L. E. Green, K. Lewis, A. Kimpton, and C. J. Nicol, Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease, Veterinary Record, vol.147, issue.9, pp.233-238, 2000.
DOI : 10.1136/vr.147.9.233

T. G. Knowles and D. M. Broom, Limb bone strength and movement in laying hens from different housing systems, Veterinary Record, vol.126, issue.15, pp.354-356, 1990.
DOI : 10.1136/vr.126.15.354
URL : http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/126/15/354

A. C. Lindberg and C. J. Nicol, Dustbathing in modified battery cages: Is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute?, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol.55, issue.1-2, pp.113-128, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00030-0

C. Moinard, J. P. Morisse, and J. M. Faure, Effect of cage area, cage height and perches on feather condition, bone breakage and mortality of laying hens, British Poultry Science, vol.126, issue.2, pp.198-202, 1998.
DOI : 10.1080/09064709409410189

S. Newman and S. Leeson, Effect of housing birds in cages or an aviary system on bone characteristics, Poultry Science, vol.77, issue.10, pp.1492-1496, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/ps/77.10.1492

G. Norgaard-nielsen, Bone strength of laying hens kept in an alternative system, compared with hens in cages and on deep???litter, British Poultry Science, vol.50, issue.1, pp.81-89, 1990.
DOI : 10.1139/y74-120

K. Odén, L. J. Keeling, and B. Algers, Behaviour of laying hens in two types of aviary systems on 25 commercial farms in Sweden, British Poultry Science, vol.10, issue.2, pp.169-181, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00041-3

R. Tauson, In: The Laying Hen and its environment (Moss R. edit.) Martinus Nijhoff, pp.269-317, 1980.

D. W. Van-liere, S. !. Bokma, and . Bibliographiques, Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dust-bathing in laying hens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol.18, issue.2, pp.197-204, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90193-6

G. Beuving, In: The Laying Hen and its environment, Moss R. edit.) Martinus Nijhoff, pp.65-84, 1980.

J. L. Campo and S. G. Davila, Estimation of heritability for heterophil:lymphocyte ratio in chickens by restricted maximum likelihood. Effects of age, sex, and crossing, Poultry Science, vol.81, issue.10, pp.1448-1453, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/ps/81.10.1448

J. M. Faure, ??tude des liaisons entre comportement en open-field et ??motivit?? chez le jeune poussin, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.7, issue.2, pp.197-204, 1975.
DOI : 10.1186/1297-9686-7-2-197
URL : http://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-7-2-197

W. B. Gross and P. B. Siegel, Evaluation of the Heterophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as a Measure of Stress in Chickens, Avian Diseases, vol.27, issue.4, pp.972-979, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/1590198

R. B. Jones, Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives, World's Poultry Science Journal, vol.52, issue.02, pp.131-168, 1996.
DOI : 10.1079/WPS19960013

K. W. Koelkebeck, J. R. Cain, and M. S. Amoss, Use of adrenocorticotropin challenges to indicate chronic stress responses of laying hens in several housing alternatives, Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol.3, issue.4, pp.301-305, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0739-7240(86)90029-9

R. O. Moe, D. Guémené, H. J. Larsen, M. Bakken, S. Lervik et al., XXII World's Poultry congress, 2004.

L. B. Murphy, The practical problems of recognizing and measuring fear and exploration behaviour in the domestic fowl, Animal Behaviour, vol.26, pp.422-431, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0003-3472(78)90059-3

H. J. Reed, L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Austin, and N. G. Gregory, The effect of environmental enrichment during rearing on fear reactions and depopulation trauma in adult caged hens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol.36, issue.1, pp.39-46, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90097-9

!. &c, M )
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00495679

2. and Y. 0<0, 00 I#::)J0 6)0 &; ) / ; ) I

&. /-i-'0#jcpi, T. *. Ui, T. Ss%, I. , and R. I. S%, 8 $8 %? $@0

I. , %. , and Q. 6360c6, 0)

-. %uu, J0 (1'00C0C1Y<0C'1430W620I#::)J0$, #M

I. !. and !. J0, CIUS%-QJ0 <c, &, vol.4, issue.0a0

1. <0-i#sti and . Qp%, !%0), UIQ%QTJ0 1cY0C<Y00 W<0IJ0!"")&@ "$!, p.0

$. M%-&-! and S. Sui, RIRT,%RTTJ0 41 20, I#::)J0 ($

2. .. Ttq% and U. 3100w6y20, J0 1 0 W 61 Y060 I)J0

R. ). 11000c6<0c<6<00c40<00cy0w60y0i, F &

M. , 0. Pi, R. , and S. , J0 '6 0C 61' 0C %* B W ' 0 I)J0 %? ! !