S. Abney, Parsing By Chunks, Principled-Based Parsing, pp.33-40, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_10

G. Adriaens and M. Devos, The Parallel Expert Parser, Natural Language Processing, pp.350-375, 1994.

J. Allen, Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals, Communications of the ACM, vol.26, issue.11, pp.832-843, 1983.
DOI : 10.1145/182.358434

J. Allen, Natural Language Understanding, p.15, 1995.

J. Allen, . Byron, . Donna, . Dzikovska, . Myroslava et al., An architecture for a generic dialogue shell, Natural Language Engineering, vol.6, issue.3&4, pp.1-16, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/S135132490000245X

J. R. Anderson, Rules of the Mind, p.38, 1993.

. Androutsopoulos, . Ion, G. D. Ritchie, and P. Thanisch, Natural language interfaces to databases ??? an introduction, Natural Language Engineering, vol.14, issue.01, pp.29-81, 1995.
DOI : 10.1145/319983.319986
URL : http://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9503016

D. Bailey, . Feldman, . Jerome, . Narayanan, . Srini et al., Modeling Embodied Lexical Development, Proceedings of CogSci97, p.31, 1997.

C. F. Baker, C. J. Fillmore, and J. B. Lowe, The Berkeley FrameNet project, Proceedings of the COLING-ACL, p.15, 1998.
DOI : 10.3115/980845.980860
URL : http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/C/C98/C98-1013.pdf

J. Barwise and R. Cooper, Generalized quantifiers and natural language, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.11, issue.no. 18, pp.159-219, 1981.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00350139

B. K. Bergen and N. C. Chang, Embodied Construction Grammar in simulationbased language understanding, pp.31-63, 2002.
DOI : 10.1075/cal.3.08ber
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.1303

P. Blache, Le rôle des contraintes dans les théories linguistiques et leur intérêt pour l'analyse automatique : les grammaires de propriétés, Actes de TALN, p.147, 2000.

P. Bosch, Vagueness " is Context-Dependence. A solution to the Sorites Paradox, Approaching Vagueness, pp.189-210, 1983.

X. Briffault, Modélisation informatique de l'expression de la localisation, Thèse de doctorat, p.91, 1992.

J. Bryant, Constructional analysis. Master's thesis, pp.61-146, 2003.

D. K. Byron and J. F. Allen, What's a reference resolution module to do ? Redefining the Role of Reference in Language Understanding Systems, Proceedings of the DAARC2002, p.101, 2002.

R. Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language. Philosophy and Scientific Method. International Library of Psychology, 1937. Translation by Amethe Smeaton, Countess von Zeppelin, p.85

N. C. Chang, . Feldman, . Jerome, . Porzel, . Robert et al., Scaling cognitive linguistics : Formalisms for language understanding, Proceedings of the 1 st International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Undestanding, pp.31-65, 2002.

E. Charniak, On the use of framed knowledge in language comprehension, Artificial Intelligence, vol.11, issue.3, pp.225-265, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(78)90002-4

E. Charniak and D. Mcdermott, Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, p.50, 1985.

N. Chomsky, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, p.82, 1982.

A. Church, The Calculi of Lambda Conversion, p.79, 1941.

A. G. Cohn, . Hazarika, and M. Shymanta, Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning : An overview, Fundamenta Informaticae, vol.46, issue.12, pp.1-29, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/3540634932_1
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.30.5832

A. Colmerauer, Les grammaires de métamorphose, Natural Language Communication with Computers, number 63 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p.40, 1978.

F. Corblin and . Indéfini, Constructions linguistiques de la référence, p.90, 1987.

W. Croft, Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations, p.56, 1991.

H. Cunningham, R. G. Gaizauskas, and Y. Wilks, A General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE) ? A new approach to Language Engineering R&D, p.35, 1995.

R. Dale and E. Reiter, Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions, Cognitive Science, vol.47, issue.4, pp.233-263, 1995.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1902_3

R. Davis, What is knowledge representation ? AI Magazine, pp.17-33, 1993.

D. Dubois and C. Grinevald, Pratiques de la couleur et d??nominations, Faits de langues, pp.11-25, 1999.
DOI : 10.3406/flang.1999.1261

. Dzikovska, . Myroslava, J. Allen, and M. Swift, When is a union really an intersection ? problems interpreting reference to locations in a dialogue system, Proceedings of GOTALOG'2000, p.106, 2000.

. Dzikovska, . Myroslava, . Swift, A. Mary, and J. , Constructing custom semantic representations from a generic lexicon, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Linguistics, p.110, 2003.

