S. Murgo, H. Vermeulen, and M. , Dépistage du cancer du sein. Pourquoi? Comment? Et ensuite, Belgique: Hopital Erasme, issue.2, p.103, 2002.

J. T. Dobbins, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume et al., ) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices, Medical Physics, vol.22, issue.10, pp.1581-93, 1995.
DOI : 10.1118/1.597627

H. Fujita, D. Y. Tsai, T. Itoh, K. Doi, J. Morishita et al., A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.11, issue.1, pp.34-43, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/42.126908

W. Hillen, U. Schiebel, and T. Zaengel, Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system, Medical Physics, vol.14, issue.5, pp.744-51, 1987.
DOI : 10.1118/1.596127

P. Monnin, D. Gutierrez, S. Bulling, D. Lepori, J. F. Valley et al., Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen?film system at four standard radiation qualitiesFull?field digital mammography designed as a complete systemPhysical measures of image quality in photostimulable phosphor radiographic systemsFundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerationsEvaluation of detector dynamic range in the x?ray exposure domain in mammography: a comparison between film?screen and flat panel detector systemsContrast?detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen?film mammography system, Proc. SPIE 18?24, 26?31; quiz 32?4, Sep?Oct 2003. [9], pp.343-50, 1997.

U. Bick, M. L. Giger, R. A. Schmidt, R. M. Nishikawa, and K. Doi, Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms., RadioGraphics, vol.16, issue.6, pp.1403-1414, 1996.
DOI : 10.1148/radiographics.16.6.8946544

R. Sivaramakrishna, N. A. Obuchowski, W. A. Chilcote, G. Cardenosa, and K. A. Powell, Comparing the Performance of Mammographic Enhancement Algorithms, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.175, issue.1, pp.45-51, 2000.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750045

M. Tapiovaara, A review of mathematical methods for measuring image quality Interfaculty Reactor Institute The NetherlandsMedical imaging ? The assessment of image quality, 1996.

M. A. Thijssen, K. R. Bijkerk, and R. J. Van-der-burght, Manual Contrast?Detail phantom Artinis CDMAM type 3

R. S. Saunders and E. Samei, Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays, Medical Physics, vol.3, issue.2, pp.308-327, 2006.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1753112

R. S. Saunders, E. Samei, J. L. Jesneck, and J. Y. Lo, Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector, Medical Physics, vol.5030, issue.2, pp.588-99, 2005.
DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevA.5.2328

M. B. Williams, P. U. Simoni, L. Smilowitz, M. Stanton, W. Phillips et al., Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.2009, issue.11, pp.2273-85, 1999.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598741

M. B. Williams, M. J. Yaffe, A. D. Maidment, M. C. Martin, J. A. Seibert et al., Image Quality in Digital Mammography: Image Acquisition, Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol.3, issue.8, pp.589-608, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.04.004

R. S. Saunders, J. A. Baker, D. M. Delong, J. P. Johnson, and E. Samei, Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance, Medical Physics, vol.236, issue.10, pp.3971-81, 2007.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2361040741

E. A. Hans-roehrig, T. M. Yu-]-r, J. S. Gagne, K. J. Boswell, and . Myers, <title>Physical and psychophysical evaluation of digital systems for mammography</title>, Medical Imaging 1995: Image Perception, pp.124-134, 1995.
DOI : 10.1117/12.206842

R. M. Gagne, B. D. Gallas, and K. J. Myers, Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms, Medical Physics, vol.214, issue.1, pp.83-95, 2006.
DOI : 10.1118/1.597576

]. S. Muller, G. Peter, and R. Rico, Cancer du sein et qualité image en mammographie Compte rendu de fin de recherche d'opération d'une recherche financée par le Ministère de la recherche, GE Medical Systems, 2002.

J. Stines, Les aspects techniques et pratique de la radioprotection en mammographie

]. A. Ramee, Aspects technologiques de la mammographie Online Radiology and Medical Imaging Textbook, 1995.

A. Noel and J. Stines, La mammographie numérique: les capteurs, Imagerie de la Femme, pp.206-210, 2003.

M. Spahn, ]. S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, I. Levis et al., Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD?based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system, European Radiology Med Phys, vol.27, pp.1832-1872, 2000.

S. K. Moore, R. Visser, and N. Karssemeijer, Better breast cancer detection, IEEE Spectrum, vol.38, issue.5, pp.50-54, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/6.920031

M. Thijssen, C. E. Metz, R. F. Wagner, K. Doi, D. G. Brown et al., Determination of contrast?detail curves of mammography systems by automated image analysis. Digital mammography 96Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems, Med Phys, vol.22, pp.155-160, 1995.

|. Bibliographie, J. T. Bibliographie, E. Dobbins, N. T. Samei, Y. Ranger et al., Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum, Med Phys, vol.33, pp.1466-75, 2006.

E. Samei, N. T. Ranger, J. T. Dobbins, and Y. Chen, Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function, Medical Electrical equipment ? Characteristics of digital X?ray imaging devices ? Part 1? 2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency ? Mammography detectors, pp.1454-65, 2005.

]. A. Noel, J. Stines, and M. Zerhouni, Développement d'un fantôme en matériau équivalent?sein pour la mammographie, pp.421-423, 1993.

