Arts and minds, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/0199256284.001.0001

A. C. Danto, The Artworld, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.61, issue.19, pp.571-584, 1964.
DOI : 10.2307/2022937

A. C. Danto, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.33, issue.2, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/429082

A. C. Danto, Art and meaning, Theories of Art Today, pp.130-140, 2000.

A. C. Danto, Seeing and Showing, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.59, issue.1, pp.1-9, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/0021-8529.00001

D. Davies, Art as Performance, 2004.

D. Davies, Reperforming and reforming Art as Performance: Responses, Acta Analytica, vol.20, issue.4, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s12136-005-1012-4

S. Davies, Definitions of art. Ithaca, 1991.

S. Davies, First Art and Art's Definition, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol.35, issue.1, pp.19-34, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1997.tb00823.x

S. Davies, Non???Western Art and Art's Definition, Theories of Art today, pp.199-216, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199202423.003.0005

S. Deahene, Les neurones de la lectures, 2007.

M. Desmurget and S. Grafton, Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.4, issue.11, pp.423-431, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01537-0

H. Deubel and W. X. Schneider, Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism, Vision Research, vol.36, issue.12, pp.1827-1837, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4

G. Dickie, Defining Art, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol.6, issue.252, 1969.

G. Dickie, The Art Circle: a theory of art, 1984.

F. I. Dretske, Naturalizing the mind, 1995.

F. Dretske, Precis of "Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol.50, issue.4, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/2108238

U. C. Drost, M. Rieger, M. Brass, T. C. Gunter, and W. Prinz, Action-effect coupling in pianists, Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, vol.26, issue.4, pp.233-241, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s00426-004-0175-8

U. C. Drost, M. Rieger, M. Brass, T. C. Gunter, and W. Prinz, When hearing turns into playing: Movement induction by auditory stimuli in pianists, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.51, issue.8, pp.58-1376, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037/h0080069

H. E. Egeth, R. A. Virzi, and H. Garbart, Searching for conjunctively defined targets., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.10, issue.1, pp.32-39, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.32

R. D. Ellis, The dance form of the eyes: what cognitive science can learn from art, Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol.6, pp.161-175, 1999.

B. Elsner and B. Hommel, Effect anticipation and action control., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.27, issue.1, pp.229-240, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229

M. J. Fenske, E. Aminoff, N. Gronau, and M. Bar, Chapter 1 Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions, Progress in Brain Research, vol.155, pp.3-22, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55001-0

G. Flores-d-'arcais, Order of strokes writing as a cue for retrieval in reading Chinese Characters, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.6, pp.337-355, 1994.

J. A. Fodor and Z. W. Pylyshyn, How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson's ???ecological approach???, Cognition, vol.9, issue.2, pp.139-196, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3

D. Freedberg and V. Gallese, Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.11, issue.5, pp.197-203, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003

J. J. Freyd, Representing the dynamics of a static form, Memory & Cognition, vol.44, issue.6, pp.342-346, 1983.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03202447

S. Friedman-hill and J. M. Wolfe, Second-order parallel processing: Visual search for the odd item in a subset., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.21, issue.3, pp.531-551, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.531

C. D. Frith and U. Frith, The Neural Basis of Mentalizing, Neuron, vol.50, issue.4, pp.50-531, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001

H. Gardner, Artful scribbles: The significance of children's drawings, 1980.

J. J. Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perception, 1979.

A. I. Goldman, Pr??cis of Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Philosophical Studies, vol.13, issue.3, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11098-009-9355-0

A. H. Goldman, Representation in Art The oxford handbook of Aesthetics, 2005.

E. H. Gombrich, L'art et l'illusion : psychologie de la représentation picturale, 2002.

E. Gombrich, Style, In: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol.15, pp.352-361, 1986.

N. Goodman, Langages de l'art: une approche de la théorie des symboles, 1990.

G. Graham, Value and the Visual Arts, Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol.28, issue.4, pp.1-14, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/3333358

G. Graham, EXPRESSIVISM, The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, pp.132-145, 2005.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203390795_chapter_11

R. Grush, The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.27, issue.03, pp.377-396, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X04000093

M. A. Hagen, Varieties of realism : geometries of representational art. Cambridge, 1986.

A. Hamilton, D. Wolpert, and U. Frith, Your Own Action Influences How You Perceive Another Person's Action, Current Biology, vol.14, issue.6, pp.493-498, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007

E. Harth, Art and Reductionism, Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol.11, issue.3-4, pp.111-116, 2004.

H. Hecht, R. Schwartz, and M. Atherton, Looking into pictures : an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space, 2003.

J. M. Henderson and A. Hollingworth, HIGH-LEVEL SCENE PERCEPTION, Annual Review of Psychology, vol.50, issue.1, pp.243-271, 1999.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243

C. Heyes, G. Bird, H. Johnson, and P. Haggard, Experience modulates automatic imitation, Cognitive Brain Research, vol.22, issue.2, pp.233-240, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.009

B. Hommel, Acquisition and control of voluntary action, Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality, pp.34-48, 2003.