J. C. Earley, An efficient context-free parsing algorithm, Natural Language Processing, pp.25-33, 1986.
DOI : 10.1145/357980.358005
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.138.1808

R. Engel, SPIN : Language Understanding for Spoken Dialogue Systems Using a Production System Approach, Proceedings of ICSLP-2002, pp.16-146, 2002.

G. Evans, The Varieties of Reference, p.79, 1982.

G. Ferguson and J. Allen, TRIPS : An Intelligent Integrated Problem-Solving Assistant, Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), pp.567-573, 1998.

G. Ferguson, J. Allen, and B. Miller, TRAINS-95 : Towards a Mixed-Initiative Planning Assistant, Proc. Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-96), pp.70-77, 1996.

C. J. Fillmore, The Mechanisms of ???Construction Grammar???, Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol.14, pp.35-55, 1988.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794

C. J. Fillmore and P. Kay, Construction Grammar. Language, pp.501-538, 1995.

J. Fodor, Tom Swift and his procedural grandmother, Cognition, vol.6, issue.3, pp.229-247, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90015-X

J. A. Fodor, The Modularity of the Mind, MIT, p.34, 1983.

J. A. Fodor, Psychosemantics : The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, p.38, 1987.

J. A. Fodor, A Theory of Content and Other Essays, p.86, 1990.

G. Frege, On concept and object The Frege Reader, pp.181-193

B. Gaiffe, . Landragin, . Frédéric, and M. Guignard, Le dialogue naturel comme un service dans un contexte mutli-applicatif : arguments pour une architecture multi-agents, Paroubeck and Sansonnet, pp.57-66, 2004.

K. Gapp, Basic meanings of spatial relations : Computation and evaluation in 3d space, Proceedings of AAAI94, p.106, 1994.

G. Gazdar, Paradigm Merger in Natural Language Processing, Computing Tomorrow : Future Research Directions in Computer Science, pp.88-109, 1996.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511605611.007

A. E. Goldberg, Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, p.56, 1995.

H. Grice and . Paul, Logic and conversation, Speech Acts, pp.41-58, 1975.

P. H. Hartline, Multimodal integration in the brain Combining dissimilar views of the world Comparative neurobiology : modes of communication in the nervous system, pp.309-334, 1985.

Y. Hatwell, Transferts intermodaux et intégration intermodale, Traité de psychologie expérimentale. Presses Universitaires de France, p.17, 1994.

B. Hayes-roth, A blackboard architecture for control, Artificial Intelligence, vol.26, issue.3, pp.251-321, 1985.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(85)90063-3

I. Heim, The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Graduate Linguistic Student Association, p.88, 1982.

G. Herzog and P. Wazinski, VIsual TRAnslator: Linking perceptions and natural language descriptions, Artificial Intelligence Review, vol.8, issue.1, pp.175-187, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00849073
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.30.4074

M. Hess, Recent developments in discourse representation theory, p.85, 1991.

R. Hicks and J. Essinger, Making computers more human : Designing for humancomputer interaction, 1991.

Y. Ishida, A framework for dynamic representation of knowledge : A minimum principle in organizing knowledge representation, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'89), pp.170-179, 1989.

. Johnson-laird and N. Philip, Procedural semantics, Cognition, vol.5, issue.3, pp.189-214, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(77)90001-4

P. N. Johnson-laird and G. Miller, Language and Perception, p.80, 1976.

M. A. Just, P. N. Carpenter, and S. Varma, Computational modeling of high-level cognition and brain function, Human Brain Mapping, vol.30, issue.2-3, pp.128-136, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<128::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-G

H. Kamp and U. Reyle, From Discourse to Logic, p.90, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-2066-1

I. Kant, Critique de la raison pure. Hartnoch, 1787, p.52

L. Karttunen, Discourse referents, Syntax and Semantics 7 : Notes from the Linguistic Underground, pp.363-385, 1976.

A. Kim, J. Chen, C. Rippey, and L. Osterhout, Combinatory semantic processing can occur independantly of syntactic support, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, p.34, 2003.

W. Kintsch, The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model., Psychological Review, vol.95, issue.2, pp.163-182, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163

G. Kleiber, Sémantique du prototype, p.49, 1990.

S. M. Kosslyn, The Strategic Eye " : another look. Minds and Machines, pp.287-291, 2001.

A. Kyburg and M. Morreau, Fitting words : Vague language in context, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.23, issue.6, pp.577-597, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005625125110

J. E. Laird, A. Newell, R. Paul, and S. , SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, vol.33, issue.1, pp.289-325, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6

G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors we live by, p.31, 1980.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001

J. M. Lammens, . Shapiro, and C. Stuart, Learning symbolic names for perceived colors, AAAI Machine Learning in Computer Vision : What, Why and How, pp.93-97, 1993.