R. M. Nishikawa, The Fundamentals of MTF, Wiener Spectra, and DQE, 1998.

J. T. Dobbins, Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems, Medical Physics, vol.22, issue.2, pp.171-81, 1995.
DOI : 10.1118/1.597600

O. N. Morgun, K. E. Nemchenko, and Y. V. Rogov, Detective Quantum Efficiency as a Quality Parameter of Imaging Equipment, Biomedical Engineering, vol.37, issue.5, pp.258-261, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/B:BIEN.0000012492.86996.20

K. Stierstorfer and M. Spahn, Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors, Medical Physics, vol.2708, issue.7, pp.1312-1321, 1999.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598626

J. Beutel, H. L. Kundel, R. L. Van-vetter-neitzel, S. Gunther?kohfahl, G. Borasi et al., Physics and PsychophysicsDetermination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x?ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set, Handbook of Medical Imaging Med Phys, vol.1, issue.31, pp.2205-2216, 2000.

N. W. Marshall, A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.2441-2463, 2006.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006

R. S. Saunders and E. Samei, A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images, Medical Physics, vol.12, issue.11, pp.3006-3023, 2003.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1621870

R. F. Aufrichtig-]-r, D. G. Wagner, and . Brown, Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen?film based imaging system for thoracic radiographyOverview of a Unified SNR Analysis of Medical Imaging Systems, Med Phys Phys. Med. Biol, vol.2651, issue.30, pp.1349-58, 1985.

B. Grosjean and L. Moisan, A-contrario Detectability of Spots in??Textured Backgrounds, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol.68, issue.2, pp.313-337, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10851-008-0111-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00534713

B. Grosjean, Lesion Detectability in Digital Mammography: Impact of Texture, PhD in Mathématiques Appliquées aux Systèmes, p.275, 2007.

M. Yip, A. Alsager, E. Lewis, K. Wells, and K. C. Young, Validation of a Digital Mammography Image Simulation Chain with Automated Scoring of CDMAM Images, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.409-416, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_57

A. K. Carton, D. Vandenbroucke, L. Struye, A. D. Maidment, Y. H. Kao et al., Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control, Medical Physics, vol.5368, issue.6, pp.1684-95, 2005.
DOI : 10.1118/1.594283

]. E. Samei, E. Buhr, P. Granfors, D. Vandenbroucke, and X. Wang, Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.50, issue.15, pp.3613-3638, 2005.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/50/15/009

I. A. Cunningham and A. Fenster, A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite-element differentiation, Medical Physics, vol.14, issue.4, pp.533-540, 1987.
DOI : 10.1118/1.596064

P. B. Greer and T. Van-doorn, Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method, Medical Physics, vol.19, issue.9, pp.2048-59, 2000.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1288682

K. Nykanen and S. Siltanen, X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.11, issue.2-3, pp.1864-73, 2003.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1584160

V. N. Cooper, J. M. Boone, J. A. Seibert, and C. J. Pellot?barakat, An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography, Medical Physics, vol.15, issue.5, pp.845-53, 2000.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598950

K. Cranley, B. J. Gilmore, G. Fogarty, and L. Desponds, Catalogue of diagnostic X?ray spectra and other data Diagnostic Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Special Interest Group of the Institute of, Physics and Engineering in Medicine, vol.61, 1997.

G. Borasi, A. Nitrosi, P. Ferrari, and D. Tassoni, On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography, Medical Physics, vol.24, issue.7, pp.1719-1750, 2003.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1569273

]. A. Burgess, On the noise variance of a digital mammography system, Medical Physics, vol.5034, issue.7, 2004.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1758791

W. E. Rasband64-]-b, P. Meyer, L. Mertz, C. Kennel, A. Constantinesco et al., ImageJ USA: Research Services Branch ? National Institute of Mental Health, Image Processing SoftwareEvaluation of the use of six diagnostic X? ray spectra computer codes The Netherlands, The British journal of Radiology RandomJ ImageJ plug?in, vol.7766, pp.224-230, 2004.

J. P. Hogge, C. H. Palmer, C. C. Muller, S. T. Little, D. C. Smith et al., Quality Assurance in Mammography: Artifact Analysis, RadioGraphics, vol.19, issue.2, pp.503-522, 1999.
DOI : 10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr13503

Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.13, issue.4, pp.600-612, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

A. Podlasov, E. Ageenko, F. Rius?diaz, F. Baron?lopez, E. Sanchez?font et al., Java Tools for Morphological Image Analysis and Research, Bioestadistica: Metodos y Aplicaciones. Malaga Rice University, vol.70, 1998.

|. Bibliographie, K. Bibliographie, and . Karila, Performance of x?ray generators and unnecessary dose in mammography, Radiology, vol.144, pp.395-401, 1991.

]. A. Ramee, C. Philippe, and P. Bourguet, Imagerie par les rayons X et radioprotection

]. S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantham, S. M. Waldrop, and C. J. Orsi, A Perceptual Evaluation of JPEG 2000 Image Compression for Digital Mammography: Contrast-Detail Characteristics, Journal of Digital Imaging, vol.3981, issue.2 Suppl l, pp.64-70, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/s10278-003-1728-x

M. Yaffe and J. Rowlands, X-ray detectors for digital radiography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.42, issue.1, pp.1-39, 1997.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/001

]. S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, D. Albagli, S. Han et al., Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype, Medical Physics, vol.205, issue.3, pp.558-67, 2000.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598895