B. Hommel and J. Musseler, Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.56, issue.3, pp.59-509, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1260

B. Hommel, J. Musseler, G. Aschersleben, and W. Prinz, The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.24, issue.05, pp.849-878, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X01000103

R. Hopkins, The Speaking Image: Visual Communication and the Nature of Depiction, Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, pp.145-159, 2005.

R. Hopkins, Painting, History, and Experience, Philosophical Studies, vol.45, issue.1, pp.19-35, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11098-005-1728-4

J. Hospers, The concept of artistic expression, Procedings of the aristotelian society, pp.313-344, 1955.

J. Hyman, Art and Neuroscience [Electronic Version]. Art and Cognition workshop, p.15, 2006.

P. Jacob, Pourquoi les choses ont-elles un sens ?, 1997.

W. James, The principles of psychology, 1890.

M. Jeannerod, Motor cognition : what actions tell to the self, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569657.001.0001

M. H. Johnson, Subcortical face processing, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol.1, issue.10, pp.766-774, 2005.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1110324

D. A. Kaufman, Normative Criticism and the Objective Value of Artworks, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.60, issue.2, pp.151-166, 2002.
DOI : 10.1111/1540-6245.00062

D. A. Kaufman, Three constraints on the philosophy of art, Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the British Society of Aesthetics, 2004.

W. E. Kennick, Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake? Mind, pp.317-334, 1958.

E. Kobatake and K. Tanaka, Neuronal selectivity to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.71, issue.3, pp.856-867, 1994.

J. Kulvicki, Image Structure, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.27, issue.4, pp.323-340, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005517909905

H. Leder and V. Bruce, When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.51, issue.2, pp.513-536, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/h0027474

A. M. Leslie, Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind.", Psychological Review, vol.94, issue.4, pp.412-426, 1987.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412

J. Levinson, Extending Art Historically, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.51, issue.3, pp.411-423, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/431513

J. Levinson, The pleasures of aesthetics : philosophical essays. Ithaca, 1996.

J. Levinson, Contemplating art: essays in aesthetics, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206179.001.0001

P. Livingston, Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study, 2005.

D. Lopes, Understanding pictures, 1996.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272037.001.0001

D. Lopes, Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/0199277346.001.0001

D. Lopes, The domain of depiction, Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, pp.160-175, 2005.

R. H. Lotze, Medical psychologie and physiologie of the soul, 1952.

M. Mandelbaum, Family Resemblances and Generalization Concerning the Arts, The American Philosophical Quarterly, vol.2, issue.3, 1965.

D. Massaro, An information-processing analysis of perception and action Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches, pp.133-166, 1990.

D. Matravers, Two comments and a problem for David Davies??? performance theory, Acta Analytica, vol.20, issue.4, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s12136-005-1009-z

D. Matravers, Defining 'art': how to turn the 'cluster account' into an institutionnal theory, and then drop both, Paper presented at the American society for aesthetics. Annual meeting of the pacific division, 2007.

P. Maynard, Drawing distinctions: the varieties of graphic expression, Ithaca, N.Y, 2005.

A. N. Meltzoff and M. K. Moore, Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates, pp.75-78, 1977.

A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, The visual brain in action, 1995.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524724.001.0001

R. G. Millikan, Pushmi-pullyu Representations, Philosophical Perspectives, pp.185-200, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2214217
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.114.1983

R. G. Millikan, A theory of representation to complement TEC, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.24, pp.894-895, 2001.

B. Montero, Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge. Paper presented at the ASA pacific division meeting, 2007.

B. Nanay, Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing?, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol.45, issue.3, pp.248-257, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/aesthj/ayi034
URL : http://bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/45/3/248

U. Neisser, Cognitive psychology, 1967.

E. Pacherie, The Content of Intentions, Mind & Language, vol.15, issue.4, pp.400-432, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000258

D. Pearson, E. Hanna, K. Martinez, T. Poggio, and E. Bizzi, Computer generated cartoons Generalization in vision and motor control, Nature, vol.431, pp.768-774, 1990.

B. Pösse, F. Waszak, and B. Hommel, Do stimulus???response bindings survive a task switch?, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.40, issue.4, pp.640-651, 2006.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03195327

M. I. Posner, M. J. Nissen, and R. M. Klein, Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance., Psychological Review, vol.83, issue.2, pp.157-171, 1976.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.157

R. Pouivet, Qu'est-ce qu'une oeuvre d'art?, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00592492

F. Pratt, A perspective on traditional artistic practises Visual order, 1985.

M. A. Preissler and P. Bloom, Two-year-olds use artist intention to understand drawings, Cognition, vol.106, issue.1, pp.512-518, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.002

J. J. Prinz, Furnishing the mind : concepts and their perceptual basis, 2002.

W. Prinz, Perception and Action Planning, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.88, issue.2, pp.129-154, 1997.
DOI : 10.1080/713752551

Z. Pylyshyn, Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.22, issue.03, pp.341-365, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X99002022

V. S. Ramachandran and W. Hirstein, The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience, Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol.6, pp.15-51, 1999.