F. Landragin, Modélisation de la communication multimodale. Vers une formalisation de la pertinence, Thèse de doctorat, p.93, 2003.

R. W. Langacker, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, p.106, 1987.

T. Lebarbé, HACTAR : coopération entre unités, fonctions et domaines linguistiques par une plateforme SMA, pp.7-13, 2004.

G. Ligozat, Generalized Intervals, Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, p.43, 1998.
DOI : 10.1002/9781118601457.ch3
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01424086

B. Liskov, Data abstraction and hierarchy. SIGPLAN Notices, p.57, 1988.

J. Martin and D. Béroule, TYCOON : six primitive types of cooperation for observating, evaluating and specifying cooperations, Proceedings of the AAAI Fall 1999 Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, p.16, 1999.

P. Materna, A radical challenge. From the Logical Point of View, p.79, 1994.

D. E. Meyer, . Kieras, and E. David, A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms., Psychological Review, vol.104, issue.1, pp.2-65, 1997.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3

L. A. Michaelis, Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.15, issue.1, pp.1-67, 2004.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.2004.001

M. Minsky, A framework for representing knowledge The Psychology of Computer Vision, 1975.

M. Minsky, Mind Design, chapter A Framework for Representing Knowledge, p.124, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50018-2
URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/6089#files-area

J. Moeshler and A. Reboul, Dictionnaire encyclopédique de Pragmatique, Le Seuil, p.45, 1994.

R. Montague, Universal grammar, Theoria, vol.26, issue.3, pp.373-398, 1970.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x

U. Montanari, Networks of constraints: Fundamental properties and applications to picture processing, Information Sciences, vol.7, issue.2, pp.95-132, 1974.
DOI : 10.1016/0020-0255(74)90008-5

S. Narayanan and . Karma, Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect, p.31, 1997.

A. Newell, . Simon, and A. Herbert, Human Problem Solving, p.36, 1972.

A. Newell, PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: MODELS OF CONTROL STRUCTURES, Visual Information Processing, pp.38-146, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-12-170150-5.50016-0

A. Newell, Unified Theories of Cognition, p.38, 1990.

J. Nielsen, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 1995.

D. A. Norman, The Invisible Computer : why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution, 1998.

D. A. Norman, Affordances and Design, p.168, 1999.

G. Nunberg, The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.5, issue.2, pp.143-184, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00126509

N. Ozkan, Vers un modèle dynamique du dialogue : analyse de dialogues finalisés dans une perspective communicationnelle, Thèse de doctorat, p.109, 1993.

R. Pasero and P. Sabatier, ILLICO for natural language interfaces, Proceedings of the First Language Engineering Convention (LEC), p.40, 1995.

R. Pasero and P. Sabatier, ILLICO : un système générique pour la compréhension d'un sous-ensemble du français, p.40, 1998.

C. Pateras, . Dudek, . Gregory, and R. Demori, Understanding referring expressions in a person-machine spoken dialogue, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, p.105, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1995.479398

G. Pitel and J. Sansonnet, A functional approach for resolution of extensional reference in practical dialogue, Proceedings of the International Symposium of Reference Resolution and its Application to question Answering and Summarization, pp.90-127, 2003.

G. Pitel and J. Sansonnet, Toward a uniform architecture for processing application-oriented dialogue, Proceedings of AMLaP'03, p.145, 2003.

C. Pollard and I. Sag, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p.31, 1994.

A. Popescu-belis, Modélisation multi-agent des échanges langagiers : application au problème de la référence et à son évaluation, Thèse de doctorat, p.90, 1999.

J. Pustejovsky, Lexicon, Generative, Computational Linguistics, vol.17, issue.4, pp.409-441, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01971-4

J. Pustejovsky, Linguistic constraints on type coercion, Computational Lexical Semantics, pp.71-97, 1995.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511527227.007

Z. Pylyshyn, Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.22, issue.03, pp.341-423, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X99002022

F. Rastier, Sémantique Interprétative. Presses Universitaires de France, p.110, 1987.

A. Reboul, Reference, agreement, evolving reference and the theory of mental representation, Studia Linguisticae in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski, pp.601-616, 1999.

A. Reboul, . Balkanski, . Cécile, . Briffault, . Xavier et al., Le projet CERVICAL : Représentations mentales, référence aux objets et aux événements, pp.46-90, 1997.

F. Recanati, Direct reference : from language to thought, Basil Blackwell, p.88, 1993.

B. Russel, On denoting, p.79, 1905.

G. Sabah, CARAMEL, Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computational linguistics -, pp.563-565, 1990.
DOI : 10.3115/991146.991246

N. Sabouret and J. Sansonnet, Automated answers to questions about a running process, Proc. CommonSense, pp.217-227, 2001.

E. D. Sacerdoti, A Structure for Plans and Behaviour, p.15, 1977.

I. A. Sag and C. Pollard, An Integrated Theory of Complement Control, Language, vol.67, issue.1, pp.63-113, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/415539

S. Salmon-alt, Reference resolution within the framework of cognitive grammar, International Colloquium on Cognitive Science, p.90, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00100430

S. Salmon-alt, Référence et Dialogue Finalisé : de la linguistique à un modèle opérationnel, Thèse de doctorat, Université H. Poincaré ? Nancy 1, pp.90-121, 2001.

. Sam-haroud, . Djamila, . Faltings, and V. Boi, Consistency techniques for continuous constraints, Constraints, vol.1, issue.1-2, pp.85-118, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00143879

J. Sansonnet, . Pitel, . Guillaume, and N. Sabouret, Un langage de description d'agents dédié à l'interaction dialogique, Actes de Modèles Formels de l'Interaction, pp.295-299, 2003.

D. Schang, Application de la notion de cadre aux énoncés de positionnement et de référence, p.106, 1995.

D. Schang, Représentation et interprétation de connaissances spatiales dans un système de dialogue homme-machine, Thèse de doctorat, p.91, 1997.

R. C. Schank, Inside Computer Understanding, p.124, 1981.

J. R. Schirra, A contribution to reference semantics of spatial prepositions: The visualization problem and its solution in VITRA, The Semantics of Prepositions ? From Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing, pp.471-515, 1993.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110872576.471

S. Seneff, . Hurley, . Ed, R. Lau, C. Pao et al., Galaxy-II : A reference architecture for conversational system development, Proc. ICSLP, pp.931-934, 1998.

L. Shastri, Advances in Shruti ? A neurally motivated model of relational knowledge representation and rapid inference using temporal synchrony, Applied Intelligence, vol.11, issue.1, pp.79-108, 1999.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008380614985

L. Shastri, Types and Quantifiers in SHRUTI ??? A Connectionist Model of Rapid Reasoning and Relational Processing, Hybrid Neural Symbolic Integration, p.49, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/10719871_3

S. L. Small, Word expert parsing, Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, p.145, 1980.
DOI : 10.3115/982163.982167

J. F. Sowa, On conceptual structures, Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.3, p.176, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(88)90069-0

D. Sperber, D. Wilson, and . Relevance, Communication and Cognition, p.93, 1995.

M. Stefanini and Y. Demazeau, TALISMAN: A multi-agent system for natural language processing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol.991, p.36, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0034824

M. Strube and H. , Functional centering, Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, pp.309-344, 1999.
DOI : 10.3115/981863.981899

L. Talmy, Rubber-sheet cognition in language, Actes du 13th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, p.56, 1977.

L. Talmy, The relation of grammar to cognition, Proceedings of TINLAP-2 (Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing), p.29, 1978.

L. Talmy, How Language Structures Space, Spatial Orientation, pp.225-282, 1983.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11

P. Tichý, The Foundations of Frege's Logic, p.80, 1988.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110849264

A. M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, LIX, issue.236 8, pp.433-460, 1950.

W. R. Uttal, The new phrenology : The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain, p.35, 2001.

. Van-herten, . Marieke, . Kolk, . Herman, and D. Chwilla, How semantic analysis can overrule syntactic analysis : an ERP study, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, p.34, 2003.

C. Vandeloise, L'espace en français : sémantique des prépositions spatiales, Les Editions du Seuil, p.106, 1986.

J. Vergne, Etude et modélisation de la syntaxe des langues à l'aide de l'ordinateur, analyse syntaxique automatique non combinatoire. Habilitation à diriger les recherches, p.40, 1999.

W. Wahlster, . Reithinger, . Norbert, and A. Blocher, Smartkom : Multimodal communication with a life-like character, Proceedings of Eurospeech2001, p.16, 2001.

P. Wazinski, Generating spatial descriptions for cross-modal references, Proceedings of the third conference on Applied natural language processing -, pp.56-63, 1992.
DOI : 10.3115/974499.974510
URL : http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/A/A92/A92-1008.pdf

T. Winograd, A procedural model of language understanding, Computer Models of Thought and Language, pp.152-186, 1973.

L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Annalen des Naturphilosophie. International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method, p.52, 1921.

W. A. Woods, Procedural semantics as a theory of meaning, Elements of Discourse Understanding, p.39, 1981.

M. Zock and X. Briffault, How to learn about space by building and exploring a microworld, Fourth International Symposium of Social Communication, p.91, 1995.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01479969

?. Qu-'est-ce-qu-'une-question, 169 10.2.1 Phases de traitement d'une question, p.170