M. Rieger, Automatic Keypress Activation in Skilled Typing., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.30, issue.3, pp.555-565, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.555

M. Rieger, Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing, Acta Psychologica, vol.126, issue.2, pp.138-153, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.006

G. Rizzolatti, L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, and L. Fogassi, Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions, Cognitive Brain Research, vol.3, issue.2, pp.131-141, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0

G. Rhodes, S. Brennan, and S. Carey, Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces, Cognitive Psychology, vol.19, issue.4, pp.473-497, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8

M. Rollins, What Monet Meant: Intention and Attention in Understanding Art, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.6, issue.2, pp.175-188, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2

M. Rollins, Pictorial representation: When cognitive science meets aesthetics, Philosophical Psychology, vol.2, issue.4, pp.387-413, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01796.x

J. Ruskin, Modern painters, 1846.
DOI : 10.2307/25528112

K. Sachs-hombach, Resemblance Reconceived Looking into pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space, pp.167-178, 2003.

T. A. Salthouse, Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing., Psychological Bulletin, vol.99, issue.3, pp.303-319, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.303

R. Saxe, D. K. Xiao, G. Kovacs, D. I. Perrett, and N. Kanwisher, A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions, Neuropsychologia, vol.42, issue.11, pp.42-1435, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.015

F. Schier, Deeper into pictures : an essay on pictorial representation, 1986.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511735585

P. G. Schyns, Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions, Cognition, vol.67, issue.1-2, pp.147-179, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00016-X

R. Seamon, Let Them Naturalize Aesthetics: A Reply to Denis Dutton [Electronic Version] Aesthetics Online, website of The, 2004.

J. R. Searle, Intentionality, an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], 1983.

R. Shusterman, Somaesthetics: A Disciplinary Proposal, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.57, issue.3, pp.299-314, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/432196

D. Sperber and L. A. Hirschfeld, The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.8, issue.1, pp.40-46, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000448

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance : communication and cognition, 1986.

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.19, issue.03, pp.530-532, 1996.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X00055345

D. Sperber, In defense of massive modularity Language, brain, and cognitive development : Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler, 2001.

R. Stecker, THE BOUNDARIES OF ART, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol.30, issue.3, pp.266-272, 1990.
DOI : 10.1093/bjaesthetics/30.3.266

R. Stecker, Is it reasonable to attempt to define art?, Theories of art today, p.45, 2000.

R. Stecker, Definition of art, The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, pp.136-154, 2005.

A. Stock and C. Stock, A short history of ideo-motor action, Psychological Research, vol.68, issue.2-3, pp.176-188, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/s00426-003-0154-5

B. Stürmer, G. Aschersleben, and W. Prinz, Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.26, issue.6, pp.1746-1759, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.26.6.1746

L. N. Tolstoi, What is art? (A. Maude, Trans, 1899.

P. U. Tse and P. Cavanagh, Chinese and Americans see opposite apparent motions in a Chinese character, Cognition, vol.74, issue.3, pp.27-32, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00065-7

A. Treisman, Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.8, issue.2, pp.194-214, 1982.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.194

M. Tucker and R. Ellis, On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.24, issue.3, pp.830-846, 1998.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830

P. Viviani and N. Stucchi, Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.18, issue.3, pp.603-623, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.603

K. L. Walton, Categories of Art. The philosophical review, pp.334-367, 1970.

K. L. Walton, Review on Dickie's 'Art and the aesthetics: an institutional analysis, Journal of aesthetics and Art criticsm, pp.97-100, 1974.

K. L. Walton, Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism Critical Inquiry, pp.246-277, 1984.

K. L. Walton, Style and the Products and Processes of Art, Concept of Style, pp.72-103, 1987.

K. L. Walton, Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.49, issue.2, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/431705

M. Weitz, The Role of Theory in Aesthetics, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol.15, issue.1, pp.27-35, 1956.
DOI : 10.2307/427491

D. Wheelwell, Against the Reduction of Art to Galvanic Skin Response, Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol.7, issue.8-9, pp.37-42, 2004.

J. Willats, Optical laws or symbolic rules? The dual nature of pictorial systems Looking into pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space, pp.125-144, 2003.

W. K. Wimsatt and M. Beardsley, L'illusion de l'intention, Philosophie analytique et esthétique, pp.223-238, 1988.

R. Wollheim, Art and its objects, 1980.

R. Wollheim, Criticism as retrieval, Art and its object, pp.185-204, 1980.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781316286777.008

R. Wollheim, Seeing-as, seeing-in, and pictorial representation, Art and its objects, pp.205-226, 1980.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781316286777.009

R. Wollheim, Painting as an Art, 1987.

D. M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan, An internal model for sensorimotor integration, Science, vol.269, issue.5232, pp.1880-1882, 1995.
DOI : 10.1126/science.7